Theatre ventilation
Owing to the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been significant disruption to all surgical specialties. In the UK, units have cancelled elective surgery and a decrease in aerosol generating procedures (AGPs) was favoured. Centres around the world advocate the use of negative pressure environments for AGP...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 2021-03, Vol.103 (3), p.151-154 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 154 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 151 |
container_title | Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England |
container_volume | 103 |
creator | Theodorou, C Simpson, G S Walsh, C J |
description | Owing to the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been significant disruption to all surgical specialties. In the UK, units have cancelled elective surgery and a decrease in aerosol generating procedures (AGPs) was favoured. Centres around the world advocate the use of negative pressure environments for AGPs in reducing the spread of infectious airborne particles. We present an overview of operating theatre ventilation systems and the respective evidence with relation to surgical site infection (SSI) and airborne pathogen transmission in light of COVID-19.
A literature search was conducted using the PubMed, Cochrane Library and MEDLINE databases. Search terms included "COVID-19", "theatre ventilation", "laminar", "turbulent" and "negative pressure".
Evidence for laminar flow ventilation in reducing the rate of SSI in orthopaedic surgery is widely documented. There is little evidence to support its use in general surgery. Following previous viral outbreaks, some centres have introduced negative pressure ventilation in an attempt to decrease exposure of airborne pathogens to staff and surrounding areas. This has again been suggested during the COVID-19 pandemic. A limited number of studies show some positive results for the use of negative pressure ventilation systems and reduction in spread of pathogens; however, cost, accessibility and duration of conversion remain an unexplored issue. Overall, there is insufficient evidence to advocate large scale conversion at this time. Nevertheless, it may be useful for each centre to have its own negative pressure room available for AGPs and high risk patients. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1308/rcsann.2020.7146 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9157996</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2503465070</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-45d71a40bdd277b1950539a7308d31ce2849b1b9ce14fda19d90985d18cbbd583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkM1LAzEUxIMotlZPXjyJ4MXL1vfysUkughS_oOClnkM2Se2W7W5NtgX_e7e2FvX0Dm9mmPkRcoEwRAbqNrpk63pIgcJQIs8PSB-5VJkExQ5JH4CJTCnOeuQkpTkAaqnwmPQYy7mgSvbJ-WQWbBvD1TrUbVnZtmzqU3I0tVUKZ7s7IG-PD5PRczZ-fXoZ3Y8zxylvMy68RMuh8J5KWaAWIJi2sivmGbpAFdcFFtoF5FNvUXsNWgmPyhWFF4oNyN02d7kqFsG7rkG0lVnGcmHjp2lsaf5-6nJm3pu10Sik1nkXcLMLiM3HKqTWLMrkQlXZOjSrZCjXXEnFvqXX_6TzZhXrbp6hAhjPBUjoVLBVudikFMN0XwbBbIibLXGzIW42xDvL5e8Re8MPYvYFlDp8Jw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2503465070</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Theatre ventilation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Theodorou, C ; Simpson, G S ; Walsh, C J</creator><creatorcontrib>Theodorou, C ; Simpson, G S ; Walsh, C J</creatorcontrib><description>Owing to the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been significant disruption to all surgical specialties. In the UK, units have cancelled elective surgery and a decrease in aerosol generating procedures (AGPs) was favoured. Centres around the world advocate the use of negative pressure environments for AGPs in reducing the spread of infectious airborne particles. We present an overview of operating theatre ventilation systems and the respective evidence with relation to surgical site infection (SSI) and airborne pathogen transmission in light of COVID-19.
A literature search was conducted using the PubMed, Cochrane Library and MEDLINE databases. Search terms included "COVID-19", "theatre ventilation", "laminar", "turbulent" and "negative pressure".
Evidence for laminar flow ventilation in reducing the rate of SSI in orthopaedic surgery is widely documented. There is little evidence to support its use in general surgery. Following previous viral outbreaks, some centres have introduced negative pressure ventilation in an attempt to decrease exposure of airborne pathogens to staff and surrounding areas. This has again been suggested during the COVID-19 pandemic. A limited number of studies show some positive results for the use of negative pressure ventilation systems and reduction in spread of pathogens; however, cost, accessibility and duration of conversion remain an unexplored issue. Overall, there is insufficient evidence to advocate large scale conversion at this time. Nevertheless, it may be useful for each centre to have its own negative pressure room available for AGPs and high risk patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0035-8843</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1478-7083</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2020.7146</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33645287</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Aerosols ; Air Filters ; Colorectal surgery ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 - prevention & control ; COVID-19 - transmission ; Disease transmission ; Environment, Controlled ; Epidemics ; Humans ; Infections ; Operating Rooms ; Orthopedic Procedures ; Pandemics ; Patient Isolators ; Patients ; Personal protective equipment ; Review ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Surgical Procedures, Operative - methods ; Surgical Wound Infection - prevention & control ; Ventilation ; Ventilation - methods</subject><ispartof>Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2021-03, Vol.103 (3), p.151-154</ispartof><rights>Copyright Royal College of Surgeons of England Mar 2021</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021, All rights reserved by the Royal College of Surgeons of England 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-45d71a40bdd277b1950539a7308d31ce2849b1b9ce14fda19d90985d18cbbd583</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-45d71a40bdd277b1950539a7308d31ce2849b1b9ce14fda19d90985d18cbbd583</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9157996/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9157996/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33645287$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Theodorou, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simpson, G S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walsh, C J</creatorcontrib><title>Theatre ventilation</title><title>Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England</title><addtitle>Ann R Coll Surg Engl</addtitle><description>Owing to the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been significant disruption to all surgical specialties. In the UK, units have cancelled elective surgery and a decrease in aerosol generating procedures (AGPs) was favoured. Centres around the world advocate the use of negative pressure environments for AGPs in reducing the spread of infectious airborne particles. We present an overview of operating theatre ventilation systems and the respective evidence with relation to surgical site infection (SSI) and airborne pathogen transmission in light of COVID-19.
A literature search was conducted using the PubMed, Cochrane Library and MEDLINE databases. Search terms included "COVID-19", "theatre ventilation", "laminar", "turbulent" and "negative pressure".
Evidence for laminar flow ventilation in reducing the rate of SSI in orthopaedic surgery is widely documented. There is little evidence to support its use in general surgery. Following previous viral outbreaks, some centres have introduced negative pressure ventilation in an attempt to decrease exposure of airborne pathogens to staff and surrounding areas. This has again been suggested during the COVID-19 pandemic. A limited number of studies show some positive results for the use of negative pressure ventilation systems and reduction in spread of pathogens; however, cost, accessibility and duration of conversion remain an unexplored issue. Overall, there is insufficient evidence to advocate large scale conversion at this time. Nevertheless, it may be useful for each centre to have its own negative pressure room available for AGPs and high risk patients.</description><subject>Aerosols</subject><subject>Air Filters</subject><subject>Colorectal surgery</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 - prevention & control</subject><subject>COVID-19 - transmission</subject><subject>Disease transmission</subject><subject>Environment, Controlled</subject><subject>Epidemics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Operating Rooms</subject><subject>Orthopedic Procedures</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Patient Isolators</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Personal protective equipment</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2</subject><subject>Surgical Procedures, Operative - methods</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection - prevention & control</subject><subject>Ventilation</subject><subject>Ventilation - methods</subject><issn>0035-8843</issn><issn>1478-7083</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkM1LAzEUxIMotlZPXjyJ4MXL1vfysUkughS_oOClnkM2Se2W7W5NtgX_e7e2FvX0Dm9mmPkRcoEwRAbqNrpk63pIgcJQIs8PSB-5VJkExQ5JH4CJTCnOeuQkpTkAaqnwmPQYy7mgSvbJ-WQWbBvD1TrUbVnZtmzqU3I0tVUKZ7s7IG-PD5PRczZ-fXoZ3Y8zxylvMy68RMuh8J5KWaAWIJi2sivmGbpAFdcFFtoF5FNvUXsNWgmPyhWFF4oNyN02d7kqFsG7rkG0lVnGcmHjp2lsaf5-6nJm3pu10Sik1nkXcLMLiM3HKqTWLMrkQlXZOjSrZCjXXEnFvqXX_6TzZhXrbp6hAhjPBUjoVLBVudikFMN0XwbBbIibLXGzIW42xDvL5e8Re8MPYvYFlDp8Jw</recordid><startdate>202103</startdate><enddate>202103</enddate><creator>Theodorou, C</creator><creator>Simpson, G S</creator><creator>Walsh, C J</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>Royal College of Surgeons</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>EHMNL</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202103</creationdate><title>Theatre ventilation</title><author>Theodorou, C ; Simpson, G S ; Walsh, C J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-45d71a40bdd277b1950539a7308d31ce2849b1b9ce14fda19d90985d18cbbd583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Aerosols</topic><topic>Air Filters</topic><topic>Colorectal surgery</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 - prevention & control</topic><topic>COVID-19 - transmission</topic><topic>Disease transmission</topic><topic>Environment, Controlled</topic><topic>Epidemics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Operating Rooms</topic><topic>Orthopedic Procedures</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Patient Isolators</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Personal protective equipment</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2</topic><topic>Surgical Procedures, Operative - methods</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection - prevention & control</topic><topic>Ventilation</topic><topic>Ventilation - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Theodorou, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simpson, G S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walsh, C J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>UK & Ireland Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Theodorou, C</au><au>Simpson, G S</au><au>Walsh, C J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Theatre ventilation</atitle><jtitle>Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England</jtitle><addtitle>Ann R Coll Surg Engl</addtitle><date>2021-03</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>103</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>151</spage><epage>154</epage><pages>151-154</pages><issn>0035-8843</issn><eissn>1478-7083</eissn><abstract>Owing to the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been significant disruption to all surgical specialties. In the UK, units have cancelled elective surgery and a decrease in aerosol generating procedures (AGPs) was favoured. Centres around the world advocate the use of negative pressure environments for AGPs in reducing the spread of infectious airborne particles. We present an overview of operating theatre ventilation systems and the respective evidence with relation to surgical site infection (SSI) and airborne pathogen transmission in light of COVID-19.
A literature search was conducted using the PubMed, Cochrane Library and MEDLINE databases. Search terms included "COVID-19", "theatre ventilation", "laminar", "turbulent" and "negative pressure".
Evidence for laminar flow ventilation in reducing the rate of SSI in orthopaedic surgery is widely documented. There is little evidence to support its use in general surgery. Following previous viral outbreaks, some centres have introduced negative pressure ventilation in an attempt to decrease exposure of airborne pathogens to staff and surrounding areas. This has again been suggested during the COVID-19 pandemic. A limited number of studies show some positive results for the use of negative pressure ventilation systems and reduction in spread of pathogens; however, cost, accessibility and duration of conversion remain an unexplored issue. Overall, there is insufficient evidence to advocate large scale conversion at this time. Nevertheless, it may be useful for each centre to have its own negative pressure room available for AGPs and high risk patients.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><pmid>33645287</pmid><doi>10.1308/rcsann.2020.7146</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0035-8843 |
ispartof | Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2021-03, Vol.103 (3), p.151-154 |
issn | 0035-8843 1478-7083 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9157996 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Aerosols Air Filters Colorectal surgery Coronaviruses COVID-19 COVID-19 - prevention & control COVID-19 - transmission Disease transmission Environment, Controlled Epidemics Humans Infections Operating Rooms Orthopedic Procedures Pandemics Patient Isolators Patients Personal protective equipment Review SARS-CoV-2 Surgical Procedures, Operative - methods Surgical Wound Infection - prevention & control Ventilation Ventilation - methods |
title | Theatre ventilation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T05%3A25%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Theatre%20ventilation&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20the%20Royal%20College%20of%20Surgeons%20of%20England&rft.au=Theodorou,%20C&rft.date=2021-03&rft.volume=103&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=151&rft.epage=154&rft.pages=151-154&rft.issn=0035-8843&rft.eissn=1478-7083&rft_id=info:doi/10.1308/rcsann.2020.7146&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2503465070%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2503465070&rft_id=info:pmid/33645287&rfr_iscdi=true |