eTEP-RS for incisional hernias in a non-robotic center. Is laparoscopy enough to perform a durable MIS repair of the abdominal wall defect?
Introduction Incisional hernias can complicate up to 25% of laparotomies, and successful repair remains a significant clinical challenge for surgeons. Recently, the surgical technique of ventral hernia repair (eTEP-RS) has been introduced. The method was presented relatively recently and continues t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Surgical endoscopy 2023-02, Vol.37 (2), p.1392-1400 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1400 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 1392 |
container_title | Surgical endoscopy |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Mitura, Kryspin Romańczuk, Michał Kisielewski, Krystian Mitura, Bernard |
description | Introduction
Incisional hernias can complicate up to 25% of laparotomies, and successful repair remains a significant clinical challenge for surgeons. Recently, the surgical technique of ventral hernia repair (eTEP-RS) has been introduced. The method was presented relatively recently and continues to evolve. The use of a robotic platform in eTEP-RS resulted in a significant improvement in ergonomics. Therefore, the questions arise as to whether the laparoscopic technique might still be feasible for such long procedures. The objective of this study is to present our early results in the treatment of patients with incisional ventral hernias using eTEP-RS and to discuss key technical aspects.
Patients and methods
A prospective case-controlled study was conducted for all incisional ventral hernia patients (hernia orifice between 4 and 10 cm) who underwent eTEP-RS between March 2019 and December 2021. Demographic data were recorded; and perioperative and postoperative results were analyzed.
Results
We performed 34 eTEP-RS procedures. The mean duration of the surgery was 211 min (145–295). The mean width of the defect was 6.8 cm and the defect area was 42.5 cm
2
. The mean mesh size was 498 cm
2
(270–625). After an average follow-up of 16 months (2–30), there was no recurrence or major complication.
Conclusions
The eTEP-RS is a safe alternative to open ventral hernia repair in selected cases and allows for the placement of a large piece of mesh in accordance with current recommendations, even in non-robotic centers. Excellent knowledge of the detailed anatomy of the abdominal wall is essential for safe and effective hernia repair. Compliance with certain rules of the laparoscopic eTEP-RS facilitates improved ergonomics for this procedure even in non-robotic centers. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00464-022-09365-w |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9181889</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2675604318</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-2da688687432f30398084c11928b8672a711b6fcc102cafacbded73af2b573443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS0EokPhBVggS2zYuPgvtrMBoarQkYpAtKwtx3FmXDl2sBNGfQZeGk-nlJ8FK0v3fvfce3wAeE7wCcFYvi4Yc8ERphThlokG7R6AFeGMIkqJeghWtYoRlS0_Ak9KucaVb0nzGByxRigshFiBH-7q7DP6cgmHlKGP1hefoglw63L0ptQSNDCmiHLq0uwttC7OLp_AdYHBTCanYtN0A11My2YL5wQnl6vWWMf6JZsuOPhxfQmzm4zPMA1w3jpouj6Nfr9nZ0KAvRucnd8-BY8GE4p7dvceg6_vz65Oz9HFpw_r03cXyHLMZ0R7I5QSSlanA8OsVVhxS0hLVaeEpEYS0onBWoKpNYOxXe96ycxAu0YyztkxeHPQnZZudP3eUTZBT9mPJt_oZLz-uxP9Vm_Sd90SRZRqq8CrO4Gcvi2uzHr0xboQTHRpKZoK2QjMGVEVffkPep2WXJ1XSkrFZdtQUSl6oGz9z5LdcH8MwXqftT5krWvW-jZrvatDL_60cT_yK9wKsANQaituXP69-z-yPwF3orY2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2778479526</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>eTEP-RS for incisional hernias in a non-robotic center. Is laparoscopy enough to perform a durable MIS repair of the abdominal wall defect?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Mitura, Kryspin ; Romańczuk, Michał ; Kisielewski, Krystian ; Mitura, Bernard</creator><creatorcontrib>Mitura, Kryspin ; Romańczuk, Michał ; Kisielewski, Krystian ; Mitura, Bernard</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction
Incisional hernias can complicate up to 25% of laparotomies, and successful repair remains a significant clinical challenge for surgeons. Recently, the surgical technique of ventral hernia repair (eTEP-RS) has been introduced. The method was presented relatively recently and continues to evolve. The use of a robotic platform in eTEP-RS resulted in a significant improvement in ergonomics. Therefore, the questions arise as to whether the laparoscopic technique might still be feasible for such long procedures. The objective of this study is to present our early results in the treatment of patients with incisional ventral hernias using eTEP-RS and to discuss key technical aspects.
Patients and methods
A prospective case-controlled study was conducted for all incisional ventral hernia patients (hernia orifice between 4 and 10 cm) who underwent eTEP-RS between March 2019 and December 2021. Demographic data were recorded; and perioperative and postoperative results were analyzed.
Results
We performed 34 eTEP-RS procedures. The mean duration of the surgery was 211 min (145–295). The mean width of the defect was 6.8 cm and the defect area was 42.5 cm
2
. The mean mesh size was 498 cm
2
(270–625). After an average follow-up of 16 months (2–30), there was no recurrence or major complication.
Conclusions
The eTEP-RS is a safe alternative to open ventral hernia repair in selected cases and allows for the placement of a large piece of mesh in accordance with current recommendations, even in non-robotic centers. Excellent knowledge of the detailed anatomy of the abdominal wall is essential for safe and effective hernia repair. Compliance with certain rules of the laparoscopic eTEP-RS facilitates improved ergonomics for this procedure even in non-robotic centers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0930-2794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2218</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09365-w</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35680666</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>2022 SAGES Oral ; Abdomen ; Abdominal Surgery ; Abdominal Wall - surgery ; Dissection ; Endoscopy ; Gastroenterology ; Gynecology ; Hepatology ; Hernia, Ventral - surgery ; Hernias ; Herniorrhaphy - methods ; Humans ; Incisional Hernia - surgery ; Laparoscopy ; Laparoscopy - methods ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Pain ; Patients ; Proctology ; Robotics ; Surgeons ; Surgery ; Surgical Mesh ; Surgical techniques</subject><ispartof>Surgical endoscopy, 2023-02, Vol.37 (2), p.1392-1400</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022</rights><rights>2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-2da688687432f30398084c11928b8672a711b6fcc102cafacbded73af2b573443</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-2da688687432f30398084c11928b8672a711b6fcc102cafacbded73af2b573443</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2227-4550</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00464-022-09365-w$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00464-022-09365-w$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,778,782,883,27907,27908,41471,42540,51302</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35680666$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mitura, Kryspin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romańczuk, Michał</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kisielewski, Krystian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitura, Bernard</creatorcontrib><title>eTEP-RS for incisional hernias in a non-robotic center. Is laparoscopy enough to perform a durable MIS repair of the abdominal wall defect?</title><title>Surgical endoscopy</title><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><description>Introduction
Incisional hernias can complicate up to 25% of laparotomies, and successful repair remains a significant clinical challenge for surgeons. Recently, the surgical technique of ventral hernia repair (eTEP-RS) has been introduced. The method was presented relatively recently and continues to evolve. The use of a robotic platform in eTEP-RS resulted in a significant improvement in ergonomics. Therefore, the questions arise as to whether the laparoscopic technique might still be feasible for such long procedures. The objective of this study is to present our early results in the treatment of patients with incisional ventral hernias using eTEP-RS and to discuss key technical aspects.
Patients and methods
A prospective case-controlled study was conducted for all incisional ventral hernia patients (hernia orifice between 4 and 10 cm) who underwent eTEP-RS between March 2019 and December 2021. Demographic data were recorded; and perioperative and postoperative results were analyzed.
Results
We performed 34 eTEP-RS procedures. The mean duration of the surgery was 211 min (145–295). The mean width of the defect was 6.8 cm and the defect area was 42.5 cm
2
. The mean mesh size was 498 cm
2
(270–625). After an average follow-up of 16 months (2–30), there was no recurrence or major complication.
Conclusions
The eTEP-RS is a safe alternative to open ventral hernia repair in selected cases and allows for the placement of a large piece of mesh in accordance with current recommendations, even in non-robotic centers. Excellent knowledge of the detailed anatomy of the abdominal wall is essential for safe and effective hernia repair. Compliance with certain rules of the laparoscopic eTEP-RS facilitates improved ergonomics for this procedure even in non-robotic centers.</description><subject>2022 SAGES Oral</subject><subject>Abdomen</subject><subject>Abdominal Surgery</subject><subject>Abdominal Wall - surgery</subject><subject>Dissection</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Hepatology</subject><subject>Hernia, Ventral - surgery</subject><subject>Hernias</subject><subject>Herniorrhaphy - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incisional Hernia - surgery</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Proctology</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Mesh</subject><subject>Surgical techniques</subject><issn>0930-2794</issn><issn>1432-2218</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS0EokPhBVggS2zYuPgvtrMBoarQkYpAtKwtx3FmXDl2sBNGfQZeGk-nlJ8FK0v3fvfce3wAeE7wCcFYvi4Yc8ERphThlokG7R6AFeGMIkqJeghWtYoRlS0_Ak9KucaVb0nzGByxRigshFiBH-7q7DP6cgmHlKGP1hefoglw63L0ptQSNDCmiHLq0uwttC7OLp_AdYHBTCanYtN0A11My2YL5wQnl6vWWMf6JZsuOPhxfQmzm4zPMA1w3jpouj6Nfr9nZ0KAvRucnd8-BY8GE4p7dvceg6_vz65Oz9HFpw_r03cXyHLMZ0R7I5QSSlanA8OsVVhxS0hLVaeEpEYS0onBWoKpNYOxXe96ycxAu0YyztkxeHPQnZZudP3eUTZBT9mPJt_oZLz-uxP9Vm_Sd90SRZRqq8CrO4Gcvi2uzHr0xboQTHRpKZoK2QjMGVEVffkPep2WXJ1XSkrFZdtQUSl6oGz9z5LdcH8MwXqftT5krWvW-jZrvatDL_60cT_yK9wKsANQaituXP69-z-yPwF3orY2</recordid><startdate>20230201</startdate><enddate>20230201</enddate><creator>Mitura, Kryspin</creator><creator>Romańczuk, Michał</creator><creator>Kisielewski, Krystian</creator><creator>Mitura, Bernard</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2227-4550</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230201</creationdate><title>eTEP-RS for incisional hernias in a non-robotic center. Is laparoscopy enough to perform a durable MIS repair of the abdominal wall defect?</title><author>Mitura, Kryspin ; Romańczuk, Michał ; Kisielewski, Krystian ; Mitura, Bernard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-2da688687432f30398084c11928b8672a711b6fcc102cafacbded73af2b573443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>2022 SAGES Oral</topic><topic>Abdomen</topic><topic>Abdominal Surgery</topic><topic>Abdominal Wall - surgery</topic><topic>Dissection</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Hepatology</topic><topic>Hernia, Ventral - surgery</topic><topic>Hernias</topic><topic>Herniorrhaphy - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incisional Hernia - surgery</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Proctology</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Mesh</topic><topic>Surgical techniques</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mitura, Kryspin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romańczuk, Michał</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kisielewski, Krystian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitura, Bernard</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mitura, Kryspin</au><au>Romańczuk, Michał</au><au>Kisielewski, Krystian</au><au>Mitura, Bernard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>eTEP-RS for incisional hernias in a non-robotic center. Is laparoscopy enough to perform a durable MIS repair of the abdominal wall defect?</atitle><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle><stitle>Surg Endosc</stitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><date>2023-02-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>1392</spage><epage>1400</epage><pages>1392-1400</pages><issn>0930-2794</issn><eissn>1432-2218</eissn><abstract>Introduction
Incisional hernias can complicate up to 25% of laparotomies, and successful repair remains a significant clinical challenge for surgeons. Recently, the surgical technique of ventral hernia repair (eTEP-RS) has been introduced. The method was presented relatively recently and continues to evolve. The use of a robotic platform in eTEP-RS resulted in a significant improvement in ergonomics. Therefore, the questions arise as to whether the laparoscopic technique might still be feasible for such long procedures. The objective of this study is to present our early results in the treatment of patients with incisional ventral hernias using eTEP-RS and to discuss key technical aspects.
Patients and methods
A prospective case-controlled study was conducted for all incisional ventral hernia patients (hernia orifice between 4 and 10 cm) who underwent eTEP-RS between March 2019 and December 2021. Demographic data were recorded; and perioperative and postoperative results were analyzed.
Results
We performed 34 eTEP-RS procedures. The mean duration of the surgery was 211 min (145–295). The mean width of the defect was 6.8 cm and the defect area was 42.5 cm
2
. The mean mesh size was 498 cm
2
(270–625). After an average follow-up of 16 months (2–30), there was no recurrence or major complication.
Conclusions
The eTEP-RS is a safe alternative to open ventral hernia repair in selected cases and allows for the placement of a large piece of mesh in accordance with current recommendations, even in non-robotic centers. Excellent knowledge of the detailed anatomy of the abdominal wall is essential for safe and effective hernia repair. Compliance with certain rules of the laparoscopic eTEP-RS facilitates improved ergonomics for this procedure even in non-robotic centers.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>35680666</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00464-022-09365-w</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2227-4550</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0930-2794 |
ispartof | Surgical endoscopy, 2023-02, Vol.37 (2), p.1392-1400 |
issn | 0930-2794 1432-2218 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9181889 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | 2022 SAGES Oral Abdomen Abdominal Surgery Abdominal Wall - surgery Dissection Endoscopy Gastroenterology Gynecology Hepatology Hernia, Ventral - surgery Hernias Herniorrhaphy - methods Humans Incisional Hernia - surgery Laparoscopy Laparoscopy - methods Medicine Medicine & Public Health Pain Patients Proctology Robotics Surgeons Surgery Surgical Mesh Surgical techniques |
title | eTEP-RS for incisional hernias in a non-robotic center. Is laparoscopy enough to perform a durable MIS repair of the abdominal wall defect? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T16%3A52%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=eTEP-RS%20for%20incisional%20hernias%20in%20a%20non-robotic%20center.%20Is%20laparoscopy%20enough%20to%20perform%20a%20durable%20MIS%20repair%20of%20the%20abdominal%20wall%20defect?&rft.jtitle=Surgical%20endoscopy&rft.au=Mitura,%20Kryspin&rft.date=2023-02-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1392&rft.epage=1400&rft.pages=1392-1400&rft.issn=0930-2794&rft.eissn=1432-2218&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00464-022-09365-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2675604318%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2778479526&rft_id=info:pmid/35680666&rfr_iscdi=true |