The relationship between family and residential settings: Aging in place vs long term care facility in South Korea

Objective: This study aims to explore the factors influencing long-term-care beneficiaries’ decisions between home health care and institutional care in South Korea. This study further investigated the association between these two types of long-term care services and emotional, financial, and physi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Innovation in aging 2021-12, Vol.5 (Supplement_1), p.619-620
Hauptverfasser: Min, Joohong, Oh, Seung-eun, Kim, Bon
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 620
container_issue Supplement_1
container_start_page 619
container_title Innovation in aging
container_volume 5
creator Min, Joohong
Oh, Seung-eun
Kim, Bon
description Objective: This study aims to explore the factors influencing long-term-care beneficiaries’ decisions between home health care and institutional care in South Korea. This study further investigated the association between these two types of long-term care services and emotional, financial, and physical burden alleviation among the beneficiaries and their family members. Methods: We analyzed data from 2019 Long-Term Care Survey. Out of 5,606 respondents, 4,079 long-term care beneficiaries and family members were included in this study. Logistic regression models were conducted to understand factors associated with types of long-term care services, and the association between types of long-term care services and burden alleviation. Results: Having a spouse, having children, or a shorter geographic distance between the beneficiaries and their family members were factors associated with higher likelihood of receiving home health care rather than institutional care. Also, more sever mobility limitation, outpatient care, and fall experiences were associated with higher likelihood of receiving institutional care. Utilization of institutional care was significantly associated with higher alleviation of physical burden. No significant differences between home health care and institutional care were found on emotional and financial burden alleviation. Conclusions: The findings suggest that family resources may be beneficial for older adults to pursue aging in place in later life. However, the physical toll of their family members may exist. Our findings provide evidence to inform public policy decisions on long-term care services for older adults and their family members.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/geroni/igab046.2366
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmedcentral_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8968738</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8968738</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1446-a2669cff40b0669c36d572895bee6c78df442d3afe8903090411ea2a9938a2ed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkM1qwzAQhE1poaHNE_SiF3AiS4pi9VAIoX800EPTs1jLa1tFtoOkpOTta5NQ2tMMO7sf7CTJXUZnGVV8XqPvOzu3NRRUyBnjUl4kE8aVShec0ss__jqZhvBFKc0UF0qwSeK3DRKPDqLtu9DYHSkwfiN2pILWuiOBrhzyYEvsogVHAsZouzrck1U9KLEd2TkwSA6BuH4YRPQtMeBxIBjrbDyOOx_9PjbkrfcIt8lVBS7g9Kw3yefT43b9km7en1_Xq01qMiFkCkxKZapK0IKOjstysWS5WhSI0izzshKClRwqzBXlVFGRZQgMlOI5MCz5TfJw4u72RYulGR7w4PTO2xb8Ufdg9f-ks42u-4POlcyXPB8A_AQwvg_BY_V7m1E9Vq9P1etz9Xqsnv8AVU19NQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The relationship between family and residential settings: Aging in place vs long term care facility in South Korea</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Min, Joohong ; Oh, Seung-eun ; Kim, Bon</creator><creatorcontrib>Min, Joohong ; Oh, Seung-eun ; Kim, Bon</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: This study aims to explore the factors influencing long-term-care beneficiaries’ decisions between home health care and institutional care in South Korea. This study further investigated the association between these two types of long-term care services and emotional, financial, and physical burden alleviation among the beneficiaries and their family members. Methods: We analyzed data from 2019 Long-Term Care Survey. Out of 5,606 respondents, 4,079 long-term care beneficiaries and family members were included in this study. Logistic regression models were conducted to understand factors associated with types of long-term care services, and the association between types of long-term care services and burden alleviation. Results: Having a spouse, having children, or a shorter geographic distance between the beneficiaries and their family members were factors associated with higher likelihood of receiving home health care rather than institutional care. Also, more sever mobility limitation, outpatient care, and fall experiences were associated with higher likelihood of receiving institutional care. Utilization of institutional care was significantly associated with higher alleviation of physical burden. No significant differences between home health care and institutional care were found on emotional and financial burden alleviation. Conclusions: The findings suggest that family resources may be beneficial for older adults to pursue aging in place in later life. However, the physical toll of their family members may exist. Our findings provide evidence to inform public policy decisions on long-term care services for older adults and their family members.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2399-5300</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2399-5300</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/geroni/igab046.2366</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Abstracts</subject><ispartof>Innovation in aging, 2021-12, Vol.5 (Supplement_1), p.619-620</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8968738/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8968738/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Min, Joohong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Seung-eun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Bon</creatorcontrib><title>The relationship between family and residential settings: Aging in place vs long term care facility in South Korea</title><title>Innovation in aging</title><description>Objective: This study aims to explore the factors influencing long-term-care beneficiaries’ decisions between home health care and institutional care in South Korea. This study further investigated the association between these two types of long-term care services and emotional, financial, and physical burden alleviation among the beneficiaries and their family members. Methods: We analyzed data from 2019 Long-Term Care Survey. Out of 5,606 respondents, 4,079 long-term care beneficiaries and family members were included in this study. Logistic regression models were conducted to understand factors associated with types of long-term care services, and the association between types of long-term care services and burden alleviation. Results: Having a spouse, having children, or a shorter geographic distance between the beneficiaries and their family members were factors associated with higher likelihood of receiving home health care rather than institutional care. Also, more sever mobility limitation, outpatient care, and fall experiences were associated with higher likelihood of receiving institutional care. Utilization of institutional care was significantly associated with higher alleviation of physical burden. No significant differences between home health care and institutional care were found on emotional and financial burden alleviation. Conclusions: The findings suggest that family resources may be beneficial for older adults to pursue aging in place in later life. However, the physical toll of their family members may exist. Our findings provide evidence to inform public policy decisions on long-term care services for older adults and their family members.</description><subject>Abstracts</subject><issn>2399-5300</issn><issn>2399-5300</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkM1qwzAQhE1poaHNE_SiF3AiS4pi9VAIoX800EPTs1jLa1tFtoOkpOTta5NQ2tMMO7sf7CTJXUZnGVV8XqPvOzu3NRRUyBnjUl4kE8aVShec0ss__jqZhvBFKc0UF0qwSeK3DRKPDqLtu9DYHSkwfiN2pILWuiOBrhzyYEvsogVHAsZouzrck1U9KLEd2TkwSA6BuH4YRPQtMeBxIBjrbDyOOx_9PjbkrfcIt8lVBS7g9Kw3yefT43b9km7en1_Xq01qMiFkCkxKZapK0IKOjstysWS5WhSI0izzshKClRwqzBXlVFGRZQgMlOI5MCz5TfJw4u72RYulGR7w4PTO2xb8Ufdg9f-ks42u-4POlcyXPB8A_AQwvg_BY_V7m1E9Vq9P1etz9Xqsnv8AVU19NQ</recordid><startdate>20211217</startdate><enddate>20211217</enddate><creator>Min, Joohong</creator><creator>Oh, Seung-eun</creator><creator>Kim, Bon</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211217</creationdate><title>The relationship between family and residential settings: Aging in place vs long term care facility in South Korea</title><author>Min, Joohong ; Oh, Seung-eun ; Kim, Bon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1446-a2669cff40b0669c36d572895bee6c78df442d3afe8903090411ea2a9938a2ed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Abstracts</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Min, Joohong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Seung-eun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Bon</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Innovation in aging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Min, Joohong</au><au>Oh, Seung-eun</au><au>Kim, Bon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The relationship between family and residential settings: Aging in place vs long term care facility in South Korea</atitle><jtitle>Innovation in aging</jtitle><date>2021-12-17</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>Supplement_1</issue><spage>619</spage><epage>620</epage><pages>619-620</pages><issn>2399-5300</issn><eissn>2399-5300</eissn><abstract>Objective: This study aims to explore the factors influencing long-term-care beneficiaries’ decisions between home health care and institutional care in South Korea. This study further investigated the association between these two types of long-term care services and emotional, financial, and physical burden alleviation among the beneficiaries and their family members. Methods: We analyzed data from 2019 Long-Term Care Survey. Out of 5,606 respondents, 4,079 long-term care beneficiaries and family members were included in this study. Logistic regression models were conducted to understand factors associated with types of long-term care services, and the association between types of long-term care services and burden alleviation. Results: Having a spouse, having children, or a shorter geographic distance between the beneficiaries and their family members were factors associated with higher likelihood of receiving home health care rather than institutional care. Also, more sever mobility limitation, outpatient care, and fall experiences were associated with higher likelihood of receiving institutional care. Utilization of institutional care was significantly associated with higher alleviation of physical burden. No significant differences between home health care and institutional care were found on emotional and financial burden alleviation. Conclusions: The findings suggest that family resources may be beneficial for older adults to pursue aging in place in later life. However, the physical toll of their family members may exist. Our findings provide evidence to inform public policy decisions on long-term care services for older adults and their family members.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/geroni/igab046.2366</doi><tpages>2</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2399-5300
ispartof Innovation in aging, 2021-12, Vol.5 (Supplement_1), p.619-620
issn 2399-5300
2399-5300
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8968738
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Oxford Journals Open Access Collection; PubMed Central
subjects Abstracts
title The relationship between family and residential settings: Aging in place vs long term care facility in South Korea
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T07%3A21%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmedcentral_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20relationship%20between%20family%20and%20residential%20settings:%20Aging%20in%20place%20vs%20long%20term%20care%20facility%20in%20South%20Korea&rft.jtitle=Innovation%20in%20aging&rft.au=Min,%20Joohong&rft.date=2021-12-17&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=Supplement_1&rft.spage=619&rft.epage=620&rft.pages=619-620&rft.issn=2399-5300&rft.eissn=2399-5300&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/geroni/igab046.2366&rft_dat=%3Cpubmedcentral_cross%3Epubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8968738%3C/pubmedcentral_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true