Diagnostic and Predictive Capacity of the Spanish Versions of the Opioid Risk Tool and the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients with Pain—Revised: A Preliminary Investigation in a Sample of People with Noncancer Chronic Pain
Introduction Accurate assessment of the risk of opioid abuse and misuse in people with noncancer chronic pain is crucial for their prevention. This study aimed to provide preliminary evidence of the diagnostic and predictive capacity of the Spanish versions of the Opioid Risk Tool (ORT) and the Scre...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Pain and Therapy 2022-06, Vol.11 (2), p.493-510 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 510 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 493 |
container_title | Pain and Therapy |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Esteve, Rosa Reyes-Pérez, Ángela Ramírez-Maestre, Carmen Gutiérrez-Extremera, Andrea Fuentes-Bravo, Rocío de la Vega, Rocío Ruíz-Párraga, Gema T. Serrano-Ibáñez, Elena R. López-Martínez, Alicia E. |
description | Introduction
Accurate assessment of the risk of opioid abuse and misuse in people with noncancer chronic pain is crucial for their prevention. This study aimed to provide preliminary evidence of the diagnostic and predictive capacity of the Spanish versions of the Opioid Risk Tool (ORT) and the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients with Pain—Revised (SOAPP-R).
Methods
We used the Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) as criterion measure to assess the capacity of each tool to identify patients misusing opioids at the time of the assessment. Eighteen months later, we used the COMM and the Drug Abuse Screening Test-10 (DAST-10) to assess their predictive capacity. In total, 147 people with noncancer chronic pain participated in the diagnostic study, and 42 in the predictive study.
Results
Receiver operating curve analysis showed that the SOAPP-R had an excellent capacity to identify participants who were misusing opioids at the time of assessment (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.827). The diagnostic capacity of the ORT was close to acceptable (AUC = 0.649–0.669), whereas its predictive capacity was poor (AUC = 0.522–0.554). The predictive capacity of the SOAPP-R was close to acceptable regarding misuse (AUC = 0.672) and poor regarding abuse (AUC = 0.423).
Conclusion
In the setting of Spanish-speaking communities, clinicians should be cautious when using these instruments to make decisions on opioid administration. Further research is needed on the diagnostic and predictive capacity of the Spanish versions of both instruments. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s40122-022-00356-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9098780</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A703563363</galeid><sourcerecordid>A703563363</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-d66e9f5daed804102607a5f378a3fbc679debc0f3b975a10ff1005e33c83e7593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uk1v1DAQjRCIVkv_AAfkI5cUJ84nB6TV8lWpoqu2IG6W1xnvTkns1M4u6o0fwS_kxr9gstlWcEGOlfHMey_znImi5wk_TTgvX4WMJ2ka83FzkRdx-ig6TpNaxEWefH18iKtUlEfRSQg3nBO-yussfxodiZziIs2Oo99vUa2tCwNqpmzDlh4a1APugC1UrzQOd8wZNmyAXfXKYtiwL-ADOhvu8xc9OmzYJYZv7Nq5dq-zJ2gPYMHvEwfUPAQIoQM7MOM8W6oBKQ7sOw4bOqH99ePnJewwQPOazcd2WuzQKn_HzuwOqM81UZxlaJliV6rrWxgbWYIbo73MJ2e1spo-vNh4Z8nZKPwsemJUG-Dk8J5Fn9-_u158jM8vPpwt5uexzopsiJuigNrkjYKm4lnC04KXKjeirJQwK12UdQMrzY1Y1WWuEm4M_Y4chNCVgDKvxSx6M-n221UHjSZ7XrWy99iRC-kUyn8rFjdy7Xay5nVVVpwEXh4EvLvdkmXZYdDQtsqC2waZFrTSrMoTgp5O0LVqQaI1jhQ1rQY61M6CQcrPy3FAhKBnFqUTQXsXggfz0FfC5ThXcporycc90mRKpBd_O3qg3E8RAcQECFSya_Dyxm29pVv-n-wfU2PelA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2626224851</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diagnostic and Predictive Capacity of the Spanish Versions of the Opioid Risk Tool and the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients with Pain—Revised: A Preliminary Investigation in a Sample of People with Noncancer Chronic Pain</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Esteve, Rosa ; Reyes-Pérez, Ángela ; Ramírez-Maestre, Carmen ; Gutiérrez-Extremera, Andrea ; Fuentes-Bravo, Rocío ; de la Vega, Rocío ; Ruíz-Párraga, Gema T. ; Serrano-Ibáñez, Elena R. ; López-Martínez, Alicia E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Esteve, Rosa ; Reyes-Pérez, Ángela ; Ramírez-Maestre, Carmen ; Gutiérrez-Extremera, Andrea ; Fuentes-Bravo, Rocío ; de la Vega, Rocío ; Ruíz-Párraga, Gema T. ; Serrano-Ibáñez, Elena R. ; López-Martínez, Alicia E.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction
Accurate assessment of the risk of opioid abuse and misuse in people with noncancer chronic pain is crucial for their prevention. This study aimed to provide preliminary evidence of the diagnostic and predictive capacity of the Spanish versions of the Opioid Risk Tool (ORT) and the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients with Pain—Revised (SOAPP-R).
Methods
We used the Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) as criterion measure to assess the capacity of each tool to identify patients misusing opioids at the time of the assessment. Eighteen months later, we used the COMM and the Drug Abuse Screening Test-10 (DAST-10) to assess their predictive capacity. In total, 147 people with noncancer chronic pain participated in the diagnostic study, and 42 in the predictive study.
Results
Receiver operating curve analysis showed that the SOAPP-R had an excellent capacity to identify participants who were misusing opioids at the time of assessment (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.827). The diagnostic capacity of the ORT was close to acceptable (AUC = 0.649–0.669), whereas its predictive capacity was poor (AUC = 0.522–0.554). The predictive capacity of the SOAPP-R was close to acceptable regarding misuse (AUC = 0.672) and poor regarding abuse (AUC = 0.423).
Conclusion
In the setting of Spanish-speaking communities, clinicians should be cautious when using these instruments to make decisions on opioid administration. Further research is needed on the diagnostic and predictive capacity of the Spanish versions of both instruments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2193-8237</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2193-651X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s40122-022-00356-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35128624</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cheshire: Springer Healthcare</publisher><subject>Chronic pain ; Drug therapy ; Health risk assessment ; Internal Medicine ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Mental health screening ; Methods ; Original Research ; Pain Medicine</subject><ispartof>Pain and Therapy, 2022-06, Vol.11 (2), p.493-510</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><rights>2022. The Author(s).</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-d66e9f5daed804102607a5f378a3fbc679debc0f3b975a10ff1005e33c83e7593</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3245-7844</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9098780/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9098780/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27923,27924,41119,42188,51575,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35128624$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Esteve, Rosa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reyes-Pérez, Ángela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramírez-Maestre, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gutiérrez-Extremera, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuentes-Bravo, Rocío</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de la Vega, Rocío</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruíz-Párraga, Gema T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serrano-Ibáñez, Elena R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López-Martínez, Alicia E.</creatorcontrib><title>Diagnostic and Predictive Capacity of the Spanish Versions of the Opioid Risk Tool and the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients with Pain—Revised: A Preliminary Investigation in a Sample of People with Noncancer Chronic Pain</title><title>Pain and Therapy</title><addtitle>Pain Ther</addtitle><addtitle>Pain Ther</addtitle><description>Introduction
Accurate assessment of the risk of opioid abuse and misuse in people with noncancer chronic pain is crucial for their prevention. This study aimed to provide preliminary evidence of the diagnostic and predictive capacity of the Spanish versions of the Opioid Risk Tool (ORT) and the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients with Pain—Revised (SOAPP-R).
Methods
We used the Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) as criterion measure to assess the capacity of each tool to identify patients misusing opioids at the time of the assessment. Eighteen months later, we used the COMM and the Drug Abuse Screening Test-10 (DAST-10) to assess their predictive capacity. In total, 147 people with noncancer chronic pain participated in the diagnostic study, and 42 in the predictive study.
Results
Receiver operating curve analysis showed that the SOAPP-R had an excellent capacity to identify participants who were misusing opioids at the time of assessment (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.827). The diagnostic capacity of the ORT was close to acceptable (AUC = 0.649–0.669), whereas its predictive capacity was poor (AUC = 0.522–0.554). The predictive capacity of the SOAPP-R was close to acceptable regarding misuse (AUC = 0.672) and poor regarding abuse (AUC = 0.423).
Conclusion
In the setting of Spanish-speaking communities, clinicians should be cautious when using these instruments to make decisions on opioid administration. Further research is needed on the diagnostic and predictive capacity of the Spanish versions of both instruments.</description><subject>Chronic pain</subject><subject>Drug therapy</subject><subject>Health risk assessment</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Mental health screening</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Pain Medicine</subject><issn>2193-8237</issn><issn>2193-651X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uk1v1DAQjRCIVkv_AAfkI5cUJ84nB6TV8lWpoqu2IG6W1xnvTkns1M4u6o0fwS_kxr9gstlWcEGOlfHMey_znImi5wk_TTgvX4WMJ2ka83FzkRdx-ig6TpNaxEWefH18iKtUlEfRSQg3nBO-yussfxodiZziIs2Oo99vUa2tCwNqpmzDlh4a1APugC1UrzQOd8wZNmyAXfXKYtiwL-ADOhvu8xc9OmzYJYZv7Nq5dq-zJ2gPYMHvEwfUPAQIoQM7MOM8W6oBKQ7sOw4bOqH99ePnJewwQPOazcd2WuzQKn_HzuwOqM81UZxlaJliV6rrWxgbWYIbo73MJ2e1spo-vNh4Z8nZKPwsemJUG-Dk8J5Fn9-_u158jM8vPpwt5uexzopsiJuigNrkjYKm4lnC04KXKjeirJQwK12UdQMrzY1Y1WWuEm4M_Y4chNCVgDKvxSx6M-n221UHjSZ7XrWy99iRC-kUyn8rFjdy7Xay5nVVVpwEXh4EvLvdkmXZYdDQtsqC2waZFrTSrMoTgp5O0LVqQaI1jhQ1rQY61M6CQcrPy3FAhKBnFqUTQXsXggfz0FfC5ThXcporycc90mRKpBd_O3qg3E8RAcQECFSya_Dyxm29pVv-n-wfU2PelA</recordid><startdate>20220601</startdate><enddate>20220601</enddate><creator>Esteve, Rosa</creator><creator>Reyes-Pérez, Ángela</creator><creator>Ramírez-Maestre, Carmen</creator><creator>Gutiérrez-Extremera, Andrea</creator><creator>Fuentes-Bravo, Rocío</creator><creator>de la Vega, Rocío</creator><creator>Ruíz-Párraga, Gema T.</creator><creator>Serrano-Ibáñez, Elena R.</creator><creator>López-Martínez, Alicia E.</creator><general>Springer Healthcare</general><general>Springer</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IAO</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3245-7844</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220601</creationdate><title>Diagnostic and Predictive Capacity of the Spanish Versions of the Opioid Risk Tool and the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients with Pain—Revised: A Preliminary Investigation in a Sample of People with Noncancer Chronic Pain</title><author>Esteve, Rosa ; Reyes-Pérez, Ángela ; Ramírez-Maestre, Carmen ; Gutiérrez-Extremera, Andrea ; Fuentes-Bravo, Rocío ; de la Vega, Rocío ; Ruíz-Párraga, Gema T. ; Serrano-Ibáñez, Elena R. ; López-Martínez, Alicia E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-d66e9f5daed804102607a5f378a3fbc679debc0f3b975a10ff1005e33c83e7593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Chronic pain</topic><topic>Drug therapy</topic><topic>Health risk assessment</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Mental health screening</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Pain Medicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Esteve, Rosa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reyes-Pérez, Ángela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramírez-Maestre, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gutiérrez-Extremera, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuentes-Bravo, Rocío</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de la Vega, Rocío</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruíz-Párraga, Gema T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serrano-Ibáñez, Elena R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López-Martínez, Alicia E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Academic OneFile</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Pain and Therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Esteve, Rosa</au><au>Reyes-Pérez, Ángela</au><au>Ramírez-Maestre, Carmen</au><au>Gutiérrez-Extremera, Andrea</au><au>Fuentes-Bravo, Rocío</au><au>de la Vega, Rocío</au><au>Ruíz-Párraga, Gema T.</au><au>Serrano-Ibáñez, Elena R.</au><au>López-Martínez, Alicia E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diagnostic and Predictive Capacity of the Spanish Versions of the Opioid Risk Tool and the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients with Pain—Revised: A Preliminary Investigation in a Sample of People with Noncancer Chronic Pain</atitle><jtitle>Pain and Therapy</jtitle><stitle>Pain Ther</stitle><addtitle>Pain Ther</addtitle><date>2022-06-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>493</spage><epage>510</epage><pages>493-510</pages><issn>2193-8237</issn><eissn>2193-651X</eissn><abstract>Introduction
Accurate assessment of the risk of opioid abuse and misuse in people with noncancer chronic pain is crucial for their prevention. This study aimed to provide preliminary evidence of the diagnostic and predictive capacity of the Spanish versions of the Opioid Risk Tool (ORT) and the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients with Pain—Revised (SOAPP-R).
Methods
We used the Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) as criterion measure to assess the capacity of each tool to identify patients misusing opioids at the time of the assessment. Eighteen months later, we used the COMM and the Drug Abuse Screening Test-10 (DAST-10) to assess their predictive capacity. In total, 147 people with noncancer chronic pain participated in the diagnostic study, and 42 in the predictive study.
Results
Receiver operating curve analysis showed that the SOAPP-R had an excellent capacity to identify participants who were misusing opioids at the time of assessment (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.827). The diagnostic capacity of the ORT was close to acceptable (AUC = 0.649–0.669), whereas its predictive capacity was poor (AUC = 0.522–0.554). The predictive capacity of the SOAPP-R was close to acceptable regarding misuse (AUC = 0.672) and poor regarding abuse (AUC = 0.423).
Conclusion
In the setting of Spanish-speaking communities, clinicians should be cautious when using these instruments to make decisions on opioid administration. Further research is needed on the diagnostic and predictive capacity of the Spanish versions of both instruments.</abstract><cop>Cheshire</cop><pub>Springer Healthcare</pub><pmid>35128624</pmid><doi>10.1007/s40122-022-00356-2</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3245-7844</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2193-8237 |
ispartof | Pain and Therapy, 2022-06, Vol.11 (2), p.493-510 |
issn | 2193-8237 2193-651X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9098780 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Chronic pain Drug therapy Health risk assessment Internal Medicine Medicine Medicine & Public Health Mental health screening Methods Original Research Pain Medicine |
title | Diagnostic and Predictive Capacity of the Spanish Versions of the Opioid Risk Tool and the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients with Pain—Revised: A Preliminary Investigation in a Sample of People with Noncancer Chronic Pain |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T04%3A00%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diagnostic%20and%20Predictive%20Capacity%20of%20the%20Spanish%20Versions%20of%20the%20Opioid%20Risk%20Tool%20and%20the%20Screener%20and%20Opioid%20Assessment%20for%20Patients%20with%20Pain%E2%80%94Revised:%20A%20Preliminary%20Investigation%20in%20a%20Sample%20of%20People%20with%20Noncancer%20Chronic%20Pain&rft.jtitle=Pain%20and%20Therapy&rft.au=Esteve,%20Rosa&rft.date=2022-06-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=493&rft.epage=510&rft.pages=493-510&rft.issn=2193-8237&rft.eissn=2193-651X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s40122-022-00356-2&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA703563363%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2626224851&rft_id=info:pmid/35128624&rft_galeid=A703563363&rfr_iscdi=true |