Screening check test to confirm the relative reactivity and applicability of 2,4‐dinitrophenylhydrazine impregnated‐filters for formaldehyde on other compounds
Objectives A simple check test method was designed to confirm whether a 2,4‐dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH) filter for formaldehyde can be used to measure other compounds. Methods Sample mixtures containing the same concentrations of formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, and acetone were spiked to the DNPH‐filt...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of occupational health 2022-01, Vol.64 (1), p.e12333-n/a |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | n/a |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | e12333 |
| container_title | Journal of occupational health |
| container_volume | 64 |
| creator | Inoue, Naoko Takaya, Mitsutoshi |
| description | Objectives
A simple check test method was designed to confirm whether a 2,4‐dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH) filter for formaldehyde can be used to measure other compounds.
Methods
Sample mixtures containing the same concentrations of formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, and acetone were spiked to the DNPH‐filter, extracted, and then measured using high performance liquid chromatography with photodiode array detector (HPLC‐PDA). The amounts of DNPH‐derivatives versus the amounts of spiked samples were then plotted.
Results
When the amount of DNPH > acetone. This order corresponded to the relative rate constants for the reaction. Therefore, this study confirmed that acetone was not collected at the formaldehyde sampling rate.
Conclusions
This check test easily measured the reaction rate order and can be used as a simple test to determine whether other samples can be measured by the analytical methods used for the specified sample. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/1348-9585.12333 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9176714</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2655103726</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5973-c510c8f4818f22b0ac129042c0143083503015c44d3ed2beeebbc55f5bed2eb63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFks1u1DAQxyMEomXhzA1Z4sKBbf2ZjwsSqoCCKvUAnC3HmWxcHDvYTlE48Qi8A2_Gk-CwZVW4cLA9tn_-z4xniuIxwScEY3pKGK-3jajFCaGMsTvF8eHk7i37qHgQ4xXGjLKa3S-OmOAl5YIfFz_e6wDgjNshPYD-hBLEhJJH2rvehBGlAVAAq5K5Xg2ls2HSgpTrkJoma7RqjV1PfI_oc_7z2_fOOJOCnwZwix2WLqivxgEy4xRg51SCLkO9sQlCRL0P6xiV7SCzgLxDPjsNOYJx8rPr4sPiXq9shEc366b4-PrVh7Pz7cXlm7dnLy-2WjQVyzPBuu55Teqe0hYrTWiDOdWYcIZrJjDDRGjOOwYdbQGgbbUQvWjzFtqSbYoXe91pbkfoNLgUlJVTMKMKi_TKyL9vnBnkzl_LhlRllZ1simc3AsF_nvNHytFEDdYqB36OkpYix8gquvp6-g965efgcnqSVqKmtCJNnanTPaWDjzFAfwiGYLk2gFxLLNcSy98NkF88uZ3Dgf9T8QyUe-CLsbD8T0--uzyne-VfgUXBvQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2758227198</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Screening check test to confirm the relative reactivity and applicability of 2,4‐dinitrophenylhydrazine impregnated‐filters for formaldehyde on other compounds</title><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>J-STAGE (Japan Science & Technology Information Aggregator, Electronic) Freely Available Titles - Japanese</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Inoue, Naoko ; Takaya, Mitsutoshi</creator><creatorcontrib>Inoue, Naoko ; Takaya, Mitsutoshi</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
A simple check test method was designed to confirm whether a 2,4‐dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH) filter for formaldehyde can be used to measure other compounds.
Methods
Sample mixtures containing the same concentrations of formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, and acetone were spiked to the DNPH‐filter, extracted, and then measured using high performance liquid chromatography with photodiode array detector (HPLC‐PDA). The amounts of DNPH‐derivatives versus the amounts of spiked samples were then plotted.
Results
When the amount of DNPH << the total amount of spiked samples, the amount of DNPH‐derivatives was formaldehyde > acetaldehyde >> acetone. This order corresponded to the relative rate constants for the reaction. Therefore, this study confirmed that acetone was not collected at the formaldehyde sampling rate.
Conclusions
This check test easily measured the reaction rate order and can be used as a simple test to determine whether other samples can be measured by the analytical methods used for the specified sample.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1348-9585</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1341-9145</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1348-9585</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/1348-9585.12333</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35462454</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Acetaldehyde ; Acetaldehyde - analysis ; Acetone ; Acetone - analysis ; aldehyde ; Aldehydes ; Analytical methods ; Brief Report ; Brief Reports ; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid - methods ; DNPH ; Formaldehyde ; Formaldehyde - analysis ; High performance liquid chromatography ; Humans ; ketone ; Liquid chromatography ; Methods ; Occupational health ; passive sampler ; Phenylhydrazines - chemistry ; Photodiodes ; Rate constants ; reactivity screening</subject><ispartof>Journal of occupational health, 2022-01, Vol.64 (1), p.e12333-n/a</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japan Society for Occupational Health</rights><rights>2022 The Authors. Journal of Occupational Health published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japan Society for Occupational Health.</rights><rights>2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5973-c510c8f4818f22b0ac129042c0143083503015c44d3ed2beeebbc55f5bed2eb63</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8992-7221 ; 0000-0002-4917-5261</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9176714/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9176714/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35462454$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Inoue, Naoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takaya, Mitsutoshi</creatorcontrib><title>Screening check test to confirm the relative reactivity and applicability of 2,4‐dinitrophenylhydrazine impregnated‐filters for formaldehyde on other compounds</title><title>Journal of occupational health</title><addtitle>J Occup Health</addtitle><description>Objectives
A simple check test method was designed to confirm whether a 2,4‐dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH) filter for formaldehyde can be used to measure other compounds.
Methods
Sample mixtures containing the same concentrations of formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, and acetone were spiked to the DNPH‐filter, extracted, and then measured using high performance liquid chromatography with photodiode array detector (HPLC‐PDA). The amounts of DNPH‐derivatives versus the amounts of spiked samples were then plotted.
Results
When the amount of DNPH << the total amount of spiked samples, the amount of DNPH‐derivatives was formaldehyde > acetaldehyde >> acetone. This order corresponded to the relative rate constants for the reaction. Therefore, this study confirmed that acetone was not collected at the formaldehyde sampling rate.
Conclusions
This check test easily measured the reaction rate order and can be used as a simple test to determine whether other samples can be measured by the analytical methods used for the specified sample.</description><subject>Acetaldehyde</subject><subject>Acetaldehyde - analysis</subject><subject>Acetone</subject><subject>Acetone - analysis</subject><subject>aldehyde</subject><subject>Aldehydes</subject><subject>Analytical methods</subject><subject>Brief Report</subject><subject>Brief Reports</subject><subject>Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid - methods</subject><subject>DNPH</subject><subject>Formaldehyde</subject><subject>Formaldehyde - analysis</subject><subject>High performance liquid chromatography</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>ketone</subject><subject>Liquid chromatography</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Occupational health</subject><subject>passive sampler</subject><subject>Phenylhydrazines - chemistry</subject><subject>Photodiodes</subject><subject>Rate constants</subject><subject>reactivity screening</subject><issn>1348-9585</issn><issn>1341-9145</issn><issn>1348-9585</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFks1u1DAQxyMEomXhzA1Z4sKBbf2ZjwsSqoCCKvUAnC3HmWxcHDvYTlE48Qi8A2_Gk-CwZVW4cLA9tn_-z4xniuIxwScEY3pKGK-3jajFCaGMsTvF8eHk7i37qHgQ4xXGjLKa3S-OmOAl5YIfFz_e6wDgjNshPYD-hBLEhJJH2rvehBGlAVAAq5K5Xg2ls2HSgpTrkJoma7RqjV1PfI_oc_7z2_fOOJOCnwZwix2WLqivxgEy4xRg51SCLkO9sQlCRL0P6xiV7SCzgLxDPjsNOYJx8rPr4sPiXq9shEc366b4-PrVh7Pz7cXlm7dnLy-2WjQVyzPBuu55Teqe0hYrTWiDOdWYcIZrJjDDRGjOOwYdbQGgbbUQvWjzFtqSbYoXe91pbkfoNLgUlJVTMKMKi_TKyL9vnBnkzl_LhlRllZ1simc3AsF_nvNHytFEDdYqB36OkpYix8gquvp6-g965efgcnqSVqKmtCJNnanTPaWDjzFAfwiGYLk2gFxLLNcSy98NkF88uZ3Dgf9T8QyUe-CLsbD8T0--uzyne-VfgUXBvQ</recordid><startdate>202201</startdate><enddate>202201</enddate><creator>Inoue, Naoko</creator><creator>Takaya, Mitsutoshi</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8992-7221</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4917-5261</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202201</creationdate><title>Screening check test to confirm the relative reactivity and applicability of 2,4‐dinitrophenylhydrazine impregnated‐filters for formaldehyde on other compounds</title><author>Inoue, Naoko ; Takaya, Mitsutoshi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5973-c510c8f4818f22b0ac129042c0143083503015c44d3ed2beeebbc55f5bed2eb63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Acetaldehyde</topic><topic>Acetaldehyde - analysis</topic><topic>Acetone</topic><topic>Acetone - analysis</topic><topic>aldehyde</topic><topic>Aldehydes</topic><topic>Analytical methods</topic><topic>Brief Report</topic><topic>Brief Reports</topic><topic>Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid - methods</topic><topic>DNPH</topic><topic>Formaldehyde</topic><topic>Formaldehyde - analysis</topic><topic>High performance liquid chromatography</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>ketone</topic><topic>Liquid chromatography</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Occupational health</topic><topic>passive sampler</topic><topic>Phenylhydrazines - chemistry</topic><topic>Photodiodes</topic><topic>Rate constants</topic><topic>reactivity screening</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Inoue, Naoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takaya, Mitsutoshi</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of occupational health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Inoue, Naoko</au><au>Takaya, Mitsutoshi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Screening check test to confirm the relative reactivity and applicability of 2,4‐dinitrophenylhydrazine impregnated‐filters for formaldehyde on other compounds</atitle><jtitle>Journal of occupational health</jtitle><addtitle>J Occup Health</addtitle><date>2022-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e12333</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e12333-n/a</pages><issn>1348-9585</issn><issn>1341-9145</issn><eissn>1348-9585</eissn><abstract>Objectives
A simple check test method was designed to confirm whether a 2,4‐dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH) filter for formaldehyde can be used to measure other compounds.
Methods
Sample mixtures containing the same concentrations of formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, and acetone were spiked to the DNPH‐filter, extracted, and then measured using high performance liquid chromatography with photodiode array detector (HPLC‐PDA). The amounts of DNPH‐derivatives versus the amounts of spiked samples were then plotted.
Results
When the amount of DNPH << the total amount of spiked samples, the amount of DNPH‐derivatives was formaldehyde > acetaldehyde >> acetone. This order corresponded to the relative rate constants for the reaction. Therefore, this study confirmed that acetone was not collected at the formaldehyde sampling rate.
Conclusions
This check test easily measured the reaction rate order and can be used as a simple test to determine whether other samples can be measured by the analytical methods used for the specified sample.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>35462454</pmid><doi>10.1002/1348-9585.12333</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8992-7221</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4917-5261</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1348-9585 |
| ispartof | Journal of occupational health, 2022-01, Vol.64 (1), p.e12333-n/a |
| issn | 1348-9585 1341-9145 1348-9585 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9176714 |
| source | Oxford Journals Open Access Collection; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; J-STAGE (Japan Science & Technology Information Aggregator, Electronic) Freely Available Titles - Japanese; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central |
| subjects | Acetaldehyde Acetaldehyde - analysis Acetone Acetone - analysis aldehyde Aldehydes Analytical methods Brief Report Brief Reports Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid - methods DNPH Formaldehyde Formaldehyde - analysis High performance liquid chromatography Humans ketone Liquid chromatography Methods Occupational health passive sampler Phenylhydrazines - chemistry Photodiodes Rate constants reactivity screening |
| title | Screening check test to confirm the relative reactivity and applicability of 2,4‐dinitrophenylhydrazine impregnated‐filters for formaldehyde on other compounds |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T17%3A19%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Screening%20check%20test%20to%20confirm%20the%20relative%20reactivity%20and%20applicability%20of%202,4%E2%80%90dinitrophenylhydrazine%20impregnated%E2%80%90filters%20for%20formaldehyde%20on%20other%20compounds&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20occupational%20health&rft.au=Inoue,%20Naoko&rft.date=2022-01&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e12333&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e12333-n/a&rft.issn=1348-9585&rft.eissn=1348-9585&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/1348-9585.12333&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2655103726%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2758227198&rft_id=info:pmid/35462454&rfr_iscdi=true |