Identifying an Optimal Screen Mesh to Enable Augmentorium-Based Enhanced Biological Control of the Olive Fruit Fly Bactrocera oleae (Diptera: Tephritidae) and the Mediterranean Fruit Fly Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae)

Abstract The augmentorium is a cost-effective screened enclosure designed to receive fruits infested with insect pests, retain the pests inside but let their natural enemies escape to enhance biological control of pest populations. Screen selection is critical to ensure that an augmentorium is effec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of insect science (Tucson, Ariz.) Ariz.), 2022-05, Vol.22 (3)
Hauptverfasser: Desurmont, G A, Tannières, M, Roche, M, Blanchet, A, Manoukis, N C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page
container_title Journal of insect science (Tucson, Ariz.)
container_volume 22
creator Desurmont, G A
Tannières, M
Roche, M
Blanchet, A
Manoukis, N C
description Abstract The augmentorium is a cost-effective screened enclosure designed to receive fruits infested with insect pests, retain the pests inside but let their natural enemies escape to enhance biological control of pest populations. Screen selection is critical to ensure that an augmentorium is effective for a particular system. Here we tested five types of screens with a mini-augmentorium design and measured the escape of four insect species under laboratory conditions: the pests olive fruit fly Bactocera oleae (Rossi) (Diptera: Tephritidae) and Mediterranean fruit fly Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae), and the parasitoids Psyttalia lounsburyi (Silvestri) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) and Psyttalia ponerophaga (Silvestri) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). The sex ratio of insects that escaped the screens was compared to the sex ratio of insects that could not escape. Results showed that one screen type (‘crystal mesh’) was the best for the purpose of designing a functional augmentorium: it retained 90% of B. oleae adults and 100% of C. capitata adults while letting 72% of Psyttalia lounsburyi adults and 94% of P. ponerophaga adults escape. The other screen types tested were suboptimal, either because they let too many flies freely escape or because they retained too many parasitoids. Sex ratio was almost always similar for insects that managed to escape the screens and insects that were retained, except for P. ponerophaga and the screen type ‘light mesh’. These results are promising for the development of a functional augmentorium against the olive fruit fly and further implementation against Mediterranean fruit fly.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jisesa/ieac027
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_TOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9154345</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jisesa/ieac027</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2672326680</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-8fbdaa6ab4e62f77d372b168c9accdc0cf3a3c8269377cb793c9efb241fcfcfe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUktv1DAQjhCIlsKVI_KxPaRN7GweHJC6SxcqtdoD5RxNJpONKycOtlNp_y8_hIFdSjkg5INn9D08Hn1R9DZNztOkUhf32pOHC02AiSyeRcfpQuWxzDL5_El9FL3y_j5JZJKV1cvoSC3yjLviOPp-3dIYdLfT41bAKDZT0AMY8QUd0ShuyfciWHE1QmNIXM7bgenW6XmIl-CpZaSHEblYamvsViOLV3YMzhphOxF6EhujH0is3ayDWJudWAIyjORAWENA4vSjngK378UdTb3TQbdAZzxO-0t_S61m2MFIPOEfnxVLApO9QJh0gAD_cHodvejAeHpzuE-ir-uru9Xn-Gbz6Xp1eROjSrMQl13TAuTQZJTLrihaVcgmzUusALHFBDsFCkuZV6oosCkqhRV1jczSDvmQOok-7H2nuRmoRV6VA1NPjlfqdrUFXf-NjLqvt_ahrtJFprIFG5weDJz9NpMP9aA9kjH8dTv7WuaFVDLPy4Sp53sqOuu9o-7xmTSpf0aj3kejPkSDBe-eDvdI_50FJpztCXae_mf2AzuLzEQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2672326680</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Identifying an Optimal Screen Mesh to Enable Augmentorium-Based Enhanced Biological Control of the Olive Fruit Fly Bactrocera oleae (Diptera: Tephritidae) and the Mediterranean Fruit Fly Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae)</title><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><creator>Desurmont, G A ; Tannières, M ; Roche, M ; Blanchet, A ; Manoukis, N C</creator><contributor>Weintraub, Phyllis</contributor><creatorcontrib>Desurmont, G A ; Tannières, M ; Roche, M ; Blanchet, A ; Manoukis, N C ; Weintraub, Phyllis</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract The augmentorium is a cost-effective screened enclosure designed to receive fruits infested with insect pests, retain the pests inside but let their natural enemies escape to enhance biological control of pest populations. Screen selection is critical to ensure that an augmentorium is effective for a particular system. Here we tested five types of screens with a mini-augmentorium design and measured the escape of four insect species under laboratory conditions: the pests olive fruit fly Bactocera oleae (Rossi) (Diptera: Tephritidae) and Mediterranean fruit fly Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae), and the parasitoids Psyttalia lounsburyi (Silvestri) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) and Psyttalia ponerophaga (Silvestri) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). The sex ratio of insects that escaped the screens was compared to the sex ratio of insects that could not escape. Results showed that one screen type (‘crystal mesh’) was the best for the purpose of designing a functional augmentorium: it retained 90% of B. oleae adults and 100% of C. capitata adults while letting 72% of Psyttalia lounsburyi adults and 94% of P. ponerophaga adults escape. The other screen types tested were suboptimal, either because they let too many flies freely escape or because they retained too many parasitoids. Sex ratio was almost always similar for insects that managed to escape the screens and insects that were retained, except for P. ponerophaga and the screen type ‘light mesh’. These results are promising for the development of a functional augmentorium against the olive fruit fly and further implementation against Mediterranean fruit fly.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1536-2442</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-2442</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jisesa/ieac027</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35640027</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Animals ; Ceratitis capitata ; Drosophila ; Hymenoptera ; Olea ; Surgical Mesh ; Tephritidae</subject><ispartof>Journal of insect science (Tucson, Ariz.), 2022-05, Vol.22 (3)</ispartof><rights>Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America 2022. 2022</rights><rights>Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-8fbdaa6ab4e62f77d372b168c9accdc0cf3a3c8269377cb793c9efb241fcfcfe3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-8fbdaa6ab4e62f77d372b168c9accdc0cf3a3c8269377cb793c9efb241fcfcfe3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2701-6582 ; 0000-0001-5062-7256</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9154345/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9154345/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,1604,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/ieac027$$EView_record_in_Oxford_University_Press$$FView_record_in_$$GOxford_University_Press</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35640027$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Weintraub, Phyllis</contributor><creatorcontrib>Desurmont, G A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tannières, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roche, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanchet, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manoukis, N C</creatorcontrib><title>Identifying an Optimal Screen Mesh to Enable Augmentorium-Based Enhanced Biological Control of the Olive Fruit Fly Bactrocera oleae (Diptera: Tephritidae) and the Mediterranean Fruit Fly Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae)</title><title>Journal of insect science (Tucson, Ariz.)</title><addtitle>J Insect Sci</addtitle><description>Abstract The augmentorium is a cost-effective screened enclosure designed to receive fruits infested with insect pests, retain the pests inside but let their natural enemies escape to enhance biological control of pest populations. Screen selection is critical to ensure that an augmentorium is effective for a particular system. Here we tested five types of screens with a mini-augmentorium design and measured the escape of four insect species under laboratory conditions: the pests olive fruit fly Bactocera oleae (Rossi) (Diptera: Tephritidae) and Mediterranean fruit fly Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae), and the parasitoids Psyttalia lounsburyi (Silvestri) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) and Psyttalia ponerophaga (Silvestri) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). The sex ratio of insects that escaped the screens was compared to the sex ratio of insects that could not escape. Results showed that one screen type (‘crystal mesh’) was the best for the purpose of designing a functional augmentorium: it retained 90% of B. oleae adults and 100% of C. capitata adults while letting 72% of Psyttalia lounsburyi adults and 94% of P. ponerophaga adults escape. The other screen types tested were suboptimal, either because they let too many flies freely escape or because they retained too many parasitoids. Sex ratio was almost always similar for insects that managed to escape the screens and insects that were retained, except for P. ponerophaga and the screen type ‘light mesh’. These results are promising for the development of a functional augmentorium against the olive fruit fly and further implementation against Mediterranean fruit fly.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Ceratitis capitata</subject><subject>Drosophila</subject><subject>Hymenoptera</subject><subject>Olea</subject><subject>Surgical Mesh</subject><subject>Tephritidae</subject><issn>1536-2442</issn><issn>1536-2442</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUktv1DAQjhCIlsKVI_KxPaRN7GweHJC6SxcqtdoD5RxNJpONKycOtlNp_y8_hIFdSjkg5INn9D08Hn1R9DZNztOkUhf32pOHC02AiSyeRcfpQuWxzDL5_El9FL3y_j5JZJKV1cvoSC3yjLviOPp-3dIYdLfT41bAKDZT0AMY8QUd0ShuyfciWHE1QmNIXM7bgenW6XmIl-CpZaSHEblYamvsViOLV3YMzhphOxF6EhujH0is3ayDWJudWAIyjORAWENA4vSjngK378UdTb3TQbdAZzxO-0t_S61m2MFIPOEfnxVLApO9QJh0gAD_cHodvejAeHpzuE-ir-uru9Xn-Gbz6Xp1eROjSrMQl13TAuTQZJTLrihaVcgmzUusALHFBDsFCkuZV6oosCkqhRV1jczSDvmQOok-7H2nuRmoRV6VA1NPjlfqdrUFXf-NjLqvt_ahrtJFprIFG5weDJz9NpMP9aA9kjH8dTv7WuaFVDLPy4Sp53sqOuu9o-7xmTSpf0aj3kejPkSDBe-eDvdI_50FJpztCXae_mf2AzuLzEQ</recordid><startdate>20220501</startdate><enddate>20220501</enddate><creator>Desurmont, G A</creator><creator>Tannières, M</creator><creator>Roche, M</creator><creator>Blanchet, A</creator><creator>Manoukis, N C</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2701-6582</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5062-7256</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220501</creationdate><title>Identifying an Optimal Screen Mesh to Enable Augmentorium-Based Enhanced Biological Control of the Olive Fruit Fly Bactrocera oleae (Diptera: Tephritidae) and the Mediterranean Fruit Fly Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae)</title><author>Desurmont, G A ; Tannières, M ; Roche, M ; Blanchet, A ; Manoukis, N C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-8fbdaa6ab4e62f77d372b168c9accdc0cf3a3c8269377cb793c9efb241fcfcfe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Ceratitis capitata</topic><topic>Drosophila</topic><topic>Hymenoptera</topic><topic>Olea</topic><topic>Surgical Mesh</topic><topic>Tephritidae</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Desurmont, G A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tannières, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roche, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanchet, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manoukis, N C</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of insect science (Tucson, Ariz.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Desurmont, G A</au><au>Tannières, M</au><au>Roche, M</au><au>Blanchet, A</au><au>Manoukis, N C</au><au>Weintraub, Phyllis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Identifying an Optimal Screen Mesh to Enable Augmentorium-Based Enhanced Biological Control of the Olive Fruit Fly Bactrocera oleae (Diptera: Tephritidae) and the Mediterranean Fruit Fly Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae)</atitle><jtitle>Journal of insect science (Tucson, Ariz.)</jtitle><addtitle>J Insect Sci</addtitle><date>2022-05-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>3</issue><issn>1536-2442</issn><eissn>1536-2442</eissn><abstract>Abstract The augmentorium is a cost-effective screened enclosure designed to receive fruits infested with insect pests, retain the pests inside but let their natural enemies escape to enhance biological control of pest populations. Screen selection is critical to ensure that an augmentorium is effective for a particular system. Here we tested five types of screens with a mini-augmentorium design and measured the escape of four insect species under laboratory conditions: the pests olive fruit fly Bactocera oleae (Rossi) (Diptera: Tephritidae) and Mediterranean fruit fly Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae), and the parasitoids Psyttalia lounsburyi (Silvestri) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) and Psyttalia ponerophaga (Silvestri) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). The sex ratio of insects that escaped the screens was compared to the sex ratio of insects that could not escape. Results showed that one screen type (‘crystal mesh’) was the best for the purpose of designing a functional augmentorium: it retained 90% of B. oleae adults and 100% of C. capitata adults while letting 72% of Psyttalia lounsburyi adults and 94% of P. ponerophaga adults escape. The other screen types tested were suboptimal, either because they let too many flies freely escape or because they retained too many parasitoids. Sex ratio was almost always similar for insects that managed to escape the screens and insects that were retained, except for P. ponerophaga and the screen type ‘light mesh’. These results are promising for the development of a functional augmentorium against the olive fruit fly and further implementation against Mediterranean fruit fly.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>35640027</pmid><doi>10.1093/jisesa/ieac027</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2701-6582</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5062-7256</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1536-2442
ispartof Journal of insect science (Tucson, Ariz.), 2022-05, Vol.22 (3)
issn 1536-2442
1536-2442
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9154345
source Oxford Journals Open Access Collection
subjects Animals
Ceratitis capitata
Drosophila
Hymenoptera
Olea
Surgical Mesh
Tephritidae
title Identifying an Optimal Screen Mesh to Enable Augmentorium-Based Enhanced Biological Control of the Olive Fruit Fly Bactrocera oleae (Diptera: Tephritidae) and the Mediterranean Fruit Fly Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T09%3A38%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_TOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Identifying%20an%20Optimal%20Screen%20Mesh%20to%20Enable%20Augmentorium-Based%20Enhanced%20Biological%20Control%20of%20the%20Olive%20Fruit%20Fly%20Bactrocera%20oleae%20(Diptera:%20Tephritidae)%20and%20the%20Mediterranean%20Fruit%20Fly%20Ceratitis%20capitata%20(Diptera:%20Tephritidae)&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20insect%20science%20(Tucson,%20Ariz.)&rft.au=Desurmont,%20G%20A&rft.date=2022-05-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=3&rft.issn=1536-2442&rft.eissn=1536-2442&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jisesa/ieac027&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_TOX%3E2672326680%3C/proquest_TOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2672326680&rft_id=info:pmid/35640027&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jisesa/ieac027&rfr_iscdi=true