Influence of Radiation Dose, Photon Energy, and Reconstruction Kernel on rho/z Analysis in Spectral Computer Tomography: A Phantom Study
The effective atomic number (Z ) and electron density relative to water (ρ or Rho) of elements can be derived in dual-energy computed tomography (DECT). The aim of this phantom study was to investigate the effect of different photon energies, radiation doses, and reconstruction kernels on Z and Rho...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | In vivo (Athens) 2022-03, Vol.36 (2), p.678-686 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 686 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 678 |
container_title | In vivo (Athens) |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Chatzaraki, Vasiliki Bolsi, Alessandra Kubik-Huch, Rahel A Schmidt, Bernhard Lomax, Antony John Weber, Damien C Thali, Michael Niemann, Tilo |
description | The effective atomic number (Z
) and electron density relative to water (ρ
or Rho) of elements can be derived in dual-energy computed tomography (DECT). The aim of this phantom study was to investigate the effect of different photon energies, radiation doses, and reconstruction kernels on Z
and Rho measured in DECT.
An anthropomorphic head phantom including five probes of known composition was scanned under three tube-voltage combinations in DECT: Sn140/100 kV, 140/80 kV and Sn140/80 kV with incremented radiation doses. Raw data were reconstructed with four reconstruction kernels (I30, I40, I50, and I70). Rho and Z
were measured for each probe for all possible combinations of scan and reconstruction parameters.
DECT-based Rho and Z
closely approached the reference values with a mean and maximum error of 1.7% and 6.8%, respectively. Rho was lower for 140/80 kV compared with Sn140/100 kV and Sn140/80 kV with differences being 0.009. Z
differed among all tube voltages with the most prominent difference being 0.28 between 140/80 kV and Sn140/100 kV. Z
was lower in I70 compared with those of I30 and I40 with a difference of 0.07. Varying radiation dose yielded a variation of 0.0002 in Rho and 0.03 in Z, both considered negligible in practice.
DECT comprises a feasible method for the extraction of material-specific information. Slight variations should be taken into account when different radiation doses, photon energies, and kernels are applied; however, they are considered small and in practice not crucial for an effective tissue differentiation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.21873/invivo.12753 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8931898</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2636143595</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-b9cb1ed08157743c2b0cf71d0c83db0f893987581423b33a97e5bfd4192dad2b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU1v1DAQhi0EokvLkSvykUPT-iNe2xyQVkuBikqt-iFxsxzb2TVK7GA7K4VfwM8m7JYKTjOjefTMSC8AbzA6I1hweu7Dzu_iGSac0WdggbnEFWe1fA4WiDBRCYa_HYFXOX9HaMkRIi_BEWWkxoyQBfh1GdpudME4GFt4q63XxccAP8bsTuHNNpZ5uAgubaZTqIOFt87EkEsazZ776lJwHZy7tI3nP-Eq6G7KPkMf4N3gTEm6g-vYD2NxCd7HPm6SHrbTe7ia7TqU2MO7MtrpBLxodZfd68d6DB4-Xdyvv1RX158v16urylDBS9VI02BnkcCM85oa0iDTcmyREdQ2qBWSSsGZwDWhDaVacsea1tZYEqstaegx-HDwDmPTO2tc-POiGpLvdZpU1F79vwl-qzZxp2YzFlLMgnePghR_jC4X1ftsXNfp4OKYFVnSJa4pk2xGqwNqUsw5ufbpDEZqn546pKf26c38239_e6L_xkV_A2apmfQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2636143595</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of Radiation Dose, Photon Energy, and Reconstruction Kernel on rho/z Analysis in Spectral Computer Tomography: A Phantom Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Chatzaraki, Vasiliki ; Bolsi, Alessandra ; Kubik-Huch, Rahel A ; Schmidt, Bernhard ; Lomax, Antony John ; Weber, Damien C ; Thali, Michael ; Niemann, Tilo</creator><creatorcontrib>Chatzaraki, Vasiliki ; Bolsi, Alessandra ; Kubik-Huch, Rahel A ; Schmidt, Bernhard ; Lomax, Antony John ; Weber, Damien C ; Thali, Michael ; Niemann, Tilo</creatorcontrib><description>The effective atomic number (Z
) and electron density relative to water (ρ
or Rho) of elements can be derived in dual-energy computed tomography (DECT). The aim of this phantom study was to investigate the effect of different photon energies, radiation doses, and reconstruction kernels on Z
and Rho measured in DECT.
An anthropomorphic head phantom including five probes of known composition was scanned under three tube-voltage combinations in DECT: Sn140/100 kV, 140/80 kV and Sn140/80 kV with incremented radiation doses. Raw data were reconstructed with four reconstruction kernels (I30, I40, I50, and I70). Rho and Z
were measured for each probe for all possible combinations of scan and reconstruction parameters.
DECT-based Rho and Z
closely approached the reference values with a mean and maximum error of 1.7% and 6.8%, respectively. Rho was lower for 140/80 kV compared with Sn140/100 kV and Sn140/80 kV with differences being 0.009. Z
differed among all tube voltages with the most prominent difference being 0.28 between 140/80 kV and Sn140/100 kV. Z
was lower in I70 compared with those of I30 and I40 with a difference of 0.07. Varying radiation dose yielded a variation of 0.0002 in Rho and 0.03 in Z, both considered negligible in practice.
DECT comprises a feasible method for the extraction of material-specific information. Slight variations should be taken into account when different radiation doses, photon energies, and kernels are applied; however, they are considered small and in practice not crucial for an effective tissue differentiation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0258-851X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1791-7549</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12753</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35241522</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Greece: International Institute of Anticancer Research</publisher><subject>Computers ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Photons ; Radiation Dosage ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><ispartof>In vivo (Athens), 2022-03, Vol.36 (2), p.678-686</ispartof><rights>Copyright© 2022, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright 2022, International Institute of Anticancer Research 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-b9cb1ed08157743c2b0cf71d0c83db0f893987581423b33a97e5bfd4192dad2b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8931898/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8931898/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35241522$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chatzaraki, Vasiliki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolsi, Alessandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kubik-Huch, Rahel A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Bernhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lomax, Antony John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, Damien C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thali, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niemann, Tilo</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of Radiation Dose, Photon Energy, and Reconstruction Kernel on rho/z Analysis in Spectral Computer Tomography: A Phantom Study</title><title>In vivo (Athens)</title><addtitle>In Vivo</addtitle><description>The effective atomic number (Z
) and electron density relative to water (ρ
or Rho) of elements can be derived in dual-energy computed tomography (DECT). The aim of this phantom study was to investigate the effect of different photon energies, radiation doses, and reconstruction kernels on Z
and Rho measured in DECT.
An anthropomorphic head phantom including five probes of known composition was scanned under three tube-voltage combinations in DECT: Sn140/100 kV, 140/80 kV and Sn140/80 kV with incremented radiation doses. Raw data were reconstructed with four reconstruction kernels (I30, I40, I50, and I70). Rho and Z
were measured for each probe for all possible combinations of scan and reconstruction parameters.
DECT-based Rho and Z
closely approached the reference values with a mean and maximum error of 1.7% and 6.8%, respectively. Rho was lower for 140/80 kV compared with Sn140/100 kV and Sn140/80 kV with differences being 0.009. Z
differed among all tube voltages with the most prominent difference being 0.28 between 140/80 kV and Sn140/100 kV. Z
was lower in I70 compared with those of I30 and I40 with a difference of 0.07. Varying radiation dose yielded a variation of 0.0002 in Rho and 0.03 in Z, both considered negligible in practice.
DECT comprises a feasible method for the extraction of material-specific information. Slight variations should be taken into account when different radiation doses, photon energies, and kernels are applied; however, they are considered small and in practice not crucial for an effective tissue differentiation.</description><subject>Computers</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Photons</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><issn>0258-851X</issn><issn>1791-7549</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkU1v1DAQhi0EokvLkSvykUPT-iNe2xyQVkuBikqt-iFxsxzb2TVK7GA7K4VfwM8m7JYKTjOjefTMSC8AbzA6I1hweu7Dzu_iGSac0WdggbnEFWe1fA4WiDBRCYa_HYFXOX9HaMkRIi_BEWWkxoyQBfh1GdpudME4GFt4q63XxccAP8bsTuHNNpZ5uAgubaZTqIOFt87EkEsazZ776lJwHZy7tI3nP-Eq6G7KPkMf4N3gTEm6g-vYD2NxCd7HPm6SHrbTe7ia7TqU2MO7MtrpBLxodZfd68d6DB4-Xdyvv1RX158v16urylDBS9VI02BnkcCM85oa0iDTcmyREdQ2qBWSSsGZwDWhDaVacsea1tZYEqstaegx-HDwDmPTO2tc-POiGpLvdZpU1F79vwl-qzZxp2YzFlLMgnePghR_jC4X1ftsXNfp4OKYFVnSJa4pk2xGqwNqUsw5ufbpDEZqn546pKf26c38239_e6L_xkV_A2apmfQ</recordid><startdate>20220301</startdate><enddate>20220301</enddate><creator>Chatzaraki, Vasiliki</creator><creator>Bolsi, Alessandra</creator><creator>Kubik-Huch, Rahel A</creator><creator>Schmidt, Bernhard</creator><creator>Lomax, Antony John</creator><creator>Weber, Damien C</creator><creator>Thali, Michael</creator><creator>Niemann, Tilo</creator><general>International Institute of Anticancer Research</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220301</creationdate><title>Influence of Radiation Dose, Photon Energy, and Reconstruction Kernel on rho/z Analysis in Spectral Computer Tomography: A Phantom Study</title><author>Chatzaraki, Vasiliki ; Bolsi, Alessandra ; Kubik-Huch, Rahel A ; Schmidt, Bernhard ; Lomax, Antony John ; Weber, Damien C ; Thali, Michael ; Niemann, Tilo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-b9cb1ed08157743c2b0cf71d0c83db0f893987581423b33a97e5bfd4192dad2b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Computers</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Photons</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chatzaraki, Vasiliki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolsi, Alessandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kubik-Huch, Rahel A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Bernhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lomax, Antony John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, Damien C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thali, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niemann, Tilo</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>In vivo (Athens)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chatzaraki, Vasiliki</au><au>Bolsi, Alessandra</au><au>Kubik-Huch, Rahel A</au><au>Schmidt, Bernhard</au><au>Lomax, Antony John</au><au>Weber, Damien C</au><au>Thali, Michael</au><au>Niemann, Tilo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of Radiation Dose, Photon Energy, and Reconstruction Kernel on rho/z Analysis in Spectral Computer Tomography: A Phantom Study</atitle><jtitle>In vivo (Athens)</jtitle><addtitle>In Vivo</addtitle><date>2022-03-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>678</spage><epage>686</epage><pages>678-686</pages><issn>0258-851X</issn><eissn>1791-7549</eissn><abstract>The effective atomic number (Z
) and electron density relative to water (ρ
or Rho) of elements can be derived in dual-energy computed tomography (DECT). The aim of this phantom study was to investigate the effect of different photon energies, radiation doses, and reconstruction kernels on Z
and Rho measured in DECT.
An anthropomorphic head phantom including five probes of known composition was scanned under three tube-voltage combinations in DECT: Sn140/100 kV, 140/80 kV and Sn140/80 kV with incremented radiation doses. Raw data were reconstructed with four reconstruction kernels (I30, I40, I50, and I70). Rho and Z
were measured for each probe for all possible combinations of scan and reconstruction parameters.
DECT-based Rho and Z
closely approached the reference values with a mean and maximum error of 1.7% and 6.8%, respectively. Rho was lower for 140/80 kV compared with Sn140/100 kV and Sn140/80 kV with differences being 0.009. Z
differed among all tube voltages with the most prominent difference being 0.28 between 140/80 kV and Sn140/100 kV. Z
was lower in I70 compared with those of I30 and I40 with a difference of 0.07. Varying radiation dose yielded a variation of 0.0002 in Rho and 0.03 in Z, both considered negligible in practice.
DECT comprises a feasible method for the extraction of material-specific information. Slight variations should be taken into account when different radiation doses, photon energies, and kernels are applied; however, they are considered small and in practice not crucial for an effective tissue differentiation.</abstract><cop>Greece</cop><pub>International Institute of Anticancer Research</pub><pmid>35241522</pmid><doi>10.21873/invivo.12753</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0258-851X |
ispartof | In vivo (Athens), 2022-03, Vol.36 (2), p.678-686 |
issn | 0258-851X 1791-7549 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8931898 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Computers Phantoms, Imaging Photons Radiation Dosage Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods |
title | Influence of Radiation Dose, Photon Energy, and Reconstruction Kernel on rho/z Analysis in Spectral Computer Tomography: A Phantom Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T21%3A11%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20Radiation%20Dose,%20Photon%20Energy,%20and%20Reconstruction%20Kernel%20on%20rho/z%20Analysis%20in%20Spectral%20Computer%20Tomography:%20A%20Phantom%20Study&rft.jtitle=In%20vivo%20(Athens)&rft.au=Chatzaraki,%20Vasiliki&rft.date=2022-03-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=678&rft.epage=686&rft.pages=678-686&rft.issn=0258-851X&rft.eissn=1791-7549&rft_id=info:doi/10.21873/invivo.12753&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2636143595%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2636143595&rft_id=info:pmid/35241522&rfr_iscdi=true |