Diagnostic value of HSP90α and related markers in lung cancer
Purpose To investigate the expression of heat shock protein 90α (HSP90α) in patients with lung cancer (LC) and the clinical value of HSP90α and other related markers in the diagnosis of LC. Methods Of 335 patients enrolled in the study cohort, 175 were screened for LC and 160 were healthy (HC). The...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical laboratory analysis 2022-06, Vol.36 (6), p.e24462-n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose
To investigate the expression of heat shock protein 90α (HSP90α) in patients with lung cancer (LC) and the clinical value of HSP90α and other related markers in the diagnosis of LC.
Methods
Of 335 patients enrolled in the study cohort, 175 were screened for LC and 160 were healthy (HC). The plasma levels of HSP90α and related markers (CEA, NSE, CYFRA21‐1 and ProGRP) were detected in all individuals in the cohort by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Groups were divided according to gender (male/female), age (≤60 years/>60 years), types of LC (small‐cell carcinoma, squamous carcinoma and adenocarcinoma), staging (I, II, III and IV) and metastasis (metastasis and non‐metastasis) separately. Wilcoxon Mann–Whitney test and Kruskal–Wallis test were used to compare statistical differences between two groups/among the multiple groups for each factor of HSP90α. The r‐value and Kappa were used to compare HSP90α with related markers, and the receiver operating curve (ROC) was used to evaluate the efficacy of plasma HSP90α in predicting LC.
Results
No statistical difference was found in the plasma level of HSP90α among different age and gender groups (p > 0.05). In the group divided by LC type, staging and metastasis status, there were statistical differences among different groups in HSP90α level (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0887-8013 1098-2825 |
DOI: | 10.1002/jcla.24462 |