MRI-based contrast clearance analysis shows high differentiation accuracy between radiation-induced reactions and progressive disease after cranial radiotherapy

Pseudoprogression (PsP) or radiation necrosis (RN) may frequently occur after cranial radiotherapy and show a similar imaging pattern compared with progressive disease (PD). We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging-based contrast clearance analysis (CCA) in this cli...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:ESMO open 2022-04, Vol.7 (2), p.100424-100424, Article 100424
Hauptverfasser: Bodensohn, R., Forbrig, R., Quach, S., Reis, J., Boulesteix, A.-L., Mansmann, U., Hadi, I., Fleischmann, D.F., Mücke, J., Holzgreve, A., Albert, N.L., Ruf, V., Dorostkar, M., Corradini, S., Herms, J., Belka, C., Thon, N., Niyazi, M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 100424
container_issue 2
container_start_page 100424
container_title ESMO open
container_volume 7
creator Bodensohn, R.
Forbrig, R.
Quach, S.
Reis, J.
Boulesteix, A.-L.
Mansmann, U.
Hadi, I.
Fleischmann, D.F.
Mücke, J.
Holzgreve, A.
Albert, N.L.
Ruf, V.
Dorostkar, M.
Corradini, S.
Herms, J.
Belka, C.
Thon, N.
Niyazi, M.
description Pseudoprogression (PsP) or radiation necrosis (RN) may frequently occur after cranial radiotherapy and show a similar imaging pattern compared with progressive disease (PD). We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging-based contrast clearance analysis (CCA) in this clinical setting. Patients with equivocal imaging findings after cranial radiotherapy were consecutively included into this monocentric prospective study. CCA was carried out by software-based automated subtraction of imaging features in late versus early T1-weighted sequences after contrast agent application. Two experienced neuroradiologists evaluated CCA with respect to PsP/RN and PD being blinded for histological findings. The radiological assessment was compared with the histopathological results, and its accuracy was calculated statistically. A total of 33 patients were included; 16 (48.5%) were treated because of a primary brain tumor (BT), and 17 (51.1%) because of a secondary BT. In one patient, CCA was technically infeasible. The accuracy of CCA in predicting the histological result was 0.84 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67-0.95; one-sided P = 0.051; n = 32]. Sensitivity and specificity of CCA were 0.93 (95% CI 0.66-1.00) and 0.78 (95% CI 0.52-0.94), respectively. The accuracy in patients with secondary BTs was 0.94 (95% CI 0.71-1.00) and nonsignificantly higher compared with patients with primary BT with an accuracy of 0.73 (95% CI 0.45-0.92), P = 0.16. In this study, CCA was a highly accurate, easy, and helpful method for distinguishing PsP or RN from PD after cranial radiotherapy, especially in patients with secondary tumors after radiosurgical treatment. •CCA is accurate in distinguishing treatment reactions from true PD.•CCA was more accurate for irradiated metastases than primary BTs.•CCA is not feasible for lesions with no contrast media uptake.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100424
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9058918</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S205970292200045X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2636890206</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-16dfe86f2a81199ddf27f71b941930d4c8c50c1c452e7a2811551991a541865b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQxiMEolXpGyDkI5cstuP8uyChCmilIiQEZ2tiTzZeZePgcbbat-FR8TallAsnWzPf_D57vix7LfhGcFG9222Q9t7PG8mlTCWupHqWnUtetnnNZfv8yf0suyTacc5FrVKxepmdFaVUTSPlefbry7ebvANCy4yfYgCKzIwIASaDDCYYj-SI0eDviA1uOzDr-h4DTtFBdH5iYMwSwBxZh_EOcWIB7NrK3WQXk8gBwZwKlICWzcFvAxK5AyYYYTJn0EcMzCRXB-M9wccBA8zHV9mLHkbCy4fzIvvx6eP3q-v89uvnm6sPt7lRVRFzUdkem6qX0AjRttb2su5r0bVKtAW3yjSm5EYYVUqsQSZRWSadgFKJpiq74iJ7v3LnpdujNXhaxqjn4PYQjtqD0_92JjforT_olpdNK5oEePsACP7nghT13pHBcYQJ_UJaVkXVtFzyKknVKjXBEwXsH20E16d89U6v-epTvnrNN429efrEx6E_af79A6ZFHRwGTcZhCtK6gCZq693_HX4Dek-9iA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2636890206</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>MRI-based contrast clearance analysis shows high differentiation accuracy between radiation-induced reactions and progressive disease after cranial radiotherapy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Bodensohn, R. ; Forbrig, R. ; Quach, S. ; Reis, J. ; Boulesteix, A.-L. ; Mansmann, U. ; Hadi, I. ; Fleischmann, D.F. ; Mücke, J. ; Holzgreve, A. ; Albert, N.L. ; Ruf, V. ; Dorostkar, M. ; Corradini, S. ; Herms, J. ; Belka, C. ; Thon, N. ; Niyazi, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bodensohn, R. ; Forbrig, R. ; Quach, S. ; Reis, J. ; Boulesteix, A.-L. ; Mansmann, U. ; Hadi, I. ; Fleischmann, D.F. ; Mücke, J. ; Holzgreve, A. ; Albert, N.L. ; Ruf, V. ; Dorostkar, M. ; Corradini, S. ; Herms, J. ; Belka, C. ; Thon, N. ; Niyazi, M.</creatorcontrib><description>Pseudoprogression (PsP) or radiation necrosis (RN) may frequently occur after cranial radiotherapy and show a similar imaging pattern compared with progressive disease (PD). We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging-based contrast clearance analysis (CCA) in this clinical setting. Patients with equivocal imaging findings after cranial radiotherapy were consecutively included into this monocentric prospective study. CCA was carried out by software-based automated subtraction of imaging features in late versus early T1-weighted sequences after contrast agent application. Two experienced neuroradiologists evaluated CCA with respect to PsP/RN and PD being blinded for histological findings. The radiological assessment was compared with the histopathological results, and its accuracy was calculated statistically. A total of 33 patients were included; 16 (48.5%) were treated because of a primary brain tumor (BT), and 17 (51.1%) because of a secondary BT. In one patient, CCA was technically infeasible. The accuracy of CCA in predicting the histological result was 0.84 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67-0.95; one-sided P = 0.051; n = 32]. Sensitivity and specificity of CCA were 0.93 (95% CI 0.66-1.00) and 0.78 (95% CI 0.52-0.94), respectively. The accuracy in patients with secondary BTs was 0.94 (95% CI 0.71-1.00) and nonsignificantly higher compared with patients with primary BT with an accuracy of 0.73 (95% CI 0.45-0.92), P = 0.16. In this study, CCA was a highly accurate, easy, and helpful method for distinguishing PsP or RN from PD after cranial radiotherapy, especially in patients with secondary tumors after radiosurgical treatment. •CCA is accurate in distinguishing treatment reactions from true PD.•CCA was more accurate for irradiated metastases than primary BTs.•CCA is not feasible for lesions with no contrast media uptake.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2059-7029</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2059-7029</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100424</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35248822</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>brain metastases ; Brain Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Contrast Media ; glioma ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - adverse effects ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Necrosis - etiology ; Necrosis - surgery ; Original Research ; Prospective Studies ; pseudoprogression ; Radiation Injuries - diagnostic imaging ; Radiation Injuries - etiology ; Radiation Injuries - pathology ; radiation necrosis ; Radiosurgery ; stereotactic radiosurgery</subject><ispartof>ESMO open, 2022-04, Vol.7 (2), p.100424-100424, Article 100424</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2022 The Authors 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-16dfe86f2a81199ddf27f71b941930d4c8c50c1c452e7a2811551991a541865b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-16dfe86f2a81199ddf27f71b941930d4c8c50c1c452e7a2811551991a541865b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9058918/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9058918/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,886,27929,27930,53796,53798</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35248822$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bodensohn, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forbrig, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quach, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reis, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boulesteix, A.-L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mansmann, U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hadi, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleischmann, D.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mücke, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holzgreve, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albert, N.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruf, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dorostkar, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corradini, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herms, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belka, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thon, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niyazi, M.</creatorcontrib><title>MRI-based contrast clearance analysis shows high differentiation accuracy between radiation-induced reactions and progressive disease after cranial radiotherapy</title><title>ESMO open</title><addtitle>ESMO Open</addtitle><description>Pseudoprogression (PsP) or radiation necrosis (RN) may frequently occur after cranial radiotherapy and show a similar imaging pattern compared with progressive disease (PD). We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging-based contrast clearance analysis (CCA) in this clinical setting. Patients with equivocal imaging findings after cranial radiotherapy were consecutively included into this monocentric prospective study. CCA was carried out by software-based automated subtraction of imaging features in late versus early T1-weighted sequences after contrast agent application. Two experienced neuroradiologists evaluated CCA with respect to PsP/RN and PD being blinded for histological findings. The radiological assessment was compared with the histopathological results, and its accuracy was calculated statistically. A total of 33 patients were included; 16 (48.5%) were treated because of a primary brain tumor (BT), and 17 (51.1%) because of a secondary BT. In one patient, CCA was technically infeasible. The accuracy of CCA in predicting the histological result was 0.84 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67-0.95; one-sided P = 0.051; n = 32]. Sensitivity and specificity of CCA were 0.93 (95% CI 0.66-1.00) and 0.78 (95% CI 0.52-0.94), respectively. The accuracy in patients with secondary BTs was 0.94 (95% CI 0.71-1.00) and nonsignificantly higher compared with patients with primary BT with an accuracy of 0.73 (95% CI 0.45-0.92), P = 0.16. In this study, CCA was a highly accurate, easy, and helpful method for distinguishing PsP or RN from PD after cranial radiotherapy, especially in patients with secondary tumors after radiosurgical treatment. •CCA is accurate in distinguishing treatment reactions from true PD.•CCA was more accurate for irradiated metastases than primary BTs.•CCA is not feasible for lesions with no contrast media uptake.</description><subject>brain metastases</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Contrast Media</subject><subject>glioma</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - adverse effects</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Necrosis - etiology</subject><subject>Necrosis - surgery</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>pseudoprogression</subject><subject>Radiation Injuries - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Radiation Injuries - etiology</subject><subject>Radiation Injuries - pathology</subject><subject>radiation necrosis</subject><subject>Radiosurgery</subject><subject>stereotactic radiosurgery</subject><issn>2059-7029</issn><issn>2059-7029</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQxiMEolXpGyDkI5cstuP8uyChCmilIiQEZ2tiTzZeZePgcbbat-FR8TallAsnWzPf_D57vix7LfhGcFG9222Q9t7PG8mlTCWupHqWnUtetnnNZfv8yf0suyTacc5FrVKxepmdFaVUTSPlefbry7ebvANCy4yfYgCKzIwIASaDDCYYj-SI0eDviA1uOzDr-h4DTtFBdH5iYMwSwBxZh_EOcWIB7NrK3WQXk8gBwZwKlICWzcFvAxK5AyYYYTJn0EcMzCRXB-M9wccBA8zHV9mLHkbCy4fzIvvx6eP3q-v89uvnm6sPt7lRVRFzUdkem6qX0AjRttb2su5r0bVKtAW3yjSm5EYYVUqsQSZRWSadgFKJpiq74iJ7v3LnpdujNXhaxqjn4PYQjtqD0_92JjforT_olpdNK5oEePsACP7nghT13pHBcYQJ_UJaVkXVtFzyKknVKjXBEwXsH20E16d89U6v-epTvnrNN429efrEx6E_af79A6ZFHRwGTcZhCtK6gCZq693_HX4Dek-9iA</recordid><startdate>20220401</startdate><enddate>20220401</enddate><creator>Bodensohn, R.</creator><creator>Forbrig, R.</creator><creator>Quach, S.</creator><creator>Reis, J.</creator><creator>Boulesteix, A.-L.</creator><creator>Mansmann, U.</creator><creator>Hadi, I.</creator><creator>Fleischmann, D.F.</creator><creator>Mücke, J.</creator><creator>Holzgreve, A.</creator><creator>Albert, N.L.</creator><creator>Ruf, V.</creator><creator>Dorostkar, M.</creator><creator>Corradini, S.</creator><creator>Herms, J.</creator><creator>Belka, C.</creator><creator>Thon, N.</creator><creator>Niyazi, M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220401</creationdate><title>MRI-based contrast clearance analysis shows high differentiation accuracy between radiation-induced reactions and progressive disease after cranial radiotherapy</title><author>Bodensohn, R. ; Forbrig, R. ; Quach, S. ; Reis, J. ; Boulesteix, A.-L. ; Mansmann, U. ; Hadi, I. ; Fleischmann, D.F. ; Mücke, J. ; Holzgreve, A. ; Albert, N.L. ; Ruf, V. ; Dorostkar, M. ; Corradini, S. ; Herms, J. ; Belka, C. ; Thon, N. ; Niyazi, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-16dfe86f2a81199ddf27f71b941930d4c8c50c1c452e7a2811551991a541865b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>brain metastases</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Contrast Media</topic><topic>glioma</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - adverse effects</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Necrosis - etiology</topic><topic>Necrosis - surgery</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>pseudoprogression</topic><topic>Radiation Injuries - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Radiation Injuries - etiology</topic><topic>Radiation Injuries - pathology</topic><topic>radiation necrosis</topic><topic>Radiosurgery</topic><topic>stereotactic radiosurgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bodensohn, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forbrig, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quach, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reis, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boulesteix, A.-L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mansmann, U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hadi, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleischmann, D.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mücke, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holzgreve, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albert, N.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruf, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dorostkar, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corradini, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herms, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belka, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thon, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niyazi, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>ESMO open</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bodensohn, R.</au><au>Forbrig, R.</au><au>Quach, S.</au><au>Reis, J.</au><au>Boulesteix, A.-L.</au><au>Mansmann, U.</au><au>Hadi, I.</au><au>Fleischmann, D.F.</au><au>Mücke, J.</au><au>Holzgreve, A.</au><au>Albert, N.L.</au><au>Ruf, V.</au><au>Dorostkar, M.</au><au>Corradini, S.</au><au>Herms, J.</au><au>Belka, C.</au><au>Thon, N.</au><au>Niyazi, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>MRI-based contrast clearance analysis shows high differentiation accuracy between radiation-induced reactions and progressive disease after cranial radiotherapy</atitle><jtitle>ESMO open</jtitle><addtitle>ESMO Open</addtitle><date>2022-04-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>100424</spage><epage>100424</epage><pages>100424-100424</pages><artnum>100424</artnum><issn>2059-7029</issn><eissn>2059-7029</eissn><abstract>Pseudoprogression (PsP) or radiation necrosis (RN) may frequently occur after cranial radiotherapy and show a similar imaging pattern compared with progressive disease (PD). We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging-based contrast clearance analysis (CCA) in this clinical setting. Patients with equivocal imaging findings after cranial radiotherapy were consecutively included into this monocentric prospective study. CCA was carried out by software-based automated subtraction of imaging features in late versus early T1-weighted sequences after contrast agent application. Two experienced neuroradiologists evaluated CCA with respect to PsP/RN and PD being blinded for histological findings. The radiological assessment was compared with the histopathological results, and its accuracy was calculated statistically. A total of 33 patients were included; 16 (48.5%) were treated because of a primary brain tumor (BT), and 17 (51.1%) because of a secondary BT. In one patient, CCA was technically infeasible. The accuracy of CCA in predicting the histological result was 0.84 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67-0.95; one-sided P = 0.051; n = 32]. Sensitivity and specificity of CCA were 0.93 (95% CI 0.66-1.00) and 0.78 (95% CI 0.52-0.94), respectively. The accuracy in patients with secondary BTs was 0.94 (95% CI 0.71-1.00) and nonsignificantly higher compared with patients with primary BT with an accuracy of 0.73 (95% CI 0.45-0.92), P = 0.16. In this study, CCA was a highly accurate, easy, and helpful method for distinguishing PsP or RN from PD after cranial radiotherapy, especially in patients with secondary tumors after radiosurgical treatment. •CCA is accurate in distinguishing treatment reactions from true PD.•CCA was more accurate for irradiated metastases than primary BTs.•CCA is not feasible for lesions with no contrast media uptake.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>35248822</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100424</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2059-7029
ispartof ESMO open, 2022-04, Vol.7 (2), p.100424-100424, Article 100424
issn 2059-7029
2059-7029
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9058918
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects brain metastases
Brain Neoplasms - radiotherapy
Contrast Media
glioma
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - adverse effects
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Necrosis - etiology
Necrosis - surgery
Original Research
Prospective Studies
pseudoprogression
Radiation Injuries - diagnostic imaging
Radiation Injuries - etiology
Radiation Injuries - pathology
radiation necrosis
Radiosurgery
stereotactic radiosurgery
title MRI-based contrast clearance analysis shows high differentiation accuracy between radiation-induced reactions and progressive disease after cranial radiotherapy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T11%3A36%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=MRI-based%20contrast%20clearance%20analysis%20shows%20high%20differentiation%20accuracy%20between%20radiation-induced%20reactions%20and%20progressive%20disease%20after%20cranial%20radiotherapy&rft.jtitle=ESMO%20open&rft.au=Bodensohn,%20R.&rft.date=2022-04-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=100424&rft.epage=100424&rft.pages=100424-100424&rft.artnum=100424&rft.issn=2059-7029&rft.eissn=2059-7029&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100424&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2636890206%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2636890206&rft_id=info:pmid/35248822&rft_els_id=S205970292200045X&rfr_iscdi=true