Prospective Implementation of a Consultative Store-and-Forward Teledermatology Model at a Single Urban Academic Health System with Real Cost Data Subanalysis

Background: Teledermatology may increase access to care but has not been widely implemented due, in part, to lack of insurance coverage and reimbursement. We assessed the impact of implementing a consultative store-and-forward teledermatology model on access to care, medical cost, and utilization. M...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Telemedicine journal and e-health 2021-09, Vol.27 (9), p.989-996
Hauptverfasser: Jariwala, Neha N, Snider, Christopher K, Mehta, Shivan J, Armstrong, J Kyle, Smith-McLallen, Aaron, Takeshita, Junko, Kovarik, Carrie L, Lipoff, Jules B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 996
container_issue 9
container_start_page 989
container_title Telemedicine journal and e-health
container_volume 27
creator Jariwala, Neha N
Snider, Christopher K
Mehta, Shivan J
Armstrong, J Kyle
Smith-McLallen, Aaron
Takeshita, Junko
Kovarik, Carrie L
Lipoff, Jules B
description Background: Teledermatology may increase access to care but has not been widely implemented due, in part, to lack of insurance coverage and reimbursement. We assessed the impact of implementing a consultative store-and-forward teledermatology model on access to care, medical cost, and utilization. Materials and Methods: Prospective implementation of teledermatology occurred at five University of Pennsylvania Health System primary care practices from June 27, 2016, to May 25, 2017. Primary outcomes included time to case completion, proportion of patients completing in-person dermatology visits, and total outpatient costs. Medical and pharmacy claims data were used for utilization and cost subanalysis. Results: The study included 167 patients and 1,962 controls with a 6-month follow-up. Median time to definitive dermatologist response was 0.19 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 0.03–2.92) for intervention and 83.60 days (IQR: 19.74–159.73) for controls. In medical claims subanalysis, no significant differences in mean outpatient costs ($3,366 vs. $2,232, p = 0.1356) or total medical costs ($3,535 vs. $2,654, p = 0.2899) were detected. Conclusions: Implementation of teledermatology improved access to care, and within this small sample, remained comparable in terms of cost and utilization. Thus, these data suggest teledermatology may improve access without increasing utilization or cost.
doi_str_mv 10.1089/tmj.2020.0248
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9206486</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2457970570</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-5388c3cf06f6179e93014c1ac26a8c7fd19cc3dc620d88c32aef6ed80b33251d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhiMEoh9w5Ip85JLFH4mTXJCqhX5IRSC2PVuz9mTryrEX29tqfwz_FUdbKjhx8mj8vO-M5q2qd4wuGO2Hj3m6X3DK6YLypn9RHbO2lbWQcng514LWreTdUXWS0j2ltGEdf10dCcGajjF2XP36HkPaos72AcnVtHU4oc-QbfAkjATIMvi0c3OnAKscItbgTX0e4iNEQ27QocE4QQ4ubPbkazDoCOSiXFm_cUhu4xo8OdNgcLKaXCK4fEdW-5RxIo-21D9Kq8xJmXyGXHS7IgC3Tza9qV6N4BK-fXpPq9vzLzfLy_r628XV8uy61o1guW5F32uhRypHyboBB0FZoxloLqHX3WjYoLUwWnJqZpIDjhJNT9dC8JYZcVp9Ovhud-sJjS4niODUNtoJ4l4FsOrfH2_v1CY8qIFT2fSyGHx4Mojh5w5TVpNNGp0Dj2GXFG_abuho29GC1gdUl8uniOPzGEbVHKkqkao5UjVHWvj3f-_2TP_JsADiAMxt8N5ZXGPM_7H9DQxHshQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2457970570</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prospective Implementation of a Consultative Store-and-Forward Teledermatology Model at a Single Urban Academic Health System with Real Cost Data Subanalysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Jariwala, Neha N ; Snider, Christopher K ; Mehta, Shivan J ; Armstrong, J Kyle ; Smith-McLallen, Aaron ; Takeshita, Junko ; Kovarik, Carrie L ; Lipoff, Jules B</creator><creatorcontrib>Jariwala, Neha N ; Snider, Christopher K ; Mehta, Shivan J ; Armstrong, J Kyle ; Smith-McLallen, Aaron ; Takeshita, Junko ; Kovarik, Carrie L ; Lipoff, Jules B</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Teledermatology may increase access to care but has not been widely implemented due, in part, to lack of insurance coverage and reimbursement. We assessed the impact of implementing a consultative store-and-forward teledermatology model on access to care, medical cost, and utilization. Materials and Methods: Prospective implementation of teledermatology occurred at five University of Pennsylvania Health System primary care practices from June 27, 2016, to May 25, 2017. Primary outcomes included time to case completion, proportion of patients completing in-person dermatology visits, and total outpatient costs. Medical and pharmacy claims data were used for utilization and cost subanalysis. Results: The study included 167 patients and 1,962 controls with a 6-month follow-up. Median time to definitive dermatologist response was 0.19 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 0.03–2.92) for intervention and 83.60 days (IQR: 19.74–159.73) for controls. In medical claims subanalysis, no significant differences in mean outpatient costs ($3,366 vs. $2,232, p = 0.1356) or total medical costs ($3,535 vs. $2,654, p = 0.2899) were detected. Conclusions: Implementation of teledermatology improved access to care, and within this small sample, remained comparable in terms of cost and utilization. Thus, these data suggest teledermatology may improve access without increasing utilization or cost.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1530-5627</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-3669</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2020.0248</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33147111</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers</publisher><subject>Delivery of Health Care ; Dermatology ; Humans ; Original Research ; Prospective Studies ; Referral and Consultation ; Skin Diseases ; Telemedicine</subject><ispartof>Telemedicine journal and e-health, 2021-09, Vol.27 (9), p.989-996</ispartof><rights>2021, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers</rights><rights>Copyright 2021, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2021 Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-5388c3cf06f6179e93014c1ac26a8c7fd19cc3dc620d88c32aef6ed80b33251d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-5388c3cf06f6179e93014c1ac26a8c7fd19cc3dc620d88c32aef6ed80b33251d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33147111$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jariwala, Neha N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snider, Christopher K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehta, Shivan J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armstrong, J Kyle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith-McLallen, Aaron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takeshita, Junko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kovarik, Carrie L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lipoff, Jules B</creatorcontrib><title>Prospective Implementation of a Consultative Store-and-Forward Teledermatology Model at a Single Urban Academic Health System with Real Cost Data Subanalysis</title><title>Telemedicine journal and e-health</title><addtitle>Telemed J E Health</addtitle><description>Background: Teledermatology may increase access to care but has not been widely implemented due, in part, to lack of insurance coverage and reimbursement. We assessed the impact of implementing a consultative store-and-forward teledermatology model on access to care, medical cost, and utilization. Materials and Methods: Prospective implementation of teledermatology occurred at five University of Pennsylvania Health System primary care practices from June 27, 2016, to May 25, 2017. Primary outcomes included time to case completion, proportion of patients completing in-person dermatology visits, and total outpatient costs. Medical and pharmacy claims data were used for utilization and cost subanalysis. Results: The study included 167 patients and 1,962 controls with a 6-month follow-up. Median time to definitive dermatologist response was 0.19 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 0.03–2.92) for intervention and 83.60 days (IQR: 19.74–159.73) for controls. In medical claims subanalysis, no significant differences in mean outpatient costs ($3,366 vs. $2,232, p = 0.1356) or total medical costs ($3,535 vs. $2,654, p = 0.2899) were detected. Conclusions: Implementation of teledermatology improved access to care, and within this small sample, remained comparable in terms of cost and utilization. Thus, these data suggest teledermatology may improve access without increasing utilization or cost.</description><subject>Delivery of Health Care</subject><subject>Dermatology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Referral and Consultation</subject><subject>Skin Diseases</subject><subject>Telemedicine</subject><issn>1530-5627</issn><issn>1556-3669</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhiMEoh9w5Ip85JLFH4mTXJCqhX5IRSC2PVuz9mTryrEX29tqfwz_FUdbKjhx8mj8vO-M5q2qd4wuGO2Hj3m6X3DK6YLypn9RHbO2lbWQcng514LWreTdUXWS0j2ltGEdf10dCcGajjF2XP36HkPaos72AcnVtHU4oc-QbfAkjATIMvi0c3OnAKscItbgTX0e4iNEQ27QocE4QQ4ubPbkazDoCOSiXFm_cUhu4xo8OdNgcLKaXCK4fEdW-5RxIo-21D9Kq8xJmXyGXHS7IgC3Tza9qV6N4BK-fXpPq9vzLzfLy_r628XV8uy61o1guW5F32uhRypHyboBB0FZoxloLqHX3WjYoLUwWnJqZpIDjhJNT9dC8JYZcVp9Ovhud-sJjS4niODUNtoJ4l4FsOrfH2_v1CY8qIFT2fSyGHx4Mojh5w5TVpNNGp0Dj2GXFG_abuho29GC1gdUl8uniOPzGEbVHKkqkao5UjVHWvj3f-_2TP_JsADiAMxt8N5ZXGPM_7H9DQxHshQ</recordid><startdate>20210901</startdate><enddate>20210901</enddate><creator>Jariwala, Neha N</creator><creator>Snider, Christopher K</creator><creator>Mehta, Shivan J</creator><creator>Armstrong, J Kyle</creator><creator>Smith-McLallen, Aaron</creator><creator>Takeshita, Junko</creator><creator>Kovarik, Carrie L</creator><creator>Lipoff, Jules B</creator><general>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210901</creationdate><title>Prospective Implementation of a Consultative Store-and-Forward Teledermatology Model at a Single Urban Academic Health System with Real Cost Data Subanalysis</title><author>Jariwala, Neha N ; Snider, Christopher K ; Mehta, Shivan J ; Armstrong, J Kyle ; Smith-McLallen, Aaron ; Takeshita, Junko ; Kovarik, Carrie L ; Lipoff, Jules B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-5388c3cf06f6179e93014c1ac26a8c7fd19cc3dc620d88c32aef6ed80b33251d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Delivery of Health Care</topic><topic>Dermatology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Referral and Consultation</topic><topic>Skin Diseases</topic><topic>Telemedicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jariwala, Neha N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snider, Christopher K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehta, Shivan J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armstrong, J Kyle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith-McLallen, Aaron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takeshita, Junko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kovarik, Carrie L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lipoff, Jules B</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Telemedicine journal and e-health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jariwala, Neha N</au><au>Snider, Christopher K</au><au>Mehta, Shivan J</au><au>Armstrong, J Kyle</au><au>Smith-McLallen, Aaron</au><au>Takeshita, Junko</au><au>Kovarik, Carrie L</au><au>Lipoff, Jules B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prospective Implementation of a Consultative Store-and-Forward Teledermatology Model at a Single Urban Academic Health System with Real Cost Data Subanalysis</atitle><jtitle>Telemedicine journal and e-health</jtitle><addtitle>Telemed J E Health</addtitle><date>2021-09-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>989</spage><epage>996</epage><pages>989-996</pages><issn>1530-5627</issn><eissn>1556-3669</eissn><abstract>Background: Teledermatology may increase access to care but has not been widely implemented due, in part, to lack of insurance coverage and reimbursement. We assessed the impact of implementing a consultative store-and-forward teledermatology model on access to care, medical cost, and utilization. Materials and Methods: Prospective implementation of teledermatology occurred at five University of Pennsylvania Health System primary care practices from June 27, 2016, to May 25, 2017. Primary outcomes included time to case completion, proportion of patients completing in-person dermatology visits, and total outpatient costs. Medical and pharmacy claims data were used for utilization and cost subanalysis. Results: The study included 167 patients and 1,962 controls with a 6-month follow-up. Median time to definitive dermatologist response was 0.19 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 0.03–2.92) for intervention and 83.60 days (IQR: 19.74–159.73) for controls. In medical claims subanalysis, no significant differences in mean outpatient costs ($3,366 vs. $2,232, p = 0.1356) or total medical costs ($3,535 vs. $2,654, p = 0.2899) were detected. Conclusions: Implementation of teledermatology improved access to care, and within this small sample, remained comparable in terms of cost and utilization. Thus, these data suggest teledermatology may improve access without increasing utilization or cost.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers</pub><pmid>33147111</pmid><doi>10.1089/tmj.2020.0248</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1530-5627
ispartof Telemedicine journal and e-health, 2021-09, Vol.27 (9), p.989-996
issn 1530-5627
1556-3669
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9206486
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Delivery of Health Care
Dermatology
Humans
Original Research
Prospective Studies
Referral and Consultation
Skin Diseases
Telemedicine
title Prospective Implementation of a Consultative Store-and-Forward Teledermatology Model at a Single Urban Academic Health System with Real Cost Data Subanalysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T05%3A08%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prospective%20Implementation%20of%20a%20Consultative%20Store-and-Forward%20Teledermatology%20Model%20at%20a%20Single%20Urban%20Academic%20Health%20System%20with%20Real%20Cost%20Data%20Subanalysis&rft.jtitle=Telemedicine%20journal%20and%20e-health&rft.au=Jariwala,%20Neha%20N&rft.date=2021-09-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=989&rft.epage=996&rft.pages=989-996&rft.issn=1530-5627&rft.eissn=1556-3669&rft_id=info:doi/10.1089/tmj.2020.0248&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2457970570%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2457970570&rft_id=info:pmid/33147111&rfr_iscdi=true