Clinical outcomes and functional analysis of third space robotic and endoscopic cooperative surgery versus laparoscopic wedge resection for gastric submucosal tumours: a propensity score-matched study
Third space robotic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (TS-RECS) is a novel minimally invasive surgery for resecting gastric submucosal tumours (GSMTs), which could accomplish the completely oncological curability and maximal functional preservation. This study investigated the clinical outcomes and...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Updates in Surgery 2022-04, Vol.74 (2), p.685-695 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 695 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 685 |
| container_title | Updates in Surgery |
| container_volume | 74 |
| creator | Shi, Feiyu Liu, Gaixia Sun, Qi zhang, Haowei Wu, Hongtao Xue, Xiaobin Li, Yingchao She, Junjun |
| description | Third space robotic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (TS-RECS) is a novel minimally invasive surgery for resecting gastric submucosal tumours (GSMTs), which could accomplish the completely oncological curability and maximal functional preservation. This study investigated the clinical outcomes and gastrointestinal function after TS-RECS versus laparoscopic wedge resection (LWR) for GSMTs. This was a single-centre retrospective study that included 130 patients with GSMTs who underwent LWR or TS-RECS from 2013 to 2019. To overcome selection biases, we performed propensity score matching (1:1) using seven covariates that could impact the group assignment and outcomes. Then, the clinical outcomes and gastrointestinal function in the LWR and TS-RECS groups were compared in a matched cohort. Among the 130 enrolled patients, 96 patients underwent LWR, and 34 underwent TS-RECS and were matched into 30 patients for each group. There was no significant difference in the operation time between the two groups (
P
= 0.543). However, the TS-RECS group had significantly less blood loss (20,5–100 vs 95,10–310 ml,
P
|
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s13304-021-01014-6 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8995283</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A704902950</galeid><sourcerecordid>A704902950</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-ad2b475323015c2c16cfc7160931ccde822ea5cd48d11bd2d2832c8a8e491d543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk1v1DAQhiMEolXpH-CAfOSS4o9kN-GAVK34kipxAYmb5bUnu64SO3jsrfYf8rOY_WgFF2LJdjzvPDOJ36p6LfiN4Hz5DoVSvKm5FDUXXDT14ll1KbnqaqWEfH7eCyV-XlTXiPecHtUf5pfVhVJL3stGXVa_V6MP3pqRxZJtnACZCY4NJdjsY6BzQ9MePbI4sLz1yTGcjQWW4jpmb49yCC6ijTO92hhnSCb7HTAsaQNpz3aQsCAbzWzSo-4B3IYggHAsxIaY2MZgThTDsp6KjUjVc5liSfieGTYnIgf0ec-IkaCeTLZboH5ycftX1YvBjAjX5_Wq-vHp4_fVl_ru2-evq9u72rZC5do4uW6WrZKKi9ZKKxZ2sEux4L0S1jropATTWtd0Toi1k052StrOdND0wrWNuqo-nLgzNQnOQsjJjHpOfjJpr6Px-t9I8Fu9iTvd9X1LMAK8PQNS_FUAs548WhhHEyAW1LLlQrb9Qhxq3ZykGzOC9mGIRLQ0HEzexgCDp_PbJW96LvuWU4I8JVj6z5hgeOpLcH2wjT7ZRpNt9NE2ekFJb_7-oqeUR5OQQJ0ESKFAN6rv6U7IFvg_7B8n2tUO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2501259614</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical outcomes and functional analysis of third space robotic and endoscopic cooperative surgery versus laparoscopic wedge resection for gastric submucosal tumours: a propensity score-matched study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Shi, Feiyu ; Liu, Gaixia ; Sun, Qi ; zhang, Haowei ; Wu, Hongtao ; Xue, Xiaobin ; Li, Yingchao ; She, Junjun</creator><creatorcontrib>Shi, Feiyu ; Liu, Gaixia ; Sun, Qi ; zhang, Haowei ; Wu, Hongtao ; Xue, Xiaobin ; Li, Yingchao ; She, Junjun</creatorcontrib><description>Third space robotic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (TS-RECS) is a novel minimally invasive surgery for resecting gastric submucosal tumours (GSMTs), which could accomplish the completely oncological curability and maximal functional preservation. This study investigated the clinical outcomes and gastrointestinal function after TS-RECS versus laparoscopic wedge resection (LWR) for GSMTs. This was a single-centre retrospective study that included 130 patients with GSMTs who underwent LWR or TS-RECS from 2013 to 2019. To overcome selection biases, we performed propensity score matching (1:1) using seven covariates that could impact the group assignment and outcomes. Then, the clinical outcomes and gastrointestinal function in the LWR and TS-RECS groups were compared in a matched cohort. Among the 130 enrolled patients, 96 patients underwent LWR, and 34 underwent TS-RECS and were matched into 30 patients for each group. There was no significant difference in the operation time between the two groups (
P
= 0.543). However, the TS-RECS group had significantly less blood loss (20,5–100 vs 95,10–310 ml,
P
< 0.0001) and better postoperative recovery in terms of time to oral intake (2,2–4 vs 3,2–6 days,
P
< 0.0001) and postoperative hospital stay (5,4–10 vs 8.5,5–16 days,
P
< 0.0001) than the LWR group. The severity and frequency scores of postoperative gastrointestinal symptoms in the TS-RECS group were significantly lower than those in the LWR group. The median follow-up period was 24 months (10–60 months) in the LWR group and 18 months (10–27 months) in the TS-RECS group, and there was in total a single recurrence in the LWR group. TS-RECS appears to be a technically safe and effective surgery with preservation of gastrointestinal function for resection of GSMT resection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2038-131X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2038-3312</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13304-021-01014-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33709243</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Cancer ; Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors - surgery ; Humans ; Laparoscopic surgery ; Laparoscopy ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Oncology, Experimental ; Original ; Original Article ; Patient outcomes ; Propensity Score ; Retrospective Studies ; Robotic surgery ; Robotic Surgical Procedures ; Stomach Neoplasms - pathology ; Surgery ; Treatment Outcome ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Updates in Surgery, 2022-04, Vol.74 (2), p.685-695</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><rights>2021. The Author(s).</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-ad2b475323015c2c16cfc7160931ccde822ea5cd48d11bd2d2832c8a8e491d543</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-ad2b475323015c2c16cfc7160931ccde822ea5cd48d11bd2d2832c8a8e491d543</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5104-663X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13304-021-01014-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13304-021-01014-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33709243$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shi, Feiyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Gaixia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Qi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>zhang, Haowei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Hongtao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xue, Xiaobin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yingchao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>She, Junjun</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical outcomes and functional analysis of third space robotic and endoscopic cooperative surgery versus laparoscopic wedge resection for gastric submucosal tumours: a propensity score-matched study</title><title>Updates in Surgery</title><addtitle>Updates Surg</addtitle><addtitle>Updates Surg</addtitle><description>Third space robotic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (TS-RECS) is a novel minimally invasive surgery for resecting gastric submucosal tumours (GSMTs), which could accomplish the completely oncological curability and maximal functional preservation. This study investigated the clinical outcomes and gastrointestinal function after TS-RECS versus laparoscopic wedge resection (LWR) for GSMTs. This was a single-centre retrospective study that included 130 patients with GSMTs who underwent LWR or TS-RECS from 2013 to 2019. To overcome selection biases, we performed propensity score matching (1:1) using seven covariates that could impact the group assignment and outcomes. Then, the clinical outcomes and gastrointestinal function in the LWR and TS-RECS groups were compared in a matched cohort. Among the 130 enrolled patients, 96 patients underwent LWR, and 34 underwent TS-RECS and were matched into 30 patients for each group. There was no significant difference in the operation time between the two groups (
P
= 0.543). However, the TS-RECS group had significantly less blood loss (20,5–100 vs 95,10–310 ml,
P
< 0.0001) and better postoperative recovery in terms of time to oral intake (2,2–4 vs 3,2–6 days,
P
< 0.0001) and postoperative hospital stay (5,4–10 vs 8.5,5–16 days,
P
< 0.0001) than the LWR group. The severity and frequency scores of postoperative gastrointestinal symptoms in the TS-RECS group were significantly lower than those in the LWR group. The median follow-up period was 24 months (10–60 months) in the LWR group and 18 months (10–27 months) in the TS-RECS group, and there was in total a single recurrence in the LWR group. TS-RECS appears to be a technically safe and effective surgery with preservation of gastrointestinal function for resection of GSMT resection.</description><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparoscopic surgery</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Oncology, Experimental</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Propensity Score</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Robotic surgery</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Stomach Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>2038-131X</issn><issn>2038-3312</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kk1v1DAQhiMEolXpH-CAfOSS4o9kN-GAVK34kipxAYmb5bUnu64SO3jsrfYf8rOY_WgFF2LJdjzvPDOJ36p6LfiN4Hz5DoVSvKm5FDUXXDT14ll1KbnqaqWEfH7eCyV-XlTXiPecHtUf5pfVhVJL3stGXVa_V6MP3pqRxZJtnACZCY4NJdjsY6BzQ9MePbI4sLz1yTGcjQWW4jpmb49yCC6ijTO92hhnSCb7HTAsaQNpz3aQsCAbzWzSo-4B3IYggHAsxIaY2MZgThTDsp6KjUjVc5liSfieGTYnIgf0ec-IkaCeTLZboH5ycftX1YvBjAjX5_Wq-vHp4_fVl_ru2-evq9u72rZC5do4uW6WrZKKi9ZKKxZ2sEux4L0S1jropATTWtd0Toi1k052StrOdND0wrWNuqo-nLgzNQnOQsjJjHpOfjJpr6Px-t9I8Fu9iTvd9X1LMAK8PQNS_FUAs548WhhHEyAW1LLlQrb9Qhxq3ZykGzOC9mGIRLQ0HEzexgCDp_PbJW96LvuWU4I8JVj6z5hgeOpLcH2wjT7ZRpNt9NE2ekFJb_7-oqeUR5OQQJ0ESKFAN6rv6U7IFvg_7B8n2tUO</recordid><startdate>20220401</startdate><enddate>20220401</enddate><creator>Shi, Feiyu</creator><creator>Liu, Gaixia</creator><creator>Sun, Qi</creator><creator>zhang, Haowei</creator><creator>Wu, Hongtao</creator><creator>Xue, Xiaobin</creator><creator>Li, Yingchao</creator><creator>She, Junjun</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IAO</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5104-663X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220401</creationdate><title>Clinical outcomes and functional analysis of third space robotic and endoscopic cooperative surgery versus laparoscopic wedge resection for gastric submucosal tumours: a propensity score-matched study</title><author>Shi, Feiyu ; Liu, Gaixia ; Sun, Qi ; zhang, Haowei ; Wu, Hongtao ; Xue, Xiaobin ; Li, Yingchao ; She, Junjun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-ad2b475323015c2c16cfc7160931ccde822ea5cd48d11bd2d2832c8a8e491d543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparoscopic surgery</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Oncology, Experimental</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Propensity Score</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Robotic surgery</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Stomach Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shi, Feiyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Gaixia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Qi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>zhang, Haowei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Hongtao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xue, Xiaobin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yingchao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>She, Junjun</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Academic OneFile</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Updates in Surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shi, Feiyu</au><au>Liu, Gaixia</au><au>Sun, Qi</au><au>zhang, Haowei</au><au>Wu, Hongtao</au><au>Xue, Xiaobin</au><au>Li, Yingchao</au><au>She, Junjun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical outcomes and functional analysis of third space robotic and endoscopic cooperative surgery versus laparoscopic wedge resection for gastric submucosal tumours: a propensity score-matched study</atitle><jtitle>Updates in Surgery</jtitle><stitle>Updates Surg</stitle><addtitle>Updates Surg</addtitle><date>2022-04-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>685</spage><epage>695</epage><pages>685-695</pages><issn>2038-131X</issn><eissn>2038-3312</eissn><abstract>Third space robotic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (TS-RECS) is a novel minimally invasive surgery for resecting gastric submucosal tumours (GSMTs), which could accomplish the completely oncological curability and maximal functional preservation. This study investigated the clinical outcomes and gastrointestinal function after TS-RECS versus laparoscopic wedge resection (LWR) for GSMTs. This was a single-centre retrospective study that included 130 patients with GSMTs who underwent LWR or TS-RECS from 2013 to 2019. To overcome selection biases, we performed propensity score matching (1:1) using seven covariates that could impact the group assignment and outcomes. Then, the clinical outcomes and gastrointestinal function in the LWR and TS-RECS groups were compared in a matched cohort. Among the 130 enrolled patients, 96 patients underwent LWR, and 34 underwent TS-RECS and were matched into 30 patients for each group. There was no significant difference in the operation time between the two groups (
P
= 0.543). However, the TS-RECS group had significantly less blood loss (20,5–100 vs 95,10–310 ml,
P
< 0.0001) and better postoperative recovery in terms of time to oral intake (2,2–4 vs 3,2–6 days,
P
< 0.0001) and postoperative hospital stay (5,4–10 vs 8.5,5–16 days,
P
< 0.0001) than the LWR group. The severity and frequency scores of postoperative gastrointestinal symptoms in the TS-RECS group were significantly lower than those in the LWR group. The median follow-up period was 24 months (10–60 months) in the LWR group and 18 months (10–27 months) in the TS-RECS group, and there was in total a single recurrence in the LWR group. TS-RECS appears to be a technically safe and effective surgery with preservation of gastrointestinal function for resection of GSMT resection.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>33709243</pmid><doi>10.1007/s13304-021-01014-6</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5104-663X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2038-131X |
| ispartof | Updates in Surgery, 2022-04, Vol.74 (2), p.685-695 |
| issn | 2038-131X 2038-3312 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8995283 |
| source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals |
| subjects | Cancer Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors - surgery Humans Laparoscopic surgery Laparoscopy Medicine Medicine & Public Health Oncology, Experimental Original Original Article Patient outcomes Propensity Score Retrospective Studies Robotic surgery Robotic Surgical Procedures Stomach Neoplasms - pathology Surgery Treatment Outcome Tumors |
| title | Clinical outcomes and functional analysis of third space robotic and endoscopic cooperative surgery versus laparoscopic wedge resection for gastric submucosal tumours: a propensity score-matched study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T06%3A35%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20outcomes%20and%20functional%20analysis%20of%20third%20space%20robotic%20and%20endoscopic%20cooperative%20surgery%20versus%20laparoscopic%20wedge%20resection%20for%20gastric%20submucosal%20tumours:%20a%20propensity%20score-matched%20study&rft.jtitle=Updates%20in%20Surgery&rft.au=Shi,%20Feiyu&rft.date=2022-04-01&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=685&rft.epage=695&rft.pages=685-695&rft.issn=2038-131X&rft.eissn=2038-3312&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13304-021-01014-6&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA704902950%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2501259614&rft_id=info:pmid/33709243&rft_galeid=A704902950&rfr_iscdi=true |