Is biofeedback-assisted pelvic floor muscle training superior to pelvic floor muscle training alone in the treatment of dysfunctional voiding in women? A prospective randomized study
To compare the effectiveness of biofeedback-assisted pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) and PFMT alone on voiding parameters in women with dysfunctional voiding (DV). The patients in group 1 (34 patients) were treated with biofeedback-assisted PFMT, and the patients in group 2 (34 patients) were tr...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International Brazilian journal of urology 2022-05, Vol.48 (3), p.501-511 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 511 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 501 |
| container_title | International Brazilian journal of urology |
| container_volume | 48 |
| creator | Sam, Emre Cinislioglu, Ahmet Emre Yilmazel, Fatih Kursat Demirdogen, Saban Oguz Yilmaz, Ali Haydar Karabulut, Ibrahim |
| description | To compare the effectiveness of biofeedback-assisted pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) and PFMT alone on voiding parameters in women with dysfunctional voiding (DV).
The patients in group 1 (34 patients) were treated with biofeedback-assisted PFMT, and the patients in group 2 (34 patients) were treated with PFMT alone for 12 weeks. The 24-hour frequency, average voided volume, maximum urine flow rate (Qmax), average urine flow rate (Qave), post-void residual urine volume (PVR), and the validated Turkish Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6) symptom scores were recorded before and after 12 weeks of treatment.
At the end of treatment sessions, the Qmax and Qave values of the patients in group 1 were significantly higher than those in group 2, and the PVR in the patients in group 1 was significantly lower than those in group 2 (p=.026, .043, and .023, respectively). The average UDI-6 symptom scores of the patients in group 1 were significantly lower than those in group 2 (p=.034). Electromyography activity during voiding, in group 1 was significantly lower than in group 2 (41.2 vs. 64.7, respectively, p=.009).
Biofeedback-assisted PFMT is more effective than PFMT alone in improving clinical symptoms, uroflowmetry parameters, and EMG activity during voiding. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2021.0687 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9060159</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>35373947</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4131-1f86e15fd80ef001ba5259ca3ec80115a36231b78c226084a2b26d7a253a129e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1uFSEUx4nR2Fp9BYMPMFcOXOZjo6mN1muauNCuCQOHljoDE5i5zfXBfL4ytja6cQXh_3EO-RHyBtgGZMfefoO6aSopRbvZffhyueGMw4bVbfOEHP-WaoDu6cN9tR2RFznfMMY71sBzciSkaES3bY7Jr12mvY8O0fba_Kh0zj7PaOmEw94b6oYYEx2XbAakc9I--HBF8zJh8kWY4_-NeogBqQ90vl5fUc8jhplGR-0huyWY2cegB7qP3q7-4ryNxfKentIpxTxhceyRJh1sHP3PslieF3t4SZ45PWR89XCekMtPH7-ffa4uvp7vzk4vKrMFARW4tkaQzrYMHWPQa8llZ7RA0zIAqUXNBfRNazivWbvVvOe1bTSXQgPvUJyQd_e909KPaE1ZPulBTcmPOh1U1F79qwR_ra7iXnWsZoVVKejuC0z5TU7oHrPA1ApT5ZWSWikp398saoWpVpgl-_rv4Y_JP_TEHX7novo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is biofeedback-assisted pelvic floor muscle training superior to pelvic floor muscle training alone in the treatment of dysfunctional voiding in women? A prospective randomized study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Sam, Emre ; Cinislioglu, Ahmet Emre ; Yilmazel, Fatih Kursat ; Demirdogen, Saban Oguz ; Yilmaz, Ali Haydar ; Karabulut, Ibrahim</creator><creatorcontrib>Sam, Emre ; Cinislioglu, Ahmet Emre ; Yilmazel, Fatih Kursat ; Demirdogen, Saban Oguz ; Yilmaz, Ali Haydar ; Karabulut, Ibrahim</creatorcontrib><description>To compare the effectiveness of biofeedback-assisted pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) and PFMT alone on voiding parameters in women with dysfunctional voiding (DV).
The patients in group 1 (34 patients) were treated with biofeedback-assisted PFMT, and the patients in group 2 (34 patients) were treated with PFMT alone for 12 weeks. The 24-hour frequency, average voided volume, maximum urine flow rate (Qmax), average urine flow rate (Qave), post-void residual urine volume (PVR), and the validated Turkish Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6) symptom scores were recorded before and after 12 weeks of treatment.
At the end of treatment sessions, the Qmax and Qave values of the patients in group 1 were significantly higher than those in group 2, and the PVR in the patients in group 1 was significantly lower than those in group 2 (p=.026, .043, and .023, respectively). The average UDI-6 symptom scores of the patients in group 1 were significantly lower than those in group 2 (p=.034). Electromyography activity during voiding, in group 1 was significantly lower than in group 2 (41.2 vs. 64.7, respectively, p=.009).
Biofeedback-assisted PFMT is more effective than PFMT alone in improving clinical symptoms, uroflowmetry parameters, and EMG activity during voiding.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1677-5538</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1677-6119</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2021.0687</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35373947</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Brazil: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia</publisher><subject>Biofeedback, Psychology ; Electromyography ; Exercise Therapy ; Female ; Humans ; Original ; Pelvic Floor ; Prospective Studies</subject><ispartof>International Brazilian journal of urology, 2022-05, Vol.48 (3), p.501-511</ispartof><rights>Copyright® by the International Brazilian Journal of Urology.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4131-1f86e15fd80ef001ba5259ca3ec80115a36231b78c226084a2b26d7a253a129e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4131-1f86e15fd80ef001ba5259ca3ec80115a36231b78c226084a2b26d7a253a129e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7706-465X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9060159/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9060159/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35373947$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sam, Emre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cinislioglu, Ahmet Emre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yilmazel, Fatih Kursat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demirdogen, Saban Oguz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yilmaz, Ali Haydar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karabulut, Ibrahim</creatorcontrib><title>Is biofeedback-assisted pelvic floor muscle training superior to pelvic floor muscle training alone in the treatment of dysfunctional voiding in women? A prospective randomized study</title><title>International Brazilian journal of urology</title><addtitle>Int Braz J Urol</addtitle><description>To compare the effectiveness of biofeedback-assisted pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) and PFMT alone on voiding parameters in women with dysfunctional voiding (DV).
The patients in group 1 (34 patients) were treated with biofeedback-assisted PFMT, and the patients in group 2 (34 patients) were treated with PFMT alone for 12 weeks. The 24-hour frequency, average voided volume, maximum urine flow rate (Qmax), average urine flow rate (Qave), post-void residual urine volume (PVR), and the validated Turkish Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6) symptom scores were recorded before and after 12 weeks of treatment.
At the end of treatment sessions, the Qmax and Qave values of the patients in group 1 were significantly higher than those in group 2, and the PVR in the patients in group 1 was significantly lower than those in group 2 (p=.026, .043, and .023, respectively). The average UDI-6 symptom scores of the patients in group 1 were significantly lower than those in group 2 (p=.034). Electromyography activity during voiding, in group 1 was significantly lower than in group 2 (41.2 vs. 64.7, respectively, p=.009).
Biofeedback-assisted PFMT is more effective than PFMT alone in improving clinical symptoms, uroflowmetry parameters, and EMG activity during voiding.</description><subject>Biofeedback, Psychology</subject><subject>Electromyography</subject><subject>Exercise Therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Pelvic Floor</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><issn>1677-5538</issn><issn>1677-6119</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1uFSEUx4nR2Fp9BYMPMFcOXOZjo6mN1muauNCuCQOHljoDE5i5zfXBfL4ytja6cQXh_3EO-RHyBtgGZMfefoO6aSopRbvZffhyueGMw4bVbfOEHP-WaoDu6cN9tR2RFznfMMY71sBzciSkaES3bY7Jr12mvY8O0fba_Kh0zj7PaOmEw94b6oYYEx2XbAakc9I--HBF8zJh8kWY4_-NeogBqQ90vl5fUc8jhplGR-0huyWY2cegB7qP3q7-4ryNxfKentIpxTxhceyRJh1sHP3PslieF3t4SZ45PWR89XCekMtPH7-ffa4uvp7vzk4vKrMFARW4tkaQzrYMHWPQa8llZ7RA0zIAqUXNBfRNazivWbvVvOe1bTSXQgPvUJyQd_e909KPaE1ZPulBTcmPOh1U1F79qwR_ra7iXnWsZoVVKejuC0z5TU7oHrPA1ApT5ZWSWikp398saoWpVpgl-_rv4Y_JP_TEHX7novo</recordid><startdate>20220501</startdate><enddate>20220501</enddate><creator>Sam, Emre</creator><creator>Cinislioglu, Ahmet Emre</creator><creator>Yilmazel, Fatih Kursat</creator><creator>Demirdogen, Saban Oguz</creator><creator>Yilmaz, Ali Haydar</creator><creator>Karabulut, Ibrahim</creator><general>Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7706-465X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220501</creationdate><title>Is biofeedback-assisted pelvic floor muscle training superior to pelvic floor muscle training alone in the treatment of dysfunctional voiding in women? A prospective randomized study</title><author>Sam, Emre ; Cinislioglu, Ahmet Emre ; Yilmazel, Fatih Kursat ; Demirdogen, Saban Oguz ; Yilmaz, Ali Haydar ; Karabulut, Ibrahim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4131-1f86e15fd80ef001ba5259ca3ec80115a36231b78c226084a2b26d7a253a129e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Biofeedback, Psychology</topic><topic>Electromyography</topic><topic>Exercise Therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Pelvic Floor</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sam, Emre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cinislioglu, Ahmet Emre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yilmazel, Fatih Kursat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demirdogen, Saban Oguz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yilmaz, Ali Haydar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karabulut, Ibrahim</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International Brazilian journal of urology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sam, Emre</au><au>Cinislioglu, Ahmet Emre</au><au>Yilmazel, Fatih Kursat</au><au>Demirdogen, Saban Oguz</au><au>Yilmaz, Ali Haydar</au><au>Karabulut, Ibrahim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is biofeedback-assisted pelvic floor muscle training superior to pelvic floor muscle training alone in the treatment of dysfunctional voiding in women? A prospective randomized study</atitle><jtitle>International Brazilian journal of urology</jtitle><addtitle>Int Braz J Urol</addtitle><date>2022-05-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>501</spage><epage>511</epage><pages>501-511</pages><issn>1677-5538</issn><eissn>1677-6119</eissn><abstract>To compare the effectiveness of biofeedback-assisted pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) and PFMT alone on voiding parameters in women with dysfunctional voiding (DV).
The patients in group 1 (34 patients) were treated with biofeedback-assisted PFMT, and the patients in group 2 (34 patients) were treated with PFMT alone for 12 weeks. The 24-hour frequency, average voided volume, maximum urine flow rate (Qmax), average urine flow rate (Qave), post-void residual urine volume (PVR), and the validated Turkish Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6) symptom scores were recorded before and after 12 weeks of treatment.
At the end of treatment sessions, the Qmax and Qave values of the patients in group 1 were significantly higher than those in group 2, and the PVR in the patients in group 1 was significantly lower than those in group 2 (p=.026, .043, and .023, respectively). The average UDI-6 symptom scores of the patients in group 1 were significantly lower than those in group 2 (p=.034). Electromyography activity during voiding, in group 1 was significantly lower than in group 2 (41.2 vs. 64.7, respectively, p=.009).
Biofeedback-assisted PFMT is more effective than PFMT alone in improving clinical symptoms, uroflowmetry parameters, and EMG activity during voiding.</abstract><cop>Brazil</cop><pub>Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia</pub><pmid>35373947</pmid><doi>10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2021.0687</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7706-465X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1677-5538 |
| ispartof | International Brazilian journal of urology, 2022-05, Vol.48 (3), p.501-511 |
| issn | 1677-5538 1677-6119 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9060159 |
| source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central |
| subjects | Biofeedback, Psychology Electromyography Exercise Therapy Female Humans Original Pelvic Floor Prospective Studies |
| title | Is biofeedback-assisted pelvic floor muscle training superior to pelvic floor muscle training alone in the treatment of dysfunctional voiding in women? A prospective randomized study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T14%3A49%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20biofeedback-assisted%20pelvic%20floor%20muscle%20training%20superior%20to%20pelvic%20floor%20muscle%20training%20alone%20in%20the%20treatment%20of%20dysfunctional%20voiding%20in%20women?%20A%20prospective%20randomized%20study&rft.jtitle=International%20Brazilian%20journal%20of%20urology&rft.au=Sam,%20Emre&rft.date=2022-05-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=501&rft.epage=511&rft.pages=501-511&rft.issn=1677-5538&rft.eissn=1677-6119&rft_id=info:doi/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2021.0687&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E35373947%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/35373947&rfr_iscdi=true |