Religious Concerns About COVID-19 Vaccines: From Abortion to Religious Freedom

In the midst of the debate about vaccines against COVID-19 and vaccine mandates, there are a surprisingly large number of concerns coming from some churches centring on the dependence of some of the vaccines on historic abortions and limitations of freedom of choice. Although the ethical significanc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of religion and health 2022-06, Vol.61 (3), p.2233-2252
1. Verfasser: Jones, D. Gareth
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2252
container_issue 3
container_start_page 2233
container_title Journal of religion and health
container_volume 61
creator Jones, D. Gareth
description In the midst of the debate about vaccines against COVID-19 and vaccine mandates, there are a surprisingly large number of concerns coming from some churches centring on the dependence of some of the vaccines on historic abortions and limitations of freedom of choice. Although the ethical significance of separation between historic abortions and the vaccines has been widely accepted by most religious authorities, the pandemic has led to renewed concern by some. The emergence of vaccine mandates, with their potential negative impact on church attendance, has led some to oppose anything that would limit freedom of choice. Within this opposition is a medley of other messages, such as lack of trust in experts and human rights violations. Some regard vaccine passports as a form of ‘medical apartheid’ or ‘therapeutic totalitarianism’, coercing people’s conscience. A countervailing perspective is provided by most church organizations that take a far more communitarian view based upon Jesus’ teachings, identification with the poor and marginalized, and public health considerations. These Christians place far greater store on science as a gift from God, medical science as a means of transforming societies for good, and the potential of vaccines to control a rampant pandemic. Flexibility in imposing vaccine mandates is essential with onus placed on protecting the vulnerable, the community, and directed by the biblical precept of love for one’s neighbour.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10943-022-01557-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8996490</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2670365201</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-9afe31df30bb581ce5d971b9e40ec0c7f876b2f02c52b0b5f16179c47124b8c43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9v1DAUxC0EokvhC3BAkbhwCbznP3HMAalaWKhUUQlBr1bsfVlSJXaxE1S-PV62tMCBkw_zm3keDWNPEV4igH6VEYwUNXBeAyql6-t7bIVKi7pRGu-zFewliUYfsUc5XwJA2xj9kB0JJUEY0azYx080DrshLrlax-AphVyduLjM1fr84vRtjaa66LwfAuXX1SbFaa-meYihmmN1Z94kom2cHrMHfTdmenLzHrMvm3ef1x_qs_P3p-uTs9pLLefadD0J3PYCnFMtelJbo9EZkkAevO5b3TjeA_eKO3Cqxwa1KV7k0rVeimP25pB7tbiJtp7CnLrRXqVh6tIPG7vB_q2E4avdxe-2NaaRBkrAi5uAFL8tlGc7DdnTOHaBSh_LC8UVNtAW9Pk_6GVcUij1CqVBNIoDFoofKJ9izon6288g2P1c9jCXLZvYX3PZ62J69meNW8vvfQogDkAuUthRurv9n9ifGXWgHw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2670365201</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Religious Concerns About COVID-19 Vaccines: From Abortion to Religious Freedom</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Jones, D. Gareth</creator><creatorcontrib>Jones, D. Gareth</creatorcontrib><description>In the midst of the debate about vaccines against COVID-19 and vaccine mandates, there are a surprisingly large number of concerns coming from some churches centring on the dependence of some of the vaccines on historic abortions and limitations of freedom of choice. Although the ethical significance of separation between historic abortions and the vaccines has been widely accepted by most religious authorities, the pandemic has led to renewed concern by some. The emergence of vaccine mandates, with their potential negative impact on church attendance, has led some to oppose anything that would limit freedom of choice. Within this opposition is a medley of other messages, such as lack of trust in experts and human rights violations. Some regard vaccine passports as a form of ‘medical apartheid’ or ‘therapeutic totalitarianism’, coercing people’s conscience. A countervailing perspective is provided by most church organizations that take a far more communitarian view based upon Jesus’ teachings, identification with the poor and marginalized, and public health considerations. These Christians place far greater store on science as a gift from God, medical science as a means of transforming societies for good, and the potential of vaccines to control a rampant pandemic. Flexibility in imposing vaccine mandates is essential with onus placed on protecting the vulnerable, the community, and directed by the biblical precept of love for one’s neighbour.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4197</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-6571</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10943-022-01557-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35403936</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Abortion ; Abortion, Induced ; Aging ; Christianity ; Clinical Psychology ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 - prevention &amp; control ; COVID-19 Vaccines ; Female ; Freedom of Religion ; Humans ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Original Paper ; Pandemics ; Pregnancy ; Public Health ; Religion ; Religious Studies ; Vaccines</subject><ispartof>Journal of religion and health, 2022-06, Vol.61 (3), p.2233-2252</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><rights>2022. The Author(s).</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-9afe31df30bb581ce5d971b9e40ec0c7f876b2f02c52b0b5f16179c47124b8c43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-9afe31df30bb581ce5d971b9e40ec0c7f876b2f02c52b0b5f16179c47124b8c43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4671-6819</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10943-022-01557-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10943-022-01557-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35403936$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jones, D. Gareth</creatorcontrib><title>Religious Concerns About COVID-19 Vaccines: From Abortion to Religious Freedom</title><title>Journal of religion and health</title><addtitle>J Relig Health</addtitle><addtitle>J Relig Health</addtitle><description>In the midst of the debate about vaccines against COVID-19 and vaccine mandates, there are a surprisingly large number of concerns coming from some churches centring on the dependence of some of the vaccines on historic abortions and limitations of freedom of choice. Although the ethical significance of separation between historic abortions and the vaccines has been widely accepted by most religious authorities, the pandemic has led to renewed concern by some. The emergence of vaccine mandates, with their potential negative impact on church attendance, has led some to oppose anything that would limit freedom of choice. Within this opposition is a medley of other messages, such as lack of trust in experts and human rights violations. Some regard vaccine passports as a form of ‘medical apartheid’ or ‘therapeutic totalitarianism’, coercing people’s conscience. A countervailing perspective is provided by most church organizations that take a far more communitarian view based upon Jesus’ teachings, identification with the poor and marginalized, and public health considerations. These Christians place far greater store on science as a gift from God, medical science as a means of transforming societies for good, and the potential of vaccines to control a rampant pandemic. Flexibility in imposing vaccine mandates is essential with onus placed on protecting the vulnerable, the community, and directed by the biblical precept of love for one’s neighbour.</description><subject>Abortion</subject><subject>Abortion, Induced</subject><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Christianity</subject><subject>Clinical Psychology</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19 - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>COVID-19 Vaccines</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Freedom of Religion</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Religious Studies</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><issn>0022-4197</issn><issn>1573-6571</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>88H</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2N</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9v1DAUxC0EokvhC3BAkbhwCbznP3HMAalaWKhUUQlBr1bsfVlSJXaxE1S-PV62tMCBkw_zm3keDWNPEV4igH6VEYwUNXBeAyql6-t7bIVKi7pRGu-zFewliUYfsUc5XwJA2xj9kB0JJUEY0azYx080DrshLrlax-AphVyduLjM1fr84vRtjaa66LwfAuXX1SbFaa-meYihmmN1Z94kom2cHrMHfTdmenLzHrMvm3ef1x_qs_P3p-uTs9pLLefadD0J3PYCnFMtelJbo9EZkkAevO5b3TjeA_eKO3Cqxwa1KV7k0rVeimP25pB7tbiJtp7CnLrRXqVh6tIPG7vB_q2E4avdxe-2NaaRBkrAi5uAFL8tlGc7DdnTOHaBSh_LC8UVNtAW9Pk_6GVcUij1CqVBNIoDFoofKJ9izon6288g2P1c9jCXLZvYX3PZ62J69meNW8vvfQogDkAuUthRurv9n9ifGXWgHw</recordid><startdate>20220601</startdate><enddate>20220601</enddate><creator>Jones, D. Gareth</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88H</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2N</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4671-6819</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220601</creationdate><title>Religious Concerns About COVID-19 Vaccines: From Abortion to Religious Freedom</title><author>Jones, D. Gareth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-9afe31df30bb581ce5d971b9e40ec0c7f876b2f02c52b0b5f16179c47124b8c43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Abortion</topic><topic>Abortion, Induced</topic><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Christianity</topic><topic>Clinical Psychology</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19 - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>COVID-19 Vaccines</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Freedom of Religion</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Religious Studies</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jones, D. Gareth</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA/Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Religion Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences &amp; Humanities Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Religion Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of religion and health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jones, D. Gareth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Religious Concerns About COVID-19 Vaccines: From Abortion to Religious Freedom</atitle><jtitle>Journal of religion and health</jtitle><stitle>J Relig Health</stitle><addtitle>J Relig Health</addtitle><date>2022-06-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>2233</spage><epage>2252</epage><pages>2233-2252</pages><issn>0022-4197</issn><eissn>1573-6571</eissn><abstract>In the midst of the debate about vaccines against COVID-19 and vaccine mandates, there are a surprisingly large number of concerns coming from some churches centring on the dependence of some of the vaccines on historic abortions and limitations of freedom of choice. Although the ethical significance of separation between historic abortions and the vaccines has been widely accepted by most religious authorities, the pandemic has led to renewed concern by some. The emergence of vaccine mandates, with their potential negative impact on church attendance, has led some to oppose anything that would limit freedom of choice. Within this opposition is a medley of other messages, such as lack of trust in experts and human rights violations. Some regard vaccine passports as a form of ‘medical apartheid’ or ‘therapeutic totalitarianism’, coercing people’s conscience. A countervailing perspective is provided by most church organizations that take a far more communitarian view based upon Jesus’ teachings, identification with the poor and marginalized, and public health considerations. These Christians place far greater store on science as a gift from God, medical science as a means of transforming societies for good, and the potential of vaccines to control a rampant pandemic. Flexibility in imposing vaccine mandates is essential with onus placed on protecting the vulnerable, the community, and directed by the biblical precept of love for one’s neighbour.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>35403936</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10943-022-01557-x</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4671-6819</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-4197
ispartof Journal of religion and health, 2022-06, Vol.61 (3), p.2233-2252
issn 0022-4197
1573-6571
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8996490
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals
subjects Abortion
Abortion, Induced
Aging
Christianity
Clinical Psychology
Coronaviruses
COVID-19 - prevention & control
COVID-19 Vaccines
Female
Freedom of Religion
Humans
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Original Paper
Pandemics
Pregnancy
Public Health
Religion
Religious Studies
Vaccines
title Religious Concerns About COVID-19 Vaccines: From Abortion to Religious Freedom
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T09%3A31%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Religious%20Concerns%20About%20COVID-19%20Vaccines:%20From%20Abortion%20to%20Religious%20Freedom&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20religion%20and%20health&rft.au=Jones,%20D.%20Gareth&rft.date=2022-06-01&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=2233&rft.epage=2252&rft.pages=2233-2252&rft.issn=0022-4197&rft.eissn=1573-6571&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10943-022-01557-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2670365201%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2670365201&rft_id=info:pmid/35403936&rfr_iscdi=true