Supplement Intake Among Older Cancer Survivors: Socio-Demographic Associations, Supplement Types, Reasons for Use, and Cost
To evaluate associations between supplement intake and socio-demographic factors among older cancer survivors and to identify type of supplements, reasons for use, and cost. This secondary analysis was performed on baseline data from 368 older cancer survivors enrolled in the Harvest for Health vege...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Current developments in nutrition 2022-06, Vol.6 (Supplement_1), p.1187-1187 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1187 |
---|---|
container_issue | Supplement_1 |
container_start_page | 1187 |
container_title | Current developments in nutrition |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Kaur, Harleen Hoenemeyer, Teri Parrish, Kelsey Demark-Wahnefried, Wendy |
description | To evaluate associations between supplement intake and socio-demographic factors among older cancer survivors and to identify type of supplements, reasons for use, and cost.
This secondary analysis was performed on baseline data from 368 older cancer survivors enrolled in the Harvest for Health vegetable gardening intervention trial. Survivors self-identifying as supplement users reported data on prescribed, over-the counter, and dietary supplements. Chi-square tests were performed to identify associations among supplement use, cancer type, and socio-demographic variables. Descriptive analyses were used to identify common types, reasons of supplement intake, and total daily cost of supplements.
More than half (59%) of the sample reported taking supplements. Female (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.35–3.32), Non-Hispanic White (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.06–3.01), and breast and gynecological cancer survivors (OR 1.58, 1.04–2.40) were significantly more likely to take a supplement compared to males, minorities, and other cancer-types (p-value < 0.05). Survivors reported a mean intake of three supplements, with vitamins (38%), multivitamins (22%), and minerals (12%) as the most prevalent. Commonly-reported reasons for supplement intake were to improve general health (47%), medical conditions (39%), and cancer-related symptoms (12%). Bone health was the most prevalent reason cited under medical conditions, and hair loss, fatigue, and sleep were most commonly reported under cancer-related symptoms. The daily cost of supplements ranged from $0.02–$19.81, with the mean, median and mode being $1.29/day, $0.78/day, and $0.34/day, respectively.
Nutritional supplement use is prevalent among older cancer survivors with overall health identified as the most common reason for supplement intake. Moreover, out-of-pocket recurrent costs can be substantial. These data emphasize the need to encourage a diet rich in nutrients to minimize daily cost of supplements among older survivors who may live on fixed incomes. Survivors should discuss proper use of supplements with their healthcare providers.
This work was supported by the National Cancer Institute and the American Cancer Society. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/cdn/nzac074.016 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>oup_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9194034</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/cdn/nzac074.016</oup_id><els_id>S2475299123210033</els_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/cdn/nzac074.016</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2216-698b81480aa29f44850d44632c1fbb8eeb809f8d897bf861b88208a3829f71a93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkM9rwjAUx8vYYOI875rzsJq0sSY7DMT9EoTB1HNI01fNZpOSVMHtn19GZbjDYKf3eN8fPD5RdE3wgGCeDlVhhuZDKjymA0yys6iT0PEoTjgn5yf7ZdTz_g1jTDjnGead6HOxq-stVGAaNDONfAc0qaxZo5dtAQ5NpVFhLHZur_fW-Vu0sErb-B4qu3ay3miFJt6Hm2y0Nb6PTvqWhxrC5RWkDxIqrUMrD30kTYGm1jdX0UUptx56x9mNVo8Py-lzPH95mk0n81glCcnijLOcEcqwlAkvKWUjXFCapYkiZZ4zgJxhXrKC8XFesozkjCWYyZQF95hInnaju7a33uUVFCr85uRW1E5X0h2ElVr8VozeiLXdC044xSkNBcO2QDnrvYPyJ0uw-OYvAn9x5C8C_5C4aRN2V__DzFszBAh7DU54pSGAL7QD1YjC6j-zX3QInnQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Supplement Intake Among Older Cancer Survivors: Socio-Demographic Associations, Supplement Types, Reasons for Use, and Cost</title><source>Access via Oxford University Press (Open Access Collection)</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Kaur, Harleen ; Hoenemeyer, Teri ; Parrish, Kelsey ; Demark-Wahnefried, Wendy</creator><creatorcontrib>Kaur, Harleen ; Hoenemeyer, Teri ; Parrish, Kelsey ; Demark-Wahnefried, Wendy</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate associations between supplement intake and socio-demographic factors among older cancer survivors and to identify type of supplements, reasons for use, and cost.
This secondary analysis was performed on baseline data from 368 older cancer survivors enrolled in the Harvest for Health vegetable gardening intervention trial. Survivors self-identifying as supplement users reported data on prescribed, over-the counter, and dietary supplements. Chi-square tests were performed to identify associations among supplement use, cancer type, and socio-demographic variables. Descriptive analyses were used to identify common types, reasons of supplement intake, and total daily cost of supplements.
More than half (59%) of the sample reported taking supplements. Female (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.35–3.32), Non-Hispanic White (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.06–3.01), and breast and gynecological cancer survivors (OR 1.58, 1.04–2.40) were significantly more likely to take a supplement compared to males, minorities, and other cancer-types (p-value < 0.05). Survivors reported a mean intake of three supplements, with vitamins (38%), multivitamins (22%), and minerals (12%) as the most prevalent. Commonly-reported reasons for supplement intake were to improve general health (47%), medical conditions (39%), and cancer-related symptoms (12%). Bone health was the most prevalent reason cited under medical conditions, and hair loss, fatigue, and sleep were most commonly reported under cancer-related symptoms. The daily cost of supplements ranged from $0.02–$19.81, with the mean, median and mode being $1.29/day, $0.78/day, and $0.34/day, respectively.
Nutritional supplement use is prevalent among older cancer survivors with overall health identified as the most common reason for supplement intake. Moreover, out-of-pocket recurrent costs can be substantial. These data emphasize the need to encourage a diet rich in nutrients to minimize daily cost of supplements among older survivors who may live on fixed incomes. Survivors should discuss proper use of supplements with their healthcare providers.
This work was supported by the National Cancer Institute and the American Cancer Society.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2475-2991</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2475-2991</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/cdn/nzac074.016</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Vitamins and Minerals</subject><ispartof>Current developments in nutrition, 2022-06, Vol.6 (Supplement_1), p.1187-1187</ispartof><rights>2022 American Society for Nutrition.</rights><rights>The Author 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The International Society for Human and Animal Mycology. 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9194034/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9194034/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,1604,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kaur, Harleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoenemeyer, Teri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parrish, Kelsey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demark-Wahnefried, Wendy</creatorcontrib><title>Supplement Intake Among Older Cancer Survivors: Socio-Demographic Associations, Supplement Types, Reasons for Use, and Cost</title><title>Current developments in nutrition</title><description>To evaluate associations between supplement intake and socio-demographic factors among older cancer survivors and to identify type of supplements, reasons for use, and cost.
This secondary analysis was performed on baseline data from 368 older cancer survivors enrolled in the Harvest for Health vegetable gardening intervention trial. Survivors self-identifying as supplement users reported data on prescribed, over-the counter, and dietary supplements. Chi-square tests were performed to identify associations among supplement use, cancer type, and socio-demographic variables. Descriptive analyses were used to identify common types, reasons of supplement intake, and total daily cost of supplements.
More than half (59%) of the sample reported taking supplements. Female (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.35–3.32), Non-Hispanic White (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.06–3.01), and breast and gynecological cancer survivors (OR 1.58, 1.04–2.40) were significantly more likely to take a supplement compared to males, minorities, and other cancer-types (p-value < 0.05). Survivors reported a mean intake of three supplements, with vitamins (38%), multivitamins (22%), and minerals (12%) as the most prevalent. Commonly-reported reasons for supplement intake were to improve general health (47%), medical conditions (39%), and cancer-related symptoms (12%). Bone health was the most prevalent reason cited under medical conditions, and hair loss, fatigue, and sleep were most commonly reported under cancer-related symptoms. The daily cost of supplements ranged from $0.02–$19.81, with the mean, median and mode being $1.29/day, $0.78/day, and $0.34/day, respectively.
Nutritional supplement use is prevalent among older cancer survivors with overall health identified as the most common reason for supplement intake. Moreover, out-of-pocket recurrent costs can be substantial. These data emphasize the need to encourage a diet rich in nutrients to minimize daily cost of supplements among older survivors who may live on fixed incomes. Survivors should discuss proper use of supplements with their healthcare providers.
This work was supported by the National Cancer Institute and the American Cancer Society.</description><subject>Vitamins and Minerals</subject><issn>2475-2991</issn><issn>2475-2991</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkM9rwjAUx8vYYOI875rzsJq0sSY7DMT9EoTB1HNI01fNZpOSVMHtn19GZbjDYKf3eN8fPD5RdE3wgGCeDlVhhuZDKjymA0yys6iT0PEoTjgn5yf7ZdTz_g1jTDjnGead6HOxq-stVGAaNDONfAc0qaxZo5dtAQ5NpVFhLHZur_fW-Vu0sErb-B4qu3ay3miFJt6Hm2y0Nb6PTvqWhxrC5RWkDxIqrUMrD30kTYGm1jdX0UUptx56x9mNVo8Py-lzPH95mk0n81glCcnijLOcEcqwlAkvKWUjXFCapYkiZZ4zgJxhXrKC8XFesozkjCWYyZQF95hInnaju7a33uUVFCr85uRW1E5X0h2ElVr8VozeiLXdC044xSkNBcO2QDnrvYPyJ0uw-OYvAn9x5C8C_5C4aRN2V__DzFszBAh7DU54pSGAL7QD1YjC6j-zX3QInnQ</recordid><startdate>202206</startdate><enddate>202206</enddate><creator>Kaur, Harleen</creator><creator>Hoenemeyer, Teri</creator><creator>Parrish, Kelsey</creator><creator>Demark-Wahnefried, Wendy</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>TOX</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202206</creationdate><title>Supplement Intake Among Older Cancer Survivors: Socio-Demographic Associations, Supplement Types, Reasons for Use, and Cost</title><author>Kaur, Harleen ; Hoenemeyer, Teri ; Parrish, Kelsey ; Demark-Wahnefried, Wendy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2216-698b81480aa29f44850d44632c1fbb8eeb809f8d897bf861b88208a3829f71a93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Vitamins and Minerals</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kaur, Harleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoenemeyer, Teri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parrish, Kelsey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demark-Wahnefried, Wendy</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Access via Oxford University Press (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Current developments in nutrition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kaur, Harleen</au><au>Hoenemeyer, Teri</au><au>Parrish, Kelsey</au><au>Demark-Wahnefried, Wendy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Supplement Intake Among Older Cancer Survivors: Socio-Demographic Associations, Supplement Types, Reasons for Use, and Cost</atitle><jtitle>Current developments in nutrition</jtitle><date>2022-06</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>Supplement_1</issue><spage>1187</spage><epage>1187</epage><pages>1187-1187</pages><issn>2475-2991</issn><eissn>2475-2991</eissn><abstract>To evaluate associations between supplement intake and socio-demographic factors among older cancer survivors and to identify type of supplements, reasons for use, and cost.
This secondary analysis was performed on baseline data from 368 older cancer survivors enrolled in the Harvest for Health vegetable gardening intervention trial. Survivors self-identifying as supplement users reported data on prescribed, over-the counter, and dietary supplements. Chi-square tests were performed to identify associations among supplement use, cancer type, and socio-demographic variables. Descriptive analyses were used to identify common types, reasons of supplement intake, and total daily cost of supplements.
More than half (59%) of the sample reported taking supplements. Female (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.35–3.32), Non-Hispanic White (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.06–3.01), and breast and gynecological cancer survivors (OR 1.58, 1.04–2.40) were significantly more likely to take a supplement compared to males, minorities, and other cancer-types (p-value < 0.05). Survivors reported a mean intake of three supplements, with vitamins (38%), multivitamins (22%), and minerals (12%) as the most prevalent. Commonly-reported reasons for supplement intake were to improve general health (47%), medical conditions (39%), and cancer-related symptoms (12%). Bone health was the most prevalent reason cited under medical conditions, and hair loss, fatigue, and sleep were most commonly reported under cancer-related symptoms. The daily cost of supplements ranged from $0.02–$19.81, with the mean, median and mode being $1.29/day, $0.78/day, and $0.34/day, respectively.
Nutritional supplement use is prevalent among older cancer survivors with overall health identified as the most common reason for supplement intake. Moreover, out-of-pocket recurrent costs can be substantial. These data emphasize the need to encourage a diet rich in nutrients to minimize daily cost of supplements among older survivors who may live on fixed incomes. Survivors should discuss proper use of supplements with their healthcare providers.
This work was supported by the National Cancer Institute and the American Cancer Society.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1093/cdn/nzac074.016</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2475-2991 |
ispartof | Current developments in nutrition, 2022-06, Vol.6 (Supplement_1), p.1187-1187 |
issn | 2475-2991 2475-2991 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9194034 |
source | Access via Oxford University Press (Open Access Collection); DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Vitamins and Minerals |
title | Supplement Intake Among Older Cancer Survivors: Socio-Demographic Associations, Supplement Types, Reasons for Use, and Cost |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T15%3A52%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Supplement%20Intake%20Among%20Older%20Cancer%20Survivors:%20Socio-Demographic%20Associations,%20Supplement%20Types,%20Reasons%20for%20Use,%20and%20Cost&rft.jtitle=Current%20developments%20in%20nutrition&rft.au=Kaur,%20Harleen&rft.date=2022-06&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=Supplement_1&rft.spage=1187&rft.epage=1187&rft.pages=1187-1187&rft.issn=2475-2991&rft.eissn=2475-2991&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/cdn/nzac074.016&rft_dat=%3Coup_pubme%3E10.1093/cdn/nzac074.016%3C/oup_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/cdn/nzac074.016&rft_els_id=S2475299123210033&rfr_iscdi=true |