Comparison of the mid-term clinical efficacy and short-term complications of Y-type coronary artery bypass grafting and sequential bypass grafting of the great saphenous vein: a retrospective cohort study

This study sought to compare and evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of Y-type coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and sequential CABG. However, the prognosis and complication rate of the two treatments are different. Therefore, we need to systematically compare the efficacy and safety of t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of thoracic disease 2022-05, Vol.14 (5), p.1598-1606
Hauptverfasser: Dai, Longsheng, Yu, Wenyuan, Li, Qin, Gao, Mingxin, Gu, Chengxiong, Yu, Yang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1606
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1598
container_title Journal of thoracic disease
container_volume 14
creator Dai, Longsheng
Yu, Wenyuan
Li, Qin
Gao, Mingxin
Gu, Chengxiong
Yu, Yang
description This study sought to compare and evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of Y-type coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and sequential CABG. However, the prognosis and complication rate of the two treatments are different. Therefore, we need to systematically compare the efficacy and safety of the two surgical schemes. A total of 112 patients who underwent Y-type CABG and 113 patients who underwent sequential CABG were selected from January 2020 to December 2020. The patients undergoing Y-type CABG of the great saphenous vein (SV) were classified as the experimental group, and those undergoing sequential anastomosis were classified as the control group. The intraoperative blood flow at each anastomotic site of the venous sequential CABG, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and left ventricular diastolic diameter (LVEDD) at the end of 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery, the incidence rate of major adverse cardiovascular events, and coronary angiography (CAG) after readmissions due to similar symptoms were compared between the 2 groups. The bridging vascular blockage rate was also determined. There was no significant difference in cardiac function between the 2 groups in the short term, and the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events in the 2 groups mainly occurred in the middle-postoperative period (1 year after surgery) or later. There was no statistical difference in the intraoperative real-time blood flow measurements at each anastomosis of the venous bridge between the 2 groups. Compared to the control group, the LVEF of the experimental group was significantly increased at the 1-year follow-up point (51.6±5.1 67.6±5.6, P=0.001). During the operation of Y-type coronary artery bypass grafting, the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events, vascular bridge, and anastomotic blockage were significantly decreased (16 39, P=0.023). Large SV Y-type CABG can improve postoperative left heart function and reduce the incidence of postoperative adverse events, which may be of great significance for improving the postoperative mid-term survival rate of patients.
doi_str_mv 10.21037/jtd-22-497
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9186256</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2675985643</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c269t-2f29f546543ecdd15ca8e66f2932685a8f64192b7de28b123008d104d5b2f5623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUk2P1DAMrRCIXS174o5yREJZWqdJWw5IaAQs0kpc4MApSvMxk1WblCQzUv8jPwrPzrACcnFsPz_7Ja6ql019A03Nurf3xVAA2g7dk-oS6q6jQkD79OEOtGnZcFFd53xf4xE1QNc9ry4YFwND77L6tYnzopLPMZDoSNlZMntDi00z0ZMPXquJWOfQ6pWoYEjexVTOAKydMFN8DPlY_oOWdbEYTzGohPiEuJWM66JyJtukXPFhe6KxP_c2FI_0_6fPc2yTVYVktexsiPtMDtaHd0SRZEuKebG6-MOx13EeksverC-qZ05N2V6f7VX1_dPHb5tbevf185fNhzuqQQyFgoPB8VbwllltTMO16q0QGGUgeq56J9pmgLEzFvqxAVbXvWnq1vARHBfArqr3J95lP87WaNSR1CSX5GdULaPy8t9M8Du5jQc5NL0ALpDg9ZkgRXyGXOTss7bTpIJFqRJEx4eei5Yh9M0JqlF0TtY9tmlq-bACEldAAkhcAUS_-nuyR-yfD2e_AcM8syA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2675985643</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the mid-term clinical efficacy and short-term complications of Y-type coronary artery bypass grafting and sequential bypass grafting of the great saphenous vein: a retrospective cohort study</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Dai, Longsheng ; Yu, Wenyuan ; Li, Qin ; Gao, Mingxin ; Gu, Chengxiong ; Yu, Yang</creator><creatorcontrib>Dai, Longsheng ; Yu, Wenyuan ; Li, Qin ; Gao, Mingxin ; Gu, Chengxiong ; Yu, Yang</creatorcontrib><description>This study sought to compare and evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of Y-type coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and sequential CABG. However, the prognosis and complication rate of the two treatments are different. Therefore, we need to systematically compare the efficacy and safety of the two surgical schemes. A total of 112 patients who underwent Y-type CABG and 113 patients who underwent sequential CABG were selected from January 2020 to December 2020. The patients undergoing Y-type CABG of the great saphenous vein (SV) were classified as the experimental group, and those undergoing sequential anastomosis were classified as the control group. The intraoperative blood flow at each anastomotic site of the venous sequential CABG, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and left ventricular diastolic diameter (LVEDD) at the end of 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery, the incidence rate of major adverse cardiovascular events, and coronary angiography (CAG) after readmissions due to similar symptoms were compared between the 2 groups. The bridging vascular blockage rate was also determined. There was no significant difference in cardiac function between the 2 groups in the short term, and the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events in the 2 groups mainly occurred in the middle-postoperative period (1 year after surgery) or later. There was no statistical difference in the intraoperative real-time blood flow measurements at each anastomosis of the venous bridge between the 2 groups. Compared to the control group, the LVEF of the experimental group was significantly increased at the 1-year follow-up point (51.6±5.1 67.6±5.6, P=0.001). During the operation of Y-type coronary artery bypass grafting, the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events, vascular bridge, and anastomotic blockage were significantly decreased (16 39, P=0.023). Large SV Y-type CABG can improve postoperative left heart function and reduce the incidence of postoperative adverse events, which may be of great significance for improving the postoperative mid-term survival rate of patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2072-1439</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2077-6624</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.21037/jtd-22-497</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35693602</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>China: AME Publishing Company</publisher><subject>Original</subject><ispartof>Journal of thoracic disease, 2022-05, Vol.14 (5), p.1598-1606</ispartof><rights>2022 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2022 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved. 2022 Journal of Thoracic Disease.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9186256/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9186256/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35693602$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dai, Longsheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Wenyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Qin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Mingxin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gu, Chengxiong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Yang</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the mid-term clinical efficacy and short-term complications of Y-type coronary artery bypass grafting and sequential bypass grafting of the great saphenous vein: a retrospective cohort study</title><title>Journal of thoracic disease</title><addtitle>J Thorac Dis</addtitle><description>This study sought to compare and evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of Y-type coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and sequential CABG. However, the prognosis and complication rate of the two treatments are different. Therefore, we need to systematically compare the efficacy and safety of the two surgical schemes. A total of 112 patients who underwent Y-type CABG and 113 patients who underwent sequential CABG were selected from January 2020 to December 2020. The patients undergoing Y-type CABG of the great saphenous vein (SV) were classified as the experimental group, and those undergoing sequential anastomosis were classified as the control group. The intraoperative blood flow at each anastomotic site of the venous sequential CABG, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and left ventricular diastolic diameter (LVEDD) at the end of 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery, the incidence rate of major adverse cardiovascular events, and coronary angiography (CAG) after readmissions due to similar symptoms were compared between the 2 groups. The bridging vascular blockage rate was also determined. There was no significant difference in cardiac function between the 2 groups in the short term, and the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events in the 2 groups mainly occurred in the middle-postoperative period (1 year after surgery) or later. There was no statistical difference in the intraoperative real-time blood flow measurements at each anastomosis of the venous bridge between the 2 groups. Compared to the control group, the LVEF of the experimental group was significantly increased at the 1-year follow-up point (51.6±5.1 67.6±5.6, P=0.001). During the operation of Y-type coronary artery bypass grafting, the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events, vascular bridge, and anastomotic blockage were significantly decreased (16 39, P=0.023). Large SV Y-type CABG can improve postoperative left heart function and reduce the incidence of postoperative adverse events, which may be of great significance for improving the postoperative mid-term survival rate of patients.</description><subject>Original</subject><issn>2072-1439</issn><issn>2077-6624</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdUk2P1DAMrRCIXS174o5yREJZWqdJWw5IaAQs0kpc4MApSvMxk1WblCQzUv8jPwrPzrACcnFsPz_7Ja6ql019A03Nurf3xVAA2g7dk-oS6q6jQkD79OEOtGnZcFFd53xf4xE1QNc9ry4YFwND77L6tYnzopLPMZDoSNlZMntDi00z0ZMPXquJWOfQ6pWoYEjexVTOAKydMFN8DPlY_oOWdbEYTzGohPiEuJWM66JyJtukXPFhe6KxP_c2FI_0_6fPc2yTVYVktexsiPtMDtaHd0SRZEuKebG6-MOx13EeksverC-qZ05N2V6f7VX1_dPHb5tbevf185fNhzuqQQyFgoPB8VbwllltTMO16q0QGGUgeq56J9pmgLEzFvqxAVbXvWnq1vARHBfArqr3J95lP87WaNSR1CSX5GdULaPy8t9M8Du5jQc5NL0ALpDg9ZkgRXyGXOTss7bTpIJFqRJEx4eei5Yh9M0JqlF0TtY9tmlq-bACEldAAkhcAUS_-nuyR-yfD2e_AcM8syA</recordid><startdate>202205</startdate><enddate>202205</enddate><creator>Dai, Longsheng</creator><creator>Yu, Wenyuan</creator><creator>Li, Qin</creator><creator>Gao, Mingxin</creator><creator>Gu, Chengxiong</creator><creator>Yu, Yang</creator><general>AME Publishing Company</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202205</creationdate><title>Comparison of the mid-term clinical efficacy and short-term complications of Y-type coronary artery bypass grafting and sequential bypass grafting of the great saphenous vein: a retrospective cohort study</title><author>Dai, Longsheng ; Yu, Wenyuan ; Li, Qin ; Gao, Mingxin ; Gu, Chengxiong ; Yu, Yang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c269t-2f29f546543ecdd15ca8e66f2932685a8f64192b7de28b123008d104d5b2f5623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Original</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dai, Longsheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Wenyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Qin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Mingxin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gu, Chengxiong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Yang</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of thoracic disease</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dai, Longsheng</au><au>Yu, Wenyuan</au><au>Li, Qin</au><au>Gao, Mingxin</au><au>Gu, Chengxiong</au><au>Yu, Yang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the mid-term clinical efficacy and short-term complications of Y-type coronary artery bypass grafting and sequential bypass grafting of the great saphenous vein: a retrospective cohort study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of thoracic disease</jtitle><addtitle>J Thorac Dis</addtitle><date>2022-05</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1598</spage><epage>1606</epage><pages>1598-1606</pages><issn>2072-1439</issn><eissn>2077-6624</eissn><abstract>This study sought to compare and evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of Y-type coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and sequential CABG. However, the prognosis and complication rate of the two treatments are different. Therefore, we need to systematically compare the efficacy and safety of the two surgical schemes. A total of 112 patients who underwent Y-type CABG and 113 patients who underwent sequential CABG were selected from January 2020 to December 2020. The patients undergoing Y-type CABG of the great saphenous vein (SV) were classified as the experimental group, and those undergoing sequential anastomosis were classified as the control group. The intraoperative blood flow at each anastomotic site of the venous sequential CABG, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and left ventricular diastolic diameter (LVEDD) at the end of 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery, the incidence rate of major adverse cardiovascular events, and coronary angiography (CAG) after readmissions due to similar symptoms were compared between the 2 groups. The bridging vascular blockage rate was also determined. There was no significant difference in cardiac function between the 2 groups in the short term, and the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events in the 2 groups mainly occurred in the middle-postoperative period (1 year after surgery) or later. There was no statistical difference in the intraoperative real-time blood flow measurements at each anastomosis of the venous bridge between the 2 groups. Compared to the control group, the LVEF of the experimental group was significantly increased at the 1-year follow-up point (51.6±5.1 67.6±5.6, P=0.001). During the operation of Y-type coronary artery bypass grafting, the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events, vascular bridge, and anastomotic blockage were significantly decreased (16 39, P=0.023). Large SV Y-type CABG can improve postoperative left heart function and reduce the incidence of postoperative adverse events, which may be of great significance for improving the postoperative mid-term survival rate of patients.</abstract><cop>China</cop><pub>AME Publishing Company</pub><pmid>35693602</pmid><doi>10.21037/jtd-22-497</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2072-1439
ispartof Journal of thoracic disease, 2022-05, Vol.14 (5), p.1598-1606
issn 2072-1439
2077-6624
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9186256
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Original
title Comparison of the mid-term clinical efficacy and short-term complications of Y-type coronary artery bypass grafting and sequential bypass grafting of the great saphenous vein: a retrospective cohort study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T00%3A06%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20mid-term%20clinical%20efficacy%20and%20short-term%20complications%20of%20Y-type%20coronary%20artery%20bypass%20grafting%20and%20sequential%20bypass%20grafting%20of%20the%20great%20saphenous%20vein:%20a%20retrospective%20cohort%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20thoracic%20disease&rft.au=Dai,%20Longsheng&rft.date=2022-05&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1598&rft.epage=1606&rft.pages=1598-1606&rft.issn=2072-1439&rft.eissn=2077-6624&rft_id=info:doi/10.21037/jtd-22-497&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2675985643%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2675985643&rft_id=info:pmid/35693602&rfr_iscdi=true