Efficacy and Safety of Difelikefalin in Japanese Patients With Moderate to Severe Pruritus Receiving Hemodialysis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Patients with pruritus receiving hemodialysis frequently experience oppressive physical and psychiatric symptoms that directly affect their quality of life and increase mortality. However, treatment options are limited. To determine the clinically recommended dose of difelikefalin, a κ-opioid recept...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JAMA network open 2022-05, Vol.5 (5), p.e2210339-e2210339
Hauptverfasser: Narita, Ichiei, Tsubakihara, Yoshiharu, Uchiyama, Takuma, Okamura, Shota, Oya, Nobuyo, Takahashi, Naoki, Gejyo, Fumitake
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e2210339
container_issue 5
container_start_page e2210339
container_title JAMA network open
container_volume 5
creator Narita, Ichiei
Tsubakihara, Yoshiharu
Uchiyama, Takuma
Okamura, Shota
Oya, Nobuyo
Takahashi, Naoki
Gejyo, Fumitake
description Patients with pruritus receiving hemodialysis frequently experience oppressive physical and psychiatric symptoms that directly affect their quality of life and increase mortality. However, treatment options are limited. To determine the clinically recommended dose of difelikefalin, a κ-opioid receptor agonist, based on the efficacy, dose response, safety, and pharmacokinetics. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 4-arm phase 2 trial was conducted from February 1, 2019, to October 22, 2019, at 94 sites in Japan. Patients with moderate to severe pruritus receiving hemodialysis were enrolled. Difelikefalin (0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 μg/kg) and placebo were intravenously administered 3 times a week at the end of each hemodialysis session for 8 weeks. The primary end point was the change from baseline in the weekly mean Worst Itching Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) score at week 8. Secondary outcomes measured changes in itch-related quality-of-life score using the Skindex-16 and 5-D itch scale. Safety was assessed according to adverse events, laboratory tests, vital signs, body weight, and 12-lead electrocardiogram. A total of 247 Japanese patients (186 male [75%]; mean [SD] age, 64.5 [11.7] years) were randomized to placebo (n = 63), 0.25 μg/kg of difelikefalin (n = 61), 0.5 μg/kg of difelikefalin (n = 61), or 1.0 μg/kg of difelikefalin (n = 62). The changes from baseline in the adjusted mean (SE) of the 24-hour Worst Itching Intensity NRS score at week 8 were -2.86 (0.29) in the placebo group, -2.97 (0.29) in the 0.25 μg/kg of difelikefalin group, -3.65 (0.30) in the 0.5 μg/kg of difelikefalin group, and -3.64 (0.30) in the 1.0 μg/kg of difelikefalin group. Significant differences were found in the 0.5 μg/kg of difelikefalin group (adjusted mean difference, -0.80; 95% CI, -1.55 to -0.04; P = .04) and the 1.0 μg/kg of difelikefalin group (adjusted mean difference, -0.78; 95% CI, -1.54 to -0.03; P = .04) compared with placebo. The Skindex-16 overall score and 5-D itch scale total score indicated an improvement with treatment with 0.5 and 1.0 μg/kg of difelikefalin (adjusted weekly mean [SE] Skindex-16 overall score at week 8, -27.79 [2.05]; 95% CI, -31.83 to -23.74 for 0.5 μg/kg of difelikefalin and -22.69 [2.04]; 95% CI, -26.71 to -18.68 for 1.0 μg/kg of difelikefalin; adjusted weekly mean [SE] 5-D itch scale total score at week 8, -6.5 [0.4]; 95% CI, -7.2 to -5.8 for 0.5 μg/kg of difelikefalin and -6.8 [0.3]; 95% CI, -7.5 to -6.2 for 1.0 μg/kg o
doi_str_mv 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.10339
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9073569</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2736872712</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c260t-1204a99c71dbd084a72887d37da62912781f5c3af5a09116b9153a7f0be7beb53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkdFOFTEQhjdGIwR5BdPojTcHp-3pdpcLE3JE0WA0gPGymd2dQg-720PbPebwEDyzRZAgSZM2mX_-f6ZfUbzhsMcB-PslDjhS-u3DpV_RuCdAiFyRsn5WbAul5zNZgXr-6L1V7Ma4BAABXNalellsSaU45xVsFzeH1roW2w3DsWOnaCltmLfso7PUu0uy2LuR5fMVVzk3EvuBydGYIvvl0gX75jsKmIglz05pTSELwhRcmiI7oZbc2o3n7IgG3znsN9HFfXbATnKYH9w1dWyR_fMAPTsLWfCqeJETI-3e3zvFz0-HZ4uj2fH3z18WB8ezVpSQZlzAHOu61bxrOqjmqEVV6U7qDktRc6ErblUr0SqEmvOyqbmSqC00pBtqlNwpPtz5rqZmoK7NCwXszSq4AcPGeHTm_8roLsy5X5satFRlnQ3e3RsEfzVRTGZwsaW-z5_kp2hEWULmBXOZpW-fSJd-CmNezwgty0oLzUVW7d-p2uBjDGQfhuFgbsmbJ-TNLXnzl3xufv14nYfWf5zlH_lKsRE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2736872712</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy and Safety of Difelikefalin in Japanese Patients With Moderate to Severe Pruritus Receiving Hemodialysis: A Randomized Clinical Trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Narita, Ichiei ; Tsubakihara, Yoshiharu ; Uchiyama, Takuma ; Okamura, Shota ; Oya, Nobuyo ; Takahashi, Naoki ; Gejyo, Fumitake</creator><creatorcontrib>Narita, Ichiei ; Tsubakihara, Yoshiharu ; Uchiyama, Takuma ; Okamura, Shota ; Oya, Nobuyo ; Takahashi, Naoki ; Gejyo, Fumitake ; MR13A9-4 Trial Investigators</creatorcontrib><description>Patients with pruritus receiving hemodialysis frequently experience oppressive physical and psychiatric symptoms that directly affect their quality of life and increase mortality. However, treatment options are limited. To determine the clinically recommended dose of difelikefalin, a κ-opioid receptor agonist, based on the efficacy, dose response, safety, and pharmacokinetics. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 4-arm phase 2 trial was conducted from February 1, 2019, to October 22, 2019, at 94 sites in Japan. Patients with moderate to severe pruritus receiving hemodialysis were enrolled. Difelikefalin (0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 μg/kg) and placebo were intravenously administered 3 times a week at the end of each hemodialysis session for 8 weeks. The primary end point was the change from baseline in the weekly mean Worst Itching Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) score at week 8. Secondary outcomes measured changes in itch-related quality-of-life score using the Skindex-16 and 5-D itch scale. Safety was assessed according to adverse events, laboratory tests, vital signs, body weight, and 12-lead electrocardiogram. A total of 247 Japanese patients (186 male [75%]; mean [SD] age, 64.5 [11.7] years) were randomized to placebo (n = 63), 0.25 μg/kg of difelikefalin (n = 61), 0.5 μg/kg of difelikefalin (n = 61), or 1.0 μg/kg of difelikefalin (n = 62). The changes from baseline in the adjusted mean (SE) of the 24-hour Worst Itching Intensity NRS score at week 8 were -2.86 (0.29) in the placebo group, -2.97 (0.29) in the 0.25 μg/kg of difelikefalin group, -3.65 (0.30) in the 0.5 μg/kg of difelikefalin group, and -3.64 (0.30) in the 1.0 μg/kg of difelikefalin group. Significant differences were found in the 0.5 μg/kg of difelikefalin group (adjusted mean difference, -0.80; 95% CI, -1.55 to -0.04; P = .04) and the 1.0 μg/kg of difelikefalin group (adjusted mean difference, -0.78; 95% CI, -1.54 to -0.03; P = .04) compared with placebo. The Skindex-16 overall score and 5-D itch scale total score indicated an improvement with treatment with 0.5 and 1.0 μg/kg of difelikefalin (adjusted weekly mean [SE] Skindex-16 overall score at week 8, -27.79 [2.05]; 95% CI, -31.83 to -23.74 for 0.5 μg/kg of difelikefalin and -22.69 [2.04]; 95% CI, -26.71 to -18.68 for 1.0 μg/kg of difelikefalin; adjusted weekly mean [SE] 5-D itch scale total score at week 8, -6.5 [0.4]; 95% CI, -7.2 to -5.8 for 0.5 μg/kg of difelikefalin and -6.8 [0.3]; 95% CI, -7.5 to -6.2 for 1.0 μg/kg of difelikefalin). The incidence of adverse events was 67% (42 of 63 patients) in the placebo group, 72% (44 of 61 patients) in the 0.25 μg/kg of difelikefalin group, 77% (47 of 61 patients) in the 0.5 μg/kg of difelikefalin group, and 85% (53 of 62 patients) in the 1.0 μg/kg of difelikefalin group. No dependency was reported. The findings of this phase 2 randomized clinical trial of difelikefalin suggest that 0.5 μg/kg of difelikefalin should be the clinically recommended dose as a new option for treating moderate to severe pruritus in patients undergoing hemodialysis because of its efficacy, acceptable tolerability, and manageable safety profile. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03802617.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2574-3805</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2574-3805</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.10339</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35511180</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Medical Association</publisher><subject>Clinical trials ; Female ; Hemodialysis ; Humans ; Japan ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nephrology ; Online Only ; Original Investigation ; Piperidines ; Pruritus ; Pruritus - drug therapy ; Pruritus - etiology ; Quality of Life ; Renal Dialysis - adverse effects</subject><ispartof>JAMA network open, 2022-05, Vol.5 (5), p.e2210339-e2210339</ispartof><rights>2022. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright 2022 Narita I et al. .</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c260t-1204a99c71dbd084a72887d37da62912781f5c3af5a09116b9153a7f0be7beb53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,860,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35511180$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Narita, Ichiei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsubakihara, Yoshiharu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uchiyama, Takuma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okamura, Shota</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oya, Nobuyo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Naoki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gejyo, Fumitake</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MR13A9-4 Trial Investigators</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy and Safety of Difelikefalin in Japanese Patients With Moderate to Severe Pruritus Receiving Hemodialysis: A Randomized Clinical Trial</title><title>JAMA network open</title><addtitle>JAMA Netw Open</addtitle><description>Patients with pruritus receiving hemodialysis frequently experience oppressive physical and psychiatric symptoms that directly affect their quality of life and increase mortality. However, treatment options are limited. To determine the clinically recommended dose of difelikefalin, a κ-opioid receptor agonist, based on the efficacy, dose response, safety, and pharmacokinetics. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 4-arm phase 2 trial was conducted from February 1, 2019, to October 22, 2019, at 94 sites in Japan. Patients with moderate to severe pruritus receiving hemodialysis were enrolled. Difelikefalin (0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 μg/kg) and placebo were intravenously administered 3 times a week at the end of each hemodialysis session for 8 weeks. The primary end point was the change from baseline in the weekly mean Worst Itching Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) score at week 8. Secondary outcomes measured changes in itch-related quality-of-life score using the Skindex-16 and 5-D itch scale. Safety was assessed according to adverse events, laboratory tests, vital signs, body weight, and 12-lead electrocardiogram. A total of 247 Japanese patients (186 male [75%]; mean [SD] age, 64.5 [11.7] years) were randomized to placebo (n = 63), 0.25 μg/kg of difelikefalin (n = 61), 0.5 μg/kg of difelikefalin (n = 61), or 1.0 μg/kg of difelikefalin (n = 62). The changes from baseline in the adjusted mean (SE) of the 24-hour Worst Itching Intensity NRS score at week 8 were -2.86 (0.29) in the placebo group, -2.97 (0.29) in the 0.25 μg/kg of difelikefalin group, -3.65 (0.30) in the 0.5 μg/kg of difelikefalin group, and -3.64 (0.30) in the 1.0 μg/kg of difelikefalin group. Significant differences were found in the 0.5 μg/kg of difelikefalin group (adjusted mean difference, -0.80; 95% CI, -1.55 to -0.04; P = .04) and the 1.0 μg/kg of difelikefalin group (adjusted mean difference, -0.78; 95% CI, -1.54 to -0.03; P = .04) compared with placebo. The Skindex-16 overall score and 5-D itch scale total score indicated an improvement with treatment with 0.5 and 1.0 μg/kg of difelikefalin (adjusted weekly mean [SE] Skindex-16 overall score at week 8, -27.79 [2.05]; 95% CI, -31.83 to -23.74 for 0.5 μg/kg of difelikefalin and -22.69 [2.04]; 95% CI, -26.71 to -18.68 for 1.0 μg/kg of difelikefalin; adjusted weekly mean [SE] 5-D itch scale total score at week 8, -6.5 [0.4]; 95% CI, -7.2 to -5.8 for 0.5 μg/kg of difelikefalin and -6.8 [0.3]; 95% CI, -7.5 to -6.2 for 1.0 μg/kg of difelikefalin). The incidence of adverse events was 67% (42 of 63 patients) in the placebo group, 72% (44 of 61 patients) in the 0.25 μg/kg of difelikefalin group, 77% (47 of 61 patients) in the 0.5 μg/kg of difelikefalin group, and 85% (53 of 62 patients) in the 1.0 μg/kg of difelikefalin group. No dependency was reported. The findings of this phase 2 randomized clinical trial of difelikefalin suggest that 0.5 μg/kg of difelikefalin should be the clinically recommended dose as a new option for treating moderate to severe pruritus in patients undergoing hemodialysis because of its efficacy, acceptable tolerability, and manageable safety profile. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03802617.</description><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hemodialysis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Japan</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nephrology</subject><subject>Online Only</subject><subject>Original Investigation</subject><subject>Piperidines</subject><subject>Pruritus</subject><subject>Pruritus - drug therapy</subject><subject>Pruritus - etiology</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Renal Dialysis - adverse effects</subject><issn>2574-3805</issn><issn>2574-3805</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkdFOFTEQhjdGIwR5BdPojTcHp-3pdpcLE3JE0WA0gPGymd2dQg-720PbPebwEDyzRZAgSZM2mX_-f6ZfUbzhsMcB-PslDjhS-u3DpV_RuCdAiFyRsn5WbAul5zNZgXr-6L1V7Ma4BAABXNalellsSaU45xVsFzeH1roW2w3DsWOnaCltmLfso7PUu0uy2LuR5fMVVzk3EvuBydGYIvvl0gX75jsKmIglz05pTSELwhRcmiI7oZbc2o3n7IgG3znsN9HFfXbATnKYH9w1dWyR_fMAPTsLWfCqeJETI-3e3zvFz0-HZ4uj2fH3z18WB8ezVpSQZlzAHOu61bxrOqjmqEVV6U7qDktRc6ErblUr0SqEmvOyqbmSqC00pBtqlNwpPtz5rqZmoK7NCwXszSq4AcPGeHTm_8roLsy5X5satFRlnQ3e3RsEfzVRTGZwsaW-z5_kp2hEWULmBXOZpW-fSJd-CmNezwgty0oLzUVW7d-p2uBjDGQfhuFgbsmbJ-TNLXnzl3xufv14nYfWf5zlH_lKsRE</recordid><startdate>20220502</startdate><enddate>20220502</enddate><creator>Narita, Ichiei</creator><creator>Tsubakihara, Yoshiharu</creator><creator>Uchiyama, Takuma</creator><creator>Okamura, Shota</creator><creator>Oya, Nobuyo</creator><creator>Takahashi, Naoki</creator><creator>Gejyo, Fumitake</creator><general>American Medical Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220502</creationdate><title>Efficacy and Safety of Difelikefalin in Japanese Patients With Moderate to Severe Pruritus Receiving Hemodialysis: A Randomized Clinical Trial</title><author>Narita, Ichiei ; Tsubakihara, Yoshiharu ; Uchiyama, Takuma ; Okamura, Shota ; Oya, Nobuyo ; Takahashi, Naoki ; Gejyo, Fumitake</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c260t-1204a99c71dbd084a72887d37da62912781f5c3af5a09116b9153a7f0be7beb53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hemodialysis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Japan</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nephrology</topic><topic>Online Only</topic><topic>Original Investigation</topic><topic>Piperidines</topic><topic>Pruritus</topic><topic>Pruritus - drug therapy</topic><topic>Pruritus - etiology</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Renal Dialysis - adverse effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Narita, Ichiei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsubakihara, Yoshiharu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uchiyama, Takuma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okamura, Shota</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oya, Nobuyo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Naoki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gejyo, Fumitake</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MR13A9-4 Trial Investigators</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>JAMA network open</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Narita, Ichiei</au><au>Tsubakihara, Yoshiharu</au><au>Uchiyama, Takuma</au><au>Okamura, Shota</au><au>Oya, Nobuyo</au><au>Takahashi, Naoki</au><au>Gejyo, Fumitake</au><aucorp>MR13A9-4 Trial Investigators</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy and Safety of Difelikefalin in Japanese Patients With Moderate to Severe Pruritus Receiving Hemodialysis: A Randomized Clinical Trial</atitle><jtitle>JAMA network open</jtitle><addtitle>JAMA Netw Open</addtitle><date>2022-05-02</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e2210339</spage><epage>e2210339</epage><pages>e2210339-e2210339</pages><issn>2574-3805</issn><eissn>2574-3805</eissn><abstract>Patients with pruritus receiving hemodialysis frequently experience oppressive physical and psychiatric symptoms that directly affect their quality of life and increase mortality. However, treatment options are limited. To determine the clinically recommended dose of difelikefalin, a κ-opioid receptor agonist, based on the efficacy, dose response, safety, and pharmacokinetics. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 4-arm phase 2 trial was conducted from February 1, 2019, to October 22, 2019, at 94 sites in Japan. Patients with moderate to severe pruritus receiving hemodialysis were enrolled. Difelikefalin (0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 μg/kg) and placebo were intravenously administered 3 times a week at the end of each hemodialysis session for 8 weeks. The primary end point was the change from baseline in the weekly mean Worst Itching Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) score at week 8. Secondary outcomes measured changes in itch-related quality-of-life score using the Skindex-16 and 5-D itch scale. Safety was assessed according to adverse events, laboratory tests, vital signs, body weight, and 12-lead electrocardiogram. A total of 247 Japanese patients (186 male [75%]; mean [SD] age, 64.5 [11.7] years) were randomized to placebo (n = 63), 0.25 μg/kg of difelikefalin (n = 61), 0.5 μg/kg of difelikefalin (n = 61), or 1.0 μg/kg of difelikefalin (n = 62). The changes from baseline in the adjusted mean (SE) of the 24-hour Worst Itching Intensity NRS score at week 8 were -2.86 (0.29) in the placebo group, -2.97 (0.29) in the 0.25 μg/kg of difelikefalin group, -3.65 (0.30) in the 0.5 μg/kg of difelikefalin group, and -3.64 (0.30) in the 1.0 μg/kg of difelikefalin group. Significant differences were found in the 0.5 μg/kg of difelikefalin group (adjusted mean difference, -0.80; 95% CI, -1.55 to -0.04; P = .04) and the 1.0 μg/kg of difelikefalin group (adjusted mean difference, -0.78; 95% CI, -1.54 to -0.03; P = .04) compared with placebo. The Skindex-16 overall score and 5-D itch scale total score indicated an improvement with treatment with 0.5 and 1.0 μg/kg of difelikefalin (adjusted weekly mean [SE] Skindex-16 overall score at week 8, -27.79 [2.05]; 95% CI, -31.83 to -23.74 for 0.5 μg/kg of difelikefalin and -22.69 [2.04]; 95% CI, -26.71 to -18.68 for 1.0 μg/kg of difelikefalin; adjusted weekly mean [SE] 5-D itch scale total score at week 8, -6.5 [0.4]; 95% CI, -7.2 to -5.8 for 0.5 μg/kg of difelikefalin and -6.8 [0.3]; 95% CI, -7.5 to -6.2 for 1.0 μg/kg of difelikefalin). The incidence of adverse events was 67% (42 of 63 patients) in the placebo group, 72% (44 of 61 patients) in the 0.25 μg/kg of difelikefalin group, 77% (47 of 61 patients) in the 0.5 μg/kg of difelikefalin group, and 85% (53 of 62 patients) in the 1.0 μg/kg of difelikefalin group. No dependency was reported. The findings of this phase 2 randomized clinical trial of difelikefalin suggest that 0.5 μg/kg of difelikefalin should be the clinically recommended dose as a new option for treating moderate to severe pruritus in patients undergoing hemodialysis because of its efficacy, acceptable tolerability, and manageable safety profile. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03802617.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Medical Association</pub><pmid>35511180</pmid><doi>10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.10339</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2574-3805
ispartof JAMA network open, 2022-05, Vol.5 (5), p.e2210339-e2210339
issn 2574-3805
2574-3805
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9073569
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Clinical trials
Female
Hemodialysis
Humans
Japan
Male
Middle Aged
Nephrology
Online Only
Original Investigation
Piperidines
Pruritus
Pruritus - drug therapy
Pruritus - etiology
Quality of Life
Renal Dialysis - adverse effects
title Efficacy and Safety of Difelikefalin in Japanese Patients With Moderate to Severe Pruritus Receiving Hemodialysis: A Randomized Clinical Trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T05%3A38%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20and%20Safety%20of%20Difelikefalin%20in%20Japanese%20Patients%20With%20Moderate%20to%20Severe%20Pruritus%20Receiving%20Hemodialysis:%20A%20Randomized%20Clinical%20Trial&rft.jtitle=JAMA%20network%20open&rft.au=Narita,%20Ichiei&rft.aucorp=MR13A9-4%20Trial%20Investigators&rft.date=2022-05-02&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e2210339&rft.epage=e2210339&rft.pages=e2210339-e2210339&rft.issn=2574-3805&rft.eissn=2574-3805&rft_id=info:doi/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.10339&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2736872712%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2736872712&rft_id=info:pmid/35511180&rfr_iscdi=true