Incorporating Digital Interventions into Mental Health Clinical Practice: a Pilot Survey of How Use Patterns, Barriers, and Opportunities Shifted for Clinicians in the COVID-19 Pandemic

Although many digital mental health interventions are available, clinicians do not routinely use them in clinical practice. In this pilot survey, we review the factors that supported the rapid transition to televisits during the COVID-19 pandemic, and we explore the barriers that continue to prevent...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of technology in behavioral science 2022-05, Vol.8 (4), p.336-340
Hauptverfasser: Johansen, Sara L., Olmert, Tony, Chaudhary, Neha, Vasan, Nina, Aragam, Gowri G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 340
container_issue 4
container_start_page 336
container_title Journal of technology in behavioral science
container_volume 8
creator Johansen, Sara L.
Olmert, Tony
Chaudhary, Neha
Vasan, Nina
Aragam, Gowri G.
description Although many digital mental health interventions are available, clinicians do not routinely use them in clinical practice. In this pilot survey, we review the factors that supported the rapid transition to televisits during the COVID-19 pandemic, and we explore the barriers that continue to prevent clinicians from using other digital mental health interventions, such as mindfulness applications, mood trackers, and digital therapy programs. We conducted a pilot survey of mental health clinicians in different practice environments in the USA. Survey respondents ( n  = 51) were primarily psychiatrists working in academic medical centers. Results indicated that systemic factors, including workplace facilitation and insurance reimbursement, were primary reasons motivating clinicians to use televisits to provide remote patient care. The shift to televisits during the pandemic was not accompanied by increased use of other digital mental health interventions in patient care. Nine clinicians reported that they have never used digital interventions with patients. Among the 42 clinicians who did report some experience using digital interventions, the majority reported no change in the use of digital applications since transitioning to televisits. Our preliminary findings lend insight into the perspective of mental health clinicians regarding the factors that supported their transition to televisits, including institutional support and insurance reimbursement, and indicate that this shift to virtual patient care has not been accompanied by increased use of other digital mental health interventions. We contend that the same systemic factors that supported the shift toward virtual visits in the COVID-19 pandemic may be applied to support the incorporation of other digital interventions in mental healthcare.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s41347-022-00260-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9086130</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2922077350</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3898-1df94a77fe22463293052c7309ff31e0e5b5614080e474b4cb9c41003526b0413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ks9uEzEQxlcIRKvSF-CALHHhwIL_rO01ByRIC4lUlEilXC2vM5u42tip7S3qo_XtcJtQCgdOHmu--Y1n_FXVS4LfEYzl-9QQ1sgaU1pjTAWu2yfVIWVC1FwJ9vRRfFAdp3SJi0oSTLF8Xh0wziVjRB1WtzNvQ9yGaLLzK3TiVi6bAc18hngNPrvgE3I-B_St3EpmCmbIazQZnHe23BfR2OwsfEAGLdwQMjofS-UNCj2ahp_oIgFamFxwPr1Fn02MDmKJjF-i-bY0zqN32UFC52vXZ1iiPsQ93pn75iivAU3mP2YnNVEF5pewcfZF9aw3Q4Lj_XlUXXw5_T6Z1mfzr7PJp7Pasla1NVn2qjFS9kBpIxhVDHNqJcOq7xkBDLzjgjS4xdDIpmtsp2xTNsw4FR0uSz6qPu6427HbwNKWNUQz6G10GxNvdDBO_53xbq1X4Vor3ArCcAG82QNiuBohZb1xycIwGA9hTJoKwQkWLeFF-vof6WUYoy_jaapo-TvJ-B2Q7lQ2hpQi9A-PIVjfmUPvzKGLOfS9OXRbil49HuOh5LcVioDtBKmk_Arin97_wf4CS9zFdA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2922077350</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Incorporating Digital Interventions into Mental Health Clinical Practice: a Pilot Survey of How Use Patterns, Barriers, and Opportunities Shifted for Clinicians in the COVID-19 Pandemic</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Johansen, Sara L. ; Olmert, Tony ; Chaudhary, Neha ; Vasan, Nina ; Aragam, Gowri G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Johansen, Sara L. ; Olmert, Tony ; Chaudhary, Neha ; Vasan, Nina ; Aragam, Gowri G.</creatorcontrib><description>Although many digital mental health interventions are available, clinicians do not routinely use them in clinical practice. In this pilot survey, we review the factors that supported the rapid transition to televisits during the COVID-19 pandemic, and we explore the barriers that continue to prevent clinicians from using other digital mental health interventions, such as mindfulness applications, mood trackers, and digital therapy programs. We conducted a pilot survey of mental health clinicians in different practice environments in the USA. Survey respondents ( n  = 51) were primarily psychiatrists working in academic medical centers. Results indicated that systemic factors, including workplace facilitation and insurance reimbursement, were primary reasons motivating clinicians to use televisits to provide remote patient care. The shift to televisits during the pandemic was not accompanied by increased use of other digital mental health interventions in patient care. Nine clinicians reported that they have never used digital interventions with patients. Among the 42 clinicians who did report some experience using digital interventions, the majority reported no change in the use of digital applications since transitioning to televisits. Our preliminary findings lend insight into the perspective of mental health clinicians regarding the factors that supported their transition to televisits, including institutional support and insurance reimbursement, and indicate that this shift to virtual patient care has not been accompanied by increased use of other digital mental health interventions. We contend that the same systemic factors that supported the shift toward virtual visits in the COVID-19 pandemic may be applied to support the incorporation of other digital interventions in mental healthcare.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2366-5963</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2366-5963</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s41347-022-00260-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35573319</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Brief Communication ; Clinical medicine ; Clinical Psychology ; COVID-19 ; Health care access ; Internet access ; Intervention ; Meditation ; Mental disorders ; Mental health ; Mindfulness ; Pandemics ; Patients ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Psychiatry ; Psychology ; Quality of life ; Reimbursement ; Social networks ; Social Work and Community Development ; Telemedicine ; Therapists ; Therapy</subject><ispartof>Journal of technology in behavioral science, 2022-05, Vol.8 (4), p.336-340</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3898-1df94a77fe22463293052c7309ff31e0e5b5614080e474b4cb9c41003526b0413</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3898-1df94a77fe22463293052c7309ff31e0e5b5614080e474b4cb9c41003526b0413</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2054-0920</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s41347-022-00260-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41347-022-00260-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,778,782,883,27911,27912,41475,42544,51306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35573319$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Johansen, Sara L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olmert, Tony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaudhary, Neha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasan, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aragam, Gowri G.</creatorcontrib><title>Incorporating Digital Interventions into Mental Health Clinical Practice: a Pilot Survey of How Use Patterns, Barriers, and Opportunities Shifted for Clinicians in the COVID-19 Pandemic</title><title>Journal of technology in behavioral science</title><addtitle>J. technol. behav. sci</addtitle><addtitle>J Technol Behav Sci</addtitle><description>Although many digital mental health interventions are available, clinicians do not routinely use them in clinical practice. In this pilot survey, we review the factors that supported the rapid transition to televisits during the COVID-19 pandemic, and we explore the barriers that continue to prevent clinicians from using other digital mental health interventions, such as mindfulness applications, mood trackers, and digital therapy programs. We conducted a pilot survey of mental health clinicians in different practice environments in the USA. Survey respondents ( n  = 51) were primarily psychiatrists working in academic medical centers. Results indicated that systemic factors, including workplace facilitation and insurance reimbursement, were primary reasons motivating clinicians to use televisits to provide remote patient care. The shift to televisits during the pandemic was not accompanied by increased use of other digital mental health interventions in patient care. Nine clinicians reported that they have never used digital interventions with patients. Among the 42 clinicians who did report some experience using digital interventions, the majority reported no change in the use of digital applications since transitioning to televisits. Our preliminary findings lend insight into the perspective of mental health clinicians regarding the factors that supported their transition to televisits, including institutional support and insurance reimbursement, and indicate that this shift to virtual patient care has not been accompanied by increased use of other digital mental health interventions. We contend that the same systemic factors that supported the shift toward virtual visits in the COVID-19 pandemic may be applied to support the incorporation of other digital interventions in mental healthcare.</description><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Brief Communication</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Clinical Psychology</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Health care access</subject><subject>Internet access</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Meditation</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Mindfulness</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Reimbursement</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Social Work and Community Development</subject><subject>Telemedicine</subject><subject>Therapists</subject><subject>Therapy</subject><issn>2366-5963</issn><issn>2366-5963</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9ks9uEzEQxlcIRKvSF-CALHHhwIL_rO01ByRIC4lUlEilXC2vM5u42tip7S3qo_XtcJtQCgdOHmu--Y1n_FXVS4LfEYzl-9QQ1sgaU1pjTAWu2yfVIWVC1FwJ9vRRfFAdp3SJi0oSTLF8Xh0wziVjRB1WtzNvQ9yGaLLzK3TiVi6bAc18hngNPrvgE3I-B_St3EpmCmbIazQZnHe23BfR2OwsfEAGLdwQMjofS-UNCj2ahp_oIgFamFxwPr1Fn02MDmKJjF-i-bY0zqN32UFC52vXZ1iiPsQ93pn75iivAU3mP2YnNVEF5pewcfZF9aw3Q4Lj_XlUXXw5_T6Z1mfzr7PJp7Pasla1NVn2qjFS9kBpIxhVDHNqJcOq7xkBDLzjgjS4xdDIpmtsp2xTNsw4FR0uSz6qPu6427HbwNKWNUQz6G10GxNvdDBO_53xbq1X4Vor3ArCcAG82QNiuBohZb1xycIwGA9hTJoKwQkWLeFF-vof6WUYoy_jaapo-TvJ-B2Q7lQ2hpQi9A-PIVjfmUPvzKGLOfS9OXRbil49HuOh5LcVioDtBKmk_Arin97_wf4CS9zFdA</recordid><startdate>20220510</startdate><enddate>20220510</enddate><creator>Johansen, Sara L.</creator><creator>Olmert, Tony</creator><creator>Chaudhary, Neha</creator><creator>Vasan, Nina</creator><creator>Aragam, Gowri G.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2054-0920</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220510</creationdate><title>Incorporating Digital Interventions into Mental Health Clinical Practice: a Pilot Survey of How Use Patterns, Barriers, and Opportunities Shifted for Clinicians in the COVID-19 Pandemic</title><author>Johansen, Sara L. ; Olmert, Tony ; Chaudhary, Neha ; Vasan, Nina ; Aragam, Gowri G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3898-1df94a77fe22463293052c7309ff31e0e5b5614080e474b4cb9c41003526b0413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Brief Communication</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Clinical Psychology</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Health care access</topic><topic>Internet access</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Meditation</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Mindfulness</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Reimbursement</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Social Work and Community Development</topic><topic>Telemedicine</topic><topic>Therapists</topic><topic>Therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Johansen, Sara L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olmert, Tony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaudhary, Neha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasan, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aragam, Gowri G.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of technology in behavioral science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Johansen, Sara L.</au><au>Olmert, Tony</au><au>Chaudhary, Neha</au><au>Vasan, Nina</au><au>Aragam, Gowri G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Incorporating Digital Interventions into Mental Health Clinical Practice: a Pilot Survey of How Use Patterns, Barriers, and Opportunities Shifted for Clinicians in the COVID-19 Pandemic</atitle><jtitle>Journal of technology in behavioral science</jtitle><stitle>J. technol. behav. sci</stitle><addtitle>J Technol Behav Sci</addtitle><date>2022-05-10</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>336</spage><epage>340</epage><pages>336-340</pages><issn>2366-5963</issn><eissn>2366-5963</eissn><abstract>Although many digital mental health interventions are available, clinicians do not routinely use them in clinical practice. In this pilot survey, we review the factors that supported the rapid transition to televisits during the COVID-19 pandemic, and we explore the barriers that continue to prevent clinicians from using other digital mental health interventions, such as mindfulness applications, mood trackers, and digital therapy programs. We conducted a pilot survey of mental health clinicians in different practice environments in the USA. Survey respondents ( n  = 51) were primarily psychiatrists working in academic medical centers. Results indicated that systemic factors, including workplace facilitation and insurance reimbursement, were primary reasons motivating clinicians to use televisits to provide remote patient care. The shift to televisits during the pandemic was not accompanied by increased use of other digital mental health interventions in patient care. Nine clinicians reported that they have never used digital interventions with patients. Among the 42 clinicians who did report some experience using digital interventions, the majority reported no change in the use of digital applications since transitioning to televisits. Our preliminary findings lend insight into the perspective of mental health clinicians regarding the factors that supported their transition to televisits, including institutional support and insurance reimbursement, and indicate that this shift to virtual patient care has not been accompanied by increased use of other digital mental health interventions. We contend that the same systemic factors that supported the shift toward virtual visits in the COVID-19 pandemic may be applied to support the incorporation of other digital interventions in mental healthcare.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>35573319</pmid><doi>10.1007/s41347-022-00260-8</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2054-0920</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2366-5963
ispartof Journal of technology in behavioral science, 2022-05, Vol.8 (4), p.336-340
issn 2366-5963
2366-5963
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9086130
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Behavioral Science and Psychology
Brief Communication
Clinical medicine
Clinical Psychology
COVID-19
Health care access
Internet access
Intervention
Meditation
Mental disorders
Mental health
Mindfulness
Pandemics
Patients
Polls & surveys
Psychiatry
Psychology
Quality of life
Reimbursement
Social networks
Social Work and Community Development
Telemedicine
Therapists
Therapy
title Incorporating Digital Interventions into Mental Health Clinical Practice: a Pilot Survey of How Use Patterns, Barriers, and Opportunities Shifted for Clinicians in the COVID-19 Pandemic
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T00%3A02%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Incorporating%20Digital%20Interventions%20into%20Mental%20Health%20Clinical%20Practice:%20a%20Pilot%20Survey%20of%20How%20Use%20Patterns,%20Barriers,%20and%20Opportunities%20Shifted%20for%20Clinicians%20in%20the%20COVID-19%20Pandemic&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20technology%20in%20behavioral%20science&rft.au=Johansen,%20Sara%20L.&rft.date=2022-05-10&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=336&rft.epage=340&rft.pages=336-340&rft.issn=2366-5963&rft.eissn=2366-5963&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s41347-022-00260-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2922077350%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2922077350&rft_id=info:pmid/35573319&rfr_iscdi=true