Feasibility of an Online-Based Safety Decision Aid for Brazilian Women Living with Intimate Partner Violence: Findings from Participatory-Action Research in a One Stop Center
Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a challenge in Brazil; the country is ranked 6th globally for femicide and one in four women experience physical and/or sexual IPV in their lifetimes. Safety decision aids (SDA) are tools for women experiencing IPV. Building upon previously developed and tested onl...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of family violence 2023-04, Vol.38 (3), p.433-446 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 446 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 433 |
| container_title | Journal of family violence |
| container_volume | 38 |
| creator | Signorelli, Marcos Claudio Costa da Silva, Vera Lucia Evans, Dabney P. Prado, Sandra Marques Glass, Nancy |
| description | Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a challenge in Brazil; the country is ranked 6th globally for femicide and one in four women experience physical and/or sexual IPV in their lifetimes. Safety decision aids (SDA) are tools for women experiencing IPV. Building upon previously developed and tested online SDA tools, we intend to adapt an SDA tool for use in Brazil. The purpose of this study was to examine the feasibility of a technology-based SDA to support Brazilian women living with IPV, tailored for the Brazilian context. Our participatory-action research approach built upon research between 2018 and 2019 at the House of the Brazilian Woman (HBW) of Curitiba, Brazil, a cross-sectoral one-stop center (OSC) providing comprehensive care for IPV survivors. Field research included observation, field notes, and in-depth interviews with twenty-eight (n = 28) participants (HBW staff and survivors). The results were grouped into four main thematic categories: advantages; uncertainties; barriers; and suggestions. The triangulated results showed that the majority of participants considered the SDA feasible, highlighting flexibility and confidentiality; information about IPV; and access to resources for formal help-seeking as advantages of the tool. Participants also expressed uncertainties about SDA’s ability to increase women’s safety and its accessibility for the most vulnerable. They made suggestions for improvement to meet the unique needs of Brazilian women. This study provided evidence on the potential of an SDA tailored for use within a comprehensive program of women survivors in Brazil. This step was crucial to inform the future implementation and evaluation. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10896-022-00409-2 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9113623</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A741322507</galeid><sourcerecordid>A741322507</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c613t-9857bef907d5dcf48aa52cf2a673297a72a6ca4ca2a9145276a7b43c115551043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kt9u0zAUxiMEYmPwAlwgS9zARYbtxHHCBVJXKFSqNLTy59I6dU5aT6ldbHdQHopnxF3HRlGFfBEr5_d9J-fky7KnjJ4ySuWrwGjdVDnlPKe0pE3O72XHTMgi57Vg97NjWtcil2XNj7JHIVxSSpu6lA-zo0JUlElRH2e_RgjBzExv4oa4joAl57Y3FvMzCNiSKXSYKm9Rm2CcJQPTks55cubhZxIl_KtboiUTc2XsnHw3cUHGNpolRCQfwUeLnnwxrker8TUZGdsmLpDOu-V13Wizguj8Jh_ouO1wgQHB6wUxlkD6GCTT6FZkiDaif5w96KAP-OTmeZJ9Hr37NPyQT87fj4eDSa4rVsS8qYWcYddQ2YpWd2UNILjuOFSy4I0EmW4aSg0cGlYKLiuQs7LQjAkhGC2Lk-zNzne1ni2x1am5h16tfBrMb5QDo_Yr1izU3F2phrGi4kUyeHFj4N23NYaoliZo7Huw6NZB8aqqOatk1ST0-T_opVt7m8ZTXNaJqwQv76g59KiM7Vzqq7emaiBLVnAuqExUfoCaY_oL0DuLnUmv9_jTA3w6LS6NPih4uSdITMQfcQ7rENR4erHP8h2rvQvBY3e7P0bVNsFql2CVEqyuE6x4Ej37e_O3kj-RTUCxA0Iq2Tn6u3X9x_Y3KVX7AA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2786686524</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Feasibility of an Online-Based Safety Decision Aid for Brazilian Women Living with Intimate Partner Violence: Findings from Participatory-Action Research in a One Stop Center</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Signorelli, Marcos Claudio ; Costa da Silva, Vera Lucia ; Evans, Dabney P. ; Prado, Sandra Marques ; Glass, Nancy</creator><creatorcontrib>Signorelli, Marcos Claudio ; Costa da Silva, Vera Lucia ; Evans, Dabney P. ; Prado, Sandra Marques ; Glass, Nancy</creatorcontrib><description>Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a challenge in Brazil; the country is ranked 6th globally for femicide and one in four women experience physical and/or sexual IPV in their lifetimes. Safety decision aids (SDA) are tools for women experiencing IPV. Building upon previously developed and tested online SDA tools, we intend to adapt an SDA tool for use in Brazil. The purpose of this study was to examine the feasibility of a technology-based SDA to support Brazilian women living with IPV, tailored for the Brazilian context. Our participatory-action research approach built upon research between 2018 and 2019 at the House of the Brazilian Woman (HBW) of Curitiba, Brazil, a cross-sectoral one-stop center (OSC) providing comprehensive care for IPV survivors. Field research included observation, field notes, and in-depth interviews with twenty-eight (n = 28) participants (HBW staff and survivors). The results were grouped into four main thematic categories: advantages; uncertainties; barriers; and suggestions. The triangulated results showed that the majority of participants considered the SDA feasible, highlighting flexibility and confidentiality; information about IPV; and access to resources for formal help-seeking as advantages of the tool. Participants also expressed uncertainties about SDA’s ability to increase women’s safety and its accessibility for the most vulnerable. They made suggestions for improvement to meet the unique needs of Brazilian women. This study provided evidence on the potential of an SDA tailored for use within a comprehensive program of women survivors in Brazil. This step was crucial to inform the future implementation and evaluation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-7482</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2851</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10896-022-00409-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35601758</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Abused women ; Access ; Action research ; Clinical Psychology ; Confidentiality ; Criminology and Criminal Justice ; Decision making ; Domestic violence ; Family violence ; Feasibility ; Femicide ; Fieldwork ; Flexibility ; Gender-based violence ; Help seeking behavior ; Homicide ; Intimate partner violence ; Law and Psychology ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Original ; Original Article ; Participatory research ; Prevention ; Psychotherapy and Counseling ; Quality of Life Research ; Safety ; Safety and security measures ; Survivor ; Technology ; Technology application ; Women</subject><ispartof>Journal of family violence, 2023-04, Vol.38 (3), p.433-446</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c613t-9857bef907d5dcf48aa52cf2a673297a72a6ca4ca2a9145276a7b43c115551043</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c613t-9857bef907d5dcf48aa52cf2a673297a72a6ca4ca2a9145276a7b43c115551043</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0677-0121 ; 0000-0002-2201-5655 ; 0000-0002-6691-3684</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10896-022-00409-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10896-022-00409-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,12827,27325,27905,27906,30980,33755,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35601758$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Signorelli, Marcos Claudio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costa da Silva, Vera Lucia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, Dabney P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prado, Sandra Marques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glass, Nancy</creatorcontrib><title>Feasibility of an Online-Based Safety Decision Aid for Brazilian Women Living with Intimate Partner Violence: Findings from Participatory-Action Research in a One Stop Center</title><title>Journal of family violence</title><addtitle>J Fam Viol</addtitle><addtitle>J Fam Violence</addtitle><description>Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a challenge in Brazil; the country is ranked 6th globally for femicide and one in four women experience physical and/or sexual IPV in their lifetimes. Safety decision aids (SDA) are tools for women experiencing IPV. Building upon previously developed and tested online SDA tools, we intend to adapt an SDA tool for use in Brazil. The purpose of this study was to examine the feasibility of a technology-based SDA to support Brazilian women living with IPV, tailored for the Brazilian context. Our participatory-action research approach built upon research between 2018 and 2019 at the House of the Brazilian Woman (HBW) of Curitiba, Brazil, a cross-sectoral one-stop center (OSC) providing comprehensive care for IPV survivors. Field research included observation, field notes, and in-depth interviews with twenty-eight (n = 28) participants (HBW staff and survivors). The results were grouped into four main thematic categories: advantages; uncertainties; barriers; and suggestions. The triangulated results showed that the majority of participants considered the SDA feasible, highlighting flexibility and confidentiality; information about IPV; and access to resources for formal help-seeking as advantages of the tool. Participants also expressed uncertainties about SDA’s ability to increase women’s safety and its accessibility for the most vulnerable. They made suggestions for improvement to meet the unique needs of Brazilian women. This study provided evidence on the potential of an SDA tailored for use within a comprehensive program of women survivors in Brazil. This step was crucial to inform the future implementation and evaluation.</description><subject>Abused women</subject><subject>Access</subject><subject>Action research</subject><subject>Clinical Psychology</subject><subject>Confidentiality</subject><subject>Criminology and Criminal Justice</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Domestic violence</subject><subject>Family violence</subject><subject>Feasibility</subject><subject>Femicide</subject><subject>Fieldwork</subject><subject>Flexibility</subject><subject>Gender-based violence</subject><subject>Help seeking behavior</subject><subject>Homicide</subject><subject>Intimate partner violence</subject><subject>Law and Psychology</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Participatory research</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Psychotherapy and Counseling</subject><subject>Quality of Life Research</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Safety and security measures</subject><subject>Survivor</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Technology application</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>0885-7482</issn><issn>1573-2851</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kt9u0zAUxiMEYmPwAlwgS9zARYbtxHHCBVJXKFSqNLTy59I6dU5aT6ldbHdQHopnxF3HRlGFfBEr5_d9J-fky7KnjJ4ySuWrwGjdVDnlPKe0pE3O72XHTMgi57Vg97NjWtcil2XNj7JHIVxSSpu6lA-zo0JUlElRH2e_RgjBzExv4oa4joAl57Y3FvMzCNiSKXSYKm9Rm2CcJQPTks55cubhZxIl_KtboiUTc2XsnHw3cUHGNpolRCQfwUeLnnwxrker8TUZGdsmLpDOu-V13Wizguj8Jh_ouO1wgQHB6wUxlkD6GCTT6FZkiDaif5w96KAP-OTmeZJ9Hr37NPyQT87fj4eDSa4rVsS8qYWcYddQ2YpWd2UNILjuOFSy4I0EmW4aSg0cGlYKLiuQs7LQjAkhGC2Lk-zNzne1ni2x1am5h16tfBrMb5QDo_Yr1izU3F2phrGi4kUyeHFj4N23NYaoliZo7Huw6NZB8aqqOatk1ST0-T_opVt7m8ZTXNaJqwQv76g59KiM7Vzqq7emaiBLVnAuqExUfoCaY_oL0DuLnUmv9_jTA3w6LS6NPih4uSdITMQfcQ7rENR4erHP8h2rvQvBY3e7P0bVNsFql2CVEqyuE6x4Ej37e_O3kj-RTUCxA0Iq2Tn6u3X9x_Y3KVX7AA</recordid><startdate>20230401</startdate><enddate>20230401</enddate><creator>Signorelli, Marcos Claudio</creator><creator>Costa da Silva, Vera Lucia</creator><creator>Evans, Dabney P.</creator><creator>Prado, Sandra Marques</creator><creator>Glass, Nancy</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0677-0121</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2201-5655</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6691-3684</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230401</creationdate><title>Feasibility of an Online-Based Safety Decision Aid for Brazilian Women Living with Intimate Partner Violence: Findings from Participatory-Action Research in a One Stop Center</title><author>Signorelli, Marcos Claudio ; Costa da Silva, Vera Lucia ; Evans, Dabney P. ; Prado, Sandra Marques ; Glass, Nancy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c613t-9857bef907d5dcf48aa52cf2a673297a72a6ca4ca2a9145276a7b43c115551043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Abused women</topic><topic>Access</topic><topic>Action research</topic><topic>Clinical Psychology</topic><topic>Confidentiality</topic><topic>Criminology and Criminal Justice</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Domestic violence</topic><topic>Family violence</topic><topic>Feasibility</topic><topic>Femicide</topic><topic>Fieldwork</topic><topic>Flexibility</topic><topic>Gender-based violence</topic><topic>Help seeking behavior</topic><topic>Homicide</topic><topic>Intimate partner violence</topic><topic>Law and Psychology</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Participatory research</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Psychotherapy and Counseling</topic><topic>Quality of Life Research</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Safety and security measures</topic><topic>Survivor</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Technology application</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Signorelli, Marcos Claudio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costa da Silva, Vera Lucia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, Dabney P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prado, Sandra Marques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glass, Nancy</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of family violence</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Signorelli, Marcos Claudio</au><au>Costa da Silva, Vera Lucia</au><au>Evans, Dabney P.</au><au>Prado, Sandra Marques</au><au>Glass, Nancy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Feasibility of an Online-Based Safety Decision Aid for Brazilian Women Living with Intimate Partner Violence: Findings from Participatory-Action Research in a One Stop Center</atitle><jtitle>Journal of family violence</jtitle><stitle>J Fam Viol</stitle><addtitle>J Fam Violence</addtitle><date>2023-04-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>433</spage><epage>446</epage><pages>433-446</pages><issn>0885-7482</issn><eissn>1573-2851</eissn><abstract>Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a challenge in Brazil; the country is ranked 6th globally for femicide and one in four women experience physical and/or sexual IPV in their lifetimes. Safety decision aids (SDA) are tools for women experiencing IPV. Building upon previously developed and tested online SDA tools, we intend to adapt an SDA tool for use in Brazil. The purpose of this study was to examine the feasibility of a technology-based SDA to support Brazilian women living with IPV, tailored for the Brazilian context. Our participatory-action research approach built upon research between 2018 and 2019 at the House of the Brazilian Woman (HBW) of Curitiba, Brazil, a cross-sectoral one-stop center (OSC) providing comprehensive care for IPV survivors. Field research included observation, field notes, and in-depth interviews with twenty-eight (n = 28) participants (HBW staff and survivors). The results were grouped into four main thematic categories: advantages; uncertainties; barriers; and suggestions. The triangulated results showed that the majority of participants considered the SDA feasible, highlighting flexibility and confidentiality; information about IPV; and access to resources for formal help-seeking as advantages of the tool. Participants also expressed uncertainties about SDA’s ability to increase women’s safety and its accessibility for the most vulnerable. They made suggestions for improvement to meet the unique needs of Brazilian women. This study provided evidence on the potential of an SDA tailored for use within a comprehensive program of women survivors in Brazil. This step was crucial to inform the future implementation and evaluation.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>35601758</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10896-022-00409-2</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0677-0121</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2201-5655</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6691-3684</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0885-7482 |
| ispartof | Journal of family violence, 2023-04, Vol.38 (3), p.433-446 |
| issn | 0885-7482 1573-2851 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9113623 |
| source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Abused women Access Action research Clinical Psychology Confidentiality Criminology and Criminal Justice Decision making Domestic violence Family violence Feasibility Femicide Fieldwork Flexibility Gender-based violence Help seeking behavior Homicide Intimate partner violence Law and Psychology Medicine Medicine & Public Health Original Original Article Participatory research Prevention Psychotherapy and Counseling Quality of Life Research Safety Safety and security measures Survivor Technology Technology application Women |
| title | Feasibility of an Online-Based Safety Decision Aid for Brazilian Women Living with Intimate Partner Violence: Findings from Participatory-Action Research in a One Stop Center |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T06%3A07%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Feasibility%20of%20an%20Online-Based%20Safety%20Decision%20Aid%20for%20Brazilian%20Women%20Living%20with%20Intimate%20Partner%20Violence:%20Findings%20from%20Participatory-Action%20Research%20in%20a%20One%20Stop%20Center&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20family%20violence&rft.au=Signorelli,%20Marcos%20Claudio&rft.date=2023-04-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=433&rft.epage=446&rft.pages=433-446&rft.issn=0885-7482&rft.eissn=1573-2851&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10896-022-00409-2&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA741322507%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2786686524&rft_id=info:pmid/35601758&rft_galeid=A741322507&rfr_iscdi=true |