Optic nerve sheath diameter and its implications in the evaluation of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis
To ascertain the role of optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) in the evaluation of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST). A retrospective study with convenient sampling was done during the period November 2018 to January 2020. Forty-one patients across all age groups with magnetic resonance venograp...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Polish journal of radiology 2022, Vol.87, p.e202-206 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 206 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | e202 |
container_title | Polish journal of radiology |
container_volume | 87 |
creator | Das, Sudha Kiran Jindal, Saurabh Patil, Vikram Sachin, T |
description | To ascertain the role of optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) in the evaluation of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST).
A retrospective study with convenient sampling was done during the period November 2018 to January 2020. Forty-one patients across all age groups with magnetic resonance venography (MRV) diagnosis of CVST and 82 gender-matched controls were included in the study. ONSD was measured on axial T2-weighted magnetic resonance images. CVST was identified on axial TOF-MRV including the stage, degree, and location. Intraparenchymal infarction and haemorrhage were also noted with their stage and size. The distribution of values for ONSD was tested for equality of variances using independent samples
-test. A cut-off value for ONSD was derived using ROC analysis.
The mean difference between ONSD of cases and controls was 0.84 mm (95% CI: 0.61-1.06) and was statistically significant at
< 0.001. Mean ONSD in cases was 5.33 ± 0.66, and in the control group it was 4.49 ± 0.31. The cut-off value for ONSD was taken as 4.57 mm, derived using the ROC analysis (AUC was 0.876 suggesting good diagnostic accuracy). ONSD showed a sensitivity of 87% and a negative predictive value of 89% in predicting CVST. However, we found no statistical significance between ONSD in patients with acute or chronic thrombosis or in those with neuroparenchymal complications.
ONSD is a valid triage tool with high sensitivity and negative predictive value, and it can be used in the evaluation of CVST. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5114/pjr.2022.115706 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9093208</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2666548008</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3086-4d3090ea03d596f941415e4c40188765bfc24c7257a9650f17b65c389c2cf7513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc9LHTEQx0OxqKhnbyXHXvaZ37u5CCLaFgQvCr2FbHa2G9lNtkneg_73Rp8VzSGZzHznmwkfhM4p2UhKxcX6lDaMMLahVLZEfUHHtNO6IVq1BzVuOW8oF7-P0FnOT6QuRbkS4hAdcSk7JrU-RuP9WrzDAdIOcJ7AlgkP3i5QIGEbBuxLxn5ZZ-9s8THUS8BlAgw7O29fUziO2EGCPtkZ7yDEbcbZh7qXKcWlj9nnU_R1tHOGs7fzBD3e3jxc_2zu7n_8ur66axwnnWrEwIkmYAkfpFajFlRQCcIJQruuVbIfHROuZbK1Wkky0rZX0vFOO-bGVlJ-gi73vuu2X2BwEEqdyqzJLzb9M9F687kS_GT-xJ3RRHNGumrw_c0gxb9byMUsPjuYZxugfswwpZQUHXmVXuylLsWcE4zvz1BiXgCZCsi8ADJ7QLXj28fp3vX_cfBnsfWNyw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2666548008</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optic nerve sheath diameter and its implications in the evaluation of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Das, Sudha Kiran ; Jindal, Saurabh ; Patil, Vikram ; Sachin, T</creator><creatorcontrib>Das, Sudha Kiran ; Jindal, Saurabh ; Patil, Vikram ; Sachin, T</creatorcontrib><description>To ascertain the role of optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) in the evaluation of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST).
A retrospective study with convenient sampling was done during the period November 2018 to January 2020. Forty-one patients across all age groups with magnetic resonance venography (MRV) diagnosis of CVST and 82 gender-matched controls were included in the study. ONSD was measured on axial T2-weighted magnetic resonance images. CVST was identified on axial TOF-MRV including the stage, degree, and location. Intraparenchymal infarction and haemorrhage were also noted with their stage and size. The distribution of values for ONSD was tested for equality of variances using independent samples
-test. A cut-off value for ONSD was derived using ROC analysis.
The mean difference between ONSD of cases and controls was 0.84 mm (95% CI: 0.61-1.06) and was statistically significant at
< 0.001. Mean ONSD in cases was 5.33 ± 0.66, and in the control group it was 4.49 ± 0.31. The cut-off value for ONSD was taken as 4.57 mm, derived using the ROC analysis (AUC was 0.876 suggesting good diagnostic accuracy). ONSD showed a sensitivity of 87% and a negative predictive value of 89% in predicting CVST. However, we found no statistical significance between ONSD in patients with acute or chronic thrombosis or in those with neuroparenchymal complications.
ONSD is a valid triage tool with high sensitivity and negative predictive value, and it can be used in the evaluation of CVST.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1733-134X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1899-0967</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1899-0967</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5114/pjr.2022.115706</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35582599</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Poland: Termedia Publishing House</publisher><subject>Original Paper</subject><ispartof>Polish journal of radiology, 2022, Vol.87, p.e202-206</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Polish Medical Society of Radiology 2022.</rights><rights>Copyright © Polish Medical Society of Radiology 2022 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3086-4d3090ea03d596f941415e4c40188765bfc24c7257a9650f17b65c389c2cf7513</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3086-4d3090ea03d596f941415e4c40188765bfc24c7257a9650f17b65c389c2cf7513</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9093208/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9093208/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,4024,27923,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35582599$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Das, Sudha Kiran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jindal, Saurabh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patil, Vikram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sachin, T</creatorcontrib><title>Optic nerve sheath diameter and its implications in the evaluation of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis</title><title>Polish journal of radiology</title><addtitle>Pol J Radiol</addtitle><description>To ascertain the role of optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) in the evaluation of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST).
A retrospective study with convenient sampling was done during the period November 2018 to January 2020. Forty-one patients across all age groups with magnetic resonance venography (MRV) diagnosis of CVST and 82 gender-matched controls were included in the study. ONSD was measured on axial T2-weighted magnetic resonance images. CVST was identified on axial TOF-MRV including the stage, degree, and location. Intraparenchymal infarction and haemorrhage were also noted with their stage and size. The distribution of values for ONSD was tested for equality of variances using independent samples
-test. A cut-off value for ONSD was derived using ROC analysis.
The mean difference between ONSD of cases and controls was 0.84 mm (95% CI: 0.61-1.06) and was statistically significant at
< 0.001. Mean ONSD in cases was 5.33 ± 0.66, and in the control group it was 4.49 ± 0.31. The cut-off value for ONSD was taken as 4.57 mm, derived using the ROC analysis (AUC was 0.876 suggesting good diagnostic accuracy). ONSD showed a sensitivity of 87% and a negative predictive value of 89% in predicting CVST. However, we found no statistical significance between ONSD in patients with acute or chronic thrombosis or in those with neuroparenchymal complications.
ONSD is a valid triage tool with high sensitivity and negative predictive value, and it can be used in the evaluation of CVST.</description><subject>Original Paper</subject><issn>1733-134X</issn><issn>1899-0967</issn><issn>1899-0967</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkc9LHTEQx0OxqKhnbyXHXvaZ37u5CCLaFgQvCr2FbHa2G9lNtkneg_73Rp8VzSGZzHznmwkfhM4p2UhKxcX6lDaMMLahVLZEfUHHtNO6IVq1BzVuOW8oF7-P0FnOT6QuRbkS4hAdcSk7JrU-RuP9WrzDAdIOcJ7AlgkP3i5QIGEbBuxLxn5ZZ-9s8THUS8BlAgw7O29fUziO2EGCPtkZ7yDEbcbZh7qXKcWlj9nnU_R1tHOGs7fzBD3e3jxc_2zu7n_8ur66axwnnWrEwIkmYAkfpFajFlRQCcIJQruuVbIfHROuZbK1Wkky0rZX0vFOO-bGVlJ-gi73vuu2X2BwEEqdyqzJLzb9M9F687kS_GT-xJ3RRHNGumrw_c0gxb9byMUsPjuYZxugfswwpZQUHXmVXuylLsWcE4zvz1BiXgCZCsi8ADJ7QLXj28fp3vX_cfBnsfWNyw</recordid><startdate>2022</startdate><enddate>2022</enddate><creator>Das, Sudha Kiran</creator><creator>Jindal, Saurabh</creator><creator>Patil, Vikram</creator><creator>Sachin, T</creator><general>Termedia Publishing House</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2022</creationdate><title>Optic nerve sheath diameter and its implications in the evaluation of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis</title><author>Das, Sudha Kiran ; Jindal, Saurabh ; Patil, Vikram ; Sachin, T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3086-4d3090ea03d596f941415e4c40188765bfc24c7257a9650f17b65c389c2cf7513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Original Paper</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Das, Sudha Kiran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jindal, Saurabh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patil, Vikram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sachin, T</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Polish journal of radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Das, Sudha Kiran</au><au>Jindal, Saurabh</au><au>Patil, Vikram</au><au>Sachin, T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optic nerve sheath diameter and its implications in the evaluation of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis</atitle><jtitle>Polish journal of radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Pol J Radiol</addtitle><date>2022</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>87</volume><spage>e202</spage><epage>206</epage><pages>e202-206</pages><issn>1733-134X</issn><issn>1899-0967</issn><eissn>1899-0967</eissn><abstract>To ascertain the role of optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) in the evaluation of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST).
A retrospective study with convenient sampling was done during the period November 2018 to January 2020. Forty-one patients across all age groups with magnetic resonance venography (MRV) diagnosis of CVST and 82 gender-matched controls were included in the study. ONSD was measured on axial T2-weighted magnetic resonance images. CVST was identified on axial TOF-MRV including the stage, degree, and location. Intraparenchymal infarction and haemorrhage were also noted with their stage and size. The distribution of values for ONSD was tested for equality of variances using independent samples
-test. A cut-off value for ONSD was derived using ROC analysis.
The mean difference between ONSD of cases and controls was 0.84 mm (95% CI: 0.61-1.06) and was statistically significant at
< 0.001. Mean ONSD in cases was 5.33 ± 0.66, and in the control group it was 4.49 ± 0.31. The cut-off value for ONSD was taken as 4.57 mm, derived using the ROC analysis (AUC was 0.876 suggesting good diagnostic accuracy). ONSD showed a sensitivity of 87% and a negative predictive value of 89% in predicting CVST. However, we found no statistical significance between ONSD in patients with acute or chronic thrombosis or in those with neuroparenchymal complications.
ONSD is a valid triage tool with high sensitivity and negative predictive value, and it can be used in the evaluation of CVST.</abstract><cop>Poland</cop><pub>Termedia Publishing House</pub><pmid>35582599</pmid><doi>10.5114/pjr.2022.115706</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1733-134X |
ispartof | Polish journal of radiology, 2022, Vol.87, p.e202-206 |
issn | 1733-134X 1899-0967 1899-0967 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9093208 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central |
subjects | Original Paper |
title | Optic nerve sheath diameter and its implications in the evaluation of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T18%3A47%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optic%20nerve%20sheath%20diameter%20and%20its%20implications%20in%20the%20evaluation%20of%20cerebral%20venous%20sinus%20thrombosis&rft.jtitle=Polish%20journal%20of%20radiology&rft.au=Das,%20Sudha%20Kiran&rft.date=2022&rft.volume=87&rft.spage=e202&rft.epage=206&rft.pages=e202-206&rft.issn=1733-134X&rft.eissn=1899-0967&rft_id=info:doi/10.5114/pjr.2022.115706&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2666548008%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2666548008&rft_id=info:pmid/35582599&rfr_iscdi=true |