A Second-Generation (44-Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis: Long-Term Observation of the Electrode-Tissue Interface

To report the long-term observations of the electrode-tissue interface and perceptual stability in humans after chronic stimulation with a 44-channel suprachoroidal retinal implant. Four subjects (S1-4) with end-stage retinitis pigmentosa received the implant unilaterally (NCT03406416). Electrode im...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Translational vision science & technology 2022-06, Vol.11 (6), p.12-12
Hauptverfasser: Titchener, Samuel A, Nayagam, David A X, Kvansakul, Jessica, Kolic, Maria, Baglin, Elizabeth K, Abbott, Carla J, McGuinness, Myra B, Ayton, Lauren N, Luu, Chi D, Greenstein, Steven, Kentler, William G, Shivdasani, Mohit N, Allen, Penelope J, Petoe, Matthew A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 12
container_issue 6
container_start_page 12
container_title Translational vision science & technology
container_volume 11
creator Titchener, Samuel A
Nayagam, David A X
Kvansakul, Jessica
Kolic, Maria
Baglin, Elizabeth K
Abbott, Carla J
McGuinness, Myra B
Ayton, Lauren N
Luu, Chi D
Greenstein, Steven
Kentler, William G
Shivdasani, Mohit N
Allen, Penelope J
Petoe, Matthew A
description To report the long-term observations of the electrode-tissue interface and perceptual stability in humans after chronic stimulation with a 44-channel suprachoroidal retinal implant. Four subjects (S1-4) with end-stage retinitis pigmentosa received the implant unilaterally (NCT03406416). Electrode impedances, electrode-retina distance (measured using optical coherence tomography imaging), and perceptual thresholds were monitored up to 181 weeks after implantation as the subjects used the prosthesis in the laboratory and in daily life. Stimulation charge density was limited to 32 µC/cm2 per phase. Electrode impedances were stable longitudinally. The electrode-retina distances increased after surgery and then stabilized, and were well-described by an asymptotic exponential model. The stabilization of electrode-retina distances was variable between subjects, stabilizing after 45 weeks for S1, 63 weeks for S2, and 24 weeks for S3 (linear regression; Pgradient > 0.05). For S4, a statistically significant increase in electrode-retina distance persisted (P < 0.05), but by the study end point the rate of increase was clinically insignificant (exponential model: 0.33 µm/wk). Perceptual electrical thresholds were stable in one subject, decreased over time in two subjects (linear model; P < 0.05), and increased slightly in one subject but remained within the predefined charge limits (P = 0.02). Chronic stimulation with the suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis over 3 years resulted in stable impedances, small individual changes in perceptual electrical thresholds, and no clinically significant increase in electrode-retina distances after a period of settling after surgery. Chronic stimulation with the 44-channel suprachoroidal retinal implant with a charge density of up to 32 µC/cm2 per phase is suitable for long-term use in humans.
doi_str_mv 10.1167/tvst.11.6.12
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9202334</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2675981932</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-aa2f23f9042643452c4d4dcc7d9fcdd6659dbddc5bb30eab1c3c8fb184a003983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc1rGzEQxUVJqYObW89FxwSy7upj5VUPhWCcNGBwSZyz0EqztspaciWtIeSfzxo7IZ3LPJgfb4Z5CH0j5YQQMf2R9ykPaiImhH5C55QIXtBKkrMPeoQuUvpbDiXqinPxBY1YJaQgjJ2jlxv8CCZ4W9yBh6izCx5fcl7MNtp76K7wY7-L2mxCDM7qDj9Adn7of2JIeQPJpZ94Efy6WEHc4mWTIO6PLqHFA4DnHZgcg4Vi5VLqAd_7DLHVBr6iz63uElyc-hg93c5Xs9_FYnl3P7tZFIbVPBda05ayVpacCs54RQ233BoztbI11gpRSdtYa6qmYSXohhhm6rYhNddlyWTNxujX0XfXN1uwBnyOulO76LY6Pqugnfp_4t1GrcNeSVpSxvhgcHkyiOFfDymrrUsGuk57CH1SVEwrWRPJ6IBeH1Ez_CdFaN_XkFIdIlOHyAalhCIH_PvH097ht4DYKyHElVY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2675981932</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Second-Generation (44-Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis: Long-Term Observation of the Electrode-Tissue Interface</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Titchener, Samuel A ; Nayagam, David A X ; Kvansakul, Jessica ; Kolic, Maria ; Baglin, Elizabeth K ; Abbott, Carla J ; McGuinness, Myra B ; Ayton, Lauren N ; Luu, Chi D ; Greenstein, Steven ; Kentler, William G ; Shivdasani, Mohit N ; Allen, Penelope J ; Petoe, Matthew A</creator><creatorcontrib>Titchener, Samuel A ; Nayagam, David A X ; Kvansakul, Jessica ; Kolic, Maria ; Baglin, Elizabeth K ; Abbott, Carla J ; McGuinness, Myra B ; Ayton, Lauren N ; Luu, Chi D ; Greenstein, Steven ; Kentler, William G ; Shivdasani, Mohit N ; Allen, Penelope J ; Petoe, Matthew A</creatorcontrib><description>To report the long-term observations of the electrode-tissue interface and perceptual stability in humans after chronic stimulation with a 44-channel suprachoroidal retinal implant. Four subjects (S1-4) with end-stage retinitis pigmentosa received the implant unilaterally (NCT03406416). Electrode impedances, electrode-retina distance (measured using optical coherence tomography imaging), and perceptual thresholds were monitored up to 181 weeks after implantation as the subjects used the prosthesis in the laboratory and in daily life. Stimulation charge density was limited to 32 µC/cm2 per phase. Electrode impedances were stable longitudinally. The electrode-retina distances increased after surgery and then stabilized, and were well-described by an asymptotic exponential model. The stabilization of electrode-retina distances was variable between subjects, stabilizing after 45 weeks for S1, 63 weeks for S2, and 24 weeks for S3 (linear regression; Pgradient &gt; 0.05). For S4, a statistically significant increase in electrode-retina distance persisted (P &lt; 0.05), but by the study end point the rate of increase was clinically insignificant (exponential model: 0.33 µm/wk). Perceptual electrical thresholds were stable in one subject, decreased over time in two subjects (linear model; P &lt; 0.05), and increased slightly in one subject but remained within the predefined charge limits (P = 0.02). Chronic stimulation with the suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis over 3 years resulted in stable impedances, small individual changes in perceptual electrical thresholds, and no clinically significant increase in electrode-retina distances after a period of settling after surgery. Chronic stimulation with the 44-channel suprachoroidal retinal implant with a charge density of up to 32 µC/cm2 per phase is suitable for long-term use in humans.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2164-2591</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2164-2591</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1167/tvst.11.6.12</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35696133</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology</publisher><subject>Electric Stimulation - methods ; Humans ; Microelectrodes ; Retina - diagnostic imaging ; Retina - surgery ; Retinitis Pigmentosa - surgery ; Visual Prosthesis</subject><ispartof>Translational vision science &amp; technology, 2022-06, Vol.11 (6), p.12-12</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2022 The Authors 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-aa2f23f9042643452c4d4dcc7d9fcdd6659dbddc5bb30eab1c3c8fb184a003983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-aa2f23f9042643452c4d4dcc7d9fcdd6659dbddc5bb30eab1c3c8fb184a003983</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9202334/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9202334/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27903,27904,53770,53772</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35696133$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Titchener, Samuel A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nayagam, David A X</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kvansakul, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolic, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baglin, Elizabeth K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbott, Carla J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGuinness, Myra B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayton, Lauren N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luu, Chi D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenstein, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kentler, William G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shivdasani, Mohit N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Penelope J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petoe, Matthew A</creatorcontrib><title>A Second-Generation (44-Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis: Long-Term Observation of the Electrode-Tissue Interface</title><title>Translational vision science &amp; technology</title><addtitle>Transl Vis Sci Technol</addtitle><description>To report the long-term observations of the electrode-tissue interface and perceptual stability in humans after chronic stimulation with a 44-channel suprachoroidal retinal implant. Four subjects (S1-4) with end-stage retinitis pigmentosa received the implant unilaterally (NCT03406416). Electrode impedances, electrode-retina distance (measured using optical coherence tomography imaging), and perceptual thresholds were monitored up to 181 weeks after implantation as the subjects used the prosthesis in the laboratory and in daily life. Stimulation charge density was limited to 32 µC/cm2 per phase. Electrode impedances were stable longitudinally. The electrode-retina distances increased after surgery and then stabilized, and were well-described by an asymptotic exponential model. The stabilization of electrode-retina distances was variable between subjects, stabilizing after 45 weeks for S1, 63 weeks for S2, and 24 weeks for S3 (linear regression; Pgradient &gt; 0.05). For S4, a statistically significant increase in electrode-retina distance persisted (P &lt; 0.05), but by the study end point the rate of increase was clinically insignificant (exponential model: 0.33 µm/wk). Perceptual electrical thresholds were stable in one subject, decreased over time in two subjects (linear model; P &lt; 0.05), and increased slightly in one subject but remained within the predefined charge limits (P = 0.02). Chronic stimulation with the suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis over 3 years resulted in stable impedances, small individual changes in perceptual electrical thresholds, and no clinically significant increase in electrode-retina distances after a period of settling after surgery. Chronic stimulation with the 44-channel suprachoroidal retinal implant with a charge density of up to 32 µC/cm2 per phase is suitable for long-term use in humans.</description><subject>Electric Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Microelectrodes</subject><subject>Retina - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Retina - surgery</subject><subject>Retinitis Pigmentosa - surgery</subject><subject>Visual Prosthesis</subject><issn>2164-2591</issn><issn>2164-2591</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkc1rGzEQxUVJqYObW89FxwSy7upj5VUPhWCcNGBwSZyz0EqztspaciWtIeSfzxo7IZ3LPJgfb4Z5CH0j5YQQMf2R9ykPaiImhH5C55QIXtBKkrMPeoQuUvpbDiXqinPxBY1YJaQgjJ2jlxv8CCZ4W9yBh6izCx5fcl7MNtp76K7wY7-L2mxCDM7qDj9Adn7of2JIeQPJpZ94Efy6WEHc4mWTIO6PLqHFA4DnHZgcg4Vi5VLqAd_7DLHVBr6iz63uElyc-hg93c5Xs9_FYnl3P7tZFIbVPBda05ayVpacCs54RQ233BoztbI11gpRSdtYa6qmYSXohhhm6rYhNddlyWTNxujX0XfXN1uwBnyOulO76LY6Pqugnfp_4t1GrcNeSVpSxvhgcHkyiOFfDymrrUsGuk57CH1SVEwrWRPJ6IBeH1Ez_CdFaN_XkFIdIlOHyAalhCIH_PvH097ht4DYKyHElVY</recordid><startdate>20220601</startdate><enddate>20220601</enddate><creator>Titchener, Samuel A</creator><creator>Nayagam, David A X</creator><creator>Kvansakul, Jessica</creator><creator>Kolic, Maria</creator><creator>Baglin, Elizabeth K</creator><creator>Abbott, Carla J</creator><creator>McGuinness, Myra B</creator><creator>Ayton, Lauren N</creator><creator>Luu, Chi D</creator><creator>Greenstein, Steven</creator><creator>Kentler, William G</creator><creator>Shivdasani, Mohit N</creator><creator>Allen, Penelope J</creator><creator>Petoe, Matthew A</creator><general>The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220601</creationdate><title>A Second-Generation (44-Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis: Long-Term Observation of the Electrode-Tissue Interface</title><author>Titchener, Samuel A ; Nayagam, David A X ; Kvansakul, Jessica ; Kolic, Maria ; Baglin, Elizabeth K ; Abbott, Carla J ; McGuinness, Myra B ; Ayton, Lauren N ; Luu, Chi D ; Greenstein, Steven ; Kentler, William G ; Shivdasani, Mohit N ; Allen, Penelope J ; Petoe, Matthew A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-aa2f23f9042643452c4d4dcc7d9fcdd6659dbddc5bb30eab1c3c8fb184a003983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Electric Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Microelectrodes</topic><topic>Retina - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Retina - surgery</topic><topic>Retinitis Pigmentosa - surgery</topic><topic>Visual Prosthesis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Titchener, Samuel A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nayagam, David A X</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kvansakul, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolic, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baglin, Elizabeth K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbott, Carla J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGuinness, Myra B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayton, Lauren N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luu, Chi D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenstein, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kentler, William G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shivdasani, Mohit N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Penelope J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petoe, Matthew A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Translational vision science &amp; technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Titchener, Samuel A</au><au>Nayagam, David A X</au><au>Kvansakul, Jessica</au><au>Kolic, Maria</au><au>Baglin, Elizabeth K</au><au>Abbott, Carla J</au><au>McGuinness, Myra B</au><au>Ayton, Lauren N</au><au>Luu, Chi D</au><au>Greenstein, Steven</au><au>Kentler, William G</au><au>Shivdasani, Mohit N</au><au>Allen, Penelope J</au><au>Petoe, Matthew A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Second-Generation (44-Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis: Long-Term Observation of the Electrode-Tissue Interface</atitle><jtitle>Translational vision science &amp; technology</jtitle><addtitle>Transl Vis Sci Technol</addtitle><date>2022-06-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>12</spage><epage>12</epage><pages>12-12</pages><issn>2164-2591</issn><eissn>2164-2591</eissn><abstract>To report the long-term observations of the electrode-tissue interface and perceptual stability in humans after chronic stimulation with a 44-channel suprachoroidal retinal implant. Four subjects (S1-4) with end-stage retinitis pigmentosa received the implant unilaterally (NCT03406416). Electrode impedances, electrode-retina distance (measured using optical coherence tomography imaging), and perceptual thresholds were monitored up to 181 weeks after implantation as the subjects used the prosthesis in the laboratory and in daily life. Stimulation charge density was limited to 32 µC/cm2 per phase. Electrode impedances were stable longitudinally. The electrode-retina distances increased after surgery and then stabilized, and were well-described by an asymptotic exponential model. The stabilization of electrode-retina distances was variable between subjects, stabilizing after 45 weeks for S1, 63 weeks for S2, and 24 weeks for S3 (linear regression; Pgradient &gt; 0.05). For S4, a statistically significant increase in electrode-retina distance persisted (P &lt; 0.05), but by the study end point the rate of increase was clinically insignificant (exponential model: 0.33 µm/wk). Perceptual electrical thresholds were stable in one subject, decreased over time in two subjects (linear model; P &lt; 0.05), and increased slightly in one subject but remained within the predefined charge limits (P = 0.02). Chronic stimulation with the suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis over 3 years resulted in stable impedances, small individual changes in perceptual electrical thresholds, and no clinically significant increase in electrode-retina distances after a period of settling after surgery. Chronic stimulation with the 44-channel suprachoroidal retinal implant with a charge density of up to 32 µC/cm2 per phase is suitable for long-term use in humans.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology</pub><pmid>35696133</pmid><doi>10.1167/tvst.11.6.12</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2164-2591
ispartof Translational vision science & technology, 2022-06, Vol.11 (6), p.12-12
issn 2164-2591
2164-2591
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9202334
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Electric Stimulation - methods
Humans
Microelectrodes
Retina - diagnostic imaging
Retina - surgery
Retinitis Pigmentosa - surgery
Visual Prosthesis
title A Second-Generation (44-Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis: Long-Term Observation of the Electrode-Tissue Interface
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T05%3A54%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Second-Generation%20(44-Channel)%20Suprachoroidal%20Retinal%20Prosthesis:%20Long-Term%20Observation%20of%20the%20Electrode-Tissue%20Interface&rft.jtitle=Translational%20vision%20science%20&%20technology&rft.au=Titchener,%20Samuel%20A&rft.date=2022-06-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=12&rft.epage=12&rft.pages=12-12&rft.issn=2164-2591&rft.eissn=2164-2591&rft_id=info:doi/10.1167/tvst.11.6.12&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2675981932%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2675981932&rft_id=info:pmid/35696133&rfr_iscdi=true