Are there distinct dimensions of apathy? The argument for reappraisal

Apathy is widely accepted to be a multidimensional syndrome. Assessment scales typically probe one or more dimensions but there is no consensus on the precise nature of these domains. Existing major theoretical frameworks include cognitive, behavioural, and emotional dimensions of apathy. While a so...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cortex 2022-04, Vol.149, p.246-256
Hauptverfasser: Dickson, Shannon S., Husain, Masud
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 256
container_issue
container_start_page 246
container_title Cortex
container_volume 149
creator Dickson, Shannon S.
Husain, Masud
description Apathy is widely accepted to be a multidimensional syndrome. Assessment scales typically probe one or more dimensions but there is no consensus on the precise nature of these domains. Existing major theoretical frameworks include cognitive, behavioural, and emotional dimensions of apathy. While a social domain has also been suggested, it is far less well studied. Here we argue that although most assessment scales have been developed with these theoretical frameworks in mind, few findings actually support the existence of some of the dimensions that have been proposed, with the evidence for separation of cognitive and behavioural dimensions particularly lacking. In our opinion, although there is evidence for behavioural and emotional domains of apathy, the contention that there might be a separate dimension of cognitive or executive apathy is far less robust. Further, while there is some evidence for a social dimension of apathy, this has not been investigated sufficiently to make any definitive conclusion. We argue that there is a pressing need to reconsider different domains of apathy using robust analyses of proposed theoretical dimensions.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.cortex.2022.01.001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9021925</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0010945222000041</els_id><sourcerecordid>2630922229</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-518b6f16c7eaccf7c2bf23729688f1f17f9b5e3d7b7bde01909ecfe28747af6f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU1P3DAQtaqisnz8g6rKsZeEGWcTxxcqhCggIfUCZ8txxqxX2TjYXgT_vkbLVy_1YWx5Zt6beY-x7wgVArYn68r4kOip4sB5BVgB4Be2QCnqskPgX9ki_0Aplw3fZwcxrgE4dE3zje3XDXaIHBfs4ixQkVaU4-BicpNJ-bGhKTo_xcLbQs86rZ5_FbcrKnS43-ZcKqwPRSA9z0G7qMcjtmf1GOn49T5kd78vbs-vyps_l9fnZzelWbZ1KjNr31psjSBtjBWG95bXgsu26yxaFFb2DdWD6EU_EKAEScYS78RSaNva-pCd7nDnbb-hweRRgh7VHNxGh2fltVP_Zia3Uvf-UUngKHmTAX6-AgT_sKWY1MZFQ-OoJ_LbqHhbg-T5yFy63JWa4GMMZN9pENSLA2qtdg6oFwcUoMp657Yfn0d8b3qT_GMHykI9OgoqGkeTocEFMkkN3v2f4S_JRps7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2630922229</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Are there distinct dimensions of apathy? The argument for reappraisal</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Dickson, Shannon S. ; Husain, Masud</creator><creatorcontrib>Dickson, Shannon S. ; Husain, Masud</creatorcontrib><description>Apathy is widely accepted to be a multidimensional syndrome. Assessment scales typically probe one or more dimensions but there is no consensus on the precise nature of these domains. Existing major theoretical frameworks include cognitive, behavioural, and emotional dimensions of apathy. While a social domain has also been suggested, it is far less well studied. Here we argue that although most assessment scales have been developed with these theoretical frameworks in mind, few findings actually support the existence of some of the dimensions that have been proposed, with the evidence for separation of cognitive and behavioural dimensions particularly lacking. In our opinion, although there is evidence for behavioural and emotional domains of apathy, the contention that there might be a separate dimension of cognitive or executive apathy is far less robust. Further, while there is some evidence for a social dimension of apathy, this has not been investigated sufficiently to make any definitive conclusion. We argue that there is a pressing need to reconsider different domains of apathy using robust analyses of proposed theoretical dimensions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-9452</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1973-8102</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2022.01.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35181121</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Italy: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Apathy ; Assessment ; Definition ; Dimensions ; Emotions ; Framework ; Humans ; Viewpoint</subject><ispartof>Cortex, 2022-04, Vol.149, p.246-256</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2022 The Authors 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-518b6f16c7eaccf7c2bf23729688f1f17f9b5e3d7b7bde01909ecfe28747af6f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-518b6f16c7eaccf7c2bf23729688f1f17f9b5e3d7b7bde01909ecfe28747af6f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2327-7806 ; 0000-0002-6850-9255</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2022.01.001$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35181121$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dickson, Shannon S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Husain, Masud</creatorcontrib><title>Are there distinct dimensions of apathy? The argument for reappraisal</title><title>Cortex</title><addtitle>Cortex</addtitle><description>Apathy is widely accepted to be a multidimensional syndrome. Assessment scales typically probe one or more dimensions but there is no consensus on the precise nature of these domains. Existing major theoretical frameworks include cognitive, behavioural, and emotional dimensions of apathy. While a social domain has also been suggested, it is far less well studied. Here we argue that although most assessment scales have been developed with these theoretical frameworks in mind, few findings actually support the existence of some of the dimensions that have been proposed, with the evidence for separation of cognitive and behavioural dimensions particularly lacking. In our opinion, although there is evidence for behavioural and emotional domains of apathy, the contention that there might be a separate dimension of cognitive or executive apathy is far less robust. Further, while there is some evidence for a social dimension of apathy, this has not been investigated sufficiently to make any definitive conclusion. We argue that there is a pressing need to reconsider different domains of apathy using robust analyses of proposed theoretical dimensions.</description><subject>Apathy</subject><subject>Assessment</subject><subject>Definition</subject><subject>Dimensions</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Framework</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Viewpoint</subject><issn>0010-9452</issn><issn>1973-8102</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UU1P3DAQtaqisnz8g6rKsZeEGWcTxxcqhCggIfUCZ8txxqxX2TjYXgT_vkbLVy_1YWx5Zt6beY-x7wgVArYn68r4kOip4sB5BVgB4Be2QCnqskPgX9ki_0Aplw3fZwcxrgE4dE3zje3XDXaIHBfs4ixQkVaU4-BicpNJ-bGhKTo_xcLbQs86rZ5_FbcrKnS43-ZcKqwPRSA9z0G7qMcjtmf1GOn49T5kd78vbs-vyps_l9fnZzelWbZ1KjNr31psjSBtjBWG95bXgsu26yxaFFb2DdWD6EU_EKAEScYS78RSaNva-pCd7nDnbb-hweRRgh7VHNxGh2fltVP_Zia3Uvf-UUngKHmTAX6-AgT_sKWY1MZFQ-OoJ_LbqHhbg-T5yFy63JWa4GMMZN9pENSLA2qtdg6oFwcUoMp657Yfn0d8b3qT_GMHykI9OgoqGkeTocEFMkkN3v2f4S_JRps7</recordid><startdate>20220401</startdate><enddate>20220401</enddate><creator>Dickson, Shannon S.</creator><creator>Husain, Masud</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Masson</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2327-7806</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6850-9255</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220401</creationdate><title>Are there distinct dimensions of apathy? The argument for reappraisal</title><author>Dickson, Shannon S. ; Husain, Masud</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-518b6f16c7eaccf7c2bf23729688f1f17f9b5e3d7b7bde01909ecfe28747af6f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Apathy</topic><topic>Assessment</topic><topic>Definition</topic><topic>Dimensions</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Framework</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Viewpoint</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dickson, Shannon S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Husain, Masud</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Cortex</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dickson, Shannon S.</au><au>Husain, Masud</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Are there distinct dimensions of apathy? The argument for reappraisal</atitle><jtitle>Cortex</jtitle><addtitle>Cortex</addtitle><date>2022-04-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>149</volume><spage>246</spage><epage>256</epage><pages>246-256</pages><issn>0010-9452</issn><eissn>1973-8102</eissn><abstract>Apathy is widely accepted to be a multidimensional syndrome. Assessment scales typically probe one or more dimensions but there is no consensus on the precise nature of these domains. Existing major theoretical frameworks include cognitive, behavioural, and emotional dimensions of apathy. While a social domain has also been suggested, it is far less well studied. Here we argue that although most assessment scales have been developed with these theoretical frameworks in mind, few findings actually support the existence of some of the dimensions that have been proposed, with the evidence for separation of cognitive and behavioural dimensions particularly lacking. In our opinion, although there is evidence for behavioural and emotional domains of apathy, the contention that there might be a separate dimension of cognitive or executive apathy is far less robust. Further, while there is some evidence for a social dimension of apathy, this has not been investigated sufficiently to make any definitive conclusion. We argue that there is a pressing need to reconsider different domains of apathy using robust analyses of proposed theoretical dimensions.</abstract><cop>Italy</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>35181121</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.cortex.2022.01.001</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2327-7806</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6850-9255</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0010-9452
ispartof Cortex, 2022-04, Vol.149, p.246-256
issn 0010-9452
1973-8102
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9021925
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Apathy
Assessment
Definition
Dimensions
Emotions
Framework
Humans
Viewpoint
title Are there distinct dimensions of apathy? The argument for reappraisal
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T22%3A39%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Are%20there%20distinct%20dimensions%20of%20apathy?%20The%20argument%20for%20reappraisal&rft.jtitle=Cortex&rft.au=Dickson,%20Shannon%20S.&rft.date=2022-04-01&rft.volume=149&rft.spage=246&rft.epage=256&rft.pages=246-256&rft.issn=0010-9452&rft.eissn=1973-8102&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cortex.2022.01.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2630922229%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2630922229&rft_id=info:pmid/35181121&rft_els_id=S0010945222000041&rfr_iscdi=true