Interspecific variation in wildlife responses to cattle, swine and chicken feed in the forests surrounding poultry farms
To strengthen farm biosecurity, wildlife behaviors around livestock environments require significant attention. Livestock feed is considered one of essential factors that attract wildlife to the livestock environment. We experimentally studied wildlife response to cattle, swine, and chicken concentr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Veterinary Medical Science 2022, Vol.84(5), pp.653-659 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 659 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 653 |
container_title | Journal of Veterinary Medical Science |
container_volume | 84 |
creator | SAKAMOTO, Shinsuke H. MIYAMOTO, Yasuyuki UKYO, Rina IEIRI, Seiji |
description | To strengthen farm biosecurity, wildlife behaviors around livestock environments require significant attention. Livestock feed is considered one of essential factors that attract wildlife to the livestock environment. We experimentally studied wildlife response to cattle, swine, and chicken concentrated feeds in the forests surrounding poultry farms. In 14 feeding sites, four feed conditions were established: without feed (control); cattle feed; chicken feed; and swine feed. Wildlife behaviors at each feed point were monitored using infrared cameras. In 3,175 videos, 10 mammals were photographed on 10 or more occasions. Wildlife more frequently appeared at the points with feed than without feed. In addition, the number of videos that captured foraging or interest behaviors was largest for swine feed, followed by chicken feed, then cattle feed. There was a large difference among wildlife in their response to livestock feeds, although each species did not have a strong preference for a specific feed. Livestock feeds invite frequent visits by high and moderate response groups, especially omnivores and carnivores with omnivorous tendencies. Therefore, to protect against such wildlife intrusion, leftover feed and feed storage must be properly managed. This study also suggests that livestock feeds may not cause intrusions by rare response group species; hence, if their intrusions occur, they may be due to factors other than livestock feed. The study situation can partly reflect actual feed-stealing situations. The results will contribute to consider the properly management to protect livestock environments from wildlife intrusions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1292/jvms.21-0627 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9177399</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2641863380</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-dcba29e24e6ea5b7361a3230dcae404d9a8b17b01fb147e06a7c6d2fbf6390ac3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1v1DAURS0EotPCjjWyxIZFU_wVO94glapApUpsYG05zsuMh8QebGdK_z0JM4yAjd_inXfkq4vQK0quKNPs3XY_5itGKyKZeoJWlAtVKcH1U7QimspKsZqcofOct4QwKqR-js54zamoFV2hn3ehQMo7cL73Du9t8rb4GLAP-MEP3eB7wAnyLoYMGZeInS1lgEucH3wAbEOH3ca77xBwD9Atd2UDuI_zUck4TynFKXQ-rPEuTkNJj7i3acwv0LPeDhleHucF-vbx9uvN5-r-y6e7m-v7yomGlqpzrWUamAAJtm4Vl9RyxknnLAgiOm2blqqW0L6lQgGRVjnZsb7tJdfEOn6B3h-8u6kdoXMQSrKD2SU_2vRoovXm303wG7OOe6OpUlzrWfD2KEjxxzSHMqPPDobBBohTNkwK2kjOGzKjb_5Dt3FKYY43U3XDaV3_Fl4eKJdizgn602coMUulZqnUMGqWSmf89d8BTvCfDmfgwwHY5mLXcAJsKt4NcLA1wtTLc7Selm5jk4HAfwGH_bjs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2658315599</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interspecific variation in wildlife responses to cattle, swine and chicken feed in the forests surrounding poultry farms</title><source>J-STAGE Free</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>SAKAMOTO, Shinsuke H. ; MIYAMOTO, Yasuyuki ; UKYO, Rina ; IEIRI, Seiji</creator><creatorcontrib>SAKAMOTO, Shinsuke H. ; MIYAMOTO, Yasuyuki ; UKYO, Rina ; IEIRI, Seiji</creatorcontrib><description>To strengthen farm biosecurity, wildlife behaviors around livestock environments require significant attention. Livestock feed is considered one of essential factors that attract wildlife to the livestock environment. We experimentally studied wildlife response to cattle, swine, and chicken concentrated feeds in the forests surrounding poultry farms. In 14 feeding sites, four feed conditions were established: without feed (control); cattle feed; chicken feed; and swine feed. Wildlife behaviors at each feed point were monitored using infrared cameras. In 3,175 videos, 10 mammals were photographed on 10 or more occasions. Wildlife more frequently appeared at the points with feed than without feed. In addition, the number of videos that captured foraging or interest behaviors was largest for swine feed, followed by chicken feed, then cattle feed. There was a large difference among wildlife in their response to livestock feeds, although each species did not have a strong preference for a specific feed. Livestock feeds invite frequent visits by high and moderate response groups, especially omnivores and carnivores with omnivorous tendencies. Therefore, to protect against such wildlife intrusion, leftover feed and feed storage must be properly managed. This study also suggests that livestock feeds may not cause intrusions by rare response group species; hence, if their intrusions occur, they may be due to factors other than livestock feed. The study situation can partly reflect actual feed-stealing situations. The results will contribute to consider the properly management to protect livestock environments from wildlife intrusions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0916-7250</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1347-7439</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1292/jvms.21-0627</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35314571</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Japan: JAPANESE SOCIETY OF VETERINARY SCIENCE</publisher><subject>Animals ; Animals, Wild ; Cameras ; Carnivores ; Cattle ; Chickens ; Farms ; feed damage ; Feeds ; Foraging behavior ; Forests ; Livestock ; Mammals ; Poultry ; Poultry farming ; production management ; Rare species ; Swine ; Wildlife ; Wildlife Science</subject><ispartof>Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, 2022, Vol.84(5), pp.653-659</ispartof><rights>2022 by the Japanese Society of Veterinary Science</rights><rights>2022. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 The Japanese Society of Veterinary Science 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-dcba29e24e6ea5b7361a3230dcae404d9a8b17b01fb147e06a7c6d2fbf6390ac3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9177399/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9177399/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,1877,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35314571$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>SAKAMOTO, Shinsuke H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MIYAMOTO, Yasuyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>UKYO, Rina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>IEIRI, Seiji</creatorcontrib><title>Interspecific variation in wildlife responses to cattle, swine and chicken feed in the forests surrounding poultry farms</title><title>Journal of Veterinary Medical Science</title><addtitle>J. Vet. Med. Sci.</addtitle><description>To strengthen farm biosecurity, wildlife behaviors around livestock environments require significant attention. Livestock feed is considered one of essential factors that attract wildlife to the livestock environment. We experimentally studied wildlife response to cattle, swine, and chicken concentrated feeds in the forests surrounding poultry farms. In 14 feeding sites, four feed conditions were established: without feed (control); cattle feed; chicken feed; and swine feed. Wildlife behaviors at each feed point were monitored using infrared cameras. In 3,175 videos, 10 mammals were photographed on 10 or more occasions. Wildlife more frequently appeared at the points with feed than without feed. In addition, the number of videos that captured foraging or interest behaviors was largest for swine feed, followed by chicken feed, then cattle feed. There was a large difference among wildlife in their response to livestock feeds, although each species did not have a strong preference for a specific feed. Livestock feeds invite frequent visits by high and moderate response groups, especially omnivores and carnivores with omnivorous tendencies. Therefore, to protect against such wildlife intrusion, leftover feed and feed storage must be properly managed. This study also suggests that livestock feeds may not cause intrusions by rare response group species; hence, if their intrusions occur, they may be due to factors other than livestock feed. The study situation can partly reflect actual feed-stealing situations. The results will contribute to consider the properly management to protect livestock environments from wildlife intrusions.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Animals, Wild</subject><subject>Cameras</subject><subject>Carnivores</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Chickens</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>feed damage</subject><subject>Feeds</subject><subject>Foraging behavior</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Mammals</subject><subject>Poultry</subject><subject>Poultry farming</subject><subject>production management</subject><subject>Rare species</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><subject>Wildlife Science</subject><issn>0916-7250</issn><issn>1347-7439</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1v1DAURS0EotPCjjWyxIZFU_wVO94glapApUpsYG05zsuMh8QebGdK_z0JM4yAjd_inXfkq4vQK0quKNPs3XY_5itGKyKZeoJWlAtVKcH1U7QimspKsZqcofOct4QwKqR-js54zamoFV2hn3ehQMo7cL73Du9t8rb4GLAP-MEP3eB7wAnyLoYMGZeInS1lgEucH3wAbEOH3ca77xBwD9Atd2UDuI_zUck4TynFKXQ-rPEuTkNJj7i3acwv0LPeDhleHucF-vbx9uvN5-r-y6e7m-v7yomGlqpzrWUamAAJtm4Vl9RyxknnLAgiOm2blqqW0L6lQgGRVjnZsb7tJdfEOn6B3h-8u6kdoXMQSrKD2SU_2vRoovXm303wG7OOe6OpUlzrWfD2KEjxxzSHMqPPDobBBohTNkwK2kjOGzKjb_5Dt3FKYY43U3XDaV3_Fl4eKJdizgn602coMUulZqnUMGqWSmf89d8BTvCfDmfgwwHY5mLXcAJsKt4NcLA1wtTLc7Selm5jk4HAfwGH_bjs</recordid><startdate>20220501</startdate><enddate>20220501</enddate><creator>SAKAMOTO, Shinsuke H.</creator><creator>MIYAMOTO, Yasuyuki</creator><creator>UKYO, Rina</creator><creator>IEIRI, Seiji</creator><general>JAPANESE SOCIETY OF VETERINARY SCIENCE</general><general>Japan Science and Technology Agency</general><general>The Japanese Society of Veterinary Science</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220501</creationdate><title>Interspecific variation in wildlife responses to cattle, swine and chicken feed in the forests surrounding poultry farms</title><author>SAKAMOTO, Shinsuke H. ; MIYAMOTO, Yasuyuki ; UKYO, Rina ; IEIRI, Seiji</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-dcba29e24e6ea5b7361a3230dcae404d9a8b17b01fb147e06a7c6d2fbf6390ac3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Animals, Wild</topic><topic>Cameras</topic><topic>Carnivores</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Chickens</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>feed damage</topic><topic>Feeds</topic><topic>Foraging behavior</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Mammals</topic><topic>Poultry</topic><topic>Poultry farming</topic><topic>production management</topic><topic>Rare species</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><topic>Wildlife Science</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SAKAMOTO, Shinsuke H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MIYAMOTO, Yasuyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>UKYO, Rina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>IEIRI, Seiji</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of Veterinary Medical Science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SAKAMOTO, Shinsuke H.</au><au>MIYAMOTO, Yasuyuki</au><au>UKYO, Rina</au><au>IEIRI, Seiji</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interspecific variation in wildlife responses to cattle, swine and chicken feed in the forests surrounding poultry farms</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Veterinary Medical Science</jtitle><addtitle>J. Vet. Med. Sci.</addtitle><date>2022-05-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>653</spage><epage>659</epage><pages>653-659</pages><artnum>21-0627</artnum><issn>0916-7250</issn><eissn>1347-7439</eissn><abstract>To strengthen farm biosecurity, wildlife behaviors around livestock environments require significant attention. Livestock feed is considered one of essential factors that attract wildlife to the livestock environment. We experimentally studied wildlife response to cattle, swine, and chicken concentrated feeds in the forests surrounding poultry farms. In 14 feeding sites, four feed conditions were established: without feed (control); cattle feed; chicken feed; and swine feed. Wildlife behaviors at each feed point were monitored using infrared cameras. In 3,175 videos, 10 mammals were photographed on 10 or more occasions. Wildlife more frequently appeared at the points with feed than without feed. In addition, the number of videos that captured foraging or interest behaviors was largest for swine feed, followed by chicken feed, then cattle feed. There was a large difference among wildlife in their response to livestock feeds, although each species did not have a strong preference for a specific feed. Livestock feeds invite frequent visits by high and moderate response groups, especially omnivores and carnivores with omnivorous tendencies. Therefore, to protect against such wildlife intrusion, leftover feed and feed storage must be properly managed. This study also suggests that livestock feeds may not cause intrusions by rare response group species; hence, if their intrusions occur, they may be due to factors other than livestock feed. The study situation can partly reflect actual feed-stealing situations. The results will contribute to consider the properly management to protect livestock environments from wildlife intrusions.</abstract><cop>Japan</cop><pub>JAPANESE SOCIETY OF VETERINARY SCIENCE</pub><pmid>35314571</pmid><doi>10.1292/jvms.21-0627</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0916-7250 |
ispartof | Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, 2022, Vol.84(5), pp.653-659 |
issn | 0916-7250 1347-7439 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9177399 |
source | J-STAGE Free; MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access |
subjects | Animals Animals, Wild Cameras Carnivores Cattle Chickens Farms feed damage Feeds Foraging behavior Forests Livestock Mammals Poultry Poultry farming production management Rare species Swine Wildlife Wildlife Science |
title | Interspecific variation in wildlife responses to cattle, swine and chicken feed in the forests surrounding poultry farms |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T13%3A58%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interspecific%20variation%20in%20wildlife%20responses%20to%20cattle,%20swine%20and%20chicken%20feed%20in%20the%20forests%20surrounding%20poultry%20farms&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Veterinary%20Medical%20Science&rft.au=SAKAMOTO,%20Shinsuke%20H.&rft.date=2022-05-01&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=653&rft.epage=659&rft.pages=653-659&rft.artnum=21-0627&rft.issn=0916-7250&rft.eissn=1347-7439&rft_id=info:doi/10.1292/jvms.21-0627&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2641863380%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2658315599&rft_id=info:pmid/35314571&rfr_iscdi=true |