The influences of target size and recent experience on the vigour of adjustments to ongoing movements
People adjust their on-going movements to changes in the environment. It takes about 100 ms to respond to an abrupt change in a target’s position. Does the vigour of such responses depend on the extent to which responding is beneficial? We asked participants to tap on targets that jumped laterally o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Experimental brain research 2022-04, Vol.240 (4), p.1219-1229 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1229 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1219 |
container_title | Experimental brain research |
container_volume | 240 |
creator | Brenner, Eli Hardon, Hidde Moesman, Ryan Crowe, Emily M. Smeets, Jeroen B. J. |
description | People adjust their on-going movements to changes in the environment. It takes about 100 ms to respond to an abrupt change in a target’s position. Does the vigour of such responses depend on the extent to which responding is beneficial? We asked participants to tap on targets that jumped laterally once their finger started to move. In separate blocks of trials the target either remained at the new position so that it was beneficial to respond to the jump, or jumped back almost immediately so that it was disadvantageous to do so. We also varied the target’s size, because a smaller, less vigorous adjustment is enough to place the finger within a larger target. There was a systematic relationship between the vigour of the response and the remaining time until the tap: the shorter the remaining time the more vigorous the response. This relationship did not depend on the target’s size or whether or not the target jumped back. It was already known that the vigour of responses to target jumps depends on the magnitude of the jump and on the time available for adjusting the movement to that jump. We show that the vigour of the response is precisely tuned to the time available for making the required adjustment irrespective of whether responding in this manner is beneficial. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00221-022-06325-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9016032</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A700912217</galeid><sourcerecordid>A700912217</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c606t-7a3b417bbb46679c9f58a5835cecba007d95cf1a12a131106a735840ee092c843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kl1rFDEUhoModq3-AS8kIIheTM3HfN4USvGjUBC0XodM9sxslplkTTJL9dd7plvbjogMZEjO876Z884h5CVnJ5yx6n1kTAie4ZKxUooiqx6RFc-lyDhn5WOyYoznWV7z5og8i3E7b2XFnpIjWfBa8LpcEbjaALWuGyZwBiL1HU069JBotL-AaremAQy4ROF6B8HOFPWOJpTtbe-nMEv0ejvFNCIWafJY7711PR39Hm4On5MnnR4ivLh9H5PvHz9cnX_OLr98ujg_u8xMycqUVVq2Oa_ats3LsmpM0xW1LmpZGDCtxpbXTWE6rrnQXM496koWdc4AWCNMnctjcnrw3U3tCOv5u4Me1C7YUYefymurlhVnN6r3e9UwXjIp0ODtrUHwPyaISY02GhgG7cBPUYlS4lW1KDiir_9Ct5iGw_aQKnjDBBP5PdXrARQG7fFeM5uqs4qxhuMfrJA6-QeFzxpGa7yDzuL5QvBuIUAmwXXq9RSjuvj2dcm-ecBuQA9pE_0wJetdXILiAJrgYwzQ3QXHmZonTh0mTuGibiZOzaJXDyO_k_wZMQTkAYhYcj2E-5z-Y_sbG-jefQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2651902024</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The influences of target size and recent experience on the vigour of adjustments to ongoing movements</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Brenner, Eli ; Hardon, Hidde ; Moesman, Ryan ; Crowe, Emily M. ; Smeets, Jeroen B. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Brenner, Eli ; Hardon, Hidde ; Moesman, Ryan ; Crowe, Emily M. ; Smeets, Jeroen B. J.</creatorcontrib><description>People adjust their on-going movements to changes in the environment. It takes about 100 ms to respond to an abrupt change in a target’s position. Does the vigour of such responses depend on the extent to which responding is beneficial? We asked participants to tap on targets that jumped laterally once their finger started to move. In separate blocks of trials the target either remained at the new position so that it was beneficial to respond to the jump, or jumped back almost immediately so that it was disadvantageous to do so. We also varied the target’s size, because a smaller, less vigorous adjustment is enough to place the finger within a larger target. There was a systematic relationship between the vigour of the response and the remaining time until the tap: the shorter the remaining time the more vigorous the response. This relationship did not depend on the target’s size or whether or not the target jumped back. It was already known that the vigour of responses to target jumps depends on the magnitude of the jump and on the time available for adjusting the movement to that jump. We show that the vigour of the response is precisely tuned to the time available for making the required adjustment irrespective of whether responding in this manner is beneficial.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-4819</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1106</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00221-022-06325-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35182186</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Brain research ; Experience ; Human mechanics ; Humans ; Motion Perception - physiology ; Movement - physiology ; Neurology ; Neurosciences ; Physiological aspects ; Psychological aspects ; Psychomotor Performance - physiology ; Reaction Time - physiology ; Research Article ; Social aspects ; Vigor</subject><ispartof>Experimental brain research, 2022-04, Vol.240 (4), p.1219-1229</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><rights>2022. The Author(s).</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c606t-7a3b417bbb46679c9f58a5835cecba007d95cf1a12a131106a735840ee092c843</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c606t-7a3b417bbb46679c9f58a5835cecba007d95cf1a12a131106a735840ee092c843</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8265-7791 ; 0000-0002-3794-0579 ; 0000-0002-3611-2843</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00221-022-06325-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00221-022-06325-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35182186$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brenner, Eli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardon, Hidde</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moesman, Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crowe, Emily M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smeets, Jeroen B. J.</creatorcontrib><title>The influences of target size and recent experience on the vigour of adjustments to ongoing movements</title><title>Experimental brain research</title><addtitle>Exp Brain Res</addtitle><addtitle>Exp Brain Res</addtitle><description>People adjust their on-going movements to changes in the environment. It takes about 100 ms to respond to an abrupt change in a target’s position. Does the vigour of such responses depend on the extent to which responding is beneficial? We asked participants to tap on targets that jumped laterally once their finger started to move. In separate blocks of trials the target either remained at the new position so that it was beneficial to respond to the jump, or jumped back almost immediately so that it was disadvantageous to do so. We also varied the target’s size, because a smaller, less vigorous adjustment is enough to place the finger within a larger target. There was a systematic relationship between the vigour of the response and the remaining time until the tap: the shorter the remaining time the more vigorous the response. This relationship did not depend on the target’s size or whether or not the target jumped back. It was already known that the vigour of responses to target jumps depends on the magnitude of the jump and on the time available for adjusting the movement to that jump. We show that the vigour of the response is precisely tuned to the time available for making the required adjustment irrespective of whether responding in this manner is beneficial.</description><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Brain research</subject><subject>Experience</subject><subject>Human mechanics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Motion Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Movement - physiology</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</subject><subject>Reaction Time - physiology</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Vigor</subject><issn>0014-4819</issn><issn>1432-1106</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kl1rFDEUhoModq3-AS8kIIheTM3HfN4USvGjUBC0XodM9sxslplkTTJL9dd7plvbjogMZEjO876Z884h5CVnJ5yx6n1kTAie4ZKxUooiqx6RFc-lyDhn5WOyYoznWV7z5og8i3E7b2XFnpIjWfBa8LpcEbjaALWuGyZwBiL1HU069JBotL-AaremAQy4ROF6B8HOFPWOJpTtbe-nMEv0ejvFNCIWafJY7711PR39Hm4On5MnnR4ivLh9H5PvHz9cnX_OLr98ujg_u8xMycqUVVq2Oa_ats3LsmpM0xW1LmpZGDCtxpbXTWE6rrnQXM496koWdc4AWCNMnctjcnrw3U3tCOv5u4Me1C7YUYefymurlhVnN6r3e9UwXjIp0ODtrUHwPyaISY02GhgG7cBPUYlS4lW1KDiir_9Ct5iGw_aQKnjDBBP5PdXrARQG7fFeM5uqs4qxhuMfrJA6-QeFzxpGa7yDzuL5QvBuIUAmwXXq9RSjuvj2dcm-ecBuQA9pE_0wJetdXILiAJrgYwzQ3QXHmZonTh0mTuGibiZOzaJXDyO_k_wZMQTkAYhYcj2E-5z-Y_sbG-jefQ</recordid><startdate>20220401</startdate><enddate>20220401</enddate><creator>Brenner, Eli</creator><creator>Hardon, Hidde</creator><creator>Moesman, Ryan</creator><creator>Crowe, Emily M.</creator><creator>Smeets, Jeroen B. J.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8265-7791</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3794-0579</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3611-2843</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220401</creationdate><title>The influences of target size and recent experience on the vigour of adjustments to ongoing movements</title><author>Brenner, Eli ; Hardon, Hidde ; Moesman, Ryan ; Crowe, Emily M. ; Smeets, Jeroen B. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c606t-7a3b417bbb46679c9f58a5835cecba007d95cf1a12a131106a735840ee092c843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Brain research</topic><topic>Experience</topic><topic>Human mechanics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Motion Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Movement - physiology</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</topic><topic>Reaction Time - physiology</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Vigor</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brenner, Eli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardon, Hidde</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moesman, Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crowe, Emily M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smeets, Jeroen B. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Experimental brain research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brenner, Eli</au><au>Hardon, Hidde</au><au>Moesman, Ryan</au><au>Crowe, Emily M.</au><au>Smeets, Jeroen B. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The influences of target size and recent experience on the vigour of adjustments to ongoing movements</atitle><jtitle>Experimental brain research</jtitle><stitle>Exp Brain Res</stitle><addtitle>Exp Brain Res</addtitle><date>2022-04-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>240</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1219</spage><epage>1229</epage><pages>1219-1229</pages><issn>0014-4819</issn><eissn>1432-1106</eissn><abstract>People adjust their on-going movements to changes in the environment. It takes about 100 ms to respond to an abrupt change in a target’s position. Does the vigour of such responses depend on the extent to which responding is beneficial? We asked participants to tap on targets that jumped laterally once their finger started to move. In separate blocks of trials the target either remained at the new position so that it was beneficial to respond to the jump, or jumped back almost immediately so that it was disadvantageous to do so. We also varied the target’s size, because a smaller, less vigorous adjustment is enough to place the finger within a larger target. There was a systematic relationship between the vigour of the response and the remaining time until the tap: the shorter the remaining time the more vigorous the response. This relationship did not depend on the target’s size or whether or not the target jumped back. It was already known that the vigour of responses to target jumps depends on the magnitude of the jump and on the time available for adjusting the movement to that jump. We show that the vigour of the response is precisely tuned to the time available for making the required adjustment irrespective of whether responding in this manner is beneficial.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>35182186</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00221-022-06325-7</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8265-7791</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3794-0579</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3611-2843</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0014-4819 |
ispartof | Experimental brain research, 2022-04, Vol.240 (4), p.1219-1229 |
issn | 0014-4819 1432-1106 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9016032 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedicine Brain research Experience Human mechanics Humans Motion Perception - physiology Movement - physiology Neurology Neurosciences Physiological aspects Psychological aspects Psychomotor Performance - physiology Reaction Time - physiology Research Article Social aspects Vigor |
title | The influences of target size and recent experience on the vigour of adjustments to ongoing movements |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T23%3A19%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20influences%20of%20target%20size%20and%20recent%20experience%20on%20the%20vigour%20of%20adjustments%20to%20ongoing%20movements&rft.jtitle=Experimental%20brain%20research&rft.au=Brenner,%20Eli&rft.date=2022-04-01&rft.volume=240&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1219&rft.epage=1229&rft.pages=1219-1229&rft.issn=0014-4819&rft.eissn=1432-1106&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00221-022-06325-7&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA700912217%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2651902024&rft_id=info:pmid/35182186&rft_galeid=A700912217&rfr_iscdi=true |