Identifying an Optimal Screen Mesh to Enable Augmentorium-Based Enhanced Biological Control of the Olive Fruit Fly Bactrocera oleae (Diptera: Tephritidae) and the Mediterranean Fruit Fly Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae)
Abstract The augmentorium is a cost-effective screened enclosure designed to receive fruits infested with insect pests, retain the pests inside but let their natural enemies escape to enhance biological control of pest populations. Screen selection is critical to ensure that an augmentorium is effec...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of insect science (Tucson, Ariz.) Ariz.), 2022-05, Vol.22 (3) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Journal of insect science (Tucson, Ariz.) |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Desurmont, G A Tannières, M Roche, M Blanchet, A Manoukis, N C |
description | Abstract
The augmentorium is a cost-effective screened enclosure designed to receive fruits infested with insect pests, retain the pests inside but let their natural enemies escape to enhance biological control of pest populations. Screen selection is critical to ensure that an augmentorium is effective for a particular system. Here we tested five types of screens with a mini-augmentorium design and measured the escape of four insect species under laboratory conditions: the pests olive fruit fly Bactocera oleae (Rossi) (Diptera: Tephritidae) and Mediterranean fruit fly Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae), and the parasitoids Psyttalia lounsburyi (Silvestri) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) and Psyttalia ponerophaga (Silvestri) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). The sex ratio of insects that escaped the screens was compared to the sex ratio of insects that could not escape. Results showed that one screen type (‘crystal mesh’) was the best for the purpose of designing a functional augmentorium: it retained 90% of B. oleae adults and 100% of C. capitata adults while letting 72% of Psyttalia lounsburyi adults and 94% of P. ponerophaga adults escape. The other screen types tested were suboptimal, either because they let too many flies freely escape or because they retained too many parasitoids. Sex ratio was almost always similar for insects that managed to escape the screens and insects that were retained, except for P. ponerophaga and the screen type ‘light mesh’. These results are promising for the development of a functional augmentorium against the olive fruit fly and further implementation against Mediterranean fruit fly. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/jisesa/ieac027 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_TOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9154345</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jisesa/ieac027</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2672326680</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-8fbdaa6ab4e62f77d372b168c9accdc0cf3a3c8269377cb793c9efb241fcfcfe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUktv1DAQjhCIlsKVI_KxPaRN7GweHJC6SxcqtdoD5RxNJpONKycOtlNp_y8_hIFdSjkg5INn9D08Hn1R9DZNztOkUhf32pOHC02AiSyeRcfpQuWxzDL5_El9FL3y_j5JZJKV1cvoSC3yjLviOPp-3dIYdLfT41bAKDZT0AMY8QUd0ShuyfciWHE1QmNIXM7bgenW6XmIl-CpZaSHEblYamvsViOLV3YMzhphOxF6EhujH0is3ayDWJudWAIyjORAWENA4vSjngK378UdTb3TQbdAZzxO-0t_S61m2MFIPOEfnxVLApO9QJh0gAD_cHodvejAeHpzuE-ir-uru9Xn-Gbz6Xp1eROjSrMQl13TAuTQZJTLrihaVcgmzUusALHFBDsFCkuZV6oosCkqhRV1jczSDvmQOok-7H2nuRmoRV6VA1NPjlfqdrUFXf-NjLqvt_ahrtJFprIFG5weDJz9NpMP9aA9kjH8dTv7WuaFVDLPy4Sp53sqOuu9o-7xmTSpf0aj3kejPkSDBe-eDvdI_50FJpztCXae_mf2AzuLzEQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2672326680</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Identifying an Optimal Screen Mesh to Enable Augmentorium-Based Enhanced Biological Control of the Olive Fruit Fly Bactrocera oleae (Diptera: Tephritidae) and the Mediterranean Fruit Fly Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae)</title><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><creator>Desurmont, G A ; Tannières, M ; Roche, M ; Blanchet, A ; Manoukis, N C</creator><contributor>Weintraub, Phyllis</contributor><creatorcontrib>Desurmont, G A ; Tannières, M ; Roche, M ; Blanchet, A ; Manoukis, N C ; Weintraub, Phyllis</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
The augmentorium is a cost-effective screened enclosure designed to receive fruits infested with insect pests, retain the pests inside but let their natural enemies escape to enhance biological control of pest populations. Screen selection is critical to ensure that an augmentorium is effective for a particular system. Here we tested five types of screens with a mini-augmentorium design and measured the escape of four insect species under laboratory conditions: the pests olive fruit fly Bactocera oleae (Rossi) (Diptera: Tephritidae) and Mediterranean fruit fly Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae), and the parasitoids Psyttalia lounsburyi (Silvestri) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) and Psyttalia ponerophaga (Silvestri) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). The sex ratio of insects that escaped the screens was compared to the sex ratio of insects that could not escape. Results showed that one screen type (‘crystal mesh’) was the best for the purpose of designing a functional augmentorium: it retained 90% of B. oleae adults and 100% of C. capitata adults while letting 72% of Psyttalia lounsburyi adults and 94% of P. ponerophaga adults escape. The other screen types tested were suboptimal, either because they let too many flies freely escape or because they retained too many parasitoids. Sex ratio was almost always similar for insects that managed to escape the screens and insects that were retained, except for P. ponerophaga and the screen type ‘light mesh’. These results are promising for the development of a functional augmentorium against the olive fruit fly and further implementation against Mediterranean fruit fly.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1536-2442</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-2442</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jisesa/ieac027</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35640027</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Animals ; Ceratitis capitata ; Drosophila ; Hymenoptera ; Olea ; Surgical Mesh ; Tephritidae</subject><ispartof>Journal of insect science (Tucson, Ariz.), 2022-05, Vol.22 (3)</ispartof><rights>Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America 2022. 2022</rights><rights>Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-8fbdaa6ab4e62f77d372b168c9accdc0cf3a3c8269377cb793c9efb241fcfcfe3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-8fbdaa6ab4e62f77d372b168c9accdc0cf3a3c8269377cb793c9efb241fcfcfe3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2701-6582 ; 0000-0001-5062-7256</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9154345/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9154345/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,1604,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/ieac027$$EView_record_in_Oxford_University_Press$$FView_record_in_$$GOxford_University_Press</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35640027$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Weintraub, Phyllis</contributor><creatorcontrib>Desurmont, G A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tannières, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roche, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanchet, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manoukis, N C</creatorcontrib><title>Identifying an Optimal Screen Mesh to Enable Augmentorium-Based Enhanced Biological Control of the Olive Fruit Fly Bactrocera oleae (Diptera: Tephritidae) and the Mediterranean Fruit Fly Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae)</title><title>Journal of insect science (Tucson, Ariz.)</title><addtitle>J Insect Sci</addtitle><description>Abstract
The augmentorium is a cost-effective screened enclosure designed to receive fruits infested with insect pests, retain the pests inside but let their natural enemies escape to enhance biological control of pest populations. Screen selection is critical to ensure that an augmentorium is effective for a particular system. Here we tested five types of screens with a mini-augmentorium design and measured the escape of four insect species under laboratory conditions: the pests olive fruit fly Bactocera oleae (Rossi) (Diptera: Tephritidae) and Mediterranean fruit fly Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae), and the parasitoids Psyttalia lounsburyi (Silvestri) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) and Psyttalia ponerophaga (Silvestri) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). The sex ratio of insects that escaped the screens was compared to the sex ratio of insects that could not escape. Results showed that one screen type (‘crystal mesh’) was the best for the purpose of designing a functional augmentorium: it retained 90% of B. oleae adults and 100% of C. capitata adults while letting 72% of Psyttalia lounsburyi adults and 94% of P. ponerophaga adults escape. The other screen types tested were suboptimal, either because they let too many flies freely escape or because they retained too many parasitoids. Sex ratio was almost always similar for insects that managed to escape the screens and insects that were retained, except for P. ponerophaga and the screen type ‘light mesh’. These results are promising for the development of a functional augmentorium against the olive fruit fly and further implementation against Mediterranean fruit fly.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Ceratitis capitata</subject><subject>Drosophila</subject><subject>Hymenoptera</subject><subject>Olea</subject><subject>Surgical Mesh</subject><subject>Tephritidae</subject><issn>1536-2442</issn><issn>1536-2442</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUktv1DAQjhCIlsKVI_KxPaRN7GweHJC6SxcqtdoD5RxNJpONKycOtlNp_y8_hIFdSjkg5INn9D08Hn1R9DZNztOkUhf32pOHC02AiSyeRcfpQuWxzDL5_El9FL3y_j5JZJKV1cvoSC3yjLviOPp-3dIYdLfT41bAKDZT0AMY8QUd0ShuyfciWHE1QmNIXM7bgenW6XmIl-CpZaSHEblYamvsViOLV3YMzhphOxF6EhujH0is3ayDWJudWAIyjORAWENA4vSjngK378UdTb3TQbdAZzxO-0t_S61m2MFIPOEfnxVLApO9QJh0gAD_cHodvejAeHpzuE-ir-uru9Xn-Gbz6Xp1eROjSrMQl13TAuTQZJTLrihaVcgmzUusALHFBDsFCkuZV6oosCkqhRV1jczSDvmQOok-7H2nuRmoRV6VA1NPjlfqdrUFXf-NjLqvt_ahrtJFprIFG5weDJz9NpMP9aA9kjH8dTv7WuaFVDLPy4Sp53sqOuu9o-7xmTSpf0aj3kejPkSDBe-eDvdI_50FJpztCXae_mf2AzuLzEQ</recordid><startdate>20220501</startdate><enddate>20220501</enddate><creator>Desurmont, G A</creator><creator>Tannières, M</creator><creator>Roche, M</creator><creator>Blanchet, A</creator><creator>Manoukis, N C</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2701-6582</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5062-7256</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220501</creationdate><title>Identifying an Optimal Screen Mesh to Enable Augmentorium-Based Enhanced Biological Control of the Olive Fruit Fly Bactrocera oleae (Diptera: Tephritidae) and the Mediterranean Fruit Fly Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae)</title><author>Desurmont, G A ; Tannières, M ; Roche, M ; Blanchet, A ; Manoukis, N C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-8fbdaa6ab4e62f77d372b168c9accdc0cf3a3c8269377cb793c9efb241fcfcfe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Ceratitis capitata</topic><topic>Drosophila</topic><topic>Hymenoptera</topic><topic>Olea</topic><topic>Surgical Mesh</topic><topic>Tephritidae</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Desurmont, G A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tannières, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roche, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanchet, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manoukis, N C</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of insect science (Tucson, Ariz.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Desurmont, G A</au><au>Tannières, M</au><au>Roche, M</au><au>Blanchet, A</au><au>Manoukis, N C</au><au>Weintraub, Phyllis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Identifying an Optimal Screen Mesh to Enable Augmentorium-Based Enhanced Biological Control of the Olive Fruit Fly Bactrocera oleae (Diptera: Tephritidae) and the Mediterranean Fruit Fly Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae)</atitle><jtitle>Journal of insect science (Tucson, Ariz.)</jtitle><addtitle>J Insect Sci</addtitle><date>2022-05-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>3</issue><issn>1536-2442</issn><eissn>1536-2442</eissn><abstract>Abstract
The augmentorium is a cost-effective screened enclosure designed to receive fruits infested with insect pests, retain the pests inside but let their natural enemies escape to enhance biological control of pest populations. Screen selection is critical to ensure that an augmentorium is effective for a particular system. Here we tested five types of screens with a mini-augmentorium design and measured the escape of four insect species under laboratory conditions: the pests olive fruit fly Bactocera oleae (Rossi) (Diptera: Tephritidae) and Mediterranean fruit fly Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae), and the parasitoids Psyttalia lounsburyi (Silvestri) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) and Psyttalia ponerophaga (Silvestri) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). The sex ratio of insects that escaped the screens was compared to the sex ratio of insects that could not escape. Results showed that one screen type (‘crystal mesh’) was the best for the purpose of designing a functional augmentorium: it retained 90% of B. oleae adults and 100% of C. capitata adults while letting 72% of Psyttalia lounsburyi adults and 94% of P. ponerophaga adults escape. The other screen types tested were suboptimal, either because they let too many flies freely escape or because they retained too many parasitoids. Sex ratio was almost always similar for insects that managed to escape the screens and insects that were retained, except for P. ponerophaga and the screen type ‘light mesh’. These results are promising for the development of a functional augmentorium against the olive fruit fly and further implementation against Mediterranean fruit fly.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>35640027</pmid><doi>10.1093/jisesa/ieac027</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2701-6582</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5062-7256</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 1536-2442 |
ispartof | Journal of insect science (Tucson, Ariz.), 2022-05, Vol.22 (3) |
issn | 1536-2442 1536-2442 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9154345 |
source | Oxford Journals Open Access Collection |
subjects | Animals Ceratitis capitata Drosophila Hymenoptera Olea Surgical Mesh Tephritidae |
title | Identifying an Optimal Screen Mesh to Enable Augmentorium-Based Enhanced Biological Control of the Olive Fruit Fly Bactrocera oleae (Diptera: Tephritidae) and the Mediterranean Fruit Fly Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T09%3A38%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_TOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Identifying%20an%20Optimal%20Screen%20Mesh%20to%20Enable%20Augmentorium-Based%20Enhanced%20Biological%20Control%20of%20the%20Olive%20Fruit%20Fly%20Bactrocera%20oleae%20(Diptera:%20Tephritidae)%20and%20the%20Mediterranean%20Fruit%20Fly%20Ceratitis%20capitata%20(Diptera:%20Tephritidae)&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20insect%20science%20(Tucson,%20Ariz.)&rft.au=Desurmont,%20G%20A&rft.date=2022-05-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=3&rft.issn=1536-2442&rft.eissn=1536-2442&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jisesa/ieac027&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_TOX%3E2672326680%3C/proquest_TOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2672326680&rft_id=info:pmid/35640027&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jisesa/ieac027&rfr_iscdi=true |