Ultrasound-guided monopolar versus bipolar radiofrequency ablation for genicular nerves in chronic knee osteoarthritis pain: A randomized controlled study

This study compared between monopolar and bipolar radiofrequency (RF) ablation of the genicular nerves using ultrasound guidance (USG) in chronic knee osteoarthritis pain. This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Fifty patients with knee osteoarthritis pain were equally randomized to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of medicine and surgery 2022-05, Vol.77, p.103680-103680, Article 103680
Hauptverfasser: Elemam, Elsayed M., Abdel Dayem, Ola T., Mousa, Sherif A., Mohammed, Hanaa M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 103680
container_issue
container_start_page 103680
container_title Annals of medicine and surgery
container_volume 77
creator Elemam, Elsayed M.
Abdel Dayem, Ola T.
Mousa, Sherif A.
Mohammed, Hanaa M.
description This study compared between monopolar and bipolar radiofrequency (RF) ablation of the genicular nerves using ultrasound guidance (USG) in chronic knee osteoarthritis pain. This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Fifty patients with knee osteoarthritis pain were equally randomized to either monopolar or bipolar groups. The primary outcome was visual analogue score (VAS). The secondary outcomes were the proportion of successful responders with a reduction of 50% of VAS score at 12 and 24 weeks, the procedure time and pain and oxford knee score (OKS).VAS and OKS were recorded at 1, 4, 12, 24 weeks after intervention. Any complications were reported. Mean VAS score in bipolar group was (p 
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103680
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9142545</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S204908012200440X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2672327910</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-2fc10e5d2d0c4b9f90ac0953238e2ed31c4dc20bc2163cfa867a68300feaa9723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQxi0EotXSF-CAfOSSZWwn3gQhpKrin1SJCz1bjj3Z9ZLYi-2stH0UnhavUqpy4eTxzDffjOZHyGsGawZMvtuv9ZTmNQfOS0LIFp6RSw51V0EL7PmT-IJcpbQHAAaNkLJ9SS5EI8Wma-tL8vtuzFGnMHtbbWdn0dIp-HAIo470iDHNifZu-UZtXRgi_prRmxPV_aizC54OIdItemfms8pjPGKizlOzi6Fk6U-PSEPKGHTMu-iyS_SgnX9Pr4unt2Fy92WuCT7HMI4lTHm2p1fkxaDHhFcP74rcff704-Zrdfv9y7eb69vK1CBzxQfDABvLLZi674YOtIGuEVy0yNEKZmprOPSGMynMoFu50bIVAANq3W24WJGPi-9h7ie0BssaelSH6CYdTypop_6teLdT23BUHat5UzfF4O2DQQzlNimrySWD46g9hjkpLssUvukKphXhi9TEkFLE4XEMA3XmqvbqzFWduaqFa2l683TBx5a_FIvgwyLAcqajw6iScYURWhfRZGWD-5__H5Mauj4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2672327910</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ultrasound-guided monopolar versus bipolar radiofrequency ablation for genicular nerves in chronic knee osteoarthritis pain: A randomized controlled study</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Elemam, Elsayed M. ; Abdel Dayem, Ola T. ; Mousa, Sherif A. ; Mohammed, Hanaa M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Elemam, Elsayed M. ; Abdel Dayem, Ola T. ; Mousa, Sherif A. ; Mohammed, Hanaa M.</creatorcontrib><description>This study compared between monopolar and bipolar radiofrequency (RF) ablation of the genicular nerves using ultrasound guidance (USG) in chronic knee osteoarthritis pain. This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Fifty patients with knee osteoarthritis pain were equally randomized to either monopolar or bipolar groups. The primary outcome was visual analogue score (VAS). The secondary outcomes were the proportion of successful responders with a reduction of 50% of VAS score at 12 and 24 weeks, the procedure time and pain and oxford knee score (OKS).VAS and OKS were recorded at 1, 4, 12, 24 weeks after intervention. Any complications were reported. Mean VAS score in bipolar group was (p &lt; 0.05) lower than monopolar group at 12 weeks [4.84 ± 0.62 Vs. 3.56 ± 0.71] and 24 weeks [5.44 ± 0.82 Vs. 3.96 ± 0.79]. The Proportion of successful responders with a reduction of at least 50% of VAS score were more in bipolar group than monopolar group at 12 weeks (80% Vs. 12%) and 24 weeks (44% Vs. 4%). Mean OKS score in bipolar group was (p &lt; 0.05) lower than monopolar group at 12 weeks [26 ± 3 Vs. 34 ± 3] and 24 weeks [27 ± 3 Vs. 35 ± 3].The procedure time and pain were (p &lt; 0.05) lower in monopolar than bipolar group. The complications were similar in both groups. USG bipolar RF ablation is more effective than monopolar RF ablation in controlling knee osteoarthritis pain as for the duration and severity of pain without fluoroscopic confirmation. •A study on 50 patient undergoing USG RFA of genicular nerves of 2 groups; Monopolar or bipolar RFA.•Bipolar RFA is more effective than Monopolar RFA.•USG radiofrequency ablation is alternative to fluoroscopic RFA.•No significant difference between the two groups according to complications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2049-0801</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2049-0801</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103680</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35637984</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Bipolar ; Monopolar ; Radiofrequency ; Randomised Controlled Trial ; Ultrasound</subject><ispartof>Annals of medicine and surgery, 2022-05, Vol.77, p.103680-103680, Article 103680</ispartof><rights>2022 The Author(s)</rights><rights>2022 The Author(s).</rights><rights>2022 The Author(s) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9142545/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9142545/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35637984$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Elemam, Elsayed M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdel Dayem, Ola T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mousa, Sherif A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohammed, Hanaa M.</creatorcontrib><title>Ultrasound-guided monopolar versus bipolar radiofrequency ablation for genicular nerves in chronic knee osteoarthritis pain: A randomized controlled study</title><title>Annals of medicine and surgery</title><addtitle>Ann Med Surg (Lond)</addtitle><description>This study compared between monopolar and bipolar radiofrequency (RF) ablation of the genicular nerves using ultrasound guidance (USG) in chronic knee osteoarthritis pain. This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Fifty patients with knee osteoarthritis pain were equally randomized to either monopolar or bipolar groups. The primary outcome was visual analogue score (VAS). The secondary outcomes were the proportion of successful responders with a reduction of 50% of VAS score at 12 and 24 weeks, the procedure time and pain and oxford knee score (OKS).VAS and OKS were recorded at 1, 4, 12, 24 weeks after intervention. Any complications were reported. Mean VAS score in bipolar group was (p &lt; 0.05) lower than monopolar group at 12 weeks [4.84 ± 0.62 Vs. 3.56 ± 0.71] and 24 weeks [5.44 ± 0.82 Vs. 3.96 ± 0.79]. The Proportion of successful responders with a reduction of at least 50% of VAS score were more in bipolar group than monopolar group at 12 weeks (80% Vs. 12%) and 24 weeks (44% Vs. 4%). Mean OKS score in bipolar group was (p &lt; 0.05) lower than monopolar group at 12 weeks [26 ± 3 Vs. 34 ± 3] and 24 weeks [27 ± 3 Vs. 35 ± 3].The procedure time and pain were (p &lt; 0.05) lower in monopolar than bipolar group. The complications were similar in both groups. USG bipolar RF ablation is more effective than monopolar RF ablation in controlling knee osteoarthritis pain as for the duration and severity of pain without fluoroscopic confirmation. •A study on 50 patient undergoing USG RFA of genicular nerves of 2 groups; Monopolar or bipolar RFA.•Bipolar RFA is more effective than Monopolar RFA.•USG radiofrequency ablation is alternative to fluoroscopic RFA.•No significant difference between the two groups according to complications.</description><subject>Bipolar</subject><subject>Monopolar</subject><subject>Radiofrequency</subject><subject>Randomised Controlled Trial</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><issn>2049-0801</issn><issn>2049-0801</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQxi0EotXSF-CAfOSSZWwn3gQhpKrin1SJCz1bjj3Z9ZLYi-2stH0UnhavUqpy4eTxzDffjOZHyGsGawZMvtuv9ZTmNQfOS0LIFp6RSw51V0EL7PmT-IJcpbQHAAaNkLJ9SS5EI8Wma-tL8vtuzFGnMHtbbWdn0dIp-HAIo470iDHNifZu-UZtXRgi_prRmxPV_aizC54OIdItemfms8pjPGKizlOzi6Fk6U-PSEPKGHTMu-iyS_SgnX9Pr4unt2Fy92WuCT7HMI4lTHm2p1fkxaDHhFcP74rcff704-Zrdfv9y7eb69vK1CBzxQfDABvLLZi674YOtIGuEVy0yNEKZmprOPSGMynMoFu50bIVAANq3W24WJGPi-9h7ie0BssaelSH6CYdTypop_6teLdT23BUHat5UzfF4O2DQQzlNimrySWD46g9hjkpLssUvukKphXhi9TEkFLE4XEMA3XmqvbqzFWduaqFa2l683TBx5a_FIvgwyLAcqajw6iScYURWhfRZGWD-5__H5Mauj4</recordid><startdate>20220501</startdate><enddate>20220501</enddate><creator>Elemam, Elsayed M.</creator><creator>Abdel Dayem, Ola T.</creator><creator>Mousa, Sherif A.</creator><creator>Mohammed, Hanaa M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220501</creationdate><title>Ultrasound-guided monopolar versus bipolar radiofrequency ablation for genicular nerves in chronic knee osteoarthritis pain: A randomized controlled study</title><author>Elemam, Elsayed M. ; Abdel Dayem, Ola T. ; Mousa, Sherif A. ; Mohammed, Hanaa M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-2fc10e5d2d0c4b9f90ac0953238e2ed31c4dc20bc2163cfa867a68300feaa9723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Bipolar</topic><topic>Monopolar</topic><topic>Radiofrequency</topic><topic>Randomised Controlled Trial</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Elemam, Elsayed M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdel Dayem, Ola T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mousa, Sherif A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohammed, Hanaa M.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Annals of medicine and surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Elemam, Elsayed M.</au><au>Abdel Dayem, Ola T.</au><au>Mousa, Sherif A.</au><au>Mohammed, Hanaa M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ultrasound-guided monopolar versus bipolar radiofrequency ablation for genicular nerves in chronic knee osteoarthritis pain: A randomized controlled study</atitle><jtitle>Annals of medicine and surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Med Surg (Lond)</addtitle><date>2022-05-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>77</volume><spage>103680</spage><epage>103680</epage><pages>103680-103680</pages><artnum>103680</artnum><issn>2049-0801</issn><eissn>2049-0801</eissn><abstract>This study compared between monopolar and bipolar radiofrequency (RF) ablation of the genicular nerves using ultrasound guidance (USG) in chronic knee osteoarthritis pain. This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Fifty patients with knee osteoarthritis pain were equally randomized to either monopolar or bipolar groups. The primary outcome was visual analogue score (VAS). The secondary outcomes were the proportion of successful responders with a reduction of 50% of VAS score at 12 and 24 weeks, the procedure time and pain and oxford knee score (OKS).VAS and OKS were recorded at 1, 4, 12, 24 weeks after intervention. Any complications were reported. Mean VAS score in bipolar group was (p &lt; 0.05) lower than monopolar group at 12 weeks [4.84 ± 0.62 Vs. 3.56 ± 0.71] and 24 weeks [5.44 ± 0.82 Vs. 3.96 ± 0.79]. The Proportion of successful responders with a reduction of at least 50% of VAS score were more in bipolar group than monopolar group at 12 weeks (80% Vs. 12%) and 24 weeks (44% Vs. 4%). Mean OKS score in bipolar group was (p &lt; 0.05) lower than monopolar group at 12 weeks [26 ± 3 Vs. 34 ± 3] and 24 weeks [27 ± 3 Vs. 35 ± 3].The procedure time and pain were (p &lt; 0.05) lower in monopolar than bipolar group. The complications were similar in both groups. USG bipolar RF ablation is more effective than monopolar RF ablation in controlling knee osteoarthritis pain as for the duration and severity of pain without fluoroscopic confirmation. •A study on 50 patient undergoing USG RFA of genicular nerves of 2 groups; Monopolar or bipolar RFA.•Bipolar RFA is more effective than Monopolar RFA.•USG radiofrequency ablation is alternative to fluoroscopic RFA.•No significant difference between the two groups according to complications.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>35637984</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103680</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2049-0801
ispartof Annals of medicine and surgery, 2022-05, Vol.77, p.103680-103680, Article 103680
issn 2049-0801
2049-0801
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9142545
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Bipolar
Monopolar
Radiofrequency
Randomised Controlled Trial
Ultrasound
title Ultrasound-guided monopolar versus bipolar radiofrequency ablation for genicular nerves in chronic knee osteoarthritis pain: A randomized controlled study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T11%3A22%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ultrasound-guided%20monopolar%20versus%20bipolar%20radiofrequency%20ablation%20for%20genicular%20nerves%20in%20chronic%20knee%20osteoarthritis%20pain:%20A%20randomized%20controlled%20study&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20medicine%20and%20surgery&rft.au=Elemam,%20Elsayed%20M.&rft.date=2022-05-01&rft.volume=77&rft.spage=103680&rft.epage=103680&rft.pages=103680-103680&rft.artnum=103680&rft.issn=2049-0801&rft.eissn=2049-0801&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103680&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2672327910%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2672327910&rft_id=info:pmid/35637984&rft_els_id=S204908012200440X&rfr_iscdi=true