Linear or circular: Anastomotic ulcer after gastric bypass surgery

Background After laparoscopic Gastric Bypass Procedure (GBP), anastomotic ulcers (AU) at the gastrojejunostomy (GJ) occur in up to 16% of the patients. Surgical techniques seem to influence the development of AU, but this is still a matter of discussion. This study aims to compare the incidence of A...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surgical endoscopy 2022-05, Vol.36 (5), p.3011-3018
Hauptverfasser: Schäfer, Aline, Gehwolf, Philipp, Kienzl-Wagner, Katrin, Cakar-Beck, Fergül, Wykypiel, Heinz
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3018
container_issue 5
container_start_page 3011
container_title Surgical endoscopy
container_volume 36
creator Schäfer, Aline
Gehwolf, Philipp
Kienzl-Wagner, Katrin
Cakar-Beck, Fergül
Wykypiel, Heinz
description Background After laparoscopic Gastric Bypass Procedure (GBP), anastomotic ulcers (AU) at the gastrojejunostomy (GJ) occur in up to 16% of the patients. Surgical techniques seem to influence the development of AU, but this is still a matter of discussion. This study aims to compare the incidence of AU in circular-stapled (CS) versus linear-stapled (LS) gastrojejunostomy. Methods Single-centre retrospective analysis of 241 (m 77 /f 164) consecutive patients (126 CS, 115 LS) with primary or revisional GBP including Roux-Y-Gastric Bypass (RYGB) and One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) between 01/2014 and 01/2018. Follow-up with oesophagogastroduodenoscopy was only performed in symptomatic patients. Age, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, smoking and medication were analyzed in both groups. The data are reported as total numbers (%) and mean ± standard deviation. Results AU occurred significantly more often in the CS group than in the LS group ( p  = 0.0034). Moreover, refractory AU and the need for revisional surgery were higher in the CS group. Smoking correlates significantly with the development of AU, whereas other risk factors had no impact on its incidence. Conclusion Linear-stapled gastrojejunostomy with a long and narrow pouch should be the preferable procedure for reducing AU development risk. Smoking cessation minimizes the risk for AU and is a necessary part of the treatment.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00464-021-08597-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9001202</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2649148723</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-6973c66169ecc78cc548a7960528ae57b05eee385db27ba8feaac5175ea26283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kclKBDEQhoMoOi4v4EEavHhprexpD8IobjDgxXtIx5qxpaczJt3CvL3RcT94qUDVV3-l6idkn8IxBdAnCUAoUQKjJRhZ6VKtkREVnJWMUbNORlBxKJmuxBbZTukJMl9RuUm2uKCSCalG5HzSdOhiEWLhm-iH1sXTYty51Id56BtfDK3HWLhpn-Msp2PO1cuFS6lIQ5xhXO6SjalrE-59vDvk_ury_uKmnNxd316MJ6UXIPpSVZp7paiq0HttvJfCOF0pkMw4lLoGiYjcyIea6dqZKTrnJdUSHVPM8B1ytpJdDPUcHzx2fXStXcRm7uLSBtfY35WuebSz8GIrAMqAZYGjD4EYngdMvZ03yWPbug7DkCyTgmsQWqiMHv5Bn8IQu7ydZSrfUBjNeKbYivIxpBRx-vUZCvbNIbtyyGaH7LtD9k364OcaXy2flmSAr4CUS10-8Pfsf2RfAeXwnFY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2649148723</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Linear or circular: Anastomotic ulcer after gastric bypass surgery</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Schäfer, Aline ; Gehwolf, Philipp ; Kienzl-Wagner, Katrin ; Cakar-Beck, Fergül ; Wykypiel, Heinz</creator><creatorcontrib>Schäfer, Aline ; Gehwolf, Philipp ; Kienzl-Wagner, Katrin ; Cakar-Beck, Fergül ; Wykypiel, Heinz</creatorcontrib><description>Background After laparoscopic Gastric Bypass Procedure (GBP), anastomotic ulcers (AU) at the gastrojejunostomy (GJ) occur in up to 16% of the patients. Surgical techniques seem to influence the development of AU, but this is still a matter of discussion. This study aims to compare the incidence of AU in circular-stapled (CS) versus linear-stapled (LS) gastrojejunostomy. Methods Single-centre retrospective analysis of 241 (m 77 /f 164) consecutive patients (126 CS, 115 LS) with primary or revisional GBP including Roux-Y-Gastric Bypass (RYGB) and One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) between 01/2014 and 01/2018. Follow-up with oesophagogastroduodenoscopy was only performed in symptomatic patients. Age, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, smoking and medication were analyzed in both groups. The data are reported as total numbers (%) and mean ± standard deviation. Results AU occurred significantly more often in the CS group than in the LS group ( p  = 0.0034). Moreover, refractory AU and the need for revisional surgery were higher in the CS group. Smoking correlates significantly with the development of AU, whereas other risk factors had no impact on its incidence. Conclusion Linear-stapled gastrojejunostomy with a long and narrow pouch should be the preferable procedure for reducing AU development risk. Smoking cessation minimizes the risk for AU and is a necessary part of the treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0930-2794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2218</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08597-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34152456</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Abdominal Surgery ; Body mass index ; Endoscopy ; Gastric Bypass - adverse effects ; Gastric Bypass - methods ; Gastroenterology ; Gastrointestinal surgery ; Gynecology ; Heart surgery ; Hepatology ; Humans ; Infections ; Laparoscopy ; Laparoscopy - methods ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Metabolism ; Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs ; Obesity, Morbid - surgery ; Ostomy ; Proctology ; Retrospective Studies ; Smoking cessation ; Standard deviation ; Surgery ; Surgical techniques ; Sutures ; Thoracic surgery ; Treatment Outcome ; Ulcer - etiology ; Ulcer - surgery ; Ulcers</subject><ispartof>Surgical endoscopy, 2022-05, Vol.36 (5), p.3011-3018</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><rights>2021. The Author(s).</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-6973c66169ecc78cc548a7960528ae57b05eee385db27ba8feaac5175ea26283</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-6973c66169ecc78cc548a7960528ae57b05eee385db27ba8feaac5175ea26283</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1761-555X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00464-021-08597-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00464-021-08597-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27922,27923,41486,42555,51317</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34152456$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schäfer, Aline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gehwolf, Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kienzl-Wagner, Katrin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cakar-Beck, Fergül</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wykypiel, Heinz</creatorcontrib><title>Linear or circular: Anastomotic ulcer after gastric bypass surgery</title><title>Surgical endoscopy</title><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><description>Background After laparoscopic Gastric Bypass Procedure (GBP), anastomotic ulcers (AU) at the gastrojejunostomy (GJ) occur in up to 16% of the patients. Surgical techniques seem to influence the development of AU, but this is still a matter of discussion. This study aims to compare the incidence of AU in circular-stapled (CS) versus linear-stapled (LS) gastrojejunostomy. Methods Single-centre retrospective analysis of 241 (m 77 /f 164) consecutive patients (126 CS, 115 LS) with primary or revisional GBP including Roux-Y-Gastric Bypass (RYGB) and One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) between 01/2014 and 01/2018. Follow-up with oesophagogastroduodenoscopy was only performed in symptomatic patients. Age, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, smoking and medication were analyzed in both groups. The data are reported as total numbers (%) and mean ± standard deviation. Results AU occurred significantly more often in the CS group than in the LS group ( p  = 0.0034). Moreover, refractory AU and the need for revisional surgery were higher in the CS group. Smoking correlates significantly with the development of AU, whereas other risk factors had no impact on its incidence. Conclusion Linear-stapled gastrojejunostomy with a long and narrow pouch should be the preferable procedure for reducing AU development risk. Smoking cessation minimizes the risk for AU and is a necessary part of the treatment.</description><subject>Abdominal Surgery</subject><subject>Body mass index</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Gastric Bypass - adverse effects</subject><subject>Gastric Bypass - methods</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal surgery</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Heart surgery</subject><subject>Hepatology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs</subject><subject>Obesity, Morbid - surgery</subject><subject>Ostomy</subject><subject>Proctology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Smoking cessation</subject><subject>Standard deviation</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical techniques</subject><subject>Sutures</subject><subject>Thoracic surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Ulcer - etiology</subject><subject>Ulcer - surgery</subject><subject>Ulcers</subject><issn>0930-2794</issn><issn>1432-2218</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kclKBDEQhoMoOi4v4EEavHhprexpD8IobjDgxXtIx5qxpaczJt3CvL3RcT94qUDVV3-l6idkn8IxBdAnCUAoUQKjJRhZ6VKtkREVnJWMUbNORlBxKJmuxBbZTukJMl9RuUm2uKCSCalG5HzSdOhiEWLhm-iH1sXTYty51Id56BtfDK3HWLhpn-Msp2PO1cuFS6lIQ5xhXO6SjalrE-59vDvk_ury_uKmnNxd316MJ6UXIPpSVZp7paiq0HttvJfCOF0pkMw4lLoGiYjcyIea6dqZKTrnJdUSHVPM8B1ytpJdDPUcHzx2fXStXcRm7uLSBtfY35WuebSz8GIrAMqAZYGjD4EYngdMvZ03yWPbug7DkCyTgmsQWqiMHv5Bn8IQu7ydZSrfUBjNeKbYivIxpBRx-vUZCvbNIbtyyGaH7LtD9k364OcaXy2flmSAr4CUS10-8Pfsf2RfAeXwnFY</recordid><startdate>20220501</startdate><enddate>20220501</enddate><creator>Schäfer, Aline</creator><creator>Gehwolf, Philipp</creator><creator>Kienzl-Wagner, Katrin</creator><creator>Cakar-Beck, Fergül</creator><creator>Wykypiel, Heinz</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1761-555X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220501</creationdate><title>Linear or circular: Anastomotic ulcer after gastric bypass surgery</title><author>Schäfer, Aline ; Gehwolf, Philipp ; Kienzl-Wagner, Katrin ; Cakar-Beck, Fergül ; Wykypiel, Heinz</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-6973c66169ecc78cc548a7960528ae57b05eee385db27ba8feaac5175ea26283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Abdominal Surgery</topic><topic>Body mass index</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Gastric Bypass - adverse effects</topic><topic>Gastric Bypass - methods</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal surgery</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Heart surgery</topic><topic>Hepatology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs</topic><topic>Obesity, Morbid - surgery</topic><topic>Ostomy</topic><topic>Proctology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Smoking cessation</topic><topic>Standard deviation</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical techniques</topic><topic>Sutures</topic><topic>Thoracic surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Ulcer - etiology</topic><topic>Ulcer - surgery</topic><topic>Ulcers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schäfer, Aline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gehwolf, Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kienzl-Wagner, Katrin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cakar-Beck, Fergül</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wykypiel, Heinz</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schäfer, Aline</au><au>Gehwolf, Philipp</au><au>Kienzl-Wagner, Katrin</au><au>Cakar-Beck, Fergül</au><au>Wykypiel, Heinz</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Linear or circular: Anastomotic ulcer after gastric bypass surgery</atitle><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle><stitle>Surg Endosc</stitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><date>2022-05-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>3011</spage><epage>3018</epage><pages>3011-3018</pages><issn>0930-2794</issn><eissn>1432-2218</eissn><abstract>Background After laparoscopic Gastric Bypass Procedure (GBP), anastomotic ulcers (AU) at the gastrojejunostomy (GJ) occur in up to 16% of the patients. Surgical techniques seem to influence the development of AU, but this is still a matter of discussion. This study aims to compare the incidence of AU in circular-stapled (CS) versus linear-stapled (LS) gastrojejunostomy. Methods Single-centre retrospective analysis of 241 (m 77 /f 164) consecutive patients (126 CS, 115 LS) with primary or revisional GBP including Roux-Y-Gastric Bypass (RYGB) and One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) between 01/2014 and 01/2018. Follow-up with oesophagogastroduodenoscopy was only performed in symptomatic patients. Age, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, smoking and medication were analyzed in both groups. The data are reported as total numbers (%) and mean ± standard deviation. Results AU occurred significantly more often in the CS group than in the LS group ( p  = 0.0034). Moreover, refractory AU and the need for revisional surgery were higher in the CS group. Smoking correlates significantly with the development of AU, whereas other risk factors had no impact on its incidence. Conclusion Linear-stapled gastrojejunostomy with a long and narrow pouch should be the preferable procedure for reducing AU development risk. Smoking cessation minimizes the risk for AU and is a necessary part of the treatment.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>34152456</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00464-021-08597-6</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1761-555X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0930-2794
ispartof Surgical endoscopy, 2022-05, Vol.36 (5), p.3011-3018
issn 0930-2794
1432-2218
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9001202
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Abdominal Surgery
Body mass index
Endoscopy
Gastric Bypass - adverse effects
Gastric Bypass - methods
Gastroenterology
Gastrointestinal surgery
Gynecology
Heart surgery
Hepatology
Humans
Infections
Laparoscopy
Laparoscopy - methods
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Metabolism
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
Obesity, Morbid - surgery
Ostomy
Proctology
Retrospective Studies
Smoking cessation
Standard deviation
Surgery
Surgical techniques
Sutures
Thoracic surgery
Treatment Outcome
Ulcer - etiology
Ulcer - surgery
Ulcers
title Linear or circular: Anastomotic ulcer after gastric bypass surgery
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T14%3A06%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Linear%20or%20circular:%20Anastomotic%20ulcer%20after%20gastric%20bypass%20surgery&rft.jtitle=Surgical%20endoscopy&rft.au=Sch%C3%A4fer,%20Aline&rft.date=2022-05-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=3011&rft.epage=3018&rft.pages=3011-3018&rft.issn=0930-2794&rft.eissn=1432-2218&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00464-021-08597-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2649148723%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2649148723&rft_id=info:pmid/34152456&rfr_iscdi=true