Outcomes of In-Person and Telehealth Ambulatory Encounters During COVID-19 Within a Large Commercially Insured Cohort

Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, few studies have assessed the association of telehealth with outcomes of care, including patterns of health care use after the initial encounter. To assess the association of telehealth and in-person visits with outcomes of care during the COVID-19 pandemic....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JAMA network open 2022-04, Vol.5 (4), p.e228954-e228954
Hauptverfasser: Hatef, Elham, Lans, Daniel, Bandeian, Stephen, Lasser, Elyse C, Goldsack, Jennifer, Weiner, Jonathan P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e228954
container_issue 4
container_start_page e228954
container_title JAMA network open
container_volume 5
creator Hatef, Elham
Lans, Daniel
Bandeian, Stephen
Lasser, Elyse C
Goldsack, Jennifer
Weiner, Jonathan P
description Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, few studies have assessed the association of telehealth with outcomes of care, including patterns of health care use after the initial encounter. To assess the association of telehealth and in-person visits with outcomes of care during the COVID-19 pandemic. This cohort study assessed continuously enrolled members in private health plans of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association from July 1, 2019, to December 31, 2020. Main outcomes were ambulatory encounters per enrollee stratified by characteristics derived from enrollment files, practitioner claims, and community characteristics linked to the enrollee's zip code. Outcomes of care were assessed 14 days after the initial encounters and included follow-up encounters of any kind, emergency department encounters, and hospitalizations after initial telehealth or in-person encounters. In this cohort study of 40 739 915 individuals (mean [SD] age, 35.37 [18.77] years; 20 480 768 [50.3%] female), ambulatory encounters decreased by 1.0% and the number of in-person encounters per enrollee decreased by 17.0% from 2019 to 2020; however, as a proportion of all ambulatory encounters, telehealth encounters increased substantially from 0.6% (n = 236 220) to 14.1% (n = 5 743 718). For members with an initial telehealth encounter for a new acute condition, the adjusted odds ratio was 1.44 (95% CI, 1.42-1.46) for all follow-ups combined and 1.11 (95% CI, 1.06-1.16) for an emergency department encounter. For members with an initial telehealth encounter for a new chronic condition, the adjusted odds ratios were 0.94 (95% CI, 0.92-0.95) for all follow-ups combined and 0.94 (95% CI, 0.90-0.99) for in-patient admissions. In this cohort study of 40.7 million commercially insured adults, telehealth accounted for a large share of ambulatory encounters at the peak of the pandemic and remained prevalent after infection rates subsided. Telehealth encounters for chronic conditions had similar rates of follow-up to in-person encounters for these conditions, whereas telehealth encounters for acute conditions seemed to be more likely than in-person encounters to require follow-up. These findings suggest a direction for future work and are relevant to policy makers, payers, and practitioners as they manage the use of telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic and afterward.
doi_str_mv 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.8954
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9044109</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2665570541</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a470t-41d80ee89f9e3c925f05bda56fa11c9ae84c0fd61ab4522b1a264f852b204f903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1u1DAURiNE1VZtX6EyYsMmw7VjJ_EGqZoWGGmkYVFgaTnJzSRDYg_-KZq3x6OWqnRlyz7fp3t1suwdhQUFoB93etYGwx_rftk9mgUDxha1FPxNds5ExfOiBvH2xf0su_J-BwAMaCFLcZqdFYJXVFRwnsVNDK2d0RPbk5XJv6Hz1hBtOnKPEw6opzCQm7mJkw7WHcidaW00IWHkNrrRbMly82N1m1NJfo5hGFOWrLXbIlnaeUbXjnqaDqnaR4ddehysC5fZSa8nj1dP50X2_fPd_fJrvt58WS1v1rnmFYSc064GxFr2EotWMtGDaDotyl5T2kqNNW-h70qqGy4Ya6hmJe9rwRoGvJdQXGSfHnv3sZmxa9EEpye1d-Os3UFZPar_f8w4qK19UBI4pyBTwYenAmd_R_RBzaNvcZqSAhu9YqUQomS8EAl9_wrd2ehMWi9RCatAcJoo-Ui1znrvsH8ehoI6-lWv_KqjX3X0m7LXL7d5Tv6zWfwFuUincw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2665570541</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Outcomes of In-Person and Telehealth Ambulatory Encounters During COVID-19 Within a Large Commercially Insured Cohort</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Hatef, Elham ; Lans, Daniel ; Bandeian, Stephen ; Lasser, Elyse C ; Goldsack, Jennifer ; Weiner, Jonathan P</creator><creatorcontrib>Hatef, Elham ; Lans, Daniel ; Bandeian, Stephen ; Lasser, Elyse C ; Goldsack, Jennifer ; Weiner, Jonathan P</creatorcontrib><description>Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, few studies have assessed the association of telehealth with outcomes of care, including patterns of health care use after the initial encounter. To assess the association of telehealth and in-person visits with outcomes of care during the COVID-19 pandemic. This cohort study assessed continuously enrolled members in private health plans of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association from July 1, 2019, to December 31, 2020. Main outcomes were ambulatory encounters per enrollee stratified by characteristics derived from enrollment files, practitioner claims, and community characteristics linked to the enrollee's zip code. Outcomes of care were assessed 14 days after the initial encounters and included follow-up encounters of any kind, emergency department encounters, and hospitalizations after initial telehealth or in-person encounters. In this cohort study of 40 739 915 individuals (mean [SD] age, 35.37 [18.77] years; 20 480 768 [50.3%] female), ambulatory encounters decreased by 1.0% and the number of in-person encounters per enrollee decreased by 17.0% from 2019 to 2020; however, as a proportion of all ambulatory encounters, telehealth encounters increased substantially from 0.6% (n = 236 220) to 14.1% (n = 5 743 718). For members with an initial telehealth encounter for a new acute condition, the adjusted odds ratio was 1.44 (95% CI, 1.42-1.46) for all follow-ups combined and 1.11 (95% CI, 1.06-1.16) for an emergency department encounter. For members with an initial telehealth encounter for a new chronic condition, the adjusted odds ratios were 0.94 (95% CI, 0.92-0.95) for all follow-ups combined and 0.94 (95% CI, 0.90-0.99) for in-patient admissions. In this cohort study of 40.7 million commercially insured adults, telehealth accounted for a large share of ambulatory encounters at the peak of the pandemic and remained prevalent after infection rates subsided. Telehealth encounters for chronic conditions had similar rates of follow-up to in-person encounters for these conditions, whereas telehealth encounters for acute conditions seemed to be more likely than in-person encounters to require follow-up. These findings suggest a direction for future work and are relevant to policy makers, payers, and practitioners as they manage the use of telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic and afterward.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2574-3805</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2574-3805</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.8954</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35471570</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Medical Association</publisher><subject>Adult ; Chronic illnesses ; Cohort Studies ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 - epidemiology ; Female ; Hospitalization ; Humans ; Male ; Online Only ; Original Investigation ; Pandemics ; Public Health ; Telemedicine</subject><ispartof>JAMA network open, 2022-04, Vol.5 (4), p.e228954-e228954</ispartof><rights>2022. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright 2022 Hatef E et al. .</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a470t-41d80ee89f9e3c925f05bda56fa11c9ae84c0fd61ab4522b1a264f852b204f903</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a470t-41d80ee89f9e3c925f05bda56fa11c9ae84c0fd61ab4522b1a264f852b204f903</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,860,881,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35471570$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hatef, Elham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lans, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bandeian, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lasser, Elyse C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldsack, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiner, Jonathan P</creatorcontrib><title>Outcomes of In-Person and Telehealth Ambulatory Encounters During COVID-19 Within a Large Commercially Insured Cohort</title><title>JAMA network open</title><addtitle>JAMA Netw Open</addtitle><description>Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, few studies have assessed the association of telehealth with outcomes of care, including patterns of health care use after the initial encounter. To assess the association of telehealth and in-person visits with outcomes of care during the COVID-19 pandemic. This cohort study assessed continuously enrolled members in private health plans of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association from July 1, 2019, to December 31, 2020. Main outcomes were ambulatory encounters per enrollee stratified by characteristics derived from enrollment files, practitioner claims, and community characteristics linked to the enrollee's zip code. Outcomes of care were assessed 14 days after the initial encounters and included follow-up encounters of any kind, emergency department encounters, and hospitalizations after initial telehealth or in-person encounters. In this cohort study of 40 739 915 individuals (mean [SD] age, 35.37 [18.77] years; 20 480 768 [50.3%] female), ambulatory encounters decreased by 1.0% and the number of in-person encounters per enrollee decreased by 17.0% from 2019 to 2020; however, as a proportion of all ambulatory encounters, telehealth encounters increased substantially from 0.6% (n = 236 220) to 14.1% (n = 5 743 718). For members with an initial telehealth encounter for a new acute condition, the adjusted odds ratio was 1.44 (95% CI, 1.42-1.46) for all follow-ups combined and 1.11 (95% CI, 1.06-1.16) for an emergency department encounter. For members with an initial telehealth encounter for a new chronic condition, the adjusted odds ratios were 0.94 (95% CI, 0.92-0.95) for all follow-ups combined and 0.94 (95% CI, 0.90-0.99) for in-patient admissions. In this cohort study of 40.7 million commercially insured adults, telehealth accounted for a large share of ambulatory encounters at the peak of the pandemic and remained prevalent after infection rates subsided. Telehealth encounters for chronic conditions had similar rates of follow-up to in-person encounters for these conditions, whereas telehealth encounters for acute conditions seemed to be more likely than in-person encounters to require follow-up. These findings suggest a direction for future work and are relevant to policy makers, payers, and practitioners as they manage the use of telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic and afterward.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Chronic illnesses</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 - epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Online Only</subject><subject>Original Investigation</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Telemedicine</subject><issn>2574-3805</issn><issn>2574-3805</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc1u1DAURiNE1VZtX6EyYsMmw7VjJ_EGqZoWGGmkYVFgaTnJzSRDYg_-KZq3x6OWqnRlyz7fp3t1suwdhQUFoB93etYGwx_rftk9mgUDxha1FPxNds5ExfOiBvH2xf0su_J-BwAMaCFLcZqdFYJXVFRwnsVNDK2d0RPbk5XJv6Hz1hBtOnKPEw6opzCQm7mJkw7WHcidaW00IWHkNrrRbMly82N1m1NJfo5hGFOWrLXbIlnaeUbXjnqaDqnaR4ddehysC5fZSa8nj1dP50X2_fPd_fJrvt58WS1v1rnmFYSc064GxFr2EotWMtGDaDotyl5T2kqNNW-h70qqGy4Ya6hmJe9rwRoGvJdQXGSfHnv3sZmxa9EEpye1d-Os3UFZPar_f8w4qK19UBI4pyBTwYenAmd_R_RBzaNvcZqSAhu9YqUQomS8EAl9_wrd2ehMWi9RCatAcJoo-Ui1znrvsH8ehoI6-lWv_KqjX3X0m7LXL7d5Tv6zWfwFuUincw</recordid><startdate>20220401</startdate><enddate>20220401</enddate><creator>Hatef, Elham</creator><creator>Lans, Daniel</creator><creator>Bandeian, Stephen</creator><creator>Lasser, Elyse C</creator><creator>Goldsack, Jennifer</creator><creator>Weiner, Jonathan P</creator><general>American Medical Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220401</creationdate><title>Outcomes of In-Person and Telehealth Ambulatory Encounters During COVID-19 Within a Large Commercially Insured Cohort</title><author>Hatef, Elham ; Lans, Daniel ; Bandeian, Stephen ; Lasser, Elyse C ; Goldsack, Jennifer ; Weiner, Jonathan P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a470t-41d80ee89f9e3c925f05bda56fa11c9ae84c0fd61ab4522b1a264f852b204f903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Chronic illnesses</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 - epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Online Only</topic><topic>Original Investigation</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Telemedicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hatef, Elham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lans, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bandeian, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lasser, Elyse C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldsack, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiner, Jonathan P</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>JAMA network open</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hatef, Elham</au><au>Lans, Daniel</au><au>Bandeian, Stephen</au><au>Lasser, Elyse C</au><au>Goldsack, Jennifer</au><au>Weiner, Jonathan P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Outcomes of In-Person and Telehealth Ambulatory Encounters During COVID-19 Within a Large Commercially Insured Cohort</atitle><jtitle>JAMA network open</jtitle><addtitle>JAMA Netw Open</addtitle><date>2022-04-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e228954</spage><epage>e228954</epage><pages>e228954-e228954</pages><issn>2574-3805</issn><eissn>2574-3805</eissn><abstract>Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, few studies have assessed the association of telehealth with outcomes of care, including patterns of health care use after the initial encounter. To assess the association of telehealth and in-person visits with outcomes of care during the COVID-19 pandemic. This cohort study assessed continuously enrolled members in private health plans of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association from July 1, 2019, to December 31, 2020. Main outcomes were ambulatory encounters per enrollee stratified by characteristics derived from enrollment files, practitioner claims, and community characteristics linked to the enrollee's zip code. Outcomes of care were assessed 14 days after the initial encounters and included follow-up encounters of any kind, emergency department encounters, and hospitalizations after initial telehealth or in-person encounters. In this cohort study of 40 739 915 individuals (mean [SD] age, 35.37 [18.77] years; 20 480 768 [50.3%] female), ambulatory encounters decreased by 1.0% and the number of in-person encounters per enrollee decreased by 17.0% from 2019 to 2020; however, as a proportion of all ambulatory encounters, telehealth encounters increased substantially from 0.6% (n = 236 220) to 14.1% (n = 5 743 718). For members with an initial telehealth encounter for a new acute condition, the adjusted odds ratio was 1.44 (95% CI, 1.42-1.46) for all follow-ups combined and 1.11 (95% CI, 1.06-1.16) for an emergency department encounter. For members with an initial telehealth encounter for a new chronic condition, the adjusted odds ratios were 0.94 (95% CI, 0.92-0.95) for all follow-ups combined and 0.94 (95% CI, 0.90-0.99) for in-patient admissions. In this cohort study of 40.7 million commercially insured adults, telehealth accounted for a large share of ambulatory encounters at the peak of the pandemic and remained prevalent after infection rates subsided. Telehealth encounters for chronic conditions had similar rates of follow-up to in-person encounters for these conditions, whereas telehealth encounters for acute conditions seemed to be more likely than in-person encounters to require follow-up. These findings suggest a direction for future work and are relevant to policy makers, payers, and practitioners as they manage the use of telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic and afterward.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Medical Association</pub><pmid>35471570</pmid><doi>10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.8954</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2574-3805
ispartof JAMA network open, 2022-04, Vol.5 (4), p.e228954-e228954
issn 2574-3805
2574-3805
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9044109
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Chronic illnesses
Cohort Studies
Coronaviruses
COVID-19
COVID-19 - epidemiology
Female
Hospitalization
Humans
Male
Online Only
Original Investigation
Pandemics
Public Health
Telemedicine
title Outcomes of In-Person and Telehealth Ambulatory Encounters During COVID-19 Within a Large Commercially Insured Cohort
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T06%3A00%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Outcomes%20of%20In-Person%20and%20Telehealth%20Ambulatory%20Encounters%20During%20COVID-19%20Within%20a%20Large%20Commercially%20Insured%20Cohort&rft.jtitle=JAMA%20network%20open&rft.au=Hatef,%20Elham&rft.date=2022-04-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e228954&rft.epage=e228954&rft.pages=e228954-e228954&rft.issn=2574-3805&rft.eissn=2574-3805&rft_id=info:doi/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.8954&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2665570541%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2665570541&rft_id=info:pmid/35471570&rfr_iscdi=true