Supplement Intake Among Older Cancer Survivors: Socio-Demographic Associations, Supplement Types, Reasons for Use, and Cost

To evaluate associations between supplement intake and socio-demographic factors among older cancer survivors and to identify type of supplements, reasons for use, and cost. This secondary analysis was performed on baseline data from 368 older cancer survivors enrolled in the Harvest for Health vege...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Current developments in nutrition 2022-06, Vol.6 (Supplement_1), p.1187-1187
Hauptverfasser: Kaur, Harleen, Hoenemeyer, Teri, Parrish, Kelsey, Demark-Wahnefried, Wendy
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1187
container_issue Supplement_1
container_start_page 1187
container_title Current developments in nutrition
container_volume 6
creator Kaur, Harleen
Hoenemeyer, Teri
Parrish, Kelsey
Demark-Wahnefried, Wendy
description To evaluate associations between supplement intake and socio-demographic factors among older cancer survivors and to identify type of supplements, reasons for use, and cost. This secondary analysis was performed on baseline data from 368 older cancer survivors enrolled in the Harvest for Health vegetable gardening intervention trial. Survivors self-identifying as supplement users reported data on prescribed, over-the counter, and dietary supplements. Chi-square tests were performed to identify associations among supplement use, cancer type, and socio-demographic variables. Descriptive analyses were used to identify common types, reasons of supplement intake, and total daily cost of supplements. More than half (59%) of the sample reported taking supplements. Female (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.35–3.32), Non-Hispanic White (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.06–3.01), and breast and gynecological cancer survivors (OR 1.58, 1.04–2.40) were significantly more likely to take a supplement compared to males, minorities, and other cancer-types (p-value < 0.05). Survivors reported a mean intake of three supplements, with vitamins (38%), multivitamins (22%), and minerals (12%) as the most prevalent. Commonly-reported reasons for supplement intake were to improve general health (47%), medical conditions (39%), and cancer-related symptoms (12%). Bone health was the most prevalent reason cited under medical conditions, and hair loss, fatigue, and sleep were most commonly reported under cancer-related symptoms. The daily cost of supplements ranged from $0.02–$19.81, with the mean, median and mode being $1.29/day, $0.78/day, and $0.34/day, respectively. Nutritional supplement use is prevalent among older cancer survivors with overall health identified as the most common reason for supplement intake. Moreover, out-of-pocket recurrent costs can be substantial. These data emphasize the need to encourage a diet rich in nutrients to minimize daily cost of supplements among older survivors who may live on fixed incomes. Survivors should discuss proper use of supplements with their healthcare providers. This work was supported by the National Cancer Institute and the American Cancer Society.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/cdn/nzac074.016
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>oup_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9194034</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/cdn/nzac074.016</oup_id><els_id>S2475299123210033</els_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/cdn/nzac074.016</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2216-698b81480aa29f44850d44632c1fbb8eeb809f8d897bf861b88208a3829f71a93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkM9rwjAUx8vYYOI875rzsJq0sSY7DMT9EoTB1HNI01fNZpOSVMHtn19GZbjDYKf3eN8fPD5RdE3wgGCeDlVhhuZDKjymA0yys6iT0PEoTjgn5yf7ZdTz_g1jTDjnGead6HOxq-stVGAaNDONfAc0qaxZo5dtAQ5NpVFhLHZur_fW-Vu0sErb-B4qu3ay3miFJt6Hm2y0Nb6PTvqWhxrC5RWkDxIqrUMrD30kTYGm1jdX0UUptx56x9mNVo8Py-lzPH95mk0n81glCcnijLOcEcqwlAkvKWUjXFCapYkiZZ4zgJxhXrKC8XFesozkjCWYyZQF95hInnaju7a33uUVFCr85uRW1E5X0h2ElVr8VozeiLXdC044xSkNBcO2QDnrvYPyJ0uw-OYvAn9x5C8C_5C4aRN2V__DzFszBAh7DU54pSGAL7QD1YjC6j-zX3QInnQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Supplement Intake Among Older Cancer Survivors: Socio-Demographic Associations, Supplement Types, Reasons for Use, and Cost</title><source>Access via Oxford University Press (Open Access Collection)</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Kaur, Harleen ; Hoenemeyer, Teri ; Parrish, Kelsey ; Demark-Wahnefried, Wendy</creator><creatorcontrib>Kaur, Harleen ; Hoenemeyer, Teri ; Parrish, Kelsey ; Demark-Wahnefried, Wendy</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate associations between supplement intake and socio-demographic factors among older cancer survivors and to identify type of supplements, reasons for use, and cost. This secondary analysis was performed on baseline data from 368 older cancer survivors enrolled in the Harvest for Health vegetable gardening intervention trial. Survivors self-identifying as supplement users reported data on prescribed, over-the counter, and dietary supplements. Chi-square tests were performed to identify associations among supplement use, cancer type, and socio-demographic variables. Descriptive analyses were used to identify common types, reasons of supplement intake, and total daily cost of supplements. More than half (59%) of the sample reported taking supplements. Female (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.35–3.32), Non-Hispanic White (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.06–3.01), and breast and gynecological cancer survivors (OR 1.58, 1.04–2.40) were significantly more likely to take a supplement compared to males, minorities, and other cancer-types (p-value &lt; 0.05). Survivors reported a mean intake of three supplements, with vitamins (38%), multivitamins (22%), and minerals (12%) as the most prevalent. Commonly-reported reasons for supplement intake were to improve general health (47%), medical conditions (39%), and cancer-related symptoms (12%). Bone health was the most prevalent reason cited under medical conditions, and hair loss, fatigue, and sleep were most commonly reported under cancer-related symptoms. The daily cost of supplements ranged from $0.02–$19.81, with the mean, median and mode being $1.29/day, $0.78/day, and $0.34/day, respectively. Nutritional supplement use is prevalent among older cancer survivors with overall health identified as the most common reason for supplement intake. Moreover, out-of-pocket recurrent costs can be substantial. These data emphasize the need to encourage a diet rich in nutrients to minimize daily cost of supplements among older survivors who may live on fixed incomes. Survivors should discuss proper use of supplements with their healthcare providers. This work was supported by the National Cancer Institute and the American Cancer Society.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2475-2991</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2475-2991</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/cdn/nzac074.016</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Vitamins and Minerals</subject><ispartof>Current developments in nutrition, 2022-06, Vol.6 (Supplement_1), p.1187-1187</ispartof><rights>2022 American Society for Nutrition.</rights><rights>The Author 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The International Society for Human and Animal Mycology. 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9194034/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9194034/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,1604,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kaur, Harleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoenemeyer, Teri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parrish, Kelsey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demark-Wahnefried, Wendy</creatorcontrib><title>Supplement Intake Among Older Cancer Survivors: Socio-Demographic Associations, Supplement Types, Reasons for Use, and Cost</title><title>Current developments in nutrition</title><description>To evaluate associations between supplement intake and socio-demographic factors among older cancer survivors and to identify type of supplements, reasons for use, and cost. This secondary analysis was performed on baseline data from 368 older cancer survivors enrolled in the Harvest for Health vegetable gardening intervention trial. Survivors self-identifying as supplement users reported data on prescribed, over-the counter, and dietary supplements. Chi-square tests were performed to identify associations among supplement use, cancer type, and socio-demographic variables. Descriptive analyses were used to identify common types, reasons of supplement intake, and total daily cost of supplements. More than half (59%) of the sample reported taking supplements. Female (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.35–3.32), Non-Hispanic White (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.06–3.01), and breast and gynecological cancer survivors (OR 1.58, 1.04–2.40) were significantly more likely to take a supplement compared to males, minorities, and other cancer-types (p-value &lt; 0.05). Survivors reported a mean intake of three supplements, with vitamins (38%), multivitamins (22%), and minerals (12%) as the most prevalent. Commonly-reported reasons for supplement intake were to improve general health (47%), medical conditions (39%), and cancer-related symptoms (12%). Bone health was the most prevalent reason cited under medical conditions, and hair loss, fatigue, and sleep were most commonly reported under cancer-related symptoms. The daily cost of supplements ranged from $0.02–$19.81, with the mean, median and mode being $1.29/day, $0.78/day, and $0.34/day, respectively. Nutritional supplement use is prevalent among older cancer survivors with overall health identified as the most common reason for supplement intake. Moreover, out-of-pocket recurrent costs can be substantial. These data emphasize the need to encourage a diet rich in nutrients to minimize daily cost of supplements among older survivors who may live on fixed incomes. Survivors should discuss proper use of supplements with their healthcare providers. This work was supported by the National Cancer Institute and the American Cancer Society.</description><subject>Vitamins and Minerals</subject><issn>2475-2991</issn><issn>2475-2991</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkM9rwjAUx8vYYOI875rzsJq0sSY7DMT9EoTB1HNI01fNZpOSVMHtn19GZbjDYKf3eN8fPD5RdE3wgGCeDlVhhuZDKjymA0yys6iT0PEoTjgn5yf7ZdTz_g1jTDjnGead6HOxq-stVGAaNDONfAc0qaxZo5dtAQ5NpVFhLHZur_fW-Vu0sErb-B4qu3ay3miFJt6Hm2y0Nb6PTvqWhxrC5RWkDxIqrUMrD30kTYGm1jdX0UUptx56x9mNVo8Py-lzPH95mk0n81glCcnijLOcEcqwlAkvKWUjXFCapYkiZZ4zgJxhXrKC8XFesozkjCWYyZQF95hInnaju7a33uUVFCr85uRW1E5X0h2ElVr8VozeiLXdC044xSkNBcO2QDnrvYPyJ0uw-OYvAn9x5C8C_5C4aRN2V__DzFszBAh7DU54pSGAL7QD1YjC6j-zX3QInnQ</recordid><startdate>202206</startdate><enddate>202206</enddate><creator>Kaur, Harleen</creator><creator>Hoenemeyer, Teri</creator><creator>Parrish, Kelsey</creator><creator>Demark-Wahnefried, Wendy</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>TOX</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202206</creationdate><title>Supplement Intake Among Older Cancer Survivors: Socio-Demographic Associations, Supplement Types, Reasons for Use, and Cost</title><author>Kaur, Harleen ; Hoenemeyer, Teri ; Parrish, Kelsey ; Demark-Wahnefried, Wendy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2216-698b81480aa29f44850d44632c1fbb8eeb809f8d897bf861b88208a3829f71a93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Vitamins and Minerals</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kaur, Harleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoenemeyer, Teri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parrish, Kelsey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demark-Wahnefried, Wendy</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Access via Oxford University Press (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Current developments in nutrition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kaur, Harleen</au><au>Hoenemeyer, Teri</au><au>Parrish, Kelsey</au><au>Demark-Wahnefried, Wendy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Supplement Intake Among Older Cancer Survivors: Socio-Demographic Associations, Supplement Types, Reasons for Use, and Cost</atitle><jtitle>Current developments in nutrition</jtitle><date>2022-06</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>Supplement_1</issue><spage>1187</spage><epage>1187</epage><pages>1187-1187</pages><issn>2475-2991</issn><eissn>2475-2991</eissn><abstract>To evaluate associations between supplement intake and socio-demographic factors among older cancer survivors and to identify type of supplements, reasons for use, and cost. This secondary analysis was performed on baseline data from 368 older cancer survivors enrolled in the Harvest for Health vegetable gardening intervention trial. Survivors self-identifying as supplement users reported data on prescribed, over-the counter, and dietary supplements. Chi-square tests were performed to identify associations among supplement use, cancer type, and socio-demographic variables. Descriptive analyses were used to identify common types, reasons of supplement intake, and total daily cost of supplements. More than half (59%) of the sample reported taking supplements. Female (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.35–3.32), Non-Hispanic White (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.06–3.01), and breast and gynecological cancer survivors (OR 1.58, 1.04–2.40) were significantly more likely to take a supplement compared to males, minorities, and other cancer-types (p-value &lt; 0.05). Survivors reported a mean intake of three supplements, with vitamins (38%), multivitamins (22%), and minerals (12%) as the most prevalent. Commonly-reported reasons for supplement intake were to improve general health (47%), medical conditions (39%), and cancer-related symptoms (12%). Bone health was the most prevalent reason cited under medical conditions, and hair loss, fatigue, and sleep were most commonly reported under cancer-related symptoms. The daily cost of supplements ranged from $0.02–$19.81, with the mean, median and mode being $1.29/day, $0.78/day, and $0.34/day, respectively. Nutritional supplement use is prevalent among older cancer survivors with overall health identified as the most common reason for supplement intake. Moreover, out-of-pocket recurrent costs can be substantial. These data emphasize the need to encourage a diet rich in nutrients to minimize daily cost of supplements among older survivors who may live on fixed incomes. Survivors should discuss proper use of supplements with their healthcare providers. This work was supported by the National Cancer Institute and the American Cancer Society.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1093/cdn/nzac074.016</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2475-2991
ispartof Current developments in nutrition, 2022-06, Vol.6 (Supplement_1), p.1187-1187
issn 2475-2991
2475-2991
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9194034
source Access via Oxford University Press (Open Access Collection); DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Vitamins and Minerals
title Supplement Intake Among Older Cancer Survivors: Socio-Demographic Associations, Supplement Types, Reasons for Use, and Cost
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T15%3A52%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Supplement%20Intake%20Among%20Older%20Cancer%20Survivors:%20Socio-Demographic%20Associations,%20Supplement%20Types,%20Reasons%20for%20Use,%20and%20Cost&rft.jtitle=Current%20developments%20in%20nutrition&rft.au=Kaur,%20Harleen&rft.date=2022-06&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=Supplement_1&rft.spage=1187&rft.epage=1187&rft.pages=1187-1187&rft.issn=2475-2991&rft.eissn=2475-2991&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/cdn/nzac074.016&rft_dat=%3Coup_pubme%3E10.1093/cdn/nzac074.016%3C/oup_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/cdn/nzac074.016&rft_els_id=S2475299123210033&rfr_iscdi=true