Analysis of Diagnostic Modalities in Hospital-admitted Patients Evaluated for COVID-19
To assess the diagnostic performance of reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), low-dose chest computed tomography (CT), and serological testing, alone and in combinations, as well as routine inflammatory markers in patients evaluated for COVID-19 during the first wave in early 202...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | In vivo (Athens) 2022-05, Vol.36 (3), p.1316-1324 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1324 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1316 |
container_title | In vivo (Athens) |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Gereke, Benedict Friedl, Andree Niemann, Tilo Calligaris-Maibach, Romana Schmid, Hans-Rudolf Vanetta, Chiara Rutishauser, Jonas Wiggli, Benedikt |
description | To assess the diagnostic performance of reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), low-dose chest computed tomography (CT), and serological testing, alone and in combinations, as well as routine inflammatory markers in patients evaluated for COVID-19 during the first wave in early 2020.
We retrospectively analyzed data of all patients who were admitted to the emergency department due to fever and/or respiratory symptoms. CT scans were rated using the COVID-19 Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS) suspicion score. True disease status (COVID-19 - positive vs. negative) was adjudicated by two independent clinicians. Receiver-operating characteristic curves and areas under the curves were calculated for inflammatory markers. Sensitivities and specificities were calculated for RT-PCR, CT, and serology alone, as well as the combinations of RT-PCR+CT, RT-PCR+serology, CT+serology, and all three modalities.
Of 221 patients with a median age of 72 years, 113 were classified as COVID-19 positive. Among 180 patients from which data on CT and RT-PCR were available, RT-PCR had the highest sensitivity to detect COVID-19 (0.87; 95%CI=0.78-0.93). Notably, the addition of CT in the analysis increased sensitivity to 0.89 (95%CI=0.8-0.94), but lowered specificity from 1 (95%CI=0.96-1) to 0.9 (95%CI=0.83-0.95). The combination of RT-PCR, CT and serology (n=60 patients with complete dataset) yielded a sensitivity of 0.83 (95%CI=0.61-0.94) and specificity of 0.86 (95%CI=0.72-0.93).
RT-PCR was the best single test in patients evaluated for COVID-19. Conversely, the routine performance of chest CT adds little sensitivity and decreases specificity. |
doi_str_mv | 10.21873/invivo.12832 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9087083</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2656744601</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-b1bc9d351afe623325217f0b0cc2d0a87ca5b895e938da9a77b9d170f1612edb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkUtPwzAQhC0EoqVw5Ipy5BLwI47tC1LV8pKKygEQN2tjO8UojUucROLfEyggOK2082l2tIPQMcFnlEjBzn3d-z6cESoZ3UFjIhRJBc_ULhpjymUqOXkeoYMYXzHOBcZ0H40Yz4QkTI7R07SG6j36mIQymXtY1SG23iR3wULlW-9i4uvkJsSNb6FKwa592zqb3MOg1W1MLnuoOvhclaFJZsun23lK1CHaK6GK7uh7TtDj1eXD7CZdLK9vZ9NFaljG2rQghVGWcQKlyyljlFMiSlxgY6jFIIUBXkjFnWLSggIhCmWJwCXJCXW2YBN0sfXddMXaWTNEaqDSm8avoXnXAbz-r9T-Ra9CrxWWAks2GJx-GzThrXOx1WsfjasqqF3ooqY5z0WW5ZgMaLpFTRNibFz5e4Zg_dWF3nahv7oY-JO_2X7pn-ezD6o4h50</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2656744601</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analysis of Diagnostic Modalities in Hospital-admitted Patients Evaluated for COVID-19</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Gereke, Benedict ; Friedl, Andree ; Niemann, Tilo ; Calligaris-Maibach, Romana ; Schmid, Hans-Rudolf ; Vanetta, Chiara ; Rutishauser, Jonas ; Wiggli, Benedikt</creator><creatorcontrib>Gereke, Benedict ; Friedl, Andree ; Niemann, Tilo ; Calligaris-Maibach, Romana ; Schmid, Hans-Rudolf ; Vanetta, Chiara ; Rutishauser, Jonas ; Wiggli, Benedikt</creatorcontrib><description>To assess the diagnostic performance of reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), low-dose chest computed tomography (CT), and serological testing, alone and in combinations, as well as routine inflammatory markers in patients evaluated for COVID-19 during the first wave in early 2020.
We retrospectively analyzed data of all patients who were admitted to the emergency department due to fever and/or respiratory symptoms. CT scans were rated using the COVID-19 Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS) suspicion score. True disease status (COVID-19 - positive vs. negative) was adjudicated by two independent clinicians. Receiver-operating characteristic curves and areas under the curves were calculated for inflammatory markers. Sensitivities and specificities were calculated for RT-PCR, CT, and serology alone, as well as the combinations of RT-PCR+CT, RT-PCR+serology, CT+serology, and all three modalities.
Of 221 patients with a median age of 72 years, 113 were classified as COVID-19 positive. Among 180 patients from which data on CT and RT-PCR were available, RT-PCR had the highest sensitivity to detect COVID-19 (0.87; 95%CI=0.78-0.93). Notably, the addition of CT in the analysis increased sensitivity to 0.89 (95%CI=0.8-0.94), but lowered specificity from 1 (95%CI=0.96-1) to 0.9 (95%CI=0.83-0.95). The combination of RT-PCR, CT and serology (n=60 patients with complete dataset) yielded a sensitivity of 0.83 (95%CI=0.61-0.94) and specificity of 0.86 (95%CI=0.72-0.93).
RT-PCR was the best single test in patients evaluated for COVID-19. Conversely, the routine performance of chest CT adds little sensitivity and decreases specificity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0258-851X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1791-7549</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12832</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35478138</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Greece: International Institute of Anticancer Research</publisher><subject>Aged ; COVID-19 - diagnosis ; Hospitalization ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Retrospective Studies ; Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><ispartof>In vivo (Athens), 2022-05, Vol.36 (3), p.1316-1324</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2022, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright 2022, International Institute of Anticancer Research 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9087083/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9087083/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35478138$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gereke, Benedict</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedl, Andree</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niemann, Tilo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calligaris-Maibach, Romana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmid, Hans-Rudolf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanetta, Chiara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutishauser, Jonas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiggli, Benedikt</creatorcontrib><title>Analysis of Diagnostic Modalities in Hospital-admitted Patients Evaluated for COVID-19</title><title>In vivo (Athens)</title><addtitle>In Vivo</addtitle><description>To assess the diagnostic performance of reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), low-dose chest computed tomography (CT), and serological testing, alone and in combinations, as well as routine inflammatory markers in patients evaluated for COVID-19 during the first wave in early 2020.
We retrospectively analyzed data of all patients who were admitted to the emergency department due to fever and/or respiratory symptoms. CT scans were rated using the COVID-19 Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS) suspicion score. True disease status (COVID-19 - positive vs. negative) was adjudicated by two independent clinicians. Receiver-operating characteristic curves and areas under the curves were calculated for inflammatory markers. Sensitivities and specificities were calculated for RT-PCR, CT, and serology alone, as well as the combinations of RT-PCR+CT, RT-PCR+serology, CT+serology, and all three modalities.
Of 221 patients with a median age of 72 years, 113 were classified as COVID-19 positive. Among 180 patients from which data on CT and RT-PCR were available, RT-PCR had the highest sensitivity to detect COVID-19 (0.87; 95%CI=0.78-0.93). Notably, the addition of CT in the analysis increased sensitivity to 0.89 (95%CI=0.8-0.94), but lowered specificity from 1 (95%CI=0.96-1) to 0.9 (95%CI=0.83-0.95). The combination of RT-PCR, CT and serology (n=60 patients with complete dataset) yielded a sensitivity of 0.83 (95%CI=0.61-0.94) and specificity of 0.86 (95%CI=0.72-0.93).
RT-PCR was the best single test in patients evaluated for COVID-19. Conversely, the routine performance of chest CT adds little sensitivity and decreases specificity.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>COVID-19 - diagnosis</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><issn>0258-851X</issn><issn>1791-7549</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkUtPwzAQhC0EoqVw5Ipy5BLwI47tC1LV8pKKygEQN2tjO8UojUucROLfEyggOK2082l2tIPQMcFnlEjBzn3d-z6cESoZ3UFjIhRJBc_ULhpjymUqOXkeoYMYXzHOBcZ0H40Yz4QkTI7R07SG6j36mIQymXtY1SG23iR3wULlW-9i4uvkJsSNb6FKwa592zqb3MOg1W1MLnuoOvhclaFJZsun23lK1CHaK6GK7uh7TtDj1eXD7CZdLK9vZ9NFaljG2rQghVGWcQKlyyljlFMiSlxgY6jFIIUBXkjFnWLSggIhCmWJwCXJCXW2YBN0sfXddMXaWTNEaqDSm8avoXnXAbz-r9T-Ra9CrxWWAks2GJx-GzThrXOx1WsfjasqqF3ooqY5z0WW5ZgMaLpFTRNibFz5e4Zg_dWF3nahv7oY-JO_2X7pn-ezD6o4h50</recordid><startdate>20220501</startdate><enddate>20220501</enddate><creator>Gereke, Benedict</creator><creator>Friedl, Andree</creator><creator>Niemann, Tilo</creator><creator>Calligaris-Maibach, Romana</creator><creator>Schmid, Hans-Rudolf</creator><creator>Vanetta, Chiara</creator><creator>Rutishauser, Jonas</creator><creator>Wiggli, Benedikt</creator><general>International Institute of Anticancer Research</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220501</creationdate><title>Analysis of Diagnostic Modalities in Hospital-admitted Patients Evaluated for COVID-19</title><author>Gereke, Benedict ; Friedl, Andree ; Niemann, Tilo ; Calligaris-Maibach, Romana ; Schmid, Hans-Rudolf ; Vanetta, Chiara ; Rutishauser, Jonas ; Wiggli, Benedikt</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-b1bc9d351afe623325217f0b0cc2d0a87ca5b895e938da9a77b9d170f1612edb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>COVID-19 - diagnosis</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gereke, Benedict</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedl, Andree</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niemann, Tilo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calligaris-Maibach, Romana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmid, Hans-Rudolf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanetta, Chiara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutishauser, Jonas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiggli, Benedikt</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>In vivo (Athens)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gereke, Benedict</au><au>Friedl, Andree</au><au>Niemann, Tilo</au><au>Calligaris-Maibach, Romana</au><au>Schmid, Hans-Rudolf</au><au>Vanetta, Chiara</au><au>Rutishauser, Jonas</au><au>Wiggli, Benedikt</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analysis of Diagnostic Modalities in Hospital-admitted Patients Evaluated for COVID-19</atitle><jtitle>In vivo (Athens)</jtitle><addtitle>In Vivo</addtitle><date>2022-05-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1316</spage><epage>1324</epage><pages>1316-1324</pages><issn>0258-851X</issn><eissn>1791-7549</eissn><abstract>To assess the diagnostic performance of reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), low-dose chest computed tomography (CT), and serological testing, alone and in combinations, as well as routine inflammatory markers in patients evaluated for COVID-19 during the first wave in early 2020.
We retrospectively analyzed data of all patients who were admitted to the emergency department due to fever and/or respiratory symptoms. CT scans were rated using the COVID-19 Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS) suspicion score. True disease status (COVID-19 - positive vs. negative) was adjudicated by two independent clinicians. Receiver-operating characteristic curves and areas under the curves were calculated for inflammatory markers. Sensitivities and specificities were calculated for RT-PCR, CT, and serology alone, as well as the combinations of RT-PCR+CT, RT-PCR+serology, CT+serology, and all three modalities.
Of 221 patients with a median age of 72 years, 113 were classified as COVID-19 positive. Among 180 patients from which data on CT and RT-PCR were available, RT-PCR had the highest sensitivity to detect COVID-19 (0.87; 95%CI=0.78-0.93). Notably, the addition of CT in the analysis increased sensitivity to 0.89 (95%CI=0.8-0.94), but lowered specificity from 1 (95%CI=0.96-1) to 0.9 (95%CI=0.83-0.95). The combination of RT-PCR, CT and serology (n=60 patients with complete dataset) yielded a sensitivity of 0.83 (95%CI=0.61-0.94) and specificity of 0.86 (95%CI=0.72-0.93).
RT-PCR was the best single test in patients evaluated for COVID-19. Conversely, the routine performance of chest CT adds little sensitivity and decreases specificity.</abstract><cop>Greece</cop><pub>International Institute of Anticancer Research</pub><pmid>35478138</pmid><doi>10.21873/invivo.12832</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0258-851X |
ispartof | In vivo (Athens), 2022-05, Vol.36 (3), p.1316-1324 |
issn | 0258-851X 1791-7549 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9087083 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Aged COVID-19 - diagnosis Hospitalization Hospitals Humans Retrospective Studies Sensitivity and Specificity |
title | Analysis of Diagnostic Modalities in Hospital-admitted Patients Evaluated for COVID-19 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T07%3A52%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analysis%20of%20Diagnostic%20Modalities%20in%20Hospital-admitted%20Patients%20Evaluated%20for%20COVID-19&rft.jtitle=In%20vivo%20(Athens)&rft.au=Gereke,%20Benedict&rft.date=2022-05-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1316&rft.epage=1324&rft.pages=1316-1324&rft.issn=0258-851X&rft.eissn=1791-7549&rft_id=info:doi/10.21873/invivo.12832&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2656744601%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2656744601&rft_id=info:pmid/35478138&rfr_iscdi=true |