Ventricular septal defect closure using radial incision of the tricuspid valve for exposure: is it really necessary?
Aim To evaluate the effects of radial incision of the tricuspid valve in patients who had undergone ventricular septal defect (VSD) closure.Methods Overall 173 patients were included in this study between 2012 and 2019. In 44 individuals, a tricuspid valve radial incision (TVRI) was included in the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cardiovascular Journal of Africa 2022-01, Vol.33 (1), p.21-25 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 25 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 21 |
container_title | Cardiovascular Journal of Africa |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Karacelik, Mustafa Bilen, Cagatay Akkaya, Gokmen Karagoz, Ugur Abud, Burcin Erdinc, Ibrahim Sariosmanoglu, Osman Nejat |
description | Aim To evaluate the effects of radial incision of the tricuspid valve in patients who had undergone ventricular septal defect (VSD) closure.Methods Overall 173 patients were included in this study between 2012 and 2019. In 44 individuals, a tricuspid valve radial incision (TVRI) was included in the surgical process.Results There were no mortalities. The demographic data did not differ between the groups. The mean ages of the TVRI and non-TVRI groups were 2.92 ± 3.88 and 2.69 ± 2.80 years, respectively. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of mean duration of cardiopulmonary bypass aortic cross-clamp, postoperative intubation time and intensive care unit stay. Mild tricuspid valve regurgitation was detected in only two patients in the TVRI and six patients in the non-TVRI groups. There was no tricuspid valve stenosis and all patients were in New York Heart Association functional class 1.Conclusion This technique, which can facilitate exposure and closure of VSDs, did not compromise the tricuspid valve function at mid-term, therefore proving to be safe. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5830/CVJA-2021-027 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9198675</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sabinet_id>https://hdl.handle.net/10520/ejc-cardio1_v33_i1_a21</sabinet_id><sourcerecordid>2544462387</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-9433645cc52c7761177da721226d2e21a68b3d57382b948cb63681d97d3fa26c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUU1v1DAQjRCIlsKRu49cAv6MHQ6galUKqBIX6HXk2JOuK28cbGdF_z1Jt0LiNCO9j3mj1zRvGX2vjKAfdrffL1tOOWsp18-ac9YZ2lIt1fN173vVMtPzs-ZVKfeUcm60etmcCclUL6Q5b-otTjUHt0SbScG52kg8jugqcTGVJSNZSpjuSLY-rFiYXCghTSSNpO6RPGrLHDw52nhEMqZM8M_8qPxIQiGhkow2xgcyocNSbH74_Lp5MdpY8M3TvGh-fbn6ufva3vy4_ra7vGmdMLK2vRSik8o5xZ3WHWNae6s547zzHDmznRmEV1oYPvTSuKETnWG-116MlndOXDSfTr7zMhzQu-1VG2HO4bDGgGQD_I9MYQ936Qg9602n1Wrw7skgp98LlgqHUBzGaCdMSwGupJQdF0av1PZEdTmVknH8d4ZR2JqCrSnYmoK1qZV_feIXO4QJKxSLaxjY1zoX2PsIezv5iLBhjCpOAe8dOJt9SAyOQkBgYDkTfwHNMqDM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2544462387</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ventricular septal defect closure using radial incision of the tricuspid valve for exposure: is it really necessary?</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Karacelik, Mustafa ; Bilen, Cagatay ; Akkaya, Gokmen ; Karagoz, Ugur ; Abud, Burcin ; Erdinc, Ibrahim ; Sariosmanoglu, Osman Nejat</creator><creatorcontrib>Karacelik, Mustafa ; Bilen, Cagatay ; Akkaya, Gokmen ; Karagoz, Ugur ; Abud, Burcin ; Erdinc, Ibrahim ; Sariosmanoglu, Osman Nejat</creatorcontrib><description>Aim To evaluate the effects of radial incision of the tricuspid valve in patients who had undergone ventricular septal defect (VSD) closure.Methods Overall 173 patients were included in this study between 2012 and 2019. In 44 individuals, a tricuspid valve radial incision (TVRI) was included in the surgical process.Results There were no mortalities. The demographic data did not differ between the groups. The mean ages of the TVRI and non-TVRI groups were 2.92 ± 3.88 and 2.69 ± 2.80 years, respectively. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of mean duration of cardiopulmonary bypass aortic cross-clamp, postoperative intubation time and intensive care unit stay. Mild tricuspid valve regurgitation was detected in only two patients in the TVRI and six patients in the non-TVRI groups. There was no tricuspid valve stenosis and all patients were in New York Heart Association functional class 1.Conclusion This technique, which can facilitate exposure and closure of VSDs, did not compromise the tricuspid valve function at mid-term, therefore proving to be safe.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1995-1892</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1680-0745</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5830/CVJA-2021-027</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34159348</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Clinics Cardive Publishing</publisher><subject>Cardiovascular Topics ; Surgery ; Tricuspid regurgitation ; Ventricular septal defect</subject><ispartof>Cardiovascular Journal of Africa, 2022-01, Vol.33 (1), p.21-25</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2022 Clinics Cardive Publishing 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9198675/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9198675/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Karacelik, Mustafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bilen, Cagatay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akkaya, Gokmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karagoz, Ugur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abud, Burcin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erdinc, Ibrahim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sariosmanoglu, Osman Nejat</creatorcontrib><title>Ventricular septal defect closure using radial incision of the tricuspid valve for exposure: is it really necessary?</title><title>Cardiovascular Journal of Africa</title><description>Aim To evaluate the effects of radial incision of the tricuspid valve in patients who had undergone ventricular septal defect (VSD) closure.Methods Overall 173 patients were included in this study between 2012 and 2019. In 44 individuals, a tricuspid valve radial incision (TVRI) was included in the surgical process.Results There were no mortalities. The demographic data did not differ between the groups. The mean ages of the TVRI and non-TVRI groups were 2.92 ± 3.88 and 2.69 ± 2.80 years, respectively. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of mean duration of cardiopulmonary bypass aortic cross-clamp, postoperative intubation time and intensive care unit stay. Mild tricuspid valve regurgitation was detected in only two patients in the TVRI and six patients in the non-TVRI groups. There was no tricuspid valve stenosis and all patients were in New York Heart Association functional class 1.Conclusion This technique, which can facilitate exposure and closure of VSDs, did not compromise the tricuspid valve function at mid-term, therefore proving to be safe.</description><subject>Cardiovascular Topics</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Tricuspid regurgitation</subject><subject>Ventricular septal defect</subject><issn>1995-1892</issn><issn>1680-0745</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVUU1v1DAQjRCIlsKRu49cAv6MHQ6galUKqBIX6HXk2JOuK28cbGdF_z1Jt0LiNCO9j3mj1zRvGX2vjKAfdrffL1tOOWsp18-ac9YZ2lIt1fN173vVMtPzs-ZVKfeUcm60etmcCclUL6Q5b-otTjUHt0SbScG52kg8jugqcTGVJSNZSpjuSLY-rFiYXCghTSSNpO6RPGrLHDw52nhEMqZM8M_8qPxIQiGhkow2xgcyocNSbH74_Lp5MdpY8M3TvGh-fbn6ufva3vy4_ra7vGmdMLK2vRSik8o5xZ3WHWNae6s547zzHDmznRmEV1oYPvTSuKETnWG-116MlndOXDSfTr7zMhzQu-1VG2HO4bDGgGQD_I9MYQ936Qg9602n1Wrw7skgp98LlgqHUBzGaCdMSwGupJQdF0av1PZEdTmVknH8d4ZR2JqCrSnYmoK1qZV_feIXO4QJKxSLaxjY1zoX2PsIezv5iLBhjCpOAe8dOJt9SAyOQkBgYDkTfwHNMqDM</recordid><startdate>20220101</startdate><enddate>20220101</enddate><creator>Karacelik, Mustafa</creator><creator>Bilen, Cagatay</creator><creator>Akkaya, Gokmen</creator><creator>Karagoz, Ugur</creator><creator>Abud, Burcin</creator><creator>Erdinc, Ibrahim</creator><creator>Sariosmanoglu, Osman Nejat</creator><general>Clinics Cardive Publishing</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220101</creationdate><title>Ventricular septal defect closure using radial incision of the tricuspid valve for exposure: is it really necessary?</title><author>Karacelik, Mustafa ; Bilen, Cagatay ; Akkaya, Gokmen ; Karagoz, Ugur ; Abud, Burcin ; Erdinc, Ibrahim ; Sariosmanoglu, Osman Nejat</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-9433645cc52c7761177da721226d2e21a68b3d57382b948cb63681d97d3fa26c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Cardiovascular Topics</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Tricuspid regurgitation</topic><topic>Ventricular septal defect</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Karacelik, Mustafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bilen, Cagatay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akkaya, Gokmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karagoz, Ugur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abud, Burcin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erdinc, Ibrahim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sariosmanoglu, Osman Nejat</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Cardiovascular Journal of Africa</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Karacelik, Mustafa</au><au>Bilen, Cagatay</au><au>Akkaya, Gokmen</au><au>Karagoz, Ugur</au><au>Abud, Burcin</au><au>Erdinc, Ibrahim</au><au>Sariosmanoglu, Osman Nejat</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ventricular septal defect closure using radial incision of the tricuspid valve for exposure: is it really necessary?</atitle><jtitle>Cardiovascular Journal of Africa</jtitle><date>2022-01-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>21</spage><epage>25</epage><pages>21-25</pages><issn>1995-1892</issn><eissn>1680-0745</eissn><abstract>Aim To evaluate the effects of radial incision of the tricuspid valve in patients who had undergone ventricular septal defect (VSD) closure.Methods Overall 173 patients were included in this study between 2012 and 2019. In 44 individuals, a tricuspid valve radial incision (TVRI) was included in the surgical process.Results There were no mortalities. The demographic data did not differ between the groups. The mean ages of the TVRI and non-TVRI groups were 2.92 ± 3.88 and 2.69 ± 2.80 years, respectively. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of mean duration of cardiopulmonary bypass aortic cross-clamp, postoperative intubation time and intensive care unit stay. Mild tricuspid valve regurgitation was detected in only two patients in the TVRI and six patients in the non-TVRI groups. There was no tricuspid valve stenosis and all patients were in New York Heart Association functional class 1.Conclusion This technique, which can facilitate exposure and closure of VSDs, did not compromise the tricuspid valve function at mid-term, therefore proving to be safe.</abstract><pub>Clinics Cardive Publishing</pub><pmid>34159348</pmid><doi>10.5830/CVJA-2021-027</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1995-1892 |
ispartof | Cardiovascular Journal of Africa, 2022-01, Vol.33 (1), p.21-25 |
issn | 1995-1892 1680-0745 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9198675 |
source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Cardiovascular Topics Surgery Tricuspid regurgitation Ventricular septal defect |
title | Ventricular septal defect closure using radial incision of the tricuspid valve for exposure: is it really necessary? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T06%3A39%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ventricular%20septal%20defect%20closure%20using%20radial%20incision%20of%20the%20tricuspid%20valve%20for%20exposure:%20is%20it%20really%20necessary?&rft.jtitle=Cardiovascular%20Journal%20of%20Africa&rft.au=Karacelik,%20Mustafa&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=21&rft.epage=25&rft.pages=21-25&rft.issn=1995-1892&rft.eissn=1680-0745&rft_id=info:doi/10.5830/CVJA-2021-027&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2544462387%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2544462387&rft_id=info:pmid/34159348&rft_sabinet_id=https://hdl.handle.net/10520/ejc-cardio1_v33_i1_a21&rfr_iscdi=true |