Occurrence of Total Aflatoxins, Aflatoxin B1, and Ochratoxin A in Chicken and Eggs in Some Cameroon Urban Areas and Population Dietary Exposure
Consumption of chicken and eggs contaminated by mycotoxins could lead to a public health concern. This study was conducted to evaluate the dietary exposure of populations to aflatoxins (AFs) and ochratoxin A (OTA) through these poultry products in the three most urbanized regions of Cameroon (Centre...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of environmental and public health 2022-06, Vol.2022, p.5541049-5541049 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 5541049 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 5541049 |
container_title | Journal of environmental and public health |
container_volume | 2022 |
creator | Tatfo Keutchatang, Fabrice De Paul Tchuenchieu, Alex K. Nguegwouo, Evelyne Mouafo, Hippolyte Tene Bouelet Ntsama, Isabelle Sandrine Kansci, Germain Medoua, Gabriel Nama |
description | Consumption of chicken and eggs contaminated by mycotoxins could lead to a public health concern. This study was conducted to evaluate the dietary exposure of populations to aflatoxins (AFs) and ochratoxin A (OTA) through these poultry products in the three most urbanized regions of Cameroon (Centre, Littoral, and West). A survey was firstly carried out to know about the consumption frequency by the different population age groups as well as their awareness about mycotoxins. Chicken feed, broiler, and eggs were collected from modern poultry farms. AFs and OTA were analysed using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and dietary exposure was evaluated using a deterministic approach. From the 900 households questioned, a daily consumption frequency of chicken and eggs was the most reported (41% and 69%, respectively), with populations having a very weak knowledge of mycotoxins and their associated health risk (18%). Mean concentrations of AFs, AFB1, and OTA in poultry tissues were below the established regulated limits (20 μg/kg for AFs, 10 μg/kg for AFB1, and 5 μg/kg for OTA) in feeds. These toxins were detected at average concentrations of 1800 and 966.7 ƞg/kg for AFs in chicken muscle and egg, respectively, and 1400 and 1933.3 ƞg/kg for OTA in muscle and egg, respectively. Based on the survey, their estimated daily intakes through these poultry products tended to be lower than the limits 1 and 100 ƞg/kg bw/day for AFB1 and OTA, respectively). The margins of exposure (MOE) of the different population age groups to AFB1 and OTA obtained suggest that the public health concern associated with the presence of mycotoxins in poultry products shall not be underestimated. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1155/2022/5541049 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9206572</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2679237256</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-8e026b8d1da9126d27f2a47f24c6fcc7a11a01a5313dcb39183c37f961b48a023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkd1u1DAQhS0Eoj9wxwNY4gaJLvXYiRPfIC3bpa1UaZFor62J4-y6JPbWTqA8Ba-Mt10VlZvxaM6no_EcQt4B-wRQlqeccX5algWwQr0ghyDraqZqEC-felYekKOUbhmTSlT8NTkQZcWl4PyQ_FkZM8VovbE0dPQ6jNjTedfjGO6dTyf_evoFTij6lq7MJu5Hc5rLYuPMD-sftOV6nXaz72GwdIGDjSF4ehMbzHC0mB6ob2E7ZVeXpTNnR4y_6fJ-G9IU7RvyqsM-2bf795jcfF1eLy5mV6vzy8X8amYE1OOstozLpm6hRQVctrzqOBa5FEZ2xlQIgAywFCBa0wgFtTCi6pSEpqiRcXFMPj_6bqdmsK2xfozY6210Q15HB3T6ueLdRq_DT604k_l62eDD3iCGu8mmUQ8uGdv36G2YkuayUjxfu5QZff8fehum6PP3dlTNQapKZerjI7VxvsVf7mkXYHoXtN4FrfdBi7-ir5ko</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2678216979</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Occurrence of Total Aflatoxins, Aflatoxin B1, and Ochratoxin A in Chicken and Eggs in Some Cameroon Urban Areas and Population Dietary Exposure</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Tatfo Keutchatang, Fabrice De Paul ; Tchuenchieu, Alex K. ; Nguegwouo, Evelyne ; Mouafo, Hippolyte Tene ; Bouelet Ntsama, Isabelle Sandrine ; Kansci, Germain ; Medoua, Gabriel Nama</creator><contributor>Orisakwe, Orish Ebere ; Orish Ebere Orisakwe</contributor><creatorcontrib>Tatfo Keutchatang, Fabrice De Paul ; Tchuenchieu, Alex K. ; Nguegwouo, Evelyne ; Mouafo, Hippolyte Tene ; Bouelet Ntsama, Isabelle Sandrine ; Kansci, Germain ; Medoua, Gabriel Nama ; Orisakwe, Orish Ebere ; Orish Ebere Orisakwe</creatorcontrib><description>Consumption of chicken and eggs contaminated by mycotoxins could lead to a public health concern. This study was conducted to evaluate the dietary exposure of populations to aflatoxins (AFs) and ochratoxin A (OTA) through these poultry products in the three most urbanized regions of Cameroon (Centre, Littoral, and West). A survey was firstly carried out to know about the consumption frequency by the different population age groups as well as their awareness about mycotoxins. Chicken feed, broiler, and eggs were collected from modern poultry farms. AFs and OTA were analysed using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and dietary exposure was evaluated using a deterministic approach. From the 900 households questioned, a daily consumption frequency of chicken and eggs was the most reported (41% and 69%, respectively), with populations having a very weak knowledge of mycotoxins and their associated health risk (18%). Mean concentrations of AFs, AFB1, and OTA in poultry tissues were below the established regulated limits (20 μg/kg for AFs, 10 μg/kg for AFB1, and 5 μg/kg for OTA) in feeds. These toxins were detected at average concentrations of 1800 and 966.7 ƞg/kg for AFs in chicken muscle and egg, respectively, and 1400 and 1933.3 ƞg/kg for OTA in muscle and egg, respectively. Based on the survey, their estimated daily intakes through these poultry products tended to be lower than the limits 1 and 100 ƞg/kg bw/day for AFB1 and OTA, respectively). The margins of exposure (MOE) of the different population age groups to AFB1 and OTA obtained suggest that the public health concern associated with the presence of mycotoxins in poultry products shall not be underestimated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1687-9805</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1687-9813</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1155/2022/5541049</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35726322</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Hindawi</publisher><subject>Aflatoxin B1 ; Aflatoxins ; Agriculture ; Chickens ; Consumption ; Diet ; Eggs ; Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay ; Exposure ; Farms ; Feeds ; Food contamination & poisoning ; Health risks ; Households ; Littoral environments ; Muscles ; Mycotoxins ; Ochratoxin A ; Older people ; Populations ; Poultry ; Poultry farming ; Public health ; Surveys ; Toxins ; Urban areas</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental and public health, 2022-06, Vol.2022, p.5541049-5541049</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2022 Fabrice De Paul Tatfo Keutchatang et al.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Fabrice De Paul Tatfo Keutchatang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Fabrice De Paul Tatfo Keutchatang et al. 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-8e026b8d1da9126d27f2a47f24c6fcc7a11a01a5313dcb39183c37f961b48a023</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-2105-5030 ; 0000-0002-0469-560X ; 0000-0002-8189-432X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9206572/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9206572/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Orisakwe, Orish Ebere</contributor><contributor>Orish Ebere Orisakwe</contributor><creatorcontrib>Tatfo Keutchatang, Fabrice De Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tchuenchieu, Alex K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguegwouo, Evelyne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mouafo, Hippolyte Tene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouelet Ntsama, Isabelle Sandrine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kansci, Germain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medoua, Gabriel Nama</creatorcontrib><title>Occurrence of Total Aflatoxins, Aflatoxin B1, and Ochratoxin A in Chicken and Eggs in Some Cameroon Urban Areas and Population Dietary Exposure</title><title>Journal of environmental and public health</title><description>Consumption of chicken and eggs contaminated by mycotoxins could lead to a public health concern. This study was conducted to evaluate the dietary exposure of populations to aflatoxins (AFs) and ochratoxin A (OTA) through these poultry products in the three most urbanized regions of Cameroon (Centre, Littoral, and West). A survey was firstly carried out to know about the consumption frequency by the different population age groups as well as their awareness about mycotoxins. Chicken feed, broiler, and eggs were collected from modern poultry farms. AFs and OTA were analysed using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and dietary exposure was evaluated using a deterministic approach. From the 900 households questioned, a daily consumption frequency of chicken and eggs was the most reported (41% and 69%, respectively), with populations having a very weak knowledge of mycotoxins and their associated health risk (18%). Mean concentrations of AFs, AFB1, and OTA in poultry tissues were below the established regulated limits (20 μg/kg for AFs, 10 μg/kg for AFB1, and 5 μg/kg for OTA) in feeds. These toxins were detected at average concentrations of 1800 and 966.7 ƞg/kg for AFs in chicken muscle and egg, respectively, and 1400 and 1933.3 ƞg/kg for OTA in muscle and egg, respectively. Based on the survey, their estimated daily intakes through these poultry products tended to be lower than the limits 1 and 100 ƞg/kg bw/day for AFB1 and OTA, respectively). The margins of exposure (MOE) of the different population age groups to AFB1 and OTA obtained suggest that the public health concern associated with the presence of mycotoxins in poultry products shall not be underestimated.</description><subject>Aflatoxin B1</subject><subject>Aflatoxins</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Chickens</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Eggs</subject><subject>Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Feeds</subject><subject>Food contamination & poisoning</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Littoral environments</subject><subject>Muscles</subject><subject>Mycotoxins</subject><subject>Ochratoxin A</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Poultry</subject><subject>Poultry farming</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Toxins</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><issn>1687-9805</issn><issn>1687-9813</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RHX</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkd1u1DAQhS0Eoj9wxwNY4gaJLvXYiRPfIC3bpa1UaZFor62J4-y6JPbWTqA8Ba-Mt10VlZvxaM6no_EcQt4B-wRQlqeccX5algWwQr0ghyDraqZqEC-felYekKOUbhmTSlT8NTkQZcWl4PyQ_FkZM8VovbE0dPQ6jNjTedfjGO6dTyf_evoFTij6lq7MJu5Hc5rLYuPMD-sftOV6nXaz72GwdIGDjSF4ehMbzHC0mB6ob2E7ZVeXpTNnR4y_6fJ-G9IU7RvyqsM-2bf795jcfF1eLy5mV6vzy8X8amYE1OOstozLpm6hRQVctrzqOBa5FEZ2xlQIgAywFCBa0wgFtTCi6pSEpqiRcXFMPj_6bqdmsK2xfozY6210Q15HB3T6ueLdRq_DT604k_l62eDD3iCGu8mmUQ8uGdv36G2YkuayUjxfu5QZff8fehum6PP3dlTNQapKZerjI7VxvsVf7mkXYHoXtN4FrfdBi7-ir5ko</recordid><startdate>20220611</startdate><enddate>20220611</enddate><creator>Tatfo Keutchatang, Fabrice De Paul</creator><creator>Tchuenchieu, Alex K.</creator><creator>Nguegwouo, Evelyne</creator><creator>Mouafo, Hippolyte Tene</creator><creator>Bouelet Ntsama, Isabelle Sandrine</creator><creator>Kansci, Germain</creator><creator>Medoua, Gabriel Nama</creator><general>Hindawi</general><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>RHU</scope><scope>RHW</scope><scope>RHX</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CWDGH</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2105-5030</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0469-560X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8189-432X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220611</creationdate><title>Occurrence of Total Aflatoxins, Aflatoxin B1, and Ochratoxin A in Chicken and Eggs in Some Cameroon Urban Areas and Population Dietary Exposure</title><author>Tatfo Keutchatang, Fabrice De Paul ; Tchuenchieu, Alex K. ; Nguegwouo, Evelyne ; Mouafo, Hippolyte Tene ; Bouelet Ntsama, Isabelle Sandrine ; Kansci, Germain ; Medoua, Gabriel Nama</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-8e026b8d1da9126d27f2a47f24c6fcc7a11a01a5313dcb39183c37f961b48a023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Aflatoxin B1</topic><topic>Aflatoxins</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Chickens</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Eggs</topic><topic>Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Feeds</topic><topic>Food contamination & poisoning</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Littoral environments</topic><topic>Muscles</topic><topic>Mycotoxins</topic><topic>Ochratoxin A</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Poultry</topic><topic>Poultry farming</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Toxins</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tatfo Keutchatang, Fabrice De Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tchuenchieu, Alex K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguegwouo, Evelyne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mouafo, Hippolyte Tene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouelet Ntsama, Isabelle Sandrine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kansci, Germain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medoua, Gabriel Nama</creatorcontrib><collection>Hindawi Publishing Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Subscription Journals</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Open Access Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Middle East & Africa Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental and public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tatfo Keutchatang, Fabrice De Paul</au><au>Tchuenchieu, Alex K.</au><au>Nguegwouo, Evelyne</au><au>Mouafo, Hippolyte Tene</au><au>Bouelet Ntsama, Isabelle Sandrine</au><au>Kansci, Germain</au><au>Medoua, Gabriel Nama</au><au>Orisakwe, Orish Ebere</au><au>Orish Ebere Orisakwe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Occurrence of Total Aflatoxins, Aflatoxin B1, and Ochratoxin A in Chicken and Eggs in Some Cameroon Urban Areas and Population Dietary Exposure</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental and public health</jtitle><date>2022-06-11</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>2022</volume><spage>5541049</spage><epage>5541049</epage><pages>5541049-5541049</pages><issn>1687-9805</issn><eissn>1687-9813</eissn><abstract>Consumption of chicken and eggs contaminated by mycotoxins could lead to a public health concern. This study was conducted to evaluate the dietary exposure of populations to aflatoxins (AFs) and ochratoxin A (OTA) through these poultry products in the three most urbanized regions of Cameroon (Centre, Littoral, and West). A survey was firstly carried out to know about the consumption frequency by the different population age groups as well as their awareness about mycotoxins. Chicken feed, broiler, and eggs were collected from modern poultry farms. AFs and OTA were analysed using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and dietary exposure was evaluated using a deterministic approach. From the 900 households questioned, a daily consumption frequency of chicken and eggs was the most reported (41% and 69%, respectively), with populations having a very weak knowledge of mycotoxins and their associated health risk (18%). Mean concentrations of AFs, AFB1, and OTA in poultry tissues were below the established regulated limits (20 μg/kg for AFs, 10 μg/kg for AFB1, and 5 μg/kg for OTA) in feeds. These toxins were detected at average concentrations of 1800 and 966.7 ƞg/kg for AFs in chicken muscle and egg, respectively, and 1400 and 1933.3 ƞg/kg for OTA in muscle and egg, respectively. Based on the survey, their estimated daily intakes through these poultry products tended to be lower than the limits 1 and 100 ƞg/kg bw/day for AFB1 and OTA, respectively). The margins of exposure (MOE) of the different population age groups to AFB1 and OTA obtained suggest that the public health concern associated with the presence of mycotoxins in poultry products shall not be underestimated.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Hindawi</pub><pmid>35726322</pmid><doi>10.1155/2022/5541049</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2105-5030</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0469-560X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8189-432X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1687-9805 |
ispartof | Journal of environmental and public health, 2022-06, Vol.2022, p.5541049-5541049 |
issn | 1687-9805 1687-9813 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9206572 |
source | PubMed Central Open Access; Wiley Online Library Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Aflatoxin B1 Aflatoxins Agriculture Chickens Consumption Diet Eggs Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay Exposure Farms Feeds Food contamination & poisoning Health risks Households Littoral environments Muscles Mycotoxins Ochratoxin A Older people Populations Poultry Poultry farming Public health Surveys Toxins Urban areas |
title | Occurrence of Total Aflatoxins, Aflatoxin B1, and Ochratoxin A in Chicken and Eggs in Some Cameroon Urban Areas and Population Dietary Exposure |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T13%3A31%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Occurrence%20of%20Total%20Aflatoxins,%20Aflatoxin%20B1,%20and%20Ochratoxin%20A%20in%20Chicken%20and%20Eggs%20in%20Some%20Cameroon%20Urban%20Areas%20and%20Population%20Dietary%20Exposure&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20and%20public%20health&rft.au=Tatfo%20Keutchatang,%20Fabrice%20De%20Paul&rft.date=2022-06-11&rft.volume=2022&rft.spage=5541049&rft.epage=5541049&rft.pages=5541049-5541049&rft.issn=1687-9805&rft.eissn=1687-9813&rft_id=info:doi/10.1155/2022/5541049&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2679237256%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2678216979&rft_id=info:pmid/35726322&rfr_iscdi=true |