Efficacy and safety of favipiravir plus interferon‐beta versus lopinavir/ritonavir plus interferon‐beta in moderately ill patients with COVID‐19: A randomized clinical trial

Favipiravir (FVP), lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/RTV), and interferon‐beta (INF‐beta) are considered as potential treatments for COVID‐19. We examined the efficacy and safety of FVP and INF‐beta compared to LPV/RTV and INF‐beta combinations for the treatment of SARS‐CoV‐2. It was a single‐center randomiz...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of medical virology 2022-07, Vol.94 (7), p.3184-3191
Hauptverfasser: Hassaniazad, Mehdi, Farshidi, Hossein, Gharibzadeh, Abdollah, Bazram, Ali, Khalili, Elham, Noormandi, Afsaneh, Fathalipour, Mohammad
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3191
container_issue 7
container_start_page 3184
container_title Journal of medical virology
container_volume 94
creator Hassaniazad, Mehdi
Farshidi, Hossein
Gharibzadeh, Abdollah
Bazram, Ali
Khalili, Elham
Noormandi, Afsaneh
Fathalipour, Mohammad
description Favipiravir (FVP), lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/RTV), and interferon‐beta (INF‐beta) are considered as potential treatments for COVID‐19. We examined the efficacy and safety of FVP and INF‐beta compared to LPV/RTV and INF‐beta combinations for the treatment of SARS‐CoV‐2. It was a single‐center randomized clinical trial. Eligible patients were randomized to receive FVP plus INF‐beta versus LPV/RTV plus INF‐beta. The primary endpoint was the viral clearance after seven days of randomization. ICU admission, length of stay (LOS) in hospital, in‐hospital mortality, and the incidence of adverse events were also measured. This trial was registered on the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT20200506047323N3). Patients were randomly allocated to the FVP (n = 33) and LPV/RTV (n = 33) groups. The viral clearance on Day seven was not significantly different between the FVP (31.1%) and the LPV/RTV groups (16.1%). The rate of ICU admission and likewise the in‐hospital mortality in the FVP group (12.5% and 6.3%, respectively) were similar to the LPV/RTV groups (19.4% and 19.4%, respectively). The median LOS in the hospital was also not different (6.8 days [interquartile range; IQR = 5.0–11.0] in the FVP and (8.0 days [IQR = 5.5–12.5]) in LPV/RTV groups (p = 0.140). Adverse events were observed in 25.0% of FVP and 32.3% of LPV/RTV groups. The combination therapy with FVP did not exert a higher efficacy compared to the combination regimen of LPV/RTV. However, both treatment regimens demonstrated a mild profile of adverse events.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jmv.27724
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9088571</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2640047860</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4434-c78ecf6a4bc80076973b77087e835dee17bc27d8b227679aa5db6d0cd6da347a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk1u1DAYhi0EokNhwQWQJTawmI7tJP5hgVQNBYqKuoFuLcdxqEeOndrOVGHFEbgLN-IkeJhSARJs7MX3-NH7yS8AjzE6wgiR1WbYHhHGSH0HLDASdCkQw3fBAuGaLinFzQF4kNIGIcQFIffBQdUQQQQXC_DtpO-tVnqGyncwqd7kGYYe9mprRxvLGeHopgStzyb2Jgb__cvX1mQFtyamMnBhtH7HraLNwf_vhfVwCJ2JKhs3Q-scHFW2xucEr22-hOvzi9NXBcbiBTyGsSQKg_1sOqid9SWlgzla5R6Ce71yyTy6uQ_Bx9cnH9Zvl2fnb07Xx2dLXddVvdSMG91TVbeaI8SoYFXLGOLM8KrpjMGs1YR1vCWEUSaUarqWdkh3tFNVzVR1CF7uvePUDqbTJWhUTo7RDirOMigr_5x4eyk_ha0UiPOG4SJ4diOI4WoyKcvBJm2cU96EKUlCa4Rqxikq6NO_0E2Yoi_rFYo2TcM43gmf7ykdQ0rR9LdhMJK7KshSBfmzCoV98nv6W_LX3xdgtQeurTPzv03y3fuLvfIHQnDF1w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2665557811</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy and safety of favipiravir plus interferon‐beta versus lopinavir/ritonavir plus interferon‐beta in moderately ill patients with COVID‐19: A randomized clinical trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Hassaniazad, Mehdi ; Farshidi, Hossein ; Gharibzadeh, Abdollah ; Bazram, Ali ; Khalili, Elham ; Noormandi, Afsaneh ; Fathalipour, Mohammad</creator><creatorcontrib>Hassaniazad, Mehdi ; Farshidi, Hossein ; Gharibzadeh, Abdollah ; Bazram, Ali ; Khalili, Elham ; Noormandi, Afsaneh ; Fathalipour, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><description>Favipiravir (FVP), lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/RTV), and interferon‐beta (INF‐beta) are considered as potential treatments for COVID‐19. We examined the efficacy and safety of FVP and INF‐beta compared to LPV/RTV and INF‐beta combinations for the treatment of SARS‐CoV‐2. It was a single‐center randomized clinical trial. Eligible patients were randomized to receive FVP plus INF‐beta versus LPV/RTV plus INF‐beta. The primary endpoint was the viral clearance after seven days of randomization. ICU admission, length of stay (LOS) in hospital, in‐hospital mortality, and the incidence of adverse events were also measured. This trial was registered on the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT20200506047323N3). Patients were randomly allocated to the FVP (n = 33) and LPV/RTV (n = 33) groups. The viral clearance on Day seven was not significantly different between the FVP (31.1%) and the LPV/RTV groups (16.1%). The rate of ICU admission and likewise the in‐hospital mortality in the FVP group (12.5% and 6.3%, respectively) were similar to the LPV/RTV groups (19.4% and 19.4%, respectively). The median LOS in the hospital was also not different (6.8 days [interquartile range; IQR = 5.0–11.0] in the FVP and (8.0 days [IQR = 5.5–12.5]) in LPV/RTV groups (p = 0.140). Adverse events were observed in 25.0% of FVP and 32.3% of LPV/RTV groups. The combination therapy with FVP did not exert a higher efficacy compared to the combination regimen of LPV/RTV. However, both treatment regimens demonstrated a mild profile of adverse events.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0146-6615</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-9071</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jmv.27724</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35292989</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adverse events ; Amides ; Antiretroviral drugs ; antiviral agents ; Antiviral drugs ; Clinical trials ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 - drug therapy ; Humans ; Interferon ; Interferon-beta ; Iran ; Lopinavir ; Lopinavir - adverse effects ; Mortality ; Patients ; Pyrazines ; Randomization ; Ritonavir ; Ritonavir - adverse effects ; Safety ; SARS-CoV-2 ; SARS‐coronavirus ; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 ; Virology</subject><ispartof>Journal of medical virology, 2022-07, Vol.94 (7), p.3184-3191</ispartof><rights>2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC</rights><rights>2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4434-c78ecf6a4bc80076973b77087e835dee17bc27d8b227679aa5db6d0cd6da347a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4434-c78ecf6a4bc80076973b77087e835dee17bc27d8b227679aa5db6d0cd6da347a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8354-9426 ; 0000-0002-4568-7024</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjmv.27724$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjmv.27724$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35292989$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hassaniazad, Mehdi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farshidi, Hossein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gharibzadeh, Abdollah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bazram, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khalili, Elham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noormandi, Afsaneh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fathalipour, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy and safety of favipiravir plus interferon‐beta versus lopinavir/ritonavir plus interferon‐beta in moderately ill patients with COVID‐19: A randomized clinical trial</title><title>Journal of medical virology</title><addtitle>J Med Virol</addtitle><description>Favipiravir (FVP), lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/RTV), and interferon‐beta (INF‐beta) are considered as potential treatments for COVID‐19. We examined the efficacy and safety of FVP and INF‐beta compared to LPV/RTV and INF‐beta combinations for the treatment of SARS‐CoV‐2. It was a single‐center randomized clinical trial. Eligible patients were randomized to receive FVP plus INF‐beta versus LPV/RTV plus INF‐beta. The primary endpoint was the viral clearance after seven days of randomization. ICU admission, length of stay (LOS) in hospital, in‐hospital mortality, and the incidence of adverse events were also measured. This trial was registered on the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT20200506047323N3). Patients were randomly allocated to the FVP (n = 33) and LPV/RTV (n = 33) groups. The viral clearance on Day seven was not significantly different between the FVP (31.1%) and the LPV/RTV groups (16.1%). The rate of ICU admission and likewise the in‐hospital mortality in the FVP group (12.5% and 6.3%, respectively) were similar to the LPV/RTV groups (19.4% and 19.4%, respectively). The median LOS in the hospital was also not different (6.8 days [interquartile range; IQR = 5.0–11.0] in the FVP and (8.0 days [IQR = 5.5–12.5]) in LPV/RTV groups (p = 0.140). Adverse events were observed in 25.0% of FVP and 32.3% of LPV/RTV groups. The combination therapy with FVP did not exert a higher efficacy compared to the combination regimen of LPV/RTV. However, both treatment regimens demonstrated a mild profile of adverse events.</description><subject>Adverse events</subject><subject>Amides</subject><subject>Antiretroviral drugs</subject><subject>antiviral agents</subject><subject>Antiviral drugs</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 - drug therapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interferon</subject><subject>Interferon-beta</subject><subject>Iran</subject><subject>Lopinavir</subject><subject>Lopinavir - adverse effects</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pyrazines</subject><subject>Randomization</subject><subject>Ritonavir</subject><subject>Ritonavir - adverse effects</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2</subject><subject>SARS‐coronavirus</subject><subject>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</subject><subject>Virology</subject><issn>0146-6615</issn><issn>1096-9071</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kk1u1DAYhi0EokNhwQWQJTawmI7tJP5hgVQNBYqKuoFuLcdxqEeOndrOVGHFEbgLN-IkeJhSARJs7MX3-NH7yS8AjzE6wgiR1WbYHhHGSH0HLDASdCkQw3fBAuGaLinFzQF4kNIGIcQFIffBQdUQQQQXC_DtpO-tVnqGyncwqd7kGYYe9mprRxvLGeHopgStzyb2Jgb__cvX1mQFtyamMnBhtH7HraLNwf_vhfVwCJ2JKhs3Q-scHFW2xucEr22-hOvzi9NXBcbiBTyGsSQKg_1sOqid9SWlgzla5R6Ce71yyTy6uQ_Bx9cnH9Zvl2fnb07Xx2dLXddVvdSMG91TVbeaI8SoYFXLGOLM8KrpjMGs1YR1vCWEUSaUarqWdkh3tFNVzVR1CF7uvePUDqbTJWhUTo7RDirOMigr_5x4eyk_ha0UiPOG4SJ4diOI4WoyKcvBJm2cU96EKUlCa4Rqxikq6NO_0E2Yoi_rFYo2TcM43gmf7ykdQ0rR9LdhMJK7KshSBfmzCoV98nv6W_LX3xdgtQeurTPzv03y3fuLvfIHQnDF1w</recordid><startdate>202207</startdate><enddate>202207</enddate><creator>Hassaniazad, Mehdi</creator><creator>Farshidi, Hossein</creator><creator>Gharibzadeh, Abdollah</creator><creator>Bazram, Ali</creator><creator>Khalili, Elham</creator><creator>Noormandi, Afsaneh</creator><creator>Fathalipour, Mohammad</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8354-9426</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4568-7024</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202207</creationdate><title>Efficacy and safety of favipiravir plus interferon‐beta versus lopinavir/ritonavir plus interferon‐beta in moderately ill patients with COVID‐19: A randomized clinical trial</title><author>Hassaniazad, Mehdi ; Farshidi, Hossein ; Gharibzadeh, Abdollah ; Bazram, Ali ; Khalili, Elham ; Noormandi, Afsaneh ; Fathalipour, Mohammad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4434-c78ecf6a4bc80076973b77087e835dee17bc27d8b227679aa5db6d0cd6da347a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adverse events</topic><topic>Amides</topic><topic>Antiretroviral drugs</topic><topic>antiviral agents</topic><topic>Antiviral drugs</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 - drug therapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interferon</topic><topic>Interferon-beta</topic><topic>Iran</topic><topic>Lopinavir</topic><topic>Lopinavir - adverse effects</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pyrazines</topic><topic>Randomization</topic><topic>Ritonavir</topic><topic>Ritonavir - adverse effects</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2</topic><topic>SARS‐coronavirus</topic><topic>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</topic><topic>Virology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hassaniazad, Mehdi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farshidi, Hossein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gharibzadeh, Abdollah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bazram, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khalili, Elham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noormandi, Afsaneh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fathalipour, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of medical virology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hassaniazad, Mehdi</au><au>Farshidi, Hossein</au><au>Gharibzadeh, Abdollah</au><au>Bazram, Ali</au><au>Khalili, Elham</au><au>Noormandi, Afsaneh</au><au>Fathalipour, Mohammad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy and safety of favipiravir plus interferon‐beta versus lopinavir/ritonavir plus interferon‐beta in moderately ill patients with COVID‐19: A randomized clinical trial</atitle><jtitle>Journal of medical virology</jtitle><addtitle>J Med Virol</addtitle><date>2022-07</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>94</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>3184</spage><epage>3191</epage><pages>3184-3191</pages><issn>0146-6615</issn><eissn>1096-9071</eissn><abstract>Favipiravir (FVP), lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/RTV), and interferon‐beta (INF‐beta) are considered as potential treatments for COVID‐19. We examined the efficacy and safety of FVP and INF‐beta compared to LPV/RTV and INF‐beta combinations for the treatment of SARS‐CoV‐2. It was a single‐center randomized clinical trial. Eligible patients were randomized to receive FVP plus INF‐beta versus LPV/RTV plus INF‐beta. The primary endpoint was the viral clearance after seven days of randomization. ICU admission, length of stay (LOS) in hospital, in‐hospital mortality, and the incidence of adverse events were also measured. This trial was registered on the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT20200506047323N3). Patients were randomly allocated to the FVP (n = 33) and LPV/RTV (n = 33) groups. The viral clearance on Day seven was not significantly different between the FVP (31.1%) and the LPV/RTV groups (16.1%). The rate of ICU admission and likewise the in‐hospital mortality in the FVP group (12.5% and 6.3%, respectively) were similar to the LPV/RTV groups (19.4% and 19.4%, respectively). The median LOS in the hospital was also not different (6.8 days [interquartile range; IQR = 5.0–11.0] in the FVP and (8.0 days [IQR = 5.5–12.5]) in LPV/RTV groups (p = 0.140). Adverse events were observed in 25.0% of FVP and 32.3% of LPV/RTV groups. The combination therapy with FVP did not exert a higher efficacy compared to the combination regimen of LPV/RTV. However, both treatment regimens demonstrated a mild profile of adverse events.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>35292989</pmid><doi>10.1002/jmv.27724</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8354-9426</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4568-7024</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0146-6615
ispartof Journal of medical virology, 2022-07, Vol.94 (7), p.3184-3191
issn 0146-6615
1096-9071
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9088571
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Adverse events
Amides
Antiretroviral drugs
antiviral agents
Antiviral drugs
Clinical trials
COVID-19
COVID-19 - drug therapy
Humans
Interferon
Interferon-beta
Iran
Lopinavir
Lopinavir - adverse effects
Mortality
Patients
Pyrazines
Randomization
Ritonavir
Ritonavir - adverse effects
Safety
SARS-CoV-2
SARS‐coronavirus
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
Virology
title Efficacy and safety of favipiravir plus interferon‐beta versus lopinavir/ritonavir plus interferon‐beta in moderately ill patients with COVID‐19: A randomized clinical trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T20%3A50%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20and%20safety%20of%20favipiravir%20plus%20interferon%E2%80%90beta%20versus%20lopinavir/ritonavir%20plus%20interferon%E2%80%90beta%20in%20moderately%20ill%20patients%20with%20COVID%E2%80%9019:%20A%20randomized%20clinical%20trial&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20medical%20virology&rft.au=Hassaniazad,%20Mehdi&rft.date=2022-07&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=3184&rft.epage=3191&rft.pages=3184-3191&rft.issn=0146-6615&rft.eissn=1096-9071&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jmv.27724&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2640047860%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2665557811&rft_id=info:pmid/35292989&rfr_iscdi=true