Efficacy and safety of favipiravir plus interferon‐beta versus lopinavir/ritonavir plus interferon‐beta in moderately ill patients with COVID‐19: A randomized clinical trial
Favipiravir (FVP), lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/RTV), and interferon‐beta (INF‐beta) are considered as potential treatments for COVID‐19. We examined the efficacy and safety of FVP and INF‐beta compared to LPV/RTV and INF‐beta combinations for the treatment of SARS‐CoV‐2. It was a single‐center randomiz...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of medical virology 2022-07, Vol.94 (7), p.3184-3191 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3191 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 3184 |
container_title | Journal of medical virology |
container_volume | 94 |
creator | Hassaniazad, Mehdi Farshidi, Hossein Gharibzadeh, Abdollah Bazram, Ali Khalili, Elham Noormandi, Afsaneh Fathalipour, Mohammad |
description | Favipiravir (FVP), lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/RTV), and interferon‐beta (INF‐beta) are considered as potential treatments for COVID‐19. We examined the efficacy and safety of FVP and INF‐beta compared to LPV/RTV and INF‐beta combinations for the treatment of SARS‐CoV‐2. It was a single‐center randomized clinical trial. Eligible patients were randomized to receive FVP plus INF‐beta versus LPV/RTV plus INF‐beta. The primary endpoint was the viral clearance after seven days of randomization. ICU admission, length of stay (LOS) in hospital, in‐hospital mortality, and the incidence of adverse events were also measured. This trial was registered on the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT20200506047323N3). Patients were randomly allocated to the FVP (n = 33) and LPV/RTV (n = 33) groups. The viral clearance on Day seven was not significantly different between the FVP (31.1%) and the LPV/RTV groups (16.1%). The rate of ICU admission and likewise the in‐hospital mortality in the FVP group (12.5% and 6.3%, respectively) were similar to the LPV/RTV groups (19.4% and 19.4%, respectively). The median LOS in the hospital was also not different (6.8 days [interquartile range; IQR = 5.0–11.0] in the FVP and (8.0 days [IQR = 5.5–12.5]) in LPV/RTV groups (p = 0.140). Adverse events were observed in 25.0% of FVP and 32.3% of LPV/RTV groups. The combination therapy with FVP did not exert a higher efficacy compared to the combination regimen of LPV/RTV. However, both treatment regimens demonstrated a mild profile of adverse events. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jmv.27724 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9088571</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2640047860</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4434-c78ecf6a4bc80076973b77087e835dee17bc27d8b227679aa5db6d0cd6da347a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk1u1DAYhi0EokNhwQWQJTawmI7tJP5hgVQNBYqKuoFuLcdxqEeOndrOVGHFEbgLN-IkeJhSARJs7MX3-NH7yS8AjzE6wgiR1WbYHhHGSH0HLDASdCkQw3fBAuGaLinFzQF4kNIGIcQFIffBQdUQQQQXC_DtpO-tVnqGyncwqd7kGYYe9mprRxvLGeHopgStzyb2Jgb__cvX1mQFtyamMnBhtH7HraLNwf_vhfVwCJ2JKhs3Q-scHFW2xucEr22-hOvzi9NXBcbiBTyGsSQKg_1sOqid9SWlgzla5R6Ce71yyTy6uQ_Bx9cnH9Zvl2fnb07Xx2dLXddVvdSMG91TVbeaI8SoYFXLGOLM8KrpjMGs1YR1vCWEUSaUarqWdkh3tFNVzVR1CF7uvePUDqbTJWhUTo7RDirOMigr_5x4eyk_ha0UiPOG4SJ4diOI4WoyKcvBJm2cU96EKUlCa4Rqxikq6NO_0E2Yoi_rFYo2TcM43gmf7ykdQ0rR9LdhMJK7KshSBfmzCoV98nv6W_LX3xdgtQeurTPzv03y3fuLvfIHQnDF1w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2665557811</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy and safety of favipiravir plus interferon‐beta versus lopinavir/ritonavir plus interferon‐beta in moderately ill patients with COVID‐19: A randomized clinical trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Hassaniazad, Mehdi ; Farshidi, Hossein ; Gharibzadeh, Abdollah ; Bazram, Ali ; Khalili, Elham ; Noormandi, Afsaneh ; Fathalipour, Mohammad</creator><creatorcontrib>Hassaniazad, Mehdi ; Farshidi, Hossein ; Gharibzadeh, Abdollah ; Bazram, Ali ; Khalili, Elham ; Noormandi, Afsaneh ; Fathalipour, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><description>Favipiravir (FVP), lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/RTV), and interferon‐beta (INF‐beta) are considered as potential treatments for COVID‐19. We examined the efficacy and safety of FVP and INF‐beta compared to LPV/RTV and INF‐beta combinations for the treatment of SARS‐CoV‐2. It was a single‐center randomized clinical trial. Eligible patients were randomized to receive FVP plus INF‐beta versus LPV/RTV plus INF‐beta. The primary endpoint was the viral clearance after seven days of randomization. ICU admission, length of stay (LOS) in hospital, in‐hospital mortality, and the incidence of adverse events were also measured. This trial was registered on the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT20200506047323N3). Patients were randomly allocated to the FVP (n = 33) and LPV/RTV (n = 33) groups. The viral clearance on Day seven was not significantly different between the FVP (31.1%) and the LPV/RTV groups (16.1%). The rate of ICU admission and likewise the in‐hospital mortality in the FVP group (12.5% and 6.3%, respectively) were similar to the LPV/RTV groups (19.4% and 19.4%, respectively). The median LOS in the hospital was also not different (6.8 days [interquartile range; IQR = 5.0–11.0] in the FVP and (8.0 days [IQR = 5.5–12.5]) in LPV/RTV groups (p = 0.140). Adverse events were observed in 25.0% of FVP and 32.3% of LPV/RTV groups. The combination therapy with FVP did not exert a higher efficacy compared to the combination regimen of LPV/RTV. However, both treatment regimens demonstrated a mild profile of adverse events.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0146-6615</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-9071</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jmv.27724</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35292989</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adverse events ; Amides ; Antiretroviral drugs ; antiviral agents ; Antiviral drugs ; Clinical trials ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 - drug therapy ; Humans ; Interferon ; Interferon-beta ; Iran ; Lopinavir ; Lopinavir - adverse effects ; Mortality ; Patients ; Pyrazines ; Randomization ; Ritonavir ; Ritonavir - adverse effects ; Safety ; SARS-CoV-2 ; SARS‐coronavirus ; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 ; Virology</subject><ispartof>Journal of medical virology, 2022-07, Vol.94 (7), p.3184-3191</ispartof><rights>2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC</rights><rights>2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4434-c78ecf6a4bc80076973b77087e835dee17bc27d8b227679aa5db6d0cd6da347a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4434-c78ecf6a4bc80076973b77087e835dee17bc27d8b227679aa5db6d0cd6da347a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8354-9426 ; 0000-0002-4568-7024</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjmv.27724$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjmv.27724$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35292989$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hassaniazad, Mehdi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farshidi, Hossein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gharibzadeh, Abdollah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bazram, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khalili, Elham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noormandi, Afsaneh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fathalipour, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy and safety of favipiravir plus interferon‐beta versus lopinavir/ritonavir plus interferon‐beta in moderately ill patients with COVID‐19: A randomized clinical trial</title><title>Journal of medical virology</title><addtitle>J Med Virol</addtitle><description>Favipiravir (FVP), lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/RTV), and interferon‐beta (INF‐beta) are considered as potential treatments for COVID‐19. We examined the efficacy and safety of FVP and INF‐beta compared to LPV/RTV and INF‐beta combinations for the treatment of SARS‐CoV‐2. It was a single‐center randomized clinical trial. Eligible patients were randomized to receive FVP plus INF‐beta versus LPV/RTV plus INF‐beta. The primary endpoint was the viral clearance after seven days of randomization. ICU admission, length of stay (LOS) in hospital, in‐hospital mortality, and the incidence of adverse events were also measured. This trial was registered on the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT20200506047323N3). Patients were randomly allocated to the FVP (n = 33) and LPV/RTV (n = 33) groups. The viral clearance on Day seven was not significantly different between the FVP (31.1%) and the LPV/RTV groups (16.1%). The rate of ICU admission and likewise the in‐hospital mortality in the FVP group (12.5% and 6.3%, respectively) were similar to the LPV/RTV groups (19.4% and 19.4%, respectively). The median LOS in the hospital was also not different (6.8 days [interquartile range; IQR = 5.0–11.0] in the FVP and (8.0 days [IQR = 5.5–12.5]) in LPV/RTV groups (p = 0.140). Adverse events were observed in 25.0% of FVP and 32.3% of LPV/RTV groups. The combination therapy with FVP did not exert a higher efficacy compared to the combination regimen of LPV/RTV. However, both treatment regimens demonstrated a mild profile of adverse events.</description><subject>Adverse events</subject><subject>Amides</subject><subject>Antiretroviral drugs</subject><subject>antiviral agents</subject><subject>Antiviral drugs</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 - drug therapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interferon</subject><subject>Interferon-beta</subject><subject>Iran</subject><subject>Lopinavir</subject><subject>Lopinavir - adverse effects</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pyrazines</subject><subject>Randomization</subject><subject>Ritonavir</subject><subject>Ritonavir - adverse effects</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2</subject><subject>SARS‐coronavirus</subject><subject>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</subject><subject>Virology</subject><issn>0146-6615</issn><issn>1096-9071</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kk1u1DAYhi0EokNhwQWQJTawmI7tJP5hgVQNBYqKuoFuLcdxqEeOndrOVGHFEbgLN-IkeJhSARJs7MX3-NH7yS8AjzE6wgiR1WbYHhHGSH0HLDASdCkQw3fBAuGaLinFzQF4kNIGIcQFIffBQdUQQQQXC_DtpO-tVnqGyncwqd7kGYYe9mprRxvLGeHopgStzyb2Jgb__cvX1mQFtyamMnBhtH7HraLNwf_vhfVwCJ2JKhs3Q-scHFW2xucEr22-hOvzi9NXBcbiBTyGsSQKg_1sOqid9SWlgzla5R6Ce71yyTy6uQ_Bx9cnH9Zvl2fnb07Xx2dLXddVvdSMG91TVbeaI8SoYFXLGOLM8KrpjMGs1YR1vCWEUSaUarqWdkh3tFNVzVR1CF7uvePUDqbTJWhUTo7RDirOMigr_5x4eyk_ha0UiPOG4SJ4diOI4WoyKcvBJm2cU96EKUlCa4Rqxikq6NO_0E2Yoi_rFYo2TcM43gmf7ykdQ0rR9LdhMJK7KshSBfmzCoV98nv6W_LX3xdgtQeurTPzv03y3fuLvfIHQnDF1w</recordid><startdate>202207</startdate><enddate>202207</enddate><creator>Hassaniazad, Mehdi</creator><creator>Farshidi, Hossein</creator><creator>Gharibzadeh, Abdollah</creator><creator>Bazram, Ali</creator><creator>Khalili, Elham</creator><creator>Noormandi, Afsaneh</creator><creator>Fathalipour, Mohammad</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8354-9426</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4568-7024</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202207</creationdate><title>Efficacy and safety of favipiravir plus interferon‐beta versus lopinavir/ritonavir plus interferon‐beta in moderately ill patients with COVID‐19: A randomized clinical trial</title><author>Hassaniazad, Mehdi ; Farshidi, Hossein ; Gharibzadeh, Abdollah ; Bazram, Ali ; Khalili, Elham ; Noormandi, Afsaneh ; Fathalipour, Mohammad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4434-c78ecf6a4bc80076973b77087e835dee17bc27d8b227679aa5db6d0cd6da347a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adverse events</topic><topic>Amides</topic><topic>Antiretroviral drugs</topic><topic>antiviral agents</topic><topic>Antiviral drugs</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 - drug therapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interferon</topic><topic>Interferon-beta</topic><topic>Iran</topic><topic>Lopinavir</topic><topic>Lopinavir - adverse effects</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pyrazines</topic><topic>Randomization</topic><topic>Ritonavir</topic><topic>Ritonavir - adverse effects</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2</topic><topic>SARS‐coronavirus</topic><topic>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</topic><topic>Virology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hassaniazad, Mehdi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farshidi, Hossein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gharibzadeh, Abdollah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bazram, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khalili, Elham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noormandi, Afsaneh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fathalipour, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of medical virology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hassaniazad, Mehdi</au><au>Farshidi, Hossein</au><au>Gharibzadeh, Abdollah</au><au>Bazram, Ali</au><au>Khalili, Elham</au><au>Noormandi, Afsaneh</au><au>Fathalipour, Mohammad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy and safety of favipiravir plus interferon‐beta versus lopinavir/ritonavir plus interferon‐beta in moderately ill patients with COVID‐19: A randomized clinical trial</atitle><jtitle>Journal of medical virology</jtitle><addtitle>J Med Virol</addtitle><date>2022-07</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>94</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>3184</spage><epage>3191</epage><pages>3184-3191</pages><issn>0146-6615</issn><eissn>1096-9071</eissn><abstract>Favipiravir (FVP), lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/RTV), and interferon‐beta (INF‐beta) are considered as potential treatments for COVID‐19. We examined the efficacy and safety of FVP and INF‐beta compared to LPV/RTV and INF‐beta combinations for the treatment of SARS‐CoV‐2. It was a single‐center randomized clinical trial. Eligible patients were randomized to receive FVP plus INF‐beta versus LPV/RTV plus INF‐beta. The primary endpoint was the viral clearance after seven days of randomization. ICU admission, length of stay (LOS) in hospital, in‐hospital mortality, and the incidence of adverse events were also measured. This trial was registered on the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT20200506047323N3). Patients were randomly allocated to the FVP (n = 33) and LPV/RTV (n = 33) groups. The viral clearance on Day seven was not significantly different between the FVP (31.1%) and the LPV/RTV groups (16.1%). The rate of ICU admission and likewise the in‐hospital mortality in the FVP group (12.5% and 6.3%, respectively) were similar to the LPV/RTV groups (19.4% and 19.4%, respectively). The median LOS in the hospital was also not different (6.8 days [interquartile range; IQR = 5.0–11.0] in the FVP and (8.0 days [IQR = 5.5–12.5]) in LPV/RTV groups (p = 0.140). Adverse events were observed in 25.0% of FVP and 32.3% of LPV/RTV groups. The combination therapy with FVP did not exert a higher efficacy compared to the combination regimen of LPV/RTV. However, both treatment regimens demonstrated a mild profile of adverse events.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>35292989</pmid><doi>10.1002/jmv.27724</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8354-9426</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4568-7024</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0146-6615 |
ispartof | Journal of medical virology, 2022-07, Vol.94 (7), p.3184-3191 |
issn | 0146-6615 1096-9071 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9088571 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Adverse events Amides Antiretroviral drugs antiviral agents Antiviral drugs Clinical trials COVID-19 COVID-19 - drug therapy Humans Interferon Interferon-beta Iran Lopinavir Lopinavir - adverse effects Mortality Patients Pyrazines Randomization Ritonavir Ritonavir - adverse effects Safety SARS-CoV-2 SARS‐coronavirus Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 Virology |
title | Efficacy and safety of favipiravir plus interferon‐beta versus lopinavir/ritonavir plus interferon‐beta in moderately ill patients with COVID‐19: A randomized clinical trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T20%3A50%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20and%20safety%20of%20favipiravir%20plus%20interferon%E2%80%90beta%20versus%20lopinavir/ritonavir%20plus%20interferon%E2%80%90beta%20in%20moderately%20ill%20patients%20with%20COVID%E2%80%9019:%20A%20randomized%20clinical%20trial&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20medical%20virology&rft.au=Hassaniazad,%20Mehdi&rft.date=2022-07&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=3184&rft.epage=3191&rft.pages=3184-3191&rft.issn=0146-6615&rft.eissn=1096-9071&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jmv.27724&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2640047860%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2665557811&rft_id=info:pmid/35292989&rfr_iscdi=true |