Prediction of Mechanical Properties of Fly-Ash/Slag-Based Geopolymer Concrete Using Ensemble and Non-Ensemble Machine-Learning Techniques
The emission of greenhouse gases and natural-resource depletion caused by the production of ordinary Portland cement (OPC) have a detrimental effect on the environment. Thus, an alternative means is required to produce eco-friendly concrete such as geopolymer concrete (GPC). However, GPC has a compl...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Materials 2022-05, Vol.15 (10), p.3478 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 3478 |
container_title | Materials |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Amin, Muhammad Nasir Khan, Kaffayatullah Javed, Muhammad Faisal Aslam, Fahid Qadir, Muhammad Ghulam Faraz, Muhammad Iftikhar |
description | The emission of greenhouse gases and natural-resource depletion caused by the production of ordinary Portland cement (OPC) have a detrimental effect on the environment. Thus, an alternative means is required to produce eco-friendly concrete such as geopolymer concrete (GPC). However, GPC has a complex cementitious matrix and an ambiguous mix design. Aside from that, the composition and proportions of materials utilized may have an impact on the compressive strength. Similarly, the use of robust and efficient machine-learning (ML) approaches is now required to forecast the strength of such a composite cementitious matrix. As a result, this study anticipated the compressive strength of GPC with waste resources using ensemble and non-ensemble ML algorithms. This was accomplished through the use of Anaconda (Python). To build a strong ensemble learner by integrating weak learners, adaptive boosting, random forest (RF), and ensemble learner bagging were employed. Furthermore, ensemble learners were utilized on non-ensemble or weak learners, such as decision trees (DT) and support vector machines (SVM) via regression. The data encompassed 156 statistical samples in which nine variables, namely superplasticizer (kg/m
), fly ash (kg/m
), ground granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBS), temperature (°C), coarse and fine aggregate (kg/m
), sodium silicate (Na
SiO
), and sodium hydroxide (NaOH), were chosen to anticipate the results. Exploring it in depth, twenty sub-models with ensemble boosting and bagging approaches were trained, and tuning was performed to achieve the highest possible coefficient of determination (R
). Moreover, cross K-Fold validation analysis and statistical checks were performed via indicators for the evaluation of the models. The result revealed that ensemble approaches yielded robust performance compared to non-ensemble algorithms. Generally, an ensemble learner with the RF and bagging approach on a DT yielded robust performance by achieving a better R
as 0.93, and with the lowest statistical errors. The communal model in artificial-intelligence analysis, on average, improved the accuracy of the model. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/ma15103478 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9147112</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2671284034</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2518-e5077c7a4b24abb3988a985cd6dbb5459cf451107ef71572942cddbc114dca3f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkV9rFDEUxYMotrR98QNIwBcRxk7-TSYvQl3aKmy1YPscMsmd3ZRMsiazhf0I_dbO0Lqt3pdccn6cnHAQekfqz4yp-nQwRJCacdm-QodEqaYiivPXL_YDdFLKXT0NY6Sl6i06YKKhShBxiB6uMzhvR58iTj2-Ars20VsT8HVOG8ijhzILF2FXnZX16a9gVtVXU8DhS0ibFHYDZLxI0WYYAd8WH1f4PBYYugDYRId_pFjtL66MXfsI1RJMjjN6Mz0Y_e8tlGP0pjehwMnTeYRuL85vFt-q5c_L74uzZWWpIG0FopbSSsM7yk3XMdW2RrXCusZ1neBC2Z4LQmoJvSRCUsWpda6zhHBnDevZEfry6LvZdgM4C3HMJuhN9oPJO52M1_8q0a_1Kt1rRbgkhE4GH58McpqDj3rwxUIIJkLaFk0bSWjLp04m9MN_6F3a5jh9b6ZqJihr5ER9eqRsTqVk6PdhSK3nkvVzyRP8_mX8Pfq3UvYH1GKjWg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2670352367</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prediction of Mechanical Properties of Fly-Ash/Slag-Based Geopolymer Concrete Using Ensemble and Non-Ensemble Machine-Learning Techniques</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Amin, Muhammad Nasir ; Khan, Kaffayatullah ; Javed, Muhammad Faisal ; Aslam, Fahid ; Qadir, Muhammad Ghulam ; Faraz, Muhammad Iftikhar</creator><creatorcontrib>Amin, Muhammad Nasir ; Khan, Kaffayatullah ; Javed, Muhammad Faisal ; Aslam, Fahid ; Qadir, Muhammad Ghulam ; Faraz, Muhammad Iftikhar</creatorcontrib><description>The emission of greenhouse gases and natural-resource depletion caused by the production of ordinary Portland cement (OPC) have a detrimental effect on the environment. Thus, an alternative means is required to produce eco-friendly concrete such as geopolymer concrete (GPC). However, GPC has a complex cementitious matrix and an ambiguous mix design. Aside from that, the composition and proportions of materials utilized may have an impact on the compressive strength. Similarly, the use of robust and efficient machine-learning (ML) approaches is now required to forecast the strength of such a composite cementitious matrix. As a result, this study anticipated the compressive strength of GPC with waste resources using ensemble and non-ensemble ML algorithms. This was accomplished through the use of Anaconda (Python). To build a strong ensemble learner by integrating weak learners, adaptive boosting, random forest (RF), and ensemble learner bagging were employed. Furthermore, ensemble learners were utilized on non-ensemble or weak learners, such as decision trees (DT) and support vector machines (SVM) via regression. The data encompassed 156 statistical samples in which nine variables, namely superplasticizer (kg/m
), fly ash (kg/m
), ground granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBS), temperature (°C), coarse and fine aggregate (kg/m
), sodium silicate (Na
SiO
), and sodium hydroxide (NaOH), were chosen to anticipate the results. Exploring it in depth, twenty sub-models with ensemble boosting and bagging approaches were trained, and tuning was performed to achieve the highest possible coefficient of determination (R
). Moreover, cross K-Fold validation analysis and statistical checks were performed via indicators for the evaluation of the models. The result revealed that ensemble approaches yielded robust performance compared to non-ensemble algorithms. Generally, an ensemble learner with the RF and bagging approach on a DT yielded robust performance by achieving a better R
as 0.93, and with the lowest statistical errors. The communal model in artificial-intelligence analysis, on average, improved the accuracy of the model.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1996-1944</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1996-1944</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/ma15103478</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35629515</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Bagging ; Blast furnace practice ; Blast furnace slags ; Cement ; Compressive strength ; Concrete ; Curing ; Decision trees ; Depletion ; Emissions ; Environmental effects ; Fly ash ; Geopolymers ; Granulation ; Greenhouse gases ; Heat ; Intelligence (information) ; Machine learning ; Mechanical properties ; Model accuracy ; Parametric statistics ; Portland cements ; Robustness ; Silica ; Slag ; Sodium hydroxide ; Sodium silicates ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical methods ; Superplasticizers ; Support vector machines ; Variables</subject><ispartof>Materials, 2022-05, Vol.15 (10), p.3478</ispartof><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2518-e5077c7a4b24abb3988a985cd6dbb5459cf451107ef71572942cddbc114dca3f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2518-e5077c7a4b24abb3988a985cd6dbb5459cf451107ef71572942cddbc114dca3f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6524-4389 ; 0000-0001-5478-9324 ; 0000-0001-7994-4642 ; 0000-0003-2863-3283</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9147112/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9147112/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35629515$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Amin, Muhammad Nasir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Kaffayatullah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Javed, Muhammad Faisal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aslam, Fahid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qadir, Muhammad Ghulam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faraz, Muhammad Iftikhar</creatorcontrib><title>Prediction of Mechanical Properties of Fly-Ash/Slag-Based Geopolymer Concrete Using Ensemble and Non-Ensemble Machine-Learning Techniques</title><title>Materials</title><addtitle>Materials (Basel)</addtitle><description>The emission of greenhouse gases and natural-resource depletion caused by the production of ordinary Portland cement (OPC) have a detrimental effect on the environment. Thus, an alternative means is required to produce eco-friendly concrete such as geopolymer concrete (GPC). However, GPC has a complex cementitious matrix and an ambiguous mix design. Aside from that, the composition and proportions of materials utilized may have an impact on the compressive strength. Similarly, the use of robust and efficient machine-learning (ML) approaches is now required to forecast the strength of such a composite cementitious matrix. As a result, this study anticipated the compressive strength of GPC with waste resources using ensemble and non-ensemble ML algorithms. This was accomplished through the use of Anaconda (Python). To build a strong ensemble learner by integrating weak learners, adaptive boosting, random forest (RF), and ensemble learner bagging were employed. Furthermore, ensemble learners were utilized on non-ensemble or weak learners, such as decision trees (DT) and support vector machines (SVM) via regression. The data encompassed 156 statistical samples in which nine variables, namely superplasticizer (kg/m
), fly ash (kg/m
), ground granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBS), temperature (°C), coarse and fine aggregate (kg/m
), sodium silicate (Na
SiO
), and sodium hydroxide (NaOH), were chosen to anticipate the results. Exploring it in depth, twenty sub-models with ensemble boosting and bagging approaches were trained, and tuning was performed to achieve the highest possible coefficient of determination (R
). Moreover, cross K-Fold validation analysis and statistical checks were performed via indicators for the evaluation of the models. The result revealed that ensemble approaches yielded robust performance compared to non-ensemble algorithms. Generally, an ensemble learner with the RF and bagging approach on a DT yielded robust performance by achieving a better R
as 0.93, and with the lowest statistical errors. The communal model in artificial-intelligence analysis, on average, improved the accuracy of the model.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Bagging</subject><subject>Blast furnace practice</subject><subject>Blast furnace slags</subject><subject>Cement</subject><subject>Compressive strength</subject><subject>Concrete</subject><subject>Curing</subject><subject>Decision trees</subject><subject>Depletion</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Environmental effects</subject><subject>Fly ash</subject><subject>Geopolymers</subject><subject>Granulation</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Heat</subject><subject>Intelligence (information)</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Model accuracy</subject><subject>Parametric statistics</subject><subject>Portland cements</subject><subject>Robustness</subject><subject>Silica</subject><subject>Slag</subject><subject>Sodium hydroxide</subject><subject>Sodium silicates</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Superplasticizers</subject><subject>Support vector machines</subject><subject>Variables</subject><issn>1996-1944</issn><issn>1996-1944</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkV9rFDEUxYMotrR98QNIwBcRxk7-TSYvQl3aKmy1YPscMsmd3ZRMsiazhf0I_dbO0Lqt3pdccn6cnHAQekfqz4yp-nQwRJCacdm-QodEqaYiivPXL_YDdFLKXT0NY6Sl6i06YKKhShBxiB6uMzhvR58iTj2-Ars20VsT8HVOG8ijhzILF2FXnZX16a9gVtVXU8DhS0ibFHYDZLxI0WYYAd8WH1f4PBYYugDYRId_pFjtL66MXfsI1RJMjjN6Mz0Y_e8tlGP0pjehwMnTeYRuL85vFt-q5c_L74uzZWWpIG0FopbSSsM7yk3XMdW2RrXCusZ1neBC2Z4LQmoJvSRCUsWpda6zhHBnDevZEfry6LvZdgM4C3HMJuhN9oPJO52M1_8q0a_1Kt1rRbgkhE4GH58McpqDj3rwxUIIJkLaFk0bSWjLp04m9MN_6F3a5jh9b6ZqJihr5ER9eqRsTqVk6PdhSK3nkvVzyRP8_mX8Pfq3UvYH1GKjWg</recordid><startdate>20220512</startdate><enddate>20220512</enddate><creator>Amin, Muhammad Nasir</creator><creator>Khan, Kaffayatullah</creator><creator>Javed, Muhammad Faisal</creator><creator>Aslam, Fahid</creator><creator>Qadir, Muhammad Ghulam</creator><creator>Faraz, Muhammad Iftikhar</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6524-4389</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5478-9324</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7994-4642</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2863-3283</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220512</creationdate><title>Prediction of Mechanical Properties of Fly-Ash/Slag-Based Geopolymer Concrete Using Ensemble and Non-Ensemble Machine-Learning Techniques</title><author>Amin, Muhammad Nasir ; Khan, Kaffayatullah ; Javed, Muhammad Faisal ; Aslam, Fahid ; Qadir, Muhammad Ghulam ; Faraz, Muhammad Iftikhar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2518-e5077c7a4b24abb3988a985cd6dbb5459cf451107ef71572942cddbc114dca3f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Bagging</topic><topic>Blast furnace practice</topic><topic>Blast furnace slags</topic><topic>Cement</topic><topic>Compressive strength</topic><topic>Concrete</topic><topic>Curing</topic><topic>Decision trees</topic><topic>Depletion</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Environmental effects</topic><topic>Fly ash</topic><topic>Geopolymers</topic><topic>Granulation</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Heat</topic><topic>Intelligence (information)</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Model accuracy</topic><topic>Parametric statistics</topic><topic>Portland cements</topic><topic>Robustness</topic><topic>Silica</topic><topic>Slag</topic><topic>Sodium hydroxide</topic><topic>Sodium silicates</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Superplasticizers</topic><topic>Support vector machines</topic><topic>Variables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Amin, Muhammad Nasir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Kaffayatullah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Javed, Muhammad Faisal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aslam, Fahid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qadir, Muhammad Ghulam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faraz, Muhammad Iftikhar</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Materials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Amin, Muhammad Nasir</au><au>Khan, Kaffayatullah</au><au>Javed, Muhammad Faisal</au><au>Aslam, Fahid</au><au>Qadir, Muhammad Ghulam</au><au>Faraz, Muhammad Iftikhar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prediction of Mechanical Properties of Fly-Ash/Slag-Based Geopolymer Concrete Using Ensemble and Non-Ensemble Machine-Learning Techniques</atitle><jtitle>Materials</jtitle><addtitle>Materials (Basel)</addtitle><date>2022-05-12</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>3478</spage><pages>3478-</pages><issn>1996-1944</issn><eissn>1996-1944</eissn><abstract>The emission of greenhouse gases and natural-resource depletion caused by the production of ordinary Portland cement (OPC) have a detrimental effect on the environment. Thus, an alternative means is required to produce eco-friendly concrete such as geopolymer concrete (GPC). However, GPC has a complex cementitious matrix and an ambiguous mix design. Aside from that, the composition and proportions of materials utilized may have an impact on the compressive strength. Similarly, the use of robust and efficient machine-learning (ML) approaches is now required to forecast the strength of such a composite cementitious matrix. As a result, this study anticipated the compressive strength of GPC with waste resources using ensemble and non-ensemble ML algorithms. This was accomplished through the use of Anaconda (Python). To build a strong ensemble learner by integrating weak learners, adaptive boosting, random forest (RF), and ensemble learner bagging were employed. Furthermore, ensemble learners were utilized on non-ensemble or weak learners, such as decision trees (DT) and support vector machines (SVM) via regression. The data encompassed 156 statistical samples in which nine variables, namely superplasticizer (kg/m
), fly ash (kg/m
), ground granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBS), temperature (°C), coarse and fine aggregate (kg/m
), sodium silicate (Na
SiO
), and sodium hydroxide (NaOH), were chosen to anticipate the results. Exploring it in depth, twenty sub-models with ensemble boosting and bagging approaches were trained, and tuning was performed to achieve the highest possible coefficient of determination (R
). Moreover, cross K-Fold validation analysis and statistical checks were performed via indicators for the evaluation of the models. The result revealed that ensemble approaches yielded robust performance compared to non-ensemble algorithms. Generally, an ensemble learner with the RF and bagging approach on a DT yielded robust performance by achieving a better R
as 0.93, and with the lowest statistical errors. The communal model in artificial-intelligence analysis, on average, improved the accuracy of the model.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>35629515</pmid><doi>10.3390/ma15103478</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6524-4389</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5478-9324</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7994-4642</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2863-3283</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1996-1944 |
ispartof | Materials, 2022-05, Vol.15 (10), p.3478 |
issn | 1996-1944 1996-1944 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9147112 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Algorithms Bagging Blast furnace practice Blast furnace slags Cement Compressive strength Concrete Curing Decision trees Depletion Emissions Environmental effects Fly ash Geopolymers Granulation Greenhouse gases Heat Intelligence (information) Machine learning Mechanical properties Model accuracy Parametric statistics Portland cements Robustness Silica Slag Sodium hydroxide Sodium silicates Statistical analysis Statistical methods Superplasticizers Support vector machines Variables |
title | Prediction of Mechanical Properties of Fly-Ash/Slag-Based Geopolymer Concrete Using Ensemble and Non-Ensemble Machine-Learning Techniques |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T16%3A43%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prediction%20of%20Mechanical%20Properties%20of%20Fly-Ash/Slag-Based%20Geopolymer%20Concrete%20Using%20Ensemble%20and%20Non-Ensemble%20Machine-Learning%20Techniques&rft.jtitle=Materials&rft.au=Amin,%20Muhammad%20Nasir&rft.date=2022-05-12&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=3478&rft.pages=3478-&rft.issn=1996-1944&rft.eissn=1996-1944&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/ma15103478&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2671284034%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2670352367&rft_id=info:pmid/35629515&rfr_iscdi=true |