Optimal Design of Reinforced Concrete Materials in Construction

The structural design process is iterative and involves many design parameters. Thus, this paper presents a controlled framework for selecting the adequate structural floor system for reinforced concrete buildings and efficiently utilizing the corresponding construction materials. Optimization was p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Materials 2022-04, Vol.15 (7), p.2625
Hauptverfasser: Rady, Mohammed, Mahfouz, Sameh Youssef, Taher, Salah El-Din Fahmy
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 7
container_start_page 2625
container_title Materials
container_volume 15
creator Rady, Mohammed
Mahfouz, Sameh Youssef
Taher, Salah El-Din Fahmy
description The structural design process is iterative and involves many design parameters. Thus, this paper presents a controlled framework for selecting the adequate structural floor system for reinforced concrete buildings and efficiently utilizing the corresponding construction materials. Optimization was performed using an evolutionary algorithm to minimize the total construction cost, considering the costs of concrete, steel reinforcement, formwork, and labor. In the problem formulation, the characteristic compressive strength of concrete was treated as a design variable because it affects the mechanical performance of concrete. The design variables included the column spacings, concrete dimensions, and steel reinforcement of different structural components. The constraints reflected the Egyptian code of practice provisions. Because the choice of the structural floor system affects the design details, three systems were considered: solid slabs, flat slabs with drop panels, and flat slabs without drop panels. Two benchmark examples were presented, and the optimal design results of the structural floor systems were compared. The solid slab system had the lowest construction cost among the three structural floor systems. Comparative diagrams were developed to investigate the distribution of construction costs of each floor system. The results revealed that an adequate choice of design variables could save up to 17% of the building's total construction cost.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/ma15072625
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9000517</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2649063557</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-fa9253fa9ed0f3a1dd183eda9b2d6e5da84b5f29815a749a5d17ea83d4234ee43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkV9LwzAUxYMobsy9-AGk4IsI1aRJ2uZFkfkXJgPR55A1tzOjS2bSCn57Mzd1moebcO-Pw7k5CB0SfEapwOcLRTgusjzjO6hPhMhTIhjb3Xr30DCEOY6HUlJmYh_1KGe4ELzso8vJsjUL1STXEMzMJq5OnsDY2vkKdDJytvLQQvKoWvBGNSExdtUNre-q1jh7gPbq2Ibh5h6gl9ub59F9Op7cPYyuxmnFcN6mtRIZp7GCxjVVRGtSUtBKTDOdA9eqZFNeZ6IkXBVMKK5JAaqkmmWUATA6QBdr3WU3XYCuwLZeNXLpo3n_IZ0y8u_Emlc5c-9SxL05KaLAyUbAu7cOQisXJlTQNMqC64LMchY_pGAUR_T4Hzp3nbdxvS8K55TzleDpmqq8C8FD_WOGYLmKRv5GE-Gjbfs_6HcQ9BPkJYlc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2649063557</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimal Design of Reinforced Concrete Materials in Construction</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Rady, Mohammed ; Mahfouz, Sameh Youssef ; Taher, Salah El-Din Fahmy</creator><creatorcontrib>Rady, Mohammed ; Mahfouz, Sameh Youssef ; Taher, Salah El-Din Fahmy</creatorcontrib><description>The structural design process is iterative and involves many design parameters. Thus, this paper presents a controlled framework for selecting the adequate structural floor system for reinforced concrete buildings and efficiently utilizing the corresponding construction materials. Optimization was performed using an evolutionary algorithm to minimize the total construction cost, considering the costs of concrete, steel reinforcement, formwork, and labor. In the problem formulation, the characteristic compressive strength of concrete was treated as a design variable because it affects the mechanical performance of concrete. The design variables included the column spacings, concrete dimensions, and steel reinforcement of different structural components. The constraints reflected the Egyptian code of practice provisions. Because the choice of the structural floor system affects the design details, three systems were considered: solid slabs, flat slabs with drop panels, and flat slabs without drop panels. Two benchmark examples were presented, and the optimal design results of the structural floor systems were compared. The solid slab system had the lowest construction cost among the three structural floor systems. Comparative diagrams were developed to investigate the distribution of construction costs of each floor system. The results revealed that an adequate choice of design variables could save up to 17% of the building's total construction cost.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1996-1944</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1996-1944</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/ma15072625</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35407958</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Codes of Practice ; Compressive strength ; Concrete ; Concrete construction ; Construction costs ; Construction materials ; Cost control ; Design optimization ; Design parameters ; Evolutionary algorithms ; Flooring ; Floors ; Formwork ; Load ; Mechanical properties ; Optimization ; Optimization techniques ; Panels ; Reinforced concrete ; Reinforcing steels ; Shear strength ; Structural design ; Variables</subject><ispartof>Materials, 2022-04, Vol.15 (7), p.2625</ispartof><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-fa9253fa9ed0f3a1dd183eda9b2d6e5da84b5f29815a749a5d17ea83d4234ee43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-fa9253fa9ed0f3a1dd183eda9b2d6e5da84b5f29815a749a5d17ea83d4234ee43</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0069-0956</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9000517/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9000517/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35407958$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rady, Mohammed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahfouz, Sameh Youssef</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taher, Salah El-Din Fahmy</creatorcontrib><title>Optimal Design of Reinforced Concrete Materials in Construction</title><title>Materials</title><addtitle>Materials (Basel)</addtitle><description>The structural design process is iterative and involves many design parameters. Thus, this paper presents a controlled framework for selecting the adequate structural floor system for reinforced concrete buildings and efficiently utilizing the corresponding construction materials. Optimization was performed using an evolutionary algorithm to minimize the total construction cost, considering the costs of concrete, steel reinforcement, formwork, and labor. In the problem formulation, the characteristic compressive strength of concrete was treated as a design variable because it affects the mechanical performance of concrete. The design variables included the column spacings, concrete dimensions, and steel reinforcement of different structural components. The constraints reflected the Egyptian code of practice provisions. Because the choice of the structural floor system affects the design details, three systems were considered: solid slabs, flat slabs with drop panels, and flat slabs without drop panels. Two benchmark examples were presented, and the optimal design results of the structural floor systems were compared. The solid slab system had the lowest construction cost among the three structural floor systems. Comparative diagrams were developed to investigate the distribution of construction costs of each floor system. The results revealed that an adequate choice of design variables could save up to 17% of the building's total construction cost.</description><subject>Codes of Practice</subject><subject>Compressive strength</subject><subject>Concrete</subject><subject>Concrete construction</subject><subject>Construction costs</subject><subject>Construction materials</subject><subject>Cost control</subject><subject>Design optimization</subject><subject>Design parameters</subject><subject>Evolutionary algorithms</subject><subject>Flooring</subject><subject>Floors</subject><subject>Formwork</subject><subject>Load</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Optimization techniques</subject><subject>Panels</subject><subject>Reinforced concrete</subject><subject>Reinforcing steels</subject><subject>Shear strength</subject><subject>Structural design</subject><subject>Variables</subject><issn>1996-1944</issn><issn>1996-1944</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkV9LwzAUxYMobsy9-AGk4IsI1aRJ2uZFkfkXJgPR55A1tzOjS2bSCn57Mzd1moebcO-Pw7k5CB0SfEapwOcLRTgusjzjO6hPhMhTIhjb3Xr30DCEOY6HUlJmYh_1KGe4ELzso8vJsjUL1STXEMzMJq5OnsDY2vkKdDJytvLQQvKoWvBGNSExdtUNre-q1jh7gPbq2Ibh5h6gl9ub59F9Op7cPYyuxmnFcN6mtRIZp7GCxjVVRGtSUtBKTDOdA9eqZFNeZ6IkXBVMKK5JAaqkmmWUATA6QBdr3WU3XYCuwLZeNXLpo3n_IZ0y8u_Emlc5c-9SxL05KaLAyUbAu7cOQisXJlTQNMqC64LMchY_pGAUR_T4Hzp3nbdxvS8K55TzleDpmqq8C8FD_WOGYLmKRv5GE-Gjbfs_6HcQ9BPkJYlc</recordid><startdate>20220402</startdate><enddate>20220402</enddate><creator>Rady, Mohammed</creator><creator>Mahfouz, Sameh Youssef</creator><creator>Taher, Salah El-Din Fahmy</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0069-0956</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220402</creationdate><title>Optimal Design of Reinforced Concrete Materials in Construction</title><author>Rady, Mohammed ; Mahfouz, Sameh Youssef ; Taher, Salah El-Din Fahmy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-fa9253fa9ed0f3a1dd183eda9b2d6e5da84b5f29815a749a5d17ea83d4234ee43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Codes of Practice</topic><topic>Compressive strength</topic><topic>Concrete</topic><topic>Concrete construction</topic><topic>Construction costs</topic><topic>Construction materials</topic><topic>Cost control</topic><topic>Design optimization</topic><topic>Design parameters</topic><topic>Evolutionary algorithms</topic><topic>Flooring</topic><topic>Floors</topic><topic>Formwork</topic><topic>Load</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Optimization techniques</topic><topic>Panels</topic><topic>Reinforced concrete</topic><topic>Reinforcing steels</topic><topic>Shear strength</topic><topic>Structural design</topic><topic>Variables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rady, Mohammed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahfouz, Sameh Youssef</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taher, Salah El-Din Fahmy</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Materials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rady, Mohammed</au><au>Mahfouz, Sameh Youssef</au><au>Taher, Salah El-Din Fahmy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimal Design of Reinforced Concrete Materials in Construction</atitle><jtitle>Materials</jtitle><addtitle>Materials (Basel)</addtitle><date>2022-04-02</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>2625</spage><pages>2625-</pages><issn>1996-1944</issn><eissn>1996-1944</eissn><abstract>The structural design process is iterative and involves many design parameters. Thus, this paper presents a controlled framework for selecting the adequate structural floor system for reinforced concrete buildings and efficiently utilizing the corresponding construction materials. Optimization was performed using an evolutionary algorithm to minimize the total construction cost, considering the costs of concrete, steel reinforcement, formwork, and labor. In the problem formulation, the characteristic compressive strength of concrete was treated as a design variable because it affects the mechanical performance of concrete. The design variables included the column spacings, concrete dimensions, and steel reinforcement of different structural components. The constraints reflected the Egyptian code of practice provisions. Because the choice of the structural floor system affects the design details, three systems were considered: solid slabs, flat slabs with drop panels, and flat slabs without drop panels. Two benchmark examples were presented, and the optimal design results of the structural floor systems were compared. The solid slab system had the lowest construction cost among the three structural floor systems. Comparative diagrams were developed to investigate the distribution of construction costs of each floor system. The results revealed that an adequate choice of design variables could save up to 17% of the building's total construction cost.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>35407958</pmid><doi>10.3390/ma15072625</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0069-0956</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1996-1944
ispartof Materials, 2022-04, Vol.15 (7), p.2625
issn 1996-1944
1996-1944
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9000517
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; PubMed Central Open Access
subjects Codes of Practice
Compressive strength
Concrete
Concrete construction
Construction costs
Construction materials
Cost control
Design optimization
Design parameters
Evolutionary algorithms
Flooring
Floors
Formwork
Load
Mechanical properties
Optimization
Optimization techniques
Panels
Reinforced concrete
Reinforcing steels
Shear strength
Structural design
Variables
title Optimal Design of Reinforced Concrete Materials in Construction
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T10%3A13%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimal%20Design%20of%20Reinforced%20Concrete%20Materials%20in%20Construction&rft.jtitle=Materials&rft.au=Rady,%20Mohammed&rft.date=2022-04-02&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=2625&rft.pages=2625-&rft.issn=1996-1944&rft.eissn=1996-1944&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/ma15072625&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2649063557%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2649063557&rft_id=info:pmid/35407958&rfr_iscdi=true