Role of Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer-A Review
For patients with completely resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with ipsilateral mediastinal lymph node involvement (pN2), the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy is the standard of care. The role of postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) is controversial. We describe the current litera...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cancers 2022-03, Vol.14 (7), p.1617 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1617 |
container_title | Cancers |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Süveg, Krisztian Plasswilm, Ludwig Iseli, Thomas Leskow, Pawel Fischer, Galina Farina Putora, Paul Martin |
description | For patients with completely resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with ipsilateral mediastinal lymph node involvement (pN2), the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy is the standard of care. The role of postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) is controversial.
We describe the current literature focusing on the role of PORT in completely resected NSCLC patients with pN2 involvement and reflect on its role in current guidelines.
Based on the results of the recent Lung ART and PORT-C trials, the authors conclude that PORT cannot be generally recommended for all resected pN2 NSCLC patients. A substantial decrease in the locoregional relapse rate without translating into a survival benefit suggests that some patients with risk factors might benefit from PORT. This must be balanced against the risk of cardiopulmonary toxicity with potentially associated mortality. Lung ART has already changed the decision making for the use of PORT in daily practice for many European lung cancer experts, with lower rates of recommendations for PORT overall.
PORT is still used, albeit decreasingly, for completely resected NSCLC with pN2 involvement. High-level evidence for its routine use is lacking. Further analyses are required to identify patients who would potentially benefit from PORT. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/cancers14071617 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8997169</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2649592869</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-eeab3df2f5a8c1e3e5af96d98ff05af38382cddd824a8f8d9aa1d1e23b18a3143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUtLAzEUhYMoKtW1Oxlw42ZsMplHshFKfUJRqLoOt5MbnTJNajJT6b831gdqFsmFfDk35x5Cjhg941zSYQ22Rh9YTitWsmqL7Ge0ytKylPn2r3qPHIYwp3Fxzqqy2iV7vMhpyYXYJxdT12LiTDLS834FtkumoBvXvaCH5TppbHLnbPqwgLZNxhi3SW-fk_GmczpKprhq8O2A7BhoAx5-nQPydHX5OL5JJ_fXt-PRJK15wboUEWZcm8wUIGqGHAswstRSGENjyQUXWa21FlkOwggtAZhmmPEZE8BZzgfk_FN32c8WqGu0nYdWLX2zAL9WDhr198Y2L-rZrZSQMo5IRoHTLwHvXnsMnVo0oY62wKLrg8rKXBYyExv05B86d7230d6GonF-jEdq-EnV3oXg0fx8hlH1EZL6F1J8cfzbww__HQl_B2qYjpk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2649006313</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Role of Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer-A Review</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Süveg, Krisztian ; Plasswilm, Ludwig ; Iseli, Thomas ; Leskow, Pawel ; Fischer, Galina Farina ; Putora, Paul Martin</creator><creatorcontrib>Süveg, Krisztian ; Plasswilm, Ludwig ; Iseli, Thomas ; Leskow, Pawel ; Fischer, Galina Farina ; Putora, Paul Martin</creatorcontrib><description>For patients with completely resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with ipsilateral mediastinal lymph node involvement (pN2), the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy is the standard of care. The role of postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) is controversial.
We describe the current literature focusing on the role of PORT in completely resected NSCLC patients with pN2 involvement and reflect on its role in current guidelines.
Based on the results of the recent Lung ART and PORT-C trials, the authors conclude that PORT cannot be generally recommended for all resected pN2 NSCLC patients. A substantial decrease in the locoregional relapse rate without translating into a survival benefit suggests that some patients with risk factors might benefit from PORT. This must be balanced against the risk of cardiopulmonary toxicity with potentially associated mortality. Lung ART has already changed the decision making for the use of PORT in daily practice for many European lung cancer experts, with lower rates of recommendations for PORT overall.
PORT is still used, albeit decreasingly, for completely resected NSCLC with pN2 involvement. High-level evidence for its routine use is lacking. Further analyses are required to identify patients who would potentially benefit from PORT.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2072-6694</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2072-6694</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/cancers14071617</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35406388</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Cancer therapies ; Chemotherapy ; Clinical trials ; Decision making ; Immunotherapy ; Lung cancer ; Lymph nodes ; Medical prognosis ; Meta-analysis ; Non-small cell lung carcinoma ; Patients ; Radiation therapy ; Review ; Risk factors ; Small cell lung carcinoma ; Thoracic surgery ; Toxicity ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Cancers, 2022-03, Vol.14 (7), p.1617</ispartof><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-eeab3df2f5a8c1e3e5af96d98ff05af38382cddd824a8f8d9aa1d1e23b18a3143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-eeab3df2f5a8c1e3e5af96d98ff05af38382cddd824a8f8d9aa1d1e23b18a3143</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8997169/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8997169/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27922,27923,53789,53791</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35406388$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Süveg, Krisztian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plasswilm, Ludwig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iseli, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leskow, Pawel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Galina Farina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Putora, Paul Martin</creatorcontrib><title>Role of Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer-A Review</title><title>Cancers</title><addtitle>Cancers (Basel)</addtitle><description>For patients with completely resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with ipsilateral mediastinal lymph node involvement (pN2), the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy is the standard of care. The role of postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) is controversial.
We describe the current literature focusing on the role of PORT in completely resected NSCLC patients with pN2 involvement and reflect on its role in current guidelines.
Based on the results of the recent Lung ART and PORT-C trials, the authors conclude that PORT cannot be generally recommended for all resected pN2 NSCLC patients. A substantial decrease in the locoregional relapse rate without translating into a survival benefit suggests that some patients with risk factors might benefit from PORT. This must be balanced against the risk of cardiopulmonary toxicity with potentially associated mortality. Lung ART has already changed the decision making for the use of PORT in daily practice for many European lung cancer experts, with lower rates of recommendations for PORT overall.
PORT is still used, albeit decreasingly, for completely resected NSCLC with pN2 involvement. High-level evidence for its routine use is lacking. Further analyses are required to identify patients who would potentially benefit from PORT.</description><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Immunotherapy</subject><subject>Lung cancer</subject><subject>Lymph nodes</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Non-small cell lung carcinoma</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Small cell lung carcinoma</subject><subject>Thoracic surgery</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>2072-6694</issn><issn>2072-6694</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUtLAzEUhYMoKtW1Oxlw42ZsMplHshFKfUJRqLoOt5MbnTJNajJT6b831gdqFsmFfDk35x5Cjhg941zSYQ22Rh9YTitWsmqL7Ge0ytKylPn2r3qPHIYwp3Fxzqqy2iV7vMhpyYXYJxdT12LiTDLS834FtkumoBvXvaCH5TppbHLnbPqwgLZNxhi3SW-fk_GmczpKprhq8O2A7BhoAx5-nQPydHX5OL5JJ_fXt-PRJK15wboUEWZcm8wUIGqGHAswstRSGENjyQUXWa21FlkOwggtAZhmmPEZE8BZzgfk_FN32c8WqGu0nYdWLX2zAL9WDhr198Y2L-rZrZSQMo5IRoHTLwHvXnsMnVo0oY62wKLrg8rKXBYyExv05B86d7230d6GonF-jEdq-EnV3oXg0fx8hlH1EZL6F1J8cfzbww__HQl_B2qYjpk</recordid><startdate>20220323</startdate><enddate>20220323</enddate><creator>Süveg, Krisztian</creator><creator>Plasswilm, Ludwig</creator><creator>Iseli, Thomas</creator><creator>Leskow, Pawel</creator><creator>Fischer, Galina Farina</creator><creator>Putora, Paul Martin</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220323</creationdate><title>Role of Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer-A Review</title><author>Süveg, Krisztian ; Plasswilm, Ludwig ; Iseli, Thomas ; Leskow, Pawel ; Fischer, Galina Farina ; Putora, Paul Martin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-eeab3df2f5a8c1e3e5af96d98ff05af38382cddd824a8f8d9aa1d1e23b18a3143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Immunotherapy</topic><topic>Lung cancer</topic><topic>Lymph nodes</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Non-small cell lung carcinoma</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Small cell lung carcinoma</topic><topic>Thoracic surgery</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Süveg, Krisztian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plasswilm, Ludwig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iseli, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leskow, Pawel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Galina Farina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Putora, Paul Martin</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Cancers</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Süveg, Krisztian</au><au>Plasswilm, Ludwig</au><au>Iseli, Thomas</au><au>Leskow, Pawel</au><au>Fischer, Galina Farina</au><au>Putora, Paul Martin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Role of Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer-A Review</atitle><jtitle>Cancers</jtitle><addtitle>Cancers (Basel)</addtitle><date>2022-03-23</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1617</spage><pages>1617-</pages><issn>2072-6694</issn><eissn>2072-6694</eissn><abstract>For patients with completely resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with ipsilateral mediastinal lymph node involvement (pN2), the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy is the standard of care. The role of postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) is controversial.
We describe the current literature focusing on the role of PORT in completely resected NSCLC patients with pN2 involvement and reflect on its role in current guidelines.
Based on the results of the recent Lung ART and PORT-C trials, the authors conclude that PORT cannot be generally recommended for all resected pN2 NSCLC patients. A substantial decrease in the locoregional relapse rate without translating into a survival benefit suggests that some patients with risk factors might benefit from PORT. This must be balanced against the risk of cardiopulmonary toxicity with potentially associated mortality. Lung ART has already changed the decision making for the use of PORT in daily practice for many European lung cancer experts, with lower rates of recommendations for PORT overall.
PORT is still used, albeit decreasingly, for completely resected NSCLC with pN2 involvement. High-level evidence for its routine use is lacking. Further analyses are required to identify patients who would potentially benefit from PORT.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>35406388</pmid><doi>10.3390/cancers14071617</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2072-6694 |
ispartof | Cancers, 2022-03, Vol.14 (7), p.1617 |
issn | 2072-6694 2072-6694 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8997169 |
source | PubMed Central Open Access; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Cancer therapies Chemotherapy Clinical trials Decision making Immunotherapy Lung cancer Lymph nodes Medical prognosis Meta-analysis Non-small cell lung carcinoma Patients Radiation therapy Review Risk factors Small cell lung carcinoma Thoracic surgery Toxicity Tumors |
title | Role of Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer-A Review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T12%3A54%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Role%20of%20Adjuvant%20Radiotherapy%20in%20Non-Small%20Cell%20Lung%20Cancer-A%20Review&rft.jtitle=Cancers&rft.au=S%C3%BCveg,%20Krisztian&rft.date=2022-03-23&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1617&rft.pages=1617-&rft.issn=2072-6694&rft.eissn=2072-6694&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/cancers14071617&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2649592869%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2649006313&rft_id=info:pmid/35406388&rfr_iscdi=true |