Family secrets: Experiences and outcomes of participating in direct-to-consumer genetic relative-finder services
In recent decades, genetic genealogy has become popular as a result of direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing. Some DTC genetic testing companies offer genetic relative-finder (GRF) services that compare the DNA of consenting participants to identify genetic relatives among them and provide each p...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of human genetics 2022-03, Vol.109 (3), p.486-497 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 497 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 486 |
container_title | American journal of human genetics |
container_volume | 109 |
creator | Guerrini, Christi J. Robinson, Jill O. Bloss, Cinnamon C. Bash Brooks, Whitney Fullerton, Stephanie M. Kirkpatrick, Brianne Lee, Sandra Soo-Jin Majumder, Mary Pereira, Stacey Schuman, Olivia McGuire, Amy L. |
description | In recent decades, genetic genealogy has become popular as a result of direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing. Some DTC genetic testing companies offer genetic relative-finder (GRF) services that compare the DNA of consenting participants to identify genetic relatives among them and provide each participant a list of their relative matches. We surveyed a convenience sample of GRF service participants to understand the prevalence of discoveries and associated experiences. Almost half (46%) of the 23,196 respondents had participated in GRF services only for non-specific reasons that included interest in building family trees and general curiosity. However, most (82%) also learned the identity of at least one genetic relative. Separately, most respondents (61%) reported learning something new about themselves or their relatives, including potentially disruptive information such as that a person they believed to be their biological parent is in fact not or that they have a sibling they had not known about. Respondents generally reported that discovering this new information had a neutral or positive impact on their lives, and most had low regret regarding their decision to participate in GRF services. Yet some reported making life changes as a result of their discoveries. Compared to respondents making other types of discoveries, those who learned that they were donor conceived reported the highest decisional regret and represented the largest proportion reporting net-negative consequences for themselves. Our findings indicate that discoveries from GRF services may be common and that the consequences for individuals, while generally positive, can be far-reaching and complex. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ajhg.2022.01.013 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8948156</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002929722000131</els_id><sourcerecordid>2633864801</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-d44f07cf8da9b5216af39b615dafb854de74467bd635ba4d41b8adf03d68e3303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU-LFDEQxYMo7jj6BTxIjl56TDp_Oi0iyLKrwoIXPYd0UpnN0J20Sfew--3NOOuiF6EgJPnVq-I9hF5TsqOEyneHnTnc7nctadsdobXYE7ShgnWNlEQ8RRtCSNv0bd9doBelHAihVBH2HF0w0VIpFdmg-dpMYbzHBWyGpbzHV3cz5ADRQsEmOpzWxaapXpLHs8lLsGE2S4h7HCJ2IYNdmiU1NsWyTpDxHiJUCGcYK3aExofo6nuBfAxV9CV65s1Y4NXDuUU_rq--X35pbr59_nr56aaxXIilcZx70lmvnOmH07bGs36QVDjjByW4g45z2Q1OMjEY7jgdlHGeMCcVMEbYFn08687rMIGzEJdsRj3nMJl8r5MJ-t-fGG71Ph216rmiQlaBtw8COf1coSx6CsXCOJoIaS26lYwpyVW1fYvaM2pzKiWDfxxDiT5FpQ_6FJU-RaUJrcVq05u_F3xs-ZNNBT6cAag2HQNkXezvYM6ua5fC__R_ATFcqP0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2633864801</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Family secrets: Experiences and outcomes of participating in direct-to-consumer genetic relative-finder services</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>Cell Press Free Archives</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Guerrini, Christi J. ; Robinson, Jill O. ; Bloss, Cinnamon C. ; Bash Brooks, Whitney ; Fullerton, Stephanie M. ; Kirkpatrick, Brianne ; Lee, Sandra Soo-Jin ; Majumder, Mary ; Pereira, Stacey ; Schuman, Olivia ; McGuire, Amy L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Guerrini, Christi J. ; Robinson, Jill O. ; Bloss, Cinnamon C. ; Bash Brooks, Whitney ; Fullerton, Stephanie M. ; Kirkpatrick, Brianne ; Lee, Sandra Soo-Jin ; Majumder, Mary ; Pereira, Stacey ; Schuman, Olivia ; McGuire, Amy L.</creatorcontrib><description>In recent decades, genetic genealogy has become popular as a result of direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing. Some DTC genetic testing companies offer genetic relative-finder (GRF) services that compare the DNA of consenting participants to identify genetic relatives among them and provide each participant a list of their relative matches. We surveyed a convenience sample of GRF service participants to understand the prevalence of discoveries and associated experiences. Almost half (46%) of the 23,196 respondents had participated in GRF services only for non-specific reasons that included interest in building family trees and general curiosity. However, most (82%) also learned the identity of at least one genetic relative. Separately, most respondents (61%) reported learning something new about themselves or their relatives, including potentially disruptive information such as that a person they believed to be their biological parent is in fact not or that they have a sibling they had not known about. Respondents generally reported that discovering this new information had a neutral or positive impact on their lives, and most had low regret regarding their decision to participate in GRF services. Yet some reported making life changes as a result of their discoveries. Compared to respondents making other types of discoveries, those who learned that they were donor conceived reported the highest decisional regret and represented the largest proportion reporting net-negative consequences for themselves. Our findings indicate that discoveries from GRF services may be common and that the consequences for individuals, while generally positive, can be far-reaching and complex.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9297</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-6605</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2022.01.013</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35216680</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>adoption ; ancestry ; direct-to-consumer genetic testing ; Direct-To-Consumer Screening and Testing ; donor conception ; Exploratory Behavior ; family secrets ; Genetic Testing ; Humans ; misattributed parentage ; non-paternity event ; Pedigree ; relative matching ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>American journal of human genetics, 2022-03, Vol.109 (3), p.486-497</ispartof><rights>2022 American Society of Human Genetics</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 American Society of Human Genetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2022 American Society of Human Genetics. 2022 American Society of Human Genetics</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-d44f07cf8da9b5216af39b615dafb854de74467bd635ba4d41b8adf03d68e3303</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-d44f07cf8da9b5216af39b615dafb854de74467bd635ba4d41b8adf03d68e3303</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4430-2740</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8948156/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002929722000131$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,53766,53768,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35216680$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guerrini, Christi J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Jill O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bloss, Cinnamon C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bash Brooks, Whitney</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fullerton, Stephanie M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirkpatrick, Brianne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sandra Soo-Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Majumder, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Stacey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuman, Olivia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGuire, Amy L.</creatorcontrib><title>Family secrets: Experiences and outcomes of participating in direct-to-consumer genetic relative-finder services</title><title>American journal of human genetics</title><addtitle>Am J Hum Genet</addtitle><description>In recent decades, genetic genealogy has become popular as a result of direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing. Some DTC genetic testing companies offer genetic relative-finder (GRF) services that compare the DNA of consenting participants to identify genetic relatives among them and provide each participant a list of their relative matches. We surveyed a convenience sample of GRF service participants to understand the prevalence of discoveries and associated experiences. Almost half (46%) of the 23,196 respondents had participated in GRF services only for non-specific reasons that included interest in building family trees and general curiosity. However, most (82%) also learned the identity of at least one genetic relative. Separately, most respondents (61%) reported learning something new about themselves or their relatives, including potentially disruptive information such as that a person they believed to be their biological parent is in fact not or that they have a sibling they had not known about. Respondents generally reported that discovering this new information had a neutral or positive impact on their lives, and most had low regret regarding their decision to participate in GRF services. Yet some reported making life changes as a result of their discoveries. Compared to respondents making other types of discoveries, those who learned that they were donor conceived reported the highest decisional regret and represented the largest proportion reporting net-negative consequences for themselves. Our findings indicate that discoveries from GRF services may be common and that the consequences for individuals, while generally positive, can be far-reaching and complex.</description><subject>adoption</subject><subject>ancestry</subject><subject>direct-to-consumer genetic testing</subject><subject>Direct-To-Consumer Screening and Testing</subject><subject>donor conception</subject><subject>Exploratory Behavior</subject><subject>family secrets</subject><subject>Genetic Testing</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>misattributed parentage</subject><subject>non-paternity event</subject><subject>Pedigree</subject><subject>relative matching</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0002-9297</issn><issn>1537-6605</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU-LFDEQxYMo7jj6BTxIjl56TDp_Oi0iyLKrwoIXPYd0UpnN0J20Sfew--3NOOuiF6EgJPnVq-I9hF5TsqOEyneHnTnc7nctadsdobXYE7ShgnWNlEQ8RRtCSNv0bd9doBelHAihVBH2HF0w0VIpFdmg-dpMYbzHBWyGpbzHV3cz5ADRQsEmOpzWxaapXpLHs8lLsGE2S4h7HCJ2IYNdmiU1NsWyTpDxHiJUCGcYK3aExofo6nuBfAxV9CV65s1Y4NXDuUU_rq--X35pbr59_nr56aaxXIilcZx70lmvnOmH07bGs36QVDjjByW4g45z2Q1OMjEY7jgdlHGeMCcVMEbYFn08687rMIGzEJdsRj3nMJl8r5MJ-t-fGG71Ph216rmiQlaBtw8COf1coSx6CsXCOJoIaS26lYwpyVW1fYvaM2pzKiWDfxxDiT5FpQ_6FJU-RaUJrcVq05u_F3xs-ZNNBT6cAag2HQNkXezvYM6ua5fC__R_ATFcqP0</recordid><startdate>20220303</startdate><enddate>20220303</enddate><creator>Guerrini, Christi J.</creator><creator>Robinson, Jill O.</creator><creator>Bloss, Cinnamon C.</creator><creator>Bash Brooks, Whitney</creator><creator>Fullerton, Stephanie M.</creator><creator>Kirkpatrick, Brianne</creator><creator>Lee, Sandra Soo-Jin</creator><creator>Majumder, Mary</creator><creator>Pereira, Stacey</creator><creator>Schuman, Olivia</creator><creator>McGuire, Amy L.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4430-2740</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220303</creationdate><title>Family secrets: Experiences and outcomes of participating in direct-to-consumer genetic relative-finder services</title><author>Guerrini, Christi J. ; Robinson, Jill O. ; Bloss, Cinnamon C. ; Bash Brooks, Whitney ; Fullerton, Stephanie M. ; Kirkpatrick, Brianne ; Lee, Sandra Soo-Jin ; Majumder, Mary ; Pereira, Stacey ; Schuman, Olivia ; McGuire, Amy L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-d44f07cf8da9b5216af39b615dafb854de74467bd635ba4d41b8adf03d68e3303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>adoption</topic><topic>ancestry</topic><topic>direct-to-consumer genetic testing</topic><topic>Direct-To-Consumer Screening and Testing</topic><topic>donor conception</topic><topic>Exploratory Behavior</topic><topic>family secrets</topic><topic>Genetic Testing</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>misattributed parentage</topic><topic>non-paternity event</topic><topic>Pedigree</topic><topic>relative matching</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guerrini, Christi J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Jill O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bloss, Cinnamon C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bash Brooks, Whitney</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fullerton, Stephanie M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirkpatrick, Brianne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sandra Soo-Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Majumder, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Stacey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuman, Olivia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGuire, Amy L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>American journal of human genetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guerrini, Christi J.</au><au>Robinson, Jill O.</au><au>Bloss, Cinnamon C.</au><au>Bash Brooks, Whitney</au><au>Fullerton, Stephanie M.</au><au>Kirkpatrick, Brianne</au><au>Lee, Sandra Soo-Jin</au><au>Majumder, Mary</au><au>Pereira, Stacey</au><au>Schuman, Olivia</au><au>McGuire, Amy L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Family secrets: Experiences and outcomes of participating in direct-to-consumer genetic relative-finder services</atitle><jtitle>American journal of human genetics</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Hum Genet</addtitle><date>2022-03-03</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>109</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>486</spage><epage>497</epage><pages>486-497</pages><issn>0002-9297</issn><eissn>1537-6605</eissn><abstract>In recent decades, genetic genealogy has become popular as a result of direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing. Some DTC genetic testing companies offer genetic relative-finder (GRF) services that compare the DNA of consenting participants to identify genetic relatives among them and provide each participant a list of their relative matches. We surveyed a convenience sample of GRF service participants to understand the prevalence of discoveries and associated experiences. Almost half (46%) of the 23,196 respondents had participated in GRF services only for non-specific reasons that included interest in building family trees and general curiosity. However, most (82%) also learned the identity of at least one genetic relative. Separately, most respondents (61%) reported learning something new about themselves or their relatives, including potentially disruptive information such as that a person they believed to be their biological parent is in fact not or that they have a sibling they had not known about. Respondents generally reported that discovering this new information had a neutral or positive impact on their lives, and most had low regret regarding their decision to participate in GRF services. Yet some reported making life changes as a result of their discoveries. Compared to respondents making other types of discoveries, those who learned that they were donor conceived reported the highest decisional regret and represented the largest proportion reporting net-negative consequences for themselves. Our findings indicate that discoveries from GRF services may be common and that the consequences for individuals, while generally positive, can be far-reaching and complex.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>35216680</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ajhg.2022.01.013</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4430-2740</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9297 |
ispartof | American journal of human genetics, 2022-03, Vol.109 (3), p.486-497 |
issn | 0002-9297 1537-6605 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8948156 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; Cell Press Free Archives; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | adoption ancestry direct-to-consumer genetic testing Direct-To-Consumer Screening and Testing donor conception Exploratory Behavior family secrets Genetic Testing Humans misattributed parentage non-paternity event Pedigree relative matching Surveys and Questionnaires |
title | Family secrets: Experiences and outcomes of participating in direct-to-consumer genetic relative-finder services |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-20T20%3A36%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Family%20secrets:%20Experiences%20and%20outcomes%20of%20participating%20in%20direct-to-consumer%20genetic%20relative-finder%20services&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20human%20genetics&rft.au=Guerrini,%20Christi%20J.&rft.date=2022-03-03&rft.volume=109&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=486&rft.epage=497&rft.pages=486-497&rft.issn=0002-9297&rft.eissn=1537-6605&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajhg.2022.01.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2633864801%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2633864801&rft_id=info:pmid/35216680&rft_els_id=S0002929722000131&rfr_iscdi=true |