Outcomes of In-Person and Telehealth Ambulatory Encounters During COVID-19 Within a Large Commercially Insured Cohort
Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, few studies have assessed the association of telehealth with outcomes of care, including patterns of health care use after the initial encounter. To assess the association of telehealth and in-person visits with outcomes of care during the COVID-19 pandemic....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | JAMA network open 2022-04, Vol.5 (4), p.e228954-e228954 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e228954 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | e228954 |
container_title | JAMA network open |
container_volume | 5 |
creator | Hatef, Elham Lans, Daniel Bandeian, Stephen Lasser, Elyse C Goldsack, Jennifer Weiner, Jonathan P |
description | Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, few studies have assessed the association of telehealth with outcomes of care, including patterns of health care use after the initial encounter.
To assess the association of telehealth and in-person visits with outcomes of care during the COVID-19 pandemic.
This cohort study assessed continuously enrolled members in private health plans of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association from July 1, 2019, to December 31, 2020.
Main outcomes were ambulatory encounters per enrollee stratified by characteristics derived from enrollment files, practitioner claims, and community characteristics linked to the enrollee's zip code. Outcomes of care were assessed 14 days after the initial encounters and included follow-up encounters of any kind, emergency department encounters, and hospitalizations after initial telehealth or in-person encounters.
In this cohort study of 40 739 915 individuals (mean [SD] age, 35.37 [18.77] years; 20 480 768 [50.3%] female), ambulatory encounters decreased by 1.0% and the number of in-person encounters per enrollee decreased by 17.0% from 2019 to 2020; however, as a proportion of all ambulatory encounters, telehealth encounters increased substantially from 0.6% (n = 236 220) to 14.1% (n = 5 743 718). For members with an initial telehealth encounter for a new acute condition, the adjusted odds ratio was 1.44 (95% CI, 1.42-1.46) for all follow-ups combined and 1.11 (95% CI, 1.06-1.16) for an emergency department encounter. For members with an initial telehealth encounter for a new chronic condition, the adjusted odds ratios were 0.94 (95% CI, 0.92-0.95) for all follow-ups combined and 0.94 (95% CI, 0.90-0.99) for in-patient admissions.
In this cohort study of 40.7 million commercially insured adults, telehealth accounted for a large share of ambulatory encounters at the peak of the pandemic and remained prevalent after infection rates subsided. Telehealth encounters for chronic conditions had similar rates of follow-up to in-person encounters for these conditions, whereas telehealth encounters for acute conditions seemed to be more likely than in-person encounters to require follow-up. These findings suggest a direction for future work and are relevant to policy makers, payers, and practitioners as they manage the use of telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic and afterward. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.8954 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9044109</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2665570541</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a470t-41d80ee89f9e3c925f05bda56fa11c9ae84c0fd61ab4522b1a264f852b204f903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1u1DAURiNE1VZtX6EyYsMmw7VjJ_EGqZoWGGmkYVFgaTnJzSRDYg_-KZq3x6OWqnRlyz7fp3t1suwdhQUFoB93etYGwx_rftk9mgUDxha1FPxNds5ExfOiBvH2xf0su_J-BwAMaCFLcZqdFYJXVFRwnsVNDK2d0RPbk5XJv6Hz1hBtOnKPEw6opzCQm7mJkw7WHcidaW00IWHkNrrRbMly82N1m1NJfo5hGFOWrLXbIlnaeUbXjnqaDqnaR4ddehysC5fZSa8nj1dP50X2_fPd_fJrvt58WS1v1rnmFYSc064GxFr2EotWMtGDaDotyl5T2kqNNW-h70qqGy4Ya6hmJe9rwRoGvJdQXGSfHnv3sZmxa9EEpye1d-Os3UFZPar_f8w4qK19UBI4pyBTwYenAmd_R_RBzaNvcZqSAhu9YqUQomS8EAl9_wrd2ehMWi9RCatAcJoo-Ui1znrvsH8ehoI6-lWv_KqjX3X0m7LXL7d5Tv6zWfwFuUincw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2665570541</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Outcomes of In-Person and Telehealth Ambulatory Encounters During COVID-19 Within a Large Commercially Insured Cohort</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Hatef, Elham ; Lans, Daniel ; Bandeian, Stephen ; Lasser, Elyse C ; Goldsack, Jennifer ; Weiner, Jonathan P</creator><creatorcontrib>Hatef, Elham ; Lans, Daniel ; Bandeian, Stephen ; Lasser, Elyse C ; Goldsack, Jennifer ; Weiner, Jonathan P</creatorcontrib><description>Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, few studies have assessed the association of telehealth with outcomes of care, including patterns of health care use after the initial encounter.
To assess the association of telehealth and in-person visits with outcomes of care during the COVID-19 pandemic.
This cohort study assessed continuously enrolled members in private health plans of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association from July 1, 2019, to December 31, 2020.
Main outcomes were ambulatory encounters per enrollee stratified by characteristics derived from enrollment files, practitioner claims, and community characteristics linked to the enrollee's zip code. Outcomes of care were assessed 14 days after the initial encounters and included follow-up encounters of any kind, emergency department encounters, and hospitalizations after initial telehealth or in-person encounters.
In this cohort study of 40 739 915 individuals (mean [SD] age, 35.37 [18.77] years; 20 480 768 [50.3%] female), ambulatory encounters decreased by 1.0% and the number of in-person encounters per enrollee decreased by 17.0% from 2019 to 2020; however, as a proportion of all ambulatory encounters, telehealth encounters increased substantially from 0.6% (n = 236 220) to 14.1% (n = 5 743 718). For members with an initial telehealth encounter for a new acute condition, the adjusted odds ratio was 1.44 (95% CI, 1.42-1.46) for all follow-ups combined and 1.11 (95% CI, 1.06-1.16) for an emergency department encounter. For members with an initial telehealth encounter for a new chronic condition, the adjusted odds ratios were 0.94 (95% CI, 0.92-0.95) for all follow-ups combined and 0.94 (95% CI, 0.90-0.99) for in-patient admissions.
In this cohort study of 40.7 million commercially insured adults, telehealth accounted for a large share of ambulatory encounters at the peak of the pandemic and remained prevalent after infection rates subsided. Telehealth encounters for chronic conditions had similar rates of follow-up to in-person encounters for these conditions, whereas telehealth encounters for acute conditions seemed to be more likely than in-person encounters to require follow-up. These findings suggest a direction for future work and are relevant to policy makers, payers, and practitioners as they manage the use of telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic and afterward.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2574-3805</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2574-3805</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.8954</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35471570</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Medical Association</publisher><subject>Adult ; Chronic illnesses ; Cohort Studies ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 - epidemiology ; Female ; Hospitalization ; Humans ; Male ; Online Only ; Original Investigation ; Pandemics ; Public Health ; Telemedicine</subject><ispartof>JAMA network open, 2022-04, Vol.5 (4), p.e228954-e228954</ispartof><rights>2022. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright 2022 Hatef E et al. .</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a470t-41d80ee89f9e3c925f05bda56fa11c9ae84c0fd61ab4522b1a264f852b204f903</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a470t-41d80ee89f9e3c925f05bda56fa11c9ae84c0fd61ab4522b1a264f852b204f903</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,860,881,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35471570$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hatef, Elham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lans, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bandeian, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lasser, Elyse C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldsack, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiner, Jonathan P</creatorcontrib><title>Outcomes of In-Person and Telehealth Ambulatory Encounters During COVID-19 Within a Large Commercially Insured Cohort</title><title>JAMA network open</title><addtitle>JAMA Netw Open</addtitle><description>Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, few studies have assessed the association of telehealth with outcomes of care, including patterns of health care use after the initial encounter.
To assess the association of telehealth and in-person visits with outcomes of care during the COVID-19 pandemic.
This cohort study assessed continuously enrolled members in private health plans of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association from July 1, 2019, to December 31, 2020.
Main outcomes were ambulatory encounters per enrollee stratified by characteristics derived from enrollment files, practitioner claims, and community characteristics linked to the enrollee's zip code. Outcomes of care were assessed 14 days after the initial encounters and included follow-up encounters of any kind, emergency department encounters, and hospitalizations after initial telehealth or in-person encounters.
In this cohort study of 40 739 915 individuals (mean [SD] age, 35.37 [18.77] years; 20 480 768 [50.3%] female), ambulatory encounters decreased by 1.0% and the number of in-person encounters per enrollee decreased by 17.0% from 2019 to 2020; however, as a proportion of all ambulatory encounters, telehealth encounters increased substantially from 0.6% (n = 236 220) to 14.1% (n = 5 743 718). For members with an initial telehealth encounter for a new acute condition, the adjusted odds ratio was 1.44 (95% CI, 1.42-1.46) for all follow-ups combined and 1.11 (95% CI, 1.06-1.16) for an emergency department encounter. For members with an initial telehealth encounter for a new chronic condition, the adjusted odds ratios were 0.94 (95% CI, 0.92-0.95) for all follow-ups combined and 0.94 (95% CI, 0.90-0.99) for in-patient admissions.
In this cohort study of 40.7 million commercially insured adults, telehealth accounted for a large share of ambulatory encounters at the peak of the pandemic and remained prevalent after infection rates subsided. Telehealth encounters for chronic conditions had similar rates of follow-up to in-person encounters for these conditions, whereas telehealth encounters for acute conditions seemed to be more likely than in-person encounters to require follow-up. These findings suggest a direction for future work and are relevant to policy makers, payers, and practitioners as they manage the use of telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic and afterward.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Chronic illnesses</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 - epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Online Only</subject><subject>Original Investigation</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Telemedicine</subject><issn>2574-3805</issn><issn>2574-3805</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc1u1DAURiNE1VZtX6EyYsMmw7VjJ_EGqZoWGGmkYVFgaTnJzSRDYg_-KZq3x6OWqnRlyz7fp3t1suwdhQUFoB93etYGwx_rftk9mgUDxha1FPxNds5ExfOiBvH2xf0su_J-BwAMaCFLcZqdFYJXVFRwnsVNDK2d0RPbk5XJv6Hz1hBtOnKPEw6opzCQm7mJkw7WHcidaW00IWHkNrrRbMly82N1m1NJfo5hGFOWrLXbIlnaeUbXjnqaDqnaR4ddehysC5fZSa8nj1dP50X2_fPd_fJrvt58WS1v1rnmFYSc064GxFr2EotWMtGDaDotyl5T2kqNNW-h70qqGy4Ya6hmJe9rwRoGvJdQXGSfHnv3sZmxa9EEpye1d-Os3UFZPar_f8w4qK19UBI4pyBTwYenAmd_R_RBzaNvcZqSAhu9YqUQomS8EAl9_wrd2ehMWi9RCatAcJoo-Ui1znrvsH8ehoI6-lWv_KqjX3X0m7LXL7d5Tv6zWfwFuUincw</recordid><startdate>20220401</startdate><enddate>20220401</enddate><creator>Hatef, Elham</creator><creator>Lans, Daniel</creator><creator>Bandeian, Stephen</creator><creator>Lasser, Elyse C</creator><creator>Goldsack, Jennifer</creator><creator>Weiner, Jonathan P</creator><general>American Medical Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220401</creationdate><title>Outcomes of In-Person and Telehealth Ambulatory Encounters During COVID-19 Within a Large Commercially Insured Cohort</title><author>Hatef, Elham ; Lans, Daniel ; Bandeian, Stephen ; Lasser, Elyse C ; Goldsack, Jennifer ; Weiner, Jonathan P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a470t-41d80ee89f9e3c925f05bda56fa11c9ae84c0fd61ab4522b1a264f852b204f903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Chronic illnesses</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 - epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Online Only</topic><topic>Original Investigation</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Telemedicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hatef, Elham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lans, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bandeian, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lasser, Elyse C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldsack, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiner, Jonathan P</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>JAMA network open</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hatef, Elham</au><au>Lans, Daniel</au><au>Bandeian, Stephen</au><au>Lasser, Elyse C</au><au>Goldsack, Jennifer</au><au>Weiner, Jonathan P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Outcomes of In-Person and Telehealth Ambulatory Encounters During COVID-19 Within a Large Commercially Insured Cohort</atitle><jtitle>JAMA network open</jtitle><addtitle>JAMA Netw Open</addtitle><date>2022-04-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e228954</spage><epage>e228954</epage><pages>e228954-e228954</pages><issn>2574-3805</issn><eissn>2574-3805</eissn><abstract>Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, few studies have assessed the association of telehealth with outcomes of care, including patterns of health care use after the initial encounter.
To assess the association of telehealth and in-person visits with outcomes of care during the COVID-19 pandemic.
This cohort study assessed continuously enrolled members in private health plans of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association from July 1, 2019, to December 31, 2020.
Main outcomes were ambulatory encounters per enrollee stratified by characteristics derived from enrollment files, practitioner claims, and community characteristics linked to the enrollee's zip code. Outcomes of care were assessed 14 days after the initial encounters and included follow-up encounters of any kind, emergency department encounters, and hospitalizations after initial telehealth or in-person encounters.
In this cohort study of 40 739 915 individuals (mean [SD] age, 35.37 [18.77] years; 20 480 768 [50.3%] female), ambulatory encounters decreased by 1.0% and the number of in-person encounters per enrollee decreased by 17.0% from 2019 to 2020; however, as a proportion of all ambulatory encounters, telehealth encounters increased substantially from 0.6% (n = 236 220) to 14.1% (n = 5 743 718). For members with an initial telehealth encounter for a new acute condition, the adjusted odds ratio was 1.44 (95% CI, 1.42-1.46) for all follow-ups combined and 1.11 (95% CI, 1.06-1.16) for an emergency department encounter. For members with an initial telehealth encounter for a new chronic condition, the adjusted odds ratios were 0.94 (95% CI, 0.92-0.95) for all follow-ups combined and 0.94 (95% CI, 0.90-0.99) for in-patient admissions.
In this cohort study of 40.7 million commercially insured adults, telehealth accounted for a large share of ambulatory encounters at the peak of the pandemic and remained prevalent after infection rates subsided. Telehealth encounters for chronic conditions had similar rates of follow-up to in-person encounters for these conditions, whereas telehealth encounters for acute conditions seemed to be more likely than in-person encounters to require follow-up. These findings suggest a direction for future work and are relevant to policy makers, payers, and practitioners as they manage the use of telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic and afterward.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Medical Association</pub><pmid>35471570</pmid><doi>10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.8954</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2574-3805 |
ispartof | JAMA network open, 2022-04, Vol.5 (4), p.e228954-e228954 |
issn | 2574-3805 2574-3805 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9044109 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adult Chronic illnesses Cohort Studies Coronaviruses COVID-19 COVID-19 - epidemiology Female Hospitalization Humans Male Online Only Original Investigation Pandemics Public Health Telemedicine |
title | Outcomes of In-Person and Telehealth Ambulatory Encounters During COVID-19 Within a Large Commercially Insured Cohort |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T06%3A00%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Outcomes%20of%20In-Person%20and%20Telehealth%20Ambulatory%20Encounters%20During%20COVID-19%20Within%20a%20Large%20Commercially%20Insured%20Cohort&rft.jtitle=JAMA%20network%20open&rft.au=Hatef,%20Elham&rft.date=2022-04-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e228954&rft.epage=e228954&rft.pages=e228954-e228954&rft.issn=2574-3805&rft.eissn=2574-3805&rft_id=info:doi/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.8954&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2665570541%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2665570541&rft_id=info:pmid/35471570&rfr_iscdi=true |