Sedentary behaviour levels in adults with an intellectual disability: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Background : Sedentary behaviour (SB), which is characterised by low levels of energy expenditure, has been linked to increased cardio-metabolic risks, obesity and mortality, as well as cancer risk. No firm guidelines are established on safe levels of SB. Adults with an intellectual disability (ID) ...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | HRB open research 2021-01, Vol.4, p.69-69 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 69 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 69 |
container_title | HRB open research |
container_volume | 4 |
creator | Lynch, Louise McCarron, Mary McCallion, Philip Burke, Eilish |
description | Background
: Sedentary behaviour (SB), which is characterised by low levels of energy expenditure, has been linked to increased cardio-metabolic risks, obesity and mortality, as well as cancer risk. No firm guidelines are established on safe levels of SB. Adults with an intellectual disability (ID) have poorer health than their counterparts in the general population with higher rates of multi-morbidity, inactivity, and obesity. The reasons for this health disparity are unclear however it is known that SB and overall inactivity contribute to poorer health. There is no clear picture of the levels of SB among individuals with ID therefore SB levels in this vulnerable population need to be examined. The aim of this systematic review is to investigate the prevalence of sedentary behaviour in adults with an ID.
Methods
: The PRISMA-P framework was applied to identify high quality articles. An extensive search was carried out in four databases and grey literature sources . In total, 1,972 articles were retrieved of which 48 articles went forward for full review after duplicate removal and screening by title and abstract. The National Institute of Health’s quality assessment tools were used to assess article quality. Two reviewers independently assessed each article. An excel spreadsheet was created to guide the data extraction process. The final review included 25 articles. A meta-analysis was completed using REVMAN.
Results
: Different SB assessment types were identified in studies. These included steps, time, questionnaires, and screen time. Studies were heterogeneous. Observed daily steps per individual ranged from 44 to above 30,000, with an average of approximately 6,500 steps. Mean daily time spent in SBs was more than 60% of available time, with observed screen time of more than 3 hours.
Conclusion
: There is a high prevalence of SB in adults with an intellectual disability.
[Registration no: Index CRD42020177225]. |
doi_str_mv | 10.12688/hrbopenres.13326.3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9020532</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2660101428</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2273-21fad12c6af28351159bf880b171ce50fc0ebb86241283dc57d2d1df1f47023d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUctOwzAQtBAIqtIv4OIjlxQ_8oIDEqp4SUgcgLO1sTfU4CTFdlr177Gg4nHa1c5oZkdDyAlncy7Kuj5b-mZYYe8xzLmUopzLPTIRBS-yvBbl_p_9iMxCeGOMpQuvmDwkR7IoOGNlPiHvT2iwj-C3tMElrO0weupwjS5Q21Mwo4uBbmxcUujTJaJzqOMIjhoboLHOxu0FBRq2IWIH0WrqcW1xk_iGdhghgx7cNthwTA5acAFnuzklLzfXz4u77OHx9n5x9ZBpISqZCd6C4UKX0Ipapp-L86ata9bwimssWKsZNk1dipwn3OiiMsJw0_I2r5iQRk7J5bfuamw6NDrl8-DUytsu5VQDWPUf6e1SvQ5rdc4EK6RIAqc7AT98jBii6mzQKTn0OIxBibJknPE82U-J_KZqP4Tgsf2x4Ux9NaV-m1JfTSkpPwHTtIs6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2660101428</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sedentary behaviour levels in adults with an intellectual disability: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Lynch, Louise ; McCarron, Mary ; McCallion, Philip ; Burke, Eilish</creator><creatorcontrib>Lynch, Louise ; McCarron, Mary ; McCallion, Philip ; Burke, Eilish</creatorcontrib><description>Background
: Sedentary behaviour (SB), which is characterised by low levels of energy expenditure, has been linked to increased cardio-metabolic risks, obesity and mortality, as well as cancer risk. No firm guidelines are established on safe levels of SB. Adults with an intellectual disability (ID) have poorer health than their counterparts in the general population with higher rates of multi-morbidity, inactivity, and obesity. The reasons for this health disparity are unclear however it is known that SB and overall inactivity contribute to poorer health. There is no clear picture of the levels of SB among individuals with ID therefore SB levels in this vulnerable population need to be examined. The aim of this systematic review is to investigate the prevalence of sedentary behaviour in adults with an ID.
Methods
: The PRISMA-P framework was applied to identify high quality articles. An extensive search was carried out in four databases and grey literature sources . In total, 1,972 articles were retrieved of which 48 articles went forward for full review after duplicate removal and screening by title and abstract. The National Institute of Health’s quality assessment tools were used to assess article quality. Two reviewers independently assessed each article. An excel spreadsheet was created to guide the data extraction process. The final review included 25 articles. A meta-analysis was completed using REVMAN.
Results
: Different SB assessment types were identified in studies. These included steps, time, questionnaires, and screen time. Studies were heterogeneous. Observed daily steps per individual ranged from 44 to above 30,000, with an average of approximately 6,500 steps. Mean daily time spent in SBs was more than 60% of available time, with observed screen time of more than 3 hours.
Conclusion
: There is a high prevalence of SB in adults with an intellectual disability.
[Registration no: Index CRD42020177225].</description><identifier>ISSN: 2515-4826</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2515-4826</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13326.3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35510064</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, UK: F1000 Research Limited</publisher><subject>Systematic Review</subject><ispartof>HRB open research, 2021-01, Vol.4, p.69-69</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2022 Lynch L et al. 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2273-21fad12c6af28351159bf880b171ce50fc0ebb86241283dc57d2d1df1f47023d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2273-21fad12c6af28351159bf880b171ce50fc0ebb86241283dc57d2d1df1f47023d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2209-4859 ; 0000-0002-3097-8048 ; 0000-0001-5129-6399</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9020532/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9020532/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lynch, Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCarron, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCallion, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burke, Eilish</creatorcontrib><title>Sedentary behaviour levels in adults with an intellectual disability: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>HRB open research</title><description>Background
: Sedentary behaviour (SB), which is characterised by low levels of energy expenditure, has been linked to increased cardio-metabolic risks, obesity and mortality, as well as cancer risk. No firm guidelines are established on safe levels of SB. Adults with an intellectual disability (ID) have poorer health than their counterparts in the general population with higher rates of multi-morbidity, inactivity, and obesity. The reasons for this health disparity are unclear however it is known that SB and overall inactivity contribute to poorer health. There is no clear picture of the levels of SB among individuals with ID therefore SB levels in this vulnerable population need to be examined. The aim of this systematic review is to investigate the prevalence of sedentary behaviour in adults with an ID.
Methods
: The PRISMA-P framework was applied to identify high quality articles. An extensive search was carried out in four databases and grey literature sources . In total, 1,972 articles were retrieved of which 48 articles went forward for full review after duplicate removal and screening by title and abstract. The National Institute of Health’s quality assessment tools were used to assess article quality. Two reviewers independently assessed each article. An excel spreadsheet was created to guide the data extraction process. The final review included 25 articles. A meta-analysis was completed using REVMAN.
Results
: Different SB assessment types were identified in studies. These included steps, time, questionnaires, and screen time. Studies were heterogeneous. Observed daily steps per individual ranged from 44 to above 30,000, with an average of approximately 6,500 steps. Mean daily time spent in SBs was more than 60% of available time, with observed screen time of more than 3 hours.
Conclusion
: There is a high prevalence of SB in adults with an intellectual disability.
[Registration no: Index CRD42020177225].</description><subject>Systematic Review</subject><issn>2515-4826</issn><issn>2515-4826</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVUctOwzAQtBAIqtIv4OIjlxQ_8oIDEqp4SUgcgLO1sTfU4CTFdlr177Gg4nHa1c5oZkdDyAlncy7Kuj5b-mZYYe8xzLmUopzLPTIRBS-yvBbl_p_9iMxCeGOMpQuvmDwkR7IoOGNlPiHvT2iwj-C3tMElrO0weupwjS5Q21Mwo4uBbmxcUujTJaJzqOMIjhoboLHOxu0FBRq2IWIH0WrqcW1xk_iGdhghgx7cNthwTA5acAFnuzklLzfXz4u77OHx9n5x9ZBpISqZCd6C4UKX0Ipapp-L86ata9bwimssWKsZNk1dipwn3OiiMsJw0_I2r5iQRk7J5bfuamw6NDrl8-DUytsu5VQDWPUf6e1SvQ5rdc4EK6RIAqc7AT98jBii6mzQKTn0OIxBibJknPE82U-J_KZqP4Tgsf2x4Ux9NaV-m1JfTSkpPwHTtIs6</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>Lynch, Louise</creator><creator>McCarron, Mary</creator><creator>McCallion, Philip</creator><creator>Burke, Eilish</creator><general>F1000 Research Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2209-4859</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3097-8048</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5129-6399</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>Sedentary behaviour levels in adults with an intellectual disability: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Lynch, Louise ; McCarron, Mary ; McCallion, Philip ; Burke, Eilish</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2273-21fad12c6af28351159bf880b171ce50fc0ebb86241283dc57d2d1df1f47023d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Systematic Review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lynch, Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCarron, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCallion, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burke, Eilish</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>HRB open research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lynch, Louise</au><au>McCarron, Mary</au><au>McCallion, Philip</au><au>Burke, Eilish</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sedentary behaviour levels in adults with an intellectual disability: a systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>HRB open research</jtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>4</volume><spage>69</spage><epage>69</epage><pages>69-69</pages><issn>2515-4826</issn><eissn>2515-4826</eissn><abstract>Background
: Sedentary behaviour (SB), which is characterised by low levels of energy expenditure, has been linked to increased cardio-metabolic risks, obesity and mortality, as well as cancer risk. No firm guidelines are established on safe levels of SB. Adults with an intellectual disability (ID) have poorer health than their counterparts in the general population with higher rates of multi-morbidity, inactivity, and obesity. The reasons for this health disparity are unclear however it is known that SB and overall inactivity contribute to poorer health. There is no clear picture of the levels of SB among individuals with ID therefore SB levels in this vulnerable population need to be examined. The aim of this systematic review is to investigate the prevalence of sedentary behaviour in adults with an ID.
Methods
: The PRISMA-P framework was applied to identify high quality articles. An extensive search was carried out in four databases and grey literature sources . In total, 1,972 articles were retrieved of which 48 articles went forward for full review after duplicate removal and screening by title and abstract. The National Institute of Health’s quality assessment tools were used to assess article quality. Two reviewers independently assessed each article. An excel spreadsheet was created to guide the data extraction process. The final review included 25 articles. A meta-analysis was completed using REVMAN.
Results
: Different SB assessment types were identified in studies. These included steps, time, questionnaires, and screen time. Studies were heterogeneous. Observed daily steps per individual ranged from 44 to above 30,000, with an average of approximately 6,500 steps. Mean daily time spent in SBs was more than 60% of available time, with observed screen time of more than 3 hours.
Conclusion
: There is a high prevalence of SB in adults with an intellectual disability.
[Registration no: Index CRD42020177225].</abstract><cop>London, UK</cop><pub>F1000 Research Limited</pub><pmid>35510064</pmid><doi>10.12688/hrbopenres.13326.3</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2209-4859</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3097-8048</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5129-6399</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2515-4826 |
ispartof | HRB open research, 2021-01, Vol.4, p.69-69 |
issn | 2515-4826 2515-4826 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9020532 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Systematic Review |
title | Sedentary behaviour levels in adults with an intellectual disability: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T20%3A48%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sedentary%20behaviour%20levels%20in%20adults%20with%20an%20intellectual%20disability:%20a%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=HRB%20open%20research&rft.au=Lynch,%20Louise&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=4&rft.spage=69&rft.epage=69&rft.pages=69-69&rft.issn=2515-4826&rft.eissn=2515-4826&rft_id=info:doi/10.12688/hrbopenres.13326.3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2660101428%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2660101428&rft_id=info:pmid/35510064&rfr_iscdi=true |