Added Value of Contrast-enhanced 3D-FLAIR MR Imaging for Differentiating Cystic Pituitary Adenoma from Rathke’s Cleft Cyst

Purpose: Half of the surgically proven Rathke’s cleft cysts (RCCs) can be preoperatively misdiagnosed as cystic pituitary adenoma (CPA). We aimed to evaluate the usefulness of contrast-enhanced (CE) 3D T2 fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery (3D T2-FLAIR) imaging for differentiating between CPA and RCC.Methods: This retrospective study included six patients with RCC (all pathologically confirmed) and six patients with CPA (five pathologically confirmed, one clinically diagnosed). The 12 patients underwent pre- and post-contrast T1-weighted (T1W)- and 3D T2-FLAIR imaging at 3T. Based on the degree of enhancement of the lesion wall, two radiologists independently scored the images using a 3-point grading system. Interobserver agreement was calculated by using the κ coefficient. The statistical significance of grading differences was analyzed with the Mann–Whitney U-test. Another neuroradiologist first interpreted conventional MR images (1st session), and then the reader read images to which the 3D T2-FLAIR images had been added (2nd session). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the reader’s interpretation were calculated.Results: Interobserver agreement for post-contrast T1W- and 3D T2-FLAIR images was excellent (κ = 1.000 and 0.885, respectively). Although the mean enhancement grade on post-contrast T1W images of RCCs and CPAs was not significantly different, on post-contrast 3D T2-FLAIR images it was significantly higher for RCCs and CPAs (P < 0.05). Three CPAs (50%) showed remarkable, donut-like enhancement along the inner margin of the cyst on CE-3D T2-FLAIR images; this was not the case on CE-T1W images. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the 2nd session were 1.00, 0.83, and 0.92, respectively, which were improved compared to the 1st session (1.00, 0.50, and 0.75, respectively).Conclusion: CE-3D FLAIR imaging is useful for discriminating CPAs and RCCs.