Reviewing the participatory management of UNESCO Biosphere Reserves: What do we miss by ignoring local academic knowledge in Mexico?
This review article addresses challenges in the management of UNESCO Biosphere Reserves (BRs) by analyzing the value of research published in journals, chapters, and books that are not indexed by Web of Science or Scopus. This widely ignored body of grounded knowledge allows deeper insights when ass...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Ambio 2022-07, Vol.51 (7), p.1726-1738 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1738 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 7 |
| container_start_page | 1726 |
| container_title | Ambio |
| container_volume | 51 |
| creator | Brenner, Ludger Job, Hubert |
| description | This review article addresses challenges in the management of UNESCO Biosphere Reserves (BRs) by analyzing the value of research published in journals, chapters, and books that are not indexed by Web of Science or Scopus. This widely ignored body of grounded knowledge allows deeper insights when assessing participatory management of BRs, an imperative reflected in guiding principles such as Aichi Target 11. The scoping literature review conducted found 120 publications that address stakeholder participation in decision-making and the economic benefits generated in Mexican BRs. Only 65 of those studies were published in indexed journals, while national outlets accounted for the other 55, most of them also peer-reviewed publications. International papers differ from national ones regarding spatial coverage, research foci, and the methods applied. Though both bodies of publications identified similar challenges, each sheds a distinct light on social-environmental contexts and regions. However, there is a consensus that genuine stakeholder participation has not yet been achieved. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s13280-021-01672-1 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9110588</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2610077372</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-daac7d7891241fdc6ad702ab8fe49ccf9cd5cc8e6aa0ea8e45e53f57bfbf0c73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAURi1ERYfCC7BAltiwCbUdJ05YUMGoQKVCpVLE0rpxbjIuSRzszAyz58FxOqX8LFjZks_9fD8dQp5w9oIzpo4DT0XBEiZ4wniuRMLvkQXPM5kowcr7ZMGYjHcp1SF5GMI1YyxP0_QBOUxlyTKeFQvy4xI3Frd2aOm0QjqCn6yxI0zO72gPA7TY4zBR19DPH08_LS_oG-vCuEKP9BID-g2Gl_TLCiZaO7pF2tsQaLWjth2cn2M7Z6CjYKDG3hr6dXDbDusWqR3oB_xujTt5RA4a6AI-vj2PyNXb06vl--T84t3Z8vV5YqSSU1IDGFWrouRC8qY2OdSKCaiKBmVpTFOaOjOmwByAIRQoM8zSJlNVUzXMqPSIvNrHjuuqx9rEXh46PXrbg99pB1b__TLYlW7dRpecs6woYsDz2wDvvq0xTDq2Ndh1MKBbBy3y2YtKlYjos3_Qa7f2Q2wXqVyWmZBipsSeMt6F4LG5W4YzPWfpvWMdHesbx5rHoad_1rgb-SU1AukeCONsAP3vv_8T-xMDMrWK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2664952422</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reviewing the participatory management of UNESCO Biosphere Reserves: What do we miss by ignoring local academic knowledge in Mexico?</title><source>PubMed Central (Open Access)</source><source>Springer</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Brenner, Ludger ; Job, Hubert</creator><creatorcontrib>Brenner, Ludger ; Job, Hubert</creatorcontrib><description>This review article addresses challenges in the management of UNESCO Biosphere Reserves (BRs) by analyzing the value of research published in journals, chapters, and books that are not indexed by Web of Science or Scopus. This widely ignored body of grounded knowledge allows deeper insights when assessing participatory management of BRs, an imperative reflected in guiding principles such as Aichi Target 11. The scoping literature review conducted found 120 publications that address stakeholder participation in decision-making and the economic benefits generated in Mexican BRs. Only 65 of those studies were published in indexed journals, while national outlets accounted for the other 55, most of them also peer-reviewed publications. International papers differ from national ones regarding spatial coverage, research foci, and the methods applied. Though both bodies of publications identified similar challenges, each sheds a distinct light on social-environmental contexts and regions. However, there is a consensus that genuine stakeholder participation has not yet been achieved.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0044-7447</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1654-7209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13280-021-01672-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34905158</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Atmospheric Sciences ; Biodiversity ; Biosphere ; Biosphere reserves ; Decision making ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecology ; Economic development ; Environment ; Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology ; Environmental Management ; Literature reviews ; Mexico ; Participation ; Physical Geography ; Review ; Stakeholder Participation ; Stakeholders ; UNESCO</subject><ispartof>Ambio, 2022-07, Vol.51 (7), p.1726-1738</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2021</rights><rights>2021. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences.</rights><rights>The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-daac7d7891241fdc6ad702ab8fe49ccf9cd5cc8e6aa0ea8e45e53f57bfbf0c73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-daac7d7891241fdc6ad702ab8fe49ccf9cd5cc8e6aa0ea8e45e53f57bfbf0c73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9110588/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9110588/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27922,27923,41486,42555,51317,53789,53791</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34905158$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brenner, Ludger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Job, Hubert</creatorcontrib><title>Reviewing the participatory management of UNESCO Biosphere Reserves: What do we miss by ignoring local academic knowledge in Mexico?</title><title>Ambio</title><addtitle>Ambio</addtitle><addtitle>Ambio</addtitle><description>This review article addresses challenges in the management of UNESCO Biosphere Reserves (BRs) by analyzing the value of research published in journals, chapters, and books that are not indexed by Web of Science or Scopus. This widely ignored body of grounded knowledge allows deeper insights when assessing participatory management of BRs, an imperative reflected in guiding principles such as Aichi Target 11. The scoping literature review conducted found 120 publications that address stakeholder participation in decision-making and the economic benefits generated in Mexican BRs. Only 65 of those studies were published in indexed journals, while national outlets accounted for the other 55, most of them also peer-reviewed publications. International papers differ from national ones regarding spatial coverage, research foci, and the methods applied. Though both bodies of publications identified similar challenges, each sheds a distinct light on social-environmental contexts and regions. However, there is a consensus that genuine stakeholder participation has not yet been achieved.</description><subject>Atmospheric Sciences</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biosphere</subject><subject>Biosphere reserves</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Mexico</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Physical Geography</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Stakeholder Participation</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>UNESCO</subject><issn>0044-7447</issn><issn>1654-7209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAURi1ERYfCC7BAltiwCbUdJ05YUMGoQKVCpVLE0rpxbjIuSRzszAyz58FxOqX8LFjZks_9fD8dQp5w9oIzpo4DT0XBEiZ4wniuRMLvkQXPM5kowcr7ZMGYjHcp1SF5GMI1YyxP0_QBOUxlyTKeFQvy4xI3Frd2aOm0QjqCn6yxI0zO72gPA7TY4zBR19DPH08_LS_oG-vCuEKP9BID-g2Gl_TLCiZaO7pF2tsQaLWjth2cn2M7Z6CjYKDG3hr6dXDbDusWqR3oB_xujTt5RA4a6AI-vj2PyNXb06vl--T84t3Z8vV5YqSSU1IDGFWrouRC8qY2OdSKCaiKBmVpTFOaOjOmwByAIRQoM8zSJlNVUzXMqPSIvNrHjuuqx9rEXh46PXrbg99pB1b__TLYlW7dRpecs6woYsDz2wDvvq0xTDq2Ndh1MKBbBy3y2YtKlYjos3_Qa7f2Q2wXqVyWmZBipsSeMt6F4LG5W4YzPWfpvWMdHesbx5rHoad_1rgb-SU1AukeCONsAP3vv_8T-xMDMrWK</recordid><startdate>20220701</startdate><enddate>20220701</enddate><creator>Brenner, Ludger</creator><creator>Job, Hubert</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220701</creationdate><title>Reviewing the participatory management of UNESCO Biosphere Reserves: What do we miss by ignoring local academic knowledge in Mexico?</title><author>Brenner, Ludger ; Job, Hubert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-daac7d7891241fdc6ad702ab8fe49ccf9cd5cc8e6aa0ea8e45e53f57bfbf0c73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Atmospheric Sciences</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biosphere</topic><topic>Biosphere reserves</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Mexico</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Physical Geography</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Stakeholder Participation</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>UNESCO</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brenner, Ludger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Job, Hubert</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Agriculture & Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Science Journals</collection><collection>Sociology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Ambio</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brenner, Ludger</au><au>Job, Hubert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reviewing the participatory management of UNESCO Biosphere Reserves: What do we miss by ignoring local academic knowledge in Mexico?</atitle><jtitle>Ambio</jtitle><stitle>Ambio</stitle><addtitle>Ambio</addtitle><date>2022-07-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1726</spage><epage>1738</epage><pages>1726-1738</pages><issn>0044-7447</issn><eissn>1654-7209</eissn><abstract>This review article addresses challenges in the management of UNESCO Biosphere Reserves (BRs) by analyzing the value of research published in journals, chapters, and books that are not indexed by Web of Science or Scopus. This widely ignored body of grounded knowledge allows deeper insights when assessing participatory management of BRs, an imperative reflected in guiding principles such as Aichi Target 11. The scoping literature review conducted found 120 publications that address stakeholder participation in decision-making and the economic benefits generated in Mexican BRs. Only 65 of those studies were published in indexed journals, while national outlets accounted for the other 55, most of them also peer-reviewed publications. International papers differ from national ones regarding spatial coverage, research foci, and the methods applied. Though both bodies of publications identified similar challenges, each sheds a distinct light on social-environmental contexts and regions. However, there is a consensus that genuine stakeholder participation has not yet been achieved.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>34905158</pmid><doi>10.1007/s13280-021-01672-1</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0044-7447 |
| ispartof | Ambio, 2022-07, Vol.51 (7), p.1726-1738 |
| issn | 0044-7447 1654-7209 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9110588 |
| source | PubMed Central (Open Access); Springer; MEDLINE; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
| subjects | Atmospheric Sciences Biodiversity Biosphere Biosphere reserves Decision making Earth and Environmental Science Ecology Economic development Environment Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology Environmental Management Literature reviews Mexico Participation Physical Geography Review Stakeholder Participation Stakeholders UNESCO |
| title | Reviewing the participatory management of UNESCO Biosphere Reserves: What do we miss by ignoring local academic knowledge in Mexico? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T15%3A49%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reviewing%20the%20participatory%20management%20of%20UNESCO%20Biosphere%20Reserves:%20What%20do%20we%20miss%20by%20ignoring%20local%20academic%20knowledge%20in%20Mexico?&rft.jtitle=Ambio&rft.au=Brenner,%20Ludger&rft.date=2022-07-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1726&rft.epage=1738&rft.pages=1726-1738&rft.issn=0044-7447&rft.eissn=1654-7209&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13280-021-01672-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2610077372%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2664952422&rft_id=info:pmid/34905158&rfr_iscdi=true |