Peritoneal malignancy: anatomy, pathophysiology and an update on modern day imaging
With increasing subspecialised experience in radical cytoreductive surgery and intra-abdominal chemotherapy for peritoneal malignancy, outcomes have improved significantly in selected patients. The surgery and the treatment regimens are radical and therefore correct patient selection is critical. Th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of radiology 2022-04, Vol.95 (1132), p.20210217-20210217 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 20210217 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1132 |
container_start_page | 20210217 |
container_title | British journal of radiology |
container_volume | 95 |
creator | Power, Jack W Dempsey, Philip J Yates, Andrew Fenlon, Helen Mulsow, Jurgen Shields, Conor Cronin, Carmel G |
description | With increasing subspecialised experience in radical cytoreductive surgery and intra-abdominal chemotherapy for peritoneal malignancy, outcomes have improved significantly in selected patients. The surgery and the treatment regimens are radical and therefore correct patient selection is critical. The radiologist plays a central role in this process by estimating, as precisely as possible, the pre-treatment disease burden. Because of the nature of the disease process, accurate staging is not an easy task. Tumour deposits may be very small and in locations where they are very difficult to detect. It must be acknowledged that no form of modern day imaging has the capability of detecting the smallest peritoneal nodules, which may only be visible to direct inspection or histopathological evaluation. Nonetheless, it behoves the radiologist to be as exact and precise as possible in the reporting of this disease process. This is both to select patients who are likely to benefit from radical treatment, and just as importantly, to identify patients who are unlikely to achieve adequate cytoreductive outcomes. In this review, we outline the patterns of spread of disease and the anatomic basis for this, as well as the essential aspects of reporting abdominal studies in this patient group. We provide an evidence-based update on the relative strengths and limitations of our available multimodality imaging techniques namely CT, MRI and positron emission tomography/CT. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1259/bjr.20210217 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9153709</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2604026682</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-81a7d340e152577c06b0f1714b6aa6e88e728731c85a841889e29ed185565b4c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUU1Lw0AQXUSxtXrzLDl6aOruJvsRD4IUv6CgoIK3ZZJs05RkN-4mQv69Kf1AYYZheI83j3kIXRI8I5QlN-nazSimZChxhMZExDKUEn8dozHGWISESjZCZ96vNytL8CkaRbGknNJkjN7ftCtbazRUQQ1VWRgwWX8bgIHW1v00aKBd2WbV-9JWtugHIB866JocWh1YE9Q2184EOfRBWUNRmuIcnSyh8vpiNyfo8_HhY_4cLl6fXub3izCLZNyGkoDIoxhrwigTIsM8xUsiSJxyAK6l1IJKEZFMMpAxkTLRNNE5kYxxlsZZNEF3W92mS2udZ9q0DirVuMGH65WFUv1HTLlShf1RCWGRwMkgcL0TcPa7075VdekzXVVgtO28ohzHmHIu6UCdbqmZs947vTycIVhtclBDDmqfw0C_-mvtQN4_PvoF2WaEXQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2604026682</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Peritoneal malignancy: anatomy, pathophysiology and an update on modern day imaging</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Power, Jack W ; Dempsey, Philip J ; Yates, Andrew ; Fenlon, Helen ; Mulsow, Jurgen ; Shields, Conor ; Cronin, Carmel G</creator><creatorcontrib>Power, Jack W ; Dempsey, Philip J ; Yates, Andrew ; Fenlon, Helen ; Mulsow, Jurgen ; Shields, Conor ; Cronin, Carmel G</creatorcontrib><description>With increasing subspecialised experience in radical cytoreductive surgery and intra-abdominal chemotherapy for peritoneal malignancy, outcomes have improved significantly in selected patients. The surgery and the treatment regimens are radical and therefore correct patient selection is critical. The radiologist plays a central role in this process by estimating, as precisely as possible, the pre-treatment disease burden. Because of the nature of the disease process, accurate staging is not an easy task. Tumour deposits may be very small and in locations where they are very difficult to detect. It must be acknowledged that no form of modern day imaging has the capability of detecting the smallest peritoneal nodules, which may only be visible to direct inspection or histopathological evaluation. Nonetheless, it behoves the radiologist to be as exact and precise as possible in the reporting of this disease process. This is both to select patients who are likely to benefit from radical treatment, and just as importantly, to identify patients who are unlikely to achieve adequate cytoreductive outcomes. In this review, we outline the patterns of spread of disease and the anatomic basis for this, as well as the essential aspects of reporting abdominal studies in this patient group. We provide an evidence-based update on the relative strengths and limitations of our available multimodality imaging techniques namely CT, MRI and positron emission tomography/CT.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1285</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-880X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20210217</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34826229</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: The British Institute of Radiology</publisher><subject>Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Peritoneal Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Peritoneal Neoplasms - pathology ; Positron-Emission Tomography ; Review ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><ispartof>British journal of radiology, 2022-04, Vol.95 (1132), p.20210217-20210217</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology 2022 The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-81a7d340e152577c06b0f1714b6aa6e88e728731c85a841889e29ed185565b4c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-81a7d340e152577c06b0f1714b6aa6e88e728731c85a841889e29ed185565b4c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7669-2996</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34826229$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Power, Jack W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dempsey, Philip J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yates, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fenlon, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulsow, Jurgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shields, Conor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cronin, Carmel G</creatorcontrib><title>Peritoneal malignancy: anatomy, pathophysiology and an update on modern day imaging</title><title>British journal of radiology</title><addtitle>Br J Radiol</addtitle><description>With increasing subspecialised experience in radical cytoreductive surgery and intra-abdominal chemotherapy for peritoneal malignancy, outcomes have improved significantly in selected patients. The surgery and the treatment regimens are radical and therefore correct patient selection is critical. The radiologist plays a central role in this process by estimating, as precisely as possible, the pre-treatment disease burden. Because of the nature of the disease process, accurate staging is not an easy task. Tumour deposits may be very small and in locations where they are very difficult to detect. It must be acknowledged that no form of modern day imaging has the capability of detecting the smallest peritoneal nodules, which may only be visible to direct inspection or histopathological evaluation. Nonetheless, it behoves the radiologist to be as exact and precise as possible in the reporting of this disease process. This is both to select patients who are likely to benefit from radical treatment, and just as importantly, to identify patients who are unlikely to achieve adequate cytoreductive outcomes. In this review, we outline the patterns of spread of disease and the anatomic basis for this, as well as the essential aspects of reporting abdominal studies in this patient group. We provide an evidence-based update on the relative strengths and limitations of our available multimodality imaging techniques namely CT, MRI and positron emission tomography/CT.</description><subject>Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Peritoneal Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Peritoneal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Positron-Emission Tomography</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><issn>0007-1285</issn><issn>1748-880X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUU1Lw0AQXUSxtXrzLDl6aOruJvsRD4IUv6CgoIK3ZZJs05RkN-4mQv69Kf1AYYZheI83j3kIXRI8I5QlN-nazSimZChxhMZExDKUEn8dozHGWISESjZCZ96vNytL8CkaRbGknNJkjN7ftCtbazRUQQ1VWRgwWX8bgIHW1v00aKBd2WbV-9JWtugHIB866JocWh1YE9Q2184EOfRBWUNRmuIcnSyh8vpiNyfo8_HhY_4cLl6fXub3izCLZNyGkoDIoxhrwigTIsM8xUsiSJxyAK6l1IJKEZFMMpAxkTLRNNE5kYxxlsZZNEF3W92mS2udZ9q0DirVuMGH65WFUv1HTLlShf1RCWGRwMkgcL0TcPa7075VdekzXVVgtO28ohzHmHIu6UCdbqmZs947vTycIVhtclBDDmqfw0C_-mvtQN4_PvoF2WaEXQ</recordid><startdate>20220401</startdate><enddate>20220401</enddate><creator>Power, Jack W</creator><creator>Dempsey, Philip J</creator><creator>Yates, Andrew</creator><creator>Fenlon, Helen</creator><creator>Mulsow, Jurgen</creator><creator>Shields, Conor</creator><creator>Cronin, Carmel G</creator><general>The British Institute of Radiology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7669-2996</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220401</creationdate><title>Peritoneal malignancy: anatomy, pathophysiology and an update on modern day imaging</title><author>Power, Jack W ; Dempsey, Philip J ; Yates, Andrew ; Fenlon, Helen ; Mulsow, Jurgen ; Shields, Conor ; Cronin, Carmel G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-81a7d340e152577c06b0f1714b6aa6e88e728731c85a841889e29ed185565b4c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Peritoneal Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Peritoneal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Positron-Emission Tomography</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Power, Jack W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dempsey, Philip J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yates, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fenlon, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulsow, Jurgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shields, Conor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cronin, Carmel G</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>British journal of radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Power, Jack W</au><au>Dempsey, Philip J</au><au>Yates, Andrew</au><au>Fenlon, Helen</au><au>Mulsow, Jurgen</au><au>Shields, Conor</au><au>Cronin, Carmel G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Peritoneal malignancy: anatomy, pathophysiology and an update on modern day imaging</atitle><jtitle>British journal of radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Radiol</addtitle><date>2022-04-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>1132</issue><spage>20210217</spage><epage>20210217</epage><pages>20210217-20210217</pages><issn>0007-1285</issn><eissn>1748-880X</eissn><abstract>With increasing subspecialised experience in radical cytoreductive surgery and intra-abdominal chemotherapy for peritoneal malignancy, outcomes have improved significantly in selected patients. The surgery and the treatment regimens are radical and therefore correct patient selection is critical. The radiologist plays a central role in this process by estimating, as precisely as possible, the pre-treatment disease burden. Because of the nature of the disease process, accurate staging is not an easy task. Tumour deposits may be very small and in locations where they are very difficult to detect. It must be acknowledged that no form of modern day imaging has the capability of detecting the smallest peritoneal nodules, which may only be visible to direct inspection or histopathological evaluation. Nonetheless, it behoves the radiologist to be as exact and precise as possible in the reporting of this disease process. This is both to select patients who are likely to benefit from radical treatment, and just as importantly, to identify patients who are unlikely to achieve adequate cytoreductive outcomes. In this review, we outline the patterns of spread of disease and the anatomic basis for this, as well as the essential aspects of reporting abdominal studies in this patient group. We provide an evidence-based update on the relative strengths and limitations of our available multimodality imaging techniques namely CT, MRI and positron emission tomography/CT.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>The British Institute of Radiology</pub><pmid>34826229</pmid><doi>10.1259/bjr.20210217</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7669-2996</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-1285 |
ispartof | British journal of radiology, 2022-04, Vol.95 (1132), p.20210217-20210217 |
issn | 0007-1285 1748-880X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9153709 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures Humans Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods Peritoneal Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Peritoneal Neoplasms - pathology Positron-Emission Tomography Review Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods |
title | Peritoneal malignancy: anatomy, pathophysiology and an update on modern day imaging |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T11%3A55%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Peritoneal%20malignancy:%20anatomy,%20pathophysiology%20and%20an%20update%20on%20modern%20day%20imaging&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20radiology&rft.au=Power,%20Jack%20W&rft.date=2022-04-01&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=1132&rft.spage=20210217&rft.epage=20210217&rft.pages=20210217-20210217&rft.issn=0007-1285&rft.eissn=1748-880X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1259/bjr.20210217&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2604026682%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2604026682&rft_id=info:pmid/34826229&rfr_iscdi=true |