Tertiary motifs as building blocks for the design of protein‐binding peptides

Despite advances in protein engineering, the de novo design of small proteins or peptides that bind to a desired target remains a difficult task. Most computational methods search for binder structures in a library of candidate scaffolds, which can lead to designs with poor target complementarity an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Protein science 2022-06, Vol.31 (6), p.e4322-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Swanson, Sebastian, Sivaraman, Venkatesh, Grigoryan, Gevorg, Keating, Amy E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 6
container_start_page e4322
container_title Protein science
container_volume 31
creator Swanson, Sebastian
Sivaraman, Venkatesh
Grigoryan, Gevorg
Keating, Amy E.
description Despite advances in protein engineering, the de novo design of small proteins or peptides that bind to a desired target remains a difficult task. Most computational methods search for binder structures in a library of candidate scaffolds, which can lead to designs with poor target complementarity and low success rates. Instead of choosing from pre‐defined scaffolds, we propose that custom peptide structures can be constructed to complement a target surface. Our method mines tertiary motifs (TERMs) from known structures to identify surface‐complementing fragments or “seeds.” We combine seeds that satisfy geometric overlap criteria to generate peptide backbones and score the backbones to identify the most likely binding structures. We found that TERM‐based seeds can describe known binding structures with high resolution: the vast majority of peptide binders from 486 peptide‐protein complexes can be covered by seeds generated from single‐chain structures. Furthermore, we demonstrate that known peptide structures can be reconstructed with high accuracy from peptide‐covering seeds. As a proof of concept, we used our method to design 100 peptide binders of TRAF6, seven of which were predicted by Rosetta to form higher‐quality interfaces than a native binder. The designed peptides interact with distinct sites on TRAF6, including the native peptide‐binding site. These results demonstrate that known peptide‐binding structures can be constructed from TERMs in single‐chain structures and suggest that TERM information can be applied to efficiently design novel target‐complementing binders.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/pro.4322
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9088223</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2671174245</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4382-9709b75bb99993b119876db00a52248929eeca1649d6dceb8b29c3deca253bc23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctKxDAUhoMozngBn0ACbtxUc2uabAQZvIEwIgruQtOmY8ZOU5NWmZ2P4DP6JMbxLphNyMnHd87hB2ALoz2MENlvvdtjlJAlMMSMy0RIfrMMhkhynAjKxQCshTBFCDFM6CoY0JRTlgk0BOMr4zub-zmcuc5WAeYB6t7WpW0mUNeuuAuwch52twaWJthJA10FY7_O2Obl6VnbZoG2pu1sBDbASpXXwWx-3Ovg-vjoanSanI9PzkaH50nBqCCJzJDUWaq1jIdqjKXIeKkRylNCmJBEGlPkmDNZ8rIwWmgiC1rGGkmpLghdBwfv3rbXMxORpvN5rVpvZ3EZ5XKrfv809lZN3IOSSAhCaBTsfgi8u-9N6NTMhsLUdd4Y1wdFeIal5FmGI7rzB5263jdxvQWFM0ZY-i0svAvBm-prGIzUW0rx7dRbShHd_jn8F_gZSwSSd-DR1mb-r0hdXI4XwleZhZ1k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2671174245</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tertiary motifs as building blocks for the design of protein‐binding peptides</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Swanson, Sebastian ; Sivaraman, Venkatesh ; Grigoryan, Gevorg ; Keating, Amy E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Swanson, Sebastian ; Sivaraman, Venkatesh ; Grigoryan, Gevorg ; Keating, Amy E.</creatorcontrib><description>Despite advances in protein engineering, the de novo design of small proteins or peptides that bind to a desired target remains a difficult task. Most computational methods search for binder structures in a library of candidate scaffolds, which can lead to designs with poor target complementarity and low success rates. Instead of choosing from pre‐defined scaffolds, we propose that custom peptide structures can be constructed to complement a target surface. Our method mines tertiary motifs (TERMs) from known structures to identify surface‐complementing fragments or “seeds.” We combine seeds that satisfy geometric overlap criteria to generate peptide backbones and score the backbones to identify the most likely binding structures. We found that TERM‐based seeds can describe known binding structures with high resolution: the vast majority of peptide binders from 486 peptide‐protein complexes can be covered by seeds generated from single‐chain structures. Furthermore, we demonstrate that known peptide structures can be reconstructed with high accuracy from peptide‐covering seeds. As a proof of concept, we used our method to design 100 peptide binders of TRAF6, seven of which were predicted by Rosetta to form higher‐quality interfaces than a native binder. The designed peptides interact with distinct sites on TRAF6, including the native peptide‐binding site. These results demonstrate that known peptide‐binding structures can be constructed from TERMs in single‐chain structures and suggest that TERM information can be applied to efficiently design novel target‐complementing binders.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0961-8368</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1469-896X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-896X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pro.4322</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35634780</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Binders ; Binding Sites ; Chains ; Complementarity ; computational protein design ; Computer applications ; de novo design ; Design ; Full‐length Paper ; Full‐length Papers ; Interfaces ; peptide binder ; peptide structure coverage ; Peptides ; Peptides - chemistry ; Protein Binding ; Protein Engineering ; protein interface ; Proteins ; Scaffolds ; tertiary motif ; TNF Receptor-Associated Factor 6 - metabolism ; TRAF6 ; TRAF6 protein</subject><ispartof>Protein science, 2022-06, Vol.31 (6), p.e4322-n/a</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Protein Society.</rights><rights>2022 The Authors. Protein Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Protein Society.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4382-9709b75bb99993b119876db00a52248929eeca1649d6dceb8b29c3deca253bc23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4382-9709b75bb99993b119876db00a52248929eeca1649d6dceb8b29c3deca253bc23</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4074-8980 ; 0000-0003-4645-7666 ; 0000-0002-0114-0051 ; 0000-0002-6965-3961</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9088223/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9088223/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,1417,1433,27923,27924,45573,45574,46408,46832,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35634780$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Swanson, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sivaraman, Venkatesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grigoryan, Gevorg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keating, Amy E.</creatorcontrib><title>Tertiary motifs as building blocks for the design of protein‐binding peptides</title><title>Protein science</title><addtitle>Protein Sci</addtitle><description>Despite advances in protein engineering, the de novo design of small proteins or peptides that bind to a desired target remains a difficult task. Most computational methods search for binder structures in a library of candidate scaffolds, which can lead to designs with poor target complementarity and low success rates. Instead of choosing from pre‐defined scaffolds, we propose that custom peptide structures can be constructed to complement a target surface. Our method mines tertiary motifs (TERMs) from known structures to identify surface‐complementing fragments or “seeds.” We combine seeds that satisfy geometric overlap criteria to generate peptide backbones and score the backbones to identify the most likely binding structures. We found that TERM‐based seeds can describe known binding structures with high resolution: the vast majority of peptide binders from 486 peptide‐protein complexes can be covered by seeds generated from single‐chain structures. Furthermore, we demonstrate that known peptide structures can be reconstructed with high accuracy from peptide‐covering seeds. As a proof of concept, we used our method to design 100 peptide binders of TRAF6, seven of which were predicted by Rosetta to form higher‐quality interfaces than a native binder. The designed peptides interact with distinct sites on TRAF6, including the native peptide‐binding site. These results demonstrate that known peptide‐binding structures can be constructed from TERMs in single‐chain structures and suggest that TERM information can be applied to efficiently design novel target‐complementing binders.</description><subject>Binders</subject><subject>Binding Sites</subject><subject>Chains</subject><subject>Complementarity</subject><subject>computational protein design</subject><subject>Computer applications</subject><subject>de novo design</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Full‐length Paper</subject><subject>Full‐length Papers</subject><subject>Interfaces</subject><subject>peptide binder</subject><subject>peptide structure coverage</subject><subject>Peptides</subject><subject>Peptides - chemistry</subject><subject>Protein Binding</subject><subject>Protein Engineering</subject><subject>protein interface</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Scaffolds</subject><subject>tertiary motif</subject><subject>TNF Receptor-Associated Factor 6 - metabolism</subject><subject>TRAF6</subject><subject>TRAF6 protein</subject><issn>0961-8368</issn><issn>1469-896X</issn><issn>1469-896X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kctKxDAUhoMozngBn0ACbtxUc2uabAQZvIEwIgruQtOmY8ZOU5NWmZ2P4DP6JMbxLphNyMnHd87hB2ALoz2MENlvvdtjlJAlMMSMy0RIfrMMhkhynAjKxQCshTBFCDFM6CoY0JRTlgk0BOMr4zub-zmcuc5WAeYB6t7WpW0mUNeuuAuwch52twaWJthJA10FY7_O2Obl6VnbZoG2pu1sBDbASpXXwWx-3Ovg-vjoanSanI9PzkaH50nBqCCJzJDUWaq1jIdqjKXIeKkRylNCmJBEGlPkmDNZ8rIwWmgiC1rGGkmpLghdBwfv3rbXMxORpvN5rVpvZ3EZ5XKrfv809lZN3IOSSAhCaBTsfgi8u-9N6NTMhsLUdd4Y1wdFeIal5FmGI7rzB5263jdxvQWFM0ZY-i0svAvBm-prGIzUW0rx7dRbShHd_jn8F_gZSwSSd-DR1mb-r0hdXI4XwleZhZ1k</recordid><startdate>202206</startdate><enddate>202206</enddate><creator>Swanson, Sebastian</creator><creator>Sivaraman, Venkatesh</creator><creator>Grigoryan, Gevorg</creator><creator>Keating, Amy E.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4074-8980</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4645-7666</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0114-0051</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6965-3961</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202206</creationdate><title>Tertiary motifs as building blocks for the design of protein‐binding peptides</title><author>Swanson, Sebastian ; Sivaraman, Venkatesh ; Grigoryan, Gevorg ; Keating, Amy E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4382-9709b75bb99993b119876db00a52248929eeca1649d6dceb8b29c3deca253bc23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Binders</topic><topic>Binding Sites</topic><topic>Chains</topic><topic>Complementarity</topic><topic>computational protein design</topic><topic>Computer applications</topic><topic>de novo design</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Full‐length Paper</topic><topic>Full‐length Papers</topic><topic>Interfaces</topic><topic>peptide binder</topic><topic>peptide structure coverage</topic><topic>Peptides</topic><topic>Peptides - chemistry</topic><topic>Protein Binding</topic><topic>Protein Engineering</topic><topic>protein interface</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Scaffolds</topic><topic>tertiary motif</topic><topic>TNF Receptor-Associated Factor 6 - metabolism</topic><topic>TRAF6</topic><topic>TRAF6 protein</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Swanson, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sivaraman, Venkatesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grigoryan, Gevorg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keating, Amy E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Protein science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Swanson, Sebastian</au><au>Sivaraman, Venkatesh</au><au>Grigoryan, Gevorg</au><au>Keating, Amy E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tertiary motifs as building blocks for the design of protein‐binding peptides</atitle><jtitle>Protein science</jtitle><addtitle>Protein Sci</addtitle><date>2022-06</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>e4322</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e4322-n/a</pages><issn>0961-8368</issn><issn>1469-896X</issn><eissn>1469-896X</eissn><abstract>Despite advances in protein engineering, the de novo design of small proteins or peptides that bind to a desired target remains a difficult task. Most computational methods search for binder structures in a library of candidate scaffolds, which can lead to designs with poor target complementarity and low success rates. Instead of choosing from pre‐defined scaffolds, we propose that custom peptide structures can be constructed to complement a target surface. Our method mines tertiary motifs (TERMs) from known structures to identify surface‐complementing fragments or “seeds.” We combine seeds that satisfy geometric overlap criteria to generate peptide backbones and score the backbones to identify the most likely binding structures. We found that TERM‐based seeds can describe known binding structures with high resolution: the vast majority of peptide binders from 486 peptide‐protein complexes can be covered by seeds generated from single‐chain structures. Furthermore, we demonstrate that known peptide structures can be reconstructed with high accuracy from peptide‐covering seeds. As a proof of concept, we used our method to design 100 peptide binders of TRAF6, seven of which were predicted by Rosetta to form higher‐quality interfaces than a native binder. The designed peptides interact with distinct sites on TRAF6, including the native peptide‐binding site. These results demonstrate that known peptide‐binding structures can be constructed from TERMs in single‐chain structures and suggest that TERM information can be applied to efficiently design novel target‐complementing binders.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>35634780</pmid><doi>10.1002/pro.4322</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4074-8980</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4645-7666</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0114-0051</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6965-3961</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0961-8368
ispartof Protein science, 2022-06, Vol.31 (6), p.e4322-n/a
issn 0961-8368
1469-896X
1469-896X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9088223
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Wiley Free Content; Wiley Online Library All Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Binders
Binding Sites
Chains
Complementarity
computational protein design
Computer applications
de novo design
Design
Full‐length Paper
Full‐length Papers
Interfaces
peptide binder
peptide structure coverage
Peptides
Peptides - chemistry
Protein Binding
Protein Engineering
protein interface
Proteins
Scaffolds
tertiary motif
TNF Receptor-Associated Factor 6 - metabolism
TRAF6
TRAF6 protein
title Tertiary motifs as building blocks for the design of protein‐binding peptides
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T08%3A24%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tertiary%20motifs%20as%20building%20blocks%20for%20the%20design%20of%20protein%E2%80%90binding%20peptides&rft.jtitle=Protein%20science&rft.au=Swanson,%20Sebastian&rft.date=2022-06&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=e4322&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e4322-n/a&rft.issn=0961-8368&rft.eissn=1469-896X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pro.4322&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2671174245%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2671174245&rft_id=info:pmid/35634780&rfr_iscdi=true