Effects of Low-Load Blood Flow Restriction Training on Hemodynamic Responses and Vascular Function in Older Adults: A Meta-Analysis
Background: The combination of low-load (LL) training with blood flow restriction (BFR) has recently been shown to trigger a series of hemodynamic responses and promote vascular function in various populations. To date, however, evidence is sparse as to how this training regimen influences hemodynam...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of environmental research and public health 2022-05, Vol.19 (11), p.6750 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 6750 |
container_title | International journal of environmental research and public health |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Zhang, Tianqi Tian, Guixian Wang, Xing |
description | Background: The combination of low-load (LL) training with blood flow restriction (BFR) has recently been shown to trigger a series of hemodynamic responses and promote vascular function in various populations. To date, however, evidence is sparse as to how this training regimen influences hemodynamic response and vascular function in older adults. Objective: To systematically evaluate the effects of LL-BFR training on hemodynamic response and vascular function in older adults. Methods: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted. The systematic literature research was performed in the following electronic databases from their inception to 30 February 2022: PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, EBSCO host, the Cochrane Library and CNKI. Subsequently, a meta-analysis with inverse variance weighting was conducted. Results: A total of 1437 articles were screened, and 12 randomized controlled trials with a total 378 subjects were included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis results showed that LL-BFR training caused a significant acute increase in heart rate (WMD: 4.02, 95% CI: 0.93, 7.10, p < 0.05), systolic blood pressure (WMD: 5.05, 95% CI: 0.63, 9.48, p < 0.05) and diastolic blood pressure (WMD: 4.87, 95% CI: 1.37, 8.37, p < 0.01). The acute hemodynamic response induced by LL-BFR training is similar to that elicited by high-load (HL) training. Training volume, cuff pressure and width were identified as significant moderators in our subgroup and meta-regression analyses. After 30 min of training, resting systolic blood pressure significantly decreased (WMD: −6.595, 95% CI: −8.88, −3.31, p < 0.01) in the LL-BFR training group, but resting hemodynamic indexes exhibited no significant differences compared with common LL and HL training; long-term LL-BFR training resulted in significant improvements in flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) (WMD: 1.30, 95% CI: 0.50, 2.10, p < 0.01), cardio ankle vascular index (CAVI) (WMD: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.11, 0.99, p < 0.05) and ankle brachial index (ABI) (WMD: 0.03, 95% CI: 0.00, 0.06, p < 0.05) in older adults. Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis reveals that LL-BFR training will cause an acute hemodynamic response in older adults, which can return to normal levels 30 min after training, and systolic blood pressure significantly decreased. Furthermore, the beneficial effect of LL-BFR training on vascular function is to improve FMD, CAVI and ABI of older adults. However, due to the influence |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/ijerph19116750 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9180641</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2674354499</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-5db98d9575a4e712f5e7e46866c950a4bed9f982ce773470e08ae29313d617b03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1r3DAQxUVoyfc1xyLopRenkiXLUg-Bbcg2hS2BkPYqtNI40SJLG8lu2HP_8TjdNCQ9zcD85jFvHkInlJwypshnv4K8vqOKUtE2ZAftUyFIxQWh7171e-iglBUhTHKhdtEea4SsGRP76M9F14EdCk4dXqSHapGMw19DSg7PQ3rA11CG7O3gU8Q32fjo4y2e-kvok9tE03v7xKxTLFCwiQ7_MsWOwWQ8H-N2z0d8FRxkPHNjGMoXPMM_YDDVLJqwKb4cofedCQWOn-sh-jm_uDm_rBZX376fzxaV5VQOVeOWSjrVtI3h0NK6a6AFLqQQVjXE8CU41SlZW2hbxlsCRBqoFaPMCdouCTtEZ1vd9bjswVmIQzZBr7PvTd7oZLx-O4n-Tt-m31pRSQSnk8CnZ4Gc7sfpM7r3xUIIJkIai66nDASRjMoJ_fgfukpjngz_pThrOFdqok63lM2plAzdyzGU6Kd89dt8p4UPry284P8CZY8peKL1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2674354499</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of Low-Load Blood Flow Restriction Training on Hemodynamic Responses and Vascular Function in Older Adults: A Meta-Analysis</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Zhang, Tianqi ; Tian, Guixian ; Wang, Xing</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Tianqi ; Tian, Guixian ; Wang, Xing</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Background: The combination of low-load (LL) training with blood flow restriction (BFR) has recently been shown to trigger a series of hemodynamic responses and promote vascular function in various populations. To date, however, evidence is sparse as to how this training regimen influences hemodynamic response and vascular function in older adults. Objective: To systematically evaluate the effects of LL-BFR training on hemodynamic response and vascular function in older adults. Methods: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted. The systematic literature research was performed in the following electronic databases from their inception to 30 February 2022: PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, EBSCO host, the Cochrane Library and CNKI. Subsequently, a meta-analysis with inverse variance weighting was conducted. Results: A total of 1437 articles were screened, and 12 randomized controlled trials with a total 378 subjects were included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis results showed that LL-BFR training caused a significant acute increase in heart rate (WMD: 4.02, 95% CI: 0.93, 7.10, p < 0.05), systolic blood pressure (WMD: 5.05, 95% CI: 0.63, 9.48, p < 0.05) and diastolic blood pressure (WMD: 4.87, 95% CI: 1.37, 8.37, p < 0.01). The acute hemodynamic response induced by LL-BFR training is similar to that elicited by high-load (HL) training. Training volume, cuff pressure and width were identified as significant moderators in our subgroup and meta-regression analyses. After 30 min of training, resting systolic blood pressure significantly decreased (WMD: −6.595, 95% CI: −8.88, −3.31, p < 0.01) in the LL-BFR training group, but resting hemodynamic indexes exhibited no significant differences compared with common LL and HL training; long-term LL-BFR training resulted in significant improvements in flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) (WMD: 1.30, 95% CI: 0.50, 2.10, p < 0.01), cardio ankle vascular index (CAVI) (WMD: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.11, 0.99, p < 0.05) and ankle brachial index (ABI) (WMD: 0.03, 95% CI: 0.00, 0.06, p < 0.05) in older adults. Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis reveals that LL-BFR training will cause an acute hemodynamic response in older adults, which can return to normal levels 30 min after training, and systolic blood pressure significantly decreased. Furthermore, the beneficial effect of LL-BFR training on vascular function is to improve FMD, CAVI and ABI of older adults. However, due to the influence of the quality of the included studies and the sample size, more high-quality studies are needed to confirm such issues as BFR pressure and training risk.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1661-7827</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19116750</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35682336</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Adults ; Aged ; Ankle ; Bias ; Blood flow ; Blood Flow Restriction Therapy ; Blood pressure ; Cardiovascular disease ; Cardiovascular system ; Clinical trials ; Collaboration ; Compliance ; Data processing ; Heart rate ; Hemodynamic responses ; Hemodynamics ; Humans ; Intervention ; Meta-analysis ; Muscle Strength - physiology ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology ; Older people ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Regional Blood Flow - physiology ; Resistance Training - methods ; Review ; Software ; Strength training ; Subgroups ; Variance analysis ; Vasodilation</subject><ispartof>International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022-05, Vol.19 (11), p.6750</ispartof><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-5db98d9575a4e712f5e7e46866c950a4bed9f982ce773470e08ae29313d617b03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-5db98d9575a4e712f5e7e46866c950a4bed9f982ce773470e08ae29313d617b03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9180641/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9180641/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35682336$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Tianqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tian, Guixian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xing</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of Low-Load Blood Flow Restriction Training on Hemodynamic Responses and Vascular Function in Older Adults: A Meta-Analysis</title><title>International journal of environmental research and public health</title><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><description><![CDATA[Background: The combination of low-load (LL) training with blood flow restriction (BFR) has recently been shown to trigger a series of hemodynamic responses and promote vascular function in various populations. To date, however, evidence is sparse as to how this training regimen influences hemodynamic response and vascular function in older adults. Objective: To systematically evaluate the effects of LL-BFR training on hemodynamic response and vascular function in older adults. Methods: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted. The systematic literature research was performed in the following electronic databases from their inception to 30 February 2022: PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, EBSCO host, the Cochrane Library and CNKI. Subsequently, a meta-analysis with inverse variance weighting was conducted. Results: A total of 1437 articles were screened, and 12 randomized controlled trials with a total 378 subjects were included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis results showed that LL-BFR training caused a significant acute increase in heart rate (WMD: 4.02, 95% CI: 0.93, 7.10, p < 0.05), systolic blood pressure (WMD: 5.05, 95% CI: 0.63, 9.48, p < 0.05) and diastolic blood pressure (WMD: 4.87, 95% CI: 1.37, 8.37, p < 0.01). The acute hemodynamic response induced by LL-BFR training is similar to that elicited by high-load (HL) training. Training volume, cuff pressure and width were identified as significant moderators in our subgroup and meta-regression analyses. After 30 min of training, resting systolic blood pressure significantly decreased (WMD: −6.595, 95% CI: −8.88, −3.31, p < 0.01) in the LL-BFR training group, but resting hemodynamic indexes exhibited no significant differences compared with common LL and HL training; long-term LL-BFR training resulted in significant improvements in flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) (WMD: 1.30, 95% CI: 0.50, 2.10, p < 0.01), cardio ankle vascular index (CAVI) (WMD: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.11, 0.99, p < 0.05) and ankle brachial index (ABI) (WMD: 0.03, 95% CI: 0.00, 0.06, p < 0.05) in older adults. Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis reveals that LL-BFR training will cause an acute hemodynamic response in older adults, which can return to normal levels 30 min after training, and systolic blood pressure significantly decreased. Furthermore, the beneficial effect of LL-BFR training on vascular function is to improve FMD, CAVI and ABI of older adults. However, due to the influence of the quality of the included studies and the sample size, more high-quality studies are needed to confirm such issues as BFR pressure and training risk.]]></description><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Ankle</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Blood flow</subject><subject>Blood Flow Restriction Therapy</subject><subject>Blood pressure</subject><subject>Cardiovascular disease</subject><subject>Cardiovascular system</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Compliance</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Heart rate</subject><subject>Hemodynamic responses</subject><subject>Hemodynamics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Muscle Strength - physiology</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Regional Blood Flow - physiology</subject><subject>Resistance Training - methods</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Strength training</subject><subject>Subgroups</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><subject>Vasodilation</subject><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><issn>1660-4601</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc1r3DAQxUVoyfc1xyLopRenkiXLUg-Bbcg2hS2BkPYqtNI40SJLG8lu2HP_8TjdNCQ9zcD85jFvHkInlJwypshnv4K8vqOKUtE2ZAftUyFIxQWh7171e-iglBUhTHKhdtEea4SsGRP76M9F14EdCk4dXqSHapGMw19DSg7PQ3rA11CG7O3gU8Q32fjo4y2e-kvok9tE03v7xKxTLFCwiQ7_MsWOwWQ8H-N2z0d8FRxkPHNjGMoXPMM_YDDVLJqwKb4cofedCQWOn-sh-jm_uDm_rBZX376fzxaV5VQOVeOWSjrVtI3h0NK6a6AFLqQQVjXE8CU41SlZW2hbxlsCRBqoFaPMCdouCTtEZ1vd9bjswVmIQzZBr7PvTd7oZLx-O4n-Tt-m31pRSQSnk8CnZ4Gc7sfpM7r3xUIIJkIai66nDASRjMoJ_fgfukpjngz_pThrOFdqok63lM2plAzdyzGU6Kd89dt8p4UPry284P8CZY8peKL1</recordid><startdate>20220531</startdate><enddate>20220531</enddate><creator>Zhang, Tianqi</creator><creator>Tian, Guixian</creator><creator>Wang, Xing</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220531</creationdate><title>Effects of Low-Load Blood Flow Restriction Training on Hemodynamic Responses and Vascular Function in Older Adults: A Meta-Analysis</title><author>Zhang, Tianqi ; Tian, Guixian ; Wang, Xing</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-5db98d9575a4e712f5e7e46866c950a4bed9f982ce773470e08ae29313d617b03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Ankle</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Blood flow</topic><topic>Blood Flow Restriction Therapy</topic><topic>Blood pressure</topic><topic>Cardiovascular disease</topic><topic>Cardiovascular system</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Compliance</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Heart rate</topic><topic>Hemodynamic responses</topic><topic>Hemodynamics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Muscle Strength - physiology</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Regional Blood Flow - physiology</topic><topic>Resistance Training - methods</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Strength training</topic><topic>Subgroups</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><topic>Vasodilation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Tianqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tian, Guixian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xing</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Tianqi</au><au>Tian, Guixian</au><au>Wang, Xing</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of Low-Load Blood Flow Restriction Training on Hemodynamic Responses and Vascular Function in Older Adults: A Meta-Analysis</atitle><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><date>2022-05-31</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>6750</spage><pages>6750-</pages><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><eissn>1660-4601</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[Background: The combination of low-load (LL) training with blood flow restriction (BFR) has recently been shown to trigger a series of hemodynamic responses and promote vascular function in various populations. To date, however, evidence is sparse as to how this training regimen influences hemodynamic response and vascular function in older adults. Objective: To systematically evaluate the effects of LL-BFR training on hemodynamic response and vascular function in older adults. Methods: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted. The systematic literature research was performed in the following electronic databases from their inception to 30 February 2022: PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, EBSCO host, the Cochrane Library and CNKI. Subsequently, a meta-analysis with inverse variance weighting was conducted. Results: A total of 1437 articles were screened, and 12 randomized controlled trials with a total 378 subjects were included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis results showed that LL-BFR training caused a significant acute increase in heart rate (WMD: 4.02, 95% CI: 0.93, 7.10, p < 0.05), systolic blood pressure (WMD: 5.05, 95% CI: 0.63, 9.48, p < 0.05) and diastolic blood pressure (WMD: 4.87, 95% CI: 1.37, 8.37, p < 0.01). The acute hemodynamic response induced by LL-BFR training is similar to that elicited by high-load (HL) training. Training volume, cuff pressure and width were identified as significant moderators in our subgroup and meta-regression analyses. After 30 min of training, resting systolic blood pressure significantly decreased (WMD: −6.595, 95% CI: −8.88, −3.31, p < 0.01) in the LL-BFR training group, but resting hemodynamic indexes exhibited no significant differences compared with common LL and HL training; long-term LL-BFR training resulted in significant improvements in flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) (WMD: 1.30, 95% CI: 0.50, 2.10, p < 0.01), cardio ankle vascular index (CAVI) (WMD: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.11, 0.99, p < 0.05) and ankle brachial index (ABI) (WMD: 0.03, 95% CI: 0.00, 0.06, p < 0.05) in older adults. Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis reveals that LL-BFR training will cause an acute hemodynamic response in older adults, which can return to normal levels 30 min after training, and systolic blood pressure significantly decreased. Furthermore, the beneficial effect of LL-BFR training on vascular function is to improve FMD, CAVI and ABI of older adults. However, due to the influence of the quality of the included studies and the sample size, more high-quality studies are needed to confirm such issues as BFR pressure and training risk.]]></abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>35682336</pmid><doi>10.3390/ijerph19116750</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1660-4601 |
ispartof | International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022-05, Vol.19 (11), p.6750 |
issn | 1660-4601 1661-7827 1660-4601 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9180641 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; PubMed Central Open Access |
subjects | Adults Aged Ankle Bias Blood flow Blood Flow Restriction Therapy Blood pressure Cardiovascular disease Cardiovascular system Clinical trials Collaboration Compliance Data processing Heart rate Hemodynamic responses Hemodynamics Humans Intervention Meta-analysis Muscle Strength - physiology Muscle, Skeletal - physiology Older people Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Regional Blood Flow - physiology Resistance Training - methods Review Software Strength training Subgroups Variance analysis Vasodilation |
title | Effects of Low-Load Blood Flow Restriction Training on Hemodynamic Responses and Vascular Function in Older Adults: A Meta-Analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T17%3A00%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20Low-Load%20Blood%20Flow%20Restriction%20Training%20on%20Hemodynamic%20Responses%20and%20Vascular%20Function%20in%20Older%20Adults:%20A%20Meta-Analysis&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20environmental%20research%20and%20public%20health&rft.au=Zhang,%20Tianqi&rft.date=2022-05-31&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=6750&rft.pages=6750-&rft.issn=1660-4601&rft.eissn=1660-4601&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/ijerph19116750&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2674354499%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2674354499&rft_id=info:pmid/35682336&rfr_iscdi=true |