Emotional Distress in Neuro-ICU Survivor-Caregiver Dyads: The Recovering Together Randomized Clinical Trial
Objective: Emotional distress is common in both survivors and their informal caregivers following admission to a neuroscience intensive care unit (Neuro-ICU) and can negatively affect their individual recovery and quality of life. Neuro-ICU survivor-caregiver dyads can influence each other's em...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Health psychology 2022-04, Vol.41 (4), p.268-277 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 277 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 268 |
container_title | Health psychology |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Bannon, Sarah M. Cornelius, Talea Gates, Melissa V. Lester, Ethan Mace, Ryan A. Popok, Paula Macklin, Eric A. Rosand, Jonathan Vranceanu, Ana-Maria |
description | Objective: Emotional distress is common in both survivors and their informal caregivers following admission to a neuroscience intensive care unit (Neuro-ICU) and can negatively affect their individual recovery and quality of life. Neuro-ICU survivor-caregiver dyads can influence each other's emotional distress over time, but whether such influence emerges during dyadic treatment remains unknown. The present study involved secondary data analysis of Neuro-ICU dyads enrolled in a randomized clinical trial of a dyadic resiliency intervention, Recovering Together (RT), versus a health education attention placebo control to test dyadic similarities in emotional distress before and after treatment. Method: Data were collected from 58 dyads following Neuro-ICU admission. Emotional distress (depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress) was assessed at baseline, 6 weeks (postintervention), and 12 weeks later. Nonindependence within survivor-caregiver dyads was examined (i.e., correlations between cross-sectional symptoms and changes in symptoms over time); mutual influence of emotional functioning over time (i.e., "partner effects") was examined using cross-lagged path analyses. Results: There were strong, positive cross-sectional correlations between survivor and caregiver distress at postintervention and follow-up and between changes in survivor and caregiver distress from baseline to postintervention and postintervention to follow-up. There were no partner effects. Conclusions: Neuro-ICU survivors and their informal caregivers show similar changes in emotional distress after treatment. These findings highlight the potential benefits of intervening on both survivor and caregiver distress following Neuro-ICU admission. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/hea0001102 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8904645</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2570517843</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a470t-748a1cda66c745b23f498069ad76c13e7f94f9d95645002d4f71218b31377d943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV1rFDEUhoModlu98QdIwBtRRvP94YUg06qFolC31yGbZHZTZyZrMrOw_fWmbK0fF14Fch4e3nNeAJ5h9AYjKt9ugkUIYYzIA7DAmqJGKoweggUiUjUCU3oEjku5rhDRnD8GR5QxrZQWC_D9bEhTTKPt4WksUw6lwDjCL2HOqTlvr-C3Oe_iLuWmtTms4y5keLq3vryDy02Al8Gl-hXHNVymdZg2dXxpR5-GeBM8bPs4Rlfdyxxt_wQ86mxfwtO79wRcfTxbtp-bi6-fztsPF41lEk2NZMpi560QTjK-IrSrYZHQ1kvhMA2y06zTXnPBeN3Is05igtWKYiql14yegPcH73ZeDcG7ME7Z9mab42Dz3iQbzd-TMW7MOu2M0ohVaRW8vBPk9GMOZTJDLC70vR1DmoshXGLEOSGqoi_-Qa_TnOs5KyWYlgJhSv5LcYk4lorRSr06UC6nUnLo7iNjZG6bNr-brvDzP5e8R39VW4HXB8BurdmWvbN5iq4Pxc0518VvZYZhw2pQRX8C_mayLA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2570517843</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Emotional Distress in Neuro-ICU Survivor-Caregiver Dyads: The Recovering Together Randomized Clinical Trial</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Bannon, Sarah M. ; Cornelius, Talea ; Gates, Melissa V. ; Lester, Ethan ; Mace, Ryan A. ; Popok, Paula ; Macklin, Eric A. ; Rosand, Jonathan ; Vranceanu, Ana-Maria</creator><contributor>Tsai, Jack ; Freedland, Kenneth E</contributor><creatorcontrib>Bannon, Sarah M. ; Cornelius, Talea ; Gates, Melissa V. ; Lester, Ethan ; Mace, Ryan A. ; Popok, Paula ; Macklin, Eric A. ; Rosand, Jonathan ; Vranceanu, Ana-Maria ; Tsai, Jack ; Freedland, Kenneth E</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: Emotional distress is common in both survivors and their informal caregivers following admission to a neuroscience intensive care unit (Neuro-ICU) and can negatively affect their individual recovery and quality of life. Neuro-ICU survivor-caregiver dyads can influence each other's emotional distress over time, but whether such influence emerges during dyadic treatment remains unknown. The present study involved secondary data analysis of Neuro-ICU dyads enrolled in a randomized clinical trial of a dyadic resiliency intervention, Recovering Together (RT), versus a health education attention placebo control to test dyadic similarities in emotional distress before and after treatment. Method: Data were collected from 58 dyads following Neuro-ICU admission. Emotional distress (depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress) was assessed at baseline, 6 weeks (postintervention), and 12 weeks later. Nonindependence within survivor-caregiver dyads was examined (i.e., correlations between cross-sectional symptoms and changes in symptoms over time); mutual influence of emotional functioning over time (i.e., "partner effects") was examined using cross-lagged path analyses. Results: There were strong, positive cross-sectional correlations between survivor and caregiver distress at postintervention and follow-up and between changes in survivor and caregiver distress from baseline to postintervention and postintervention to follow-up. There were no partner effects. Conclusions: Neuro-ICU survivors and their informal caregivers show similar changes in emotional distress after treatment. These findings highlight the potential benefits of intervening on both survivor and caregiver distress following Neuro-ICU admission.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-6133</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1930-7810</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/hea0001102</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34498896</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adaptation, Psychological ; Caregivers ; Caregivers - psychology ; Clinical research ; Clinical trials ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Depression - psychology ; Distress ; Dyads ; Emotional distress ; Emotional well being ; Female ; Health education ; Human ; Humans ; Inpatient ; Intensive Care ; Intensive Care Units ; Male ; Post traumatic stress disorder ; Posttraumatic Stress ; Psychological Distress ; Quality of Life ; Quality of Life - psychology ; Randomized Clinical Trials ; Resilience ; Stress Reactions ; Survivor ; Survivors ; Survivors - psychology ; Symptoms ; Treatment</subject><ispartof>Health psychology, 2022-04, Vol.41 (4), p.268-277</ispartof><rights>2021 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2021, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Apr 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a470t-748a1cda66c745b23f498069ad76c13e7f94f9d95645002d4f71218b31377d943</citedby><orcidid>0000-0003-3994-6488</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,30976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34498896$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Tsai, Jack</contributor><contributor>Freedland, Kenneth E</contributor><creatorcontrib>Bannon, Sarah M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cornelius, Talea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gates, Melissa V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lester, Ethan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mace, Ryan A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Popok, Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macklin, Eric A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosand, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vranceanu, Ana-Maria</creatorcontrib><title>Emotional Distress in Neuro-ICU Survivor-Caregiver Dyads: The Recovering Together Randomized Clinical Trial</title><title>Health psychology</title><addtitle>Health Psychol</addtitle><description>Objective: Emotional distress is common in both survivors and their informal caregivers following admission to a neuroscience intensive care unit (Neuro-ICU) and can negatively affect their individual recovery and quality of life. Neuro-ICU survivor-caregiver dyads can influence each other's emotional distress over time, but whether such influence emerges during dyadic treatment remains unknown. The present study involved secondary data analysis of Neuro-ICU dyads enrolled in a randomized clinical trial of a dyadic resiliency intervention, Recovering Together (RT), versus a health education attention placebo control to test dyadic similarities in emotional distress before and after treatment. Method: Data were collected from 58 dyads following Neuro-ICU admission. Emotional distress (depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress) was assessed at baseline, 6 weeks (postintervention), and 12 weeks later. Nonindependence within survivor-caregiver dyads was examined (i.e., correlations between cross-sectional symptoms and changes in symptoms over time); mutual influence of emotional functioning over time (i.e., "partner effects") was examined using cross-lagged path analyses. Results: There were strong, positive cross-sectional correlations between survivor and caregiver distress at postintervention and follow-up and between changes in survivor and caregiver distress from baseline to postintervention and postintervention to follow-up. There were no partner effects. Conclusions: Neuro-ICU survivors and their informal caregivers show similar changes in emotional distress after treatment. These findings highlight the potential benefits of intervening on both survivor and caregiver distress following Neuro-ICU admission.</description><subject>Adaptation, Psychological</subject><subject>Caregivers</subject><subject>Caregivers - psychology</subject><subject>Clinical research</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Depression - psychology</subject><subject>Distress</subject><subject>Dyads</subject><subject>Emotional distress</subject><subject>Emotional well being</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health education</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inpatient</subject><subject>Intensive Care</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Post traumatic stress disorder</subject><subject>Posttraumatic Stress</subject><subject>Psychological Distress</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Quality of Life - psychology</subject><subject>Randomized Clinical Trials</subject><subject>Resilience</subject><subject>Stress Reactions</subject><subject>Survivor</subject><subject>Survivors</subject><subject>Survivors - psychology</subject><subject>Symptoms</subject><subject>Treatment</subject><issn>0278-6133</issn><issn>1930-7810</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kV1rFDEUhoModlu98QdIwBtRRvP94YUg06qFolC31yGbZHZTZyZrMrOw_fWmbK0fF14Fch4e3nNeAJ5h9AYjKt9ugkUIYYzIA7DAmqJGKoweggUiUjUCU3oEjku5rhDRnD8GR5QxrZQWC_D9bEhTTKPt4WksUw6lwDjCL2HOqTlvr-C3Oe_iLuWmtTms4y5keLq3vryDy02Al8Gl-hXHNVymdZg2dXxpR5-GeBM8bPs4Rlfdyxxt_wQ86mxfwtO79wRcfTxbtp-bi6-fztsPF41lEk2NZMpi560QTjK-IrSrYZHQ1kvhMA2y06zTXnPBeN3Is05igtWKYiql14yegPcH73ZeDcG7ME7Z9mab42Dz3iQbzd-TMW7MOu2M0ohVaRW8vBPk9GMOZTJDLC70vR1DmoshXGLEOSGqoi_-Qa_TnOs5KyWYlgJhSv5LcYk4lorRSr06UC6nUnLo7iNjZG6bNr-brvDzP5e8R39VW4HXB8BurdmWvbN5iq4Pxc0518VvZYZhw2pQRX8C_mayLA</recordid><startdate>20220401</startdate><enddate>20220401</enddate><creator>Bannon, Sarah M.</creator><creator>Cornelius, Talea</creator><creator>Gates, Melissa V.</creator><creator>Lester, Ethan</creator><creator>Mace, Ryan A.</creator><creator>Popok, Paula</creator><creator>Macklin, Eric A.</creator><creator>Rosand, Jonathan</creator><creator>Vranceanu, Ana-Maria</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3994-6488</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220401</creationdate><title>Emotional Distress in Neuro-ICU Survivor-Caregiver Dyads: The Recovering Together Randomized Clinical Trial</title><author>Bannon, Sarah M. ; Cornelius, Talea ; Gates, Melissa V. ; Lester, Ethan ; Mace, Ryan A. ; Popok, Paula ; Macklin, Eric A. ; Rosand, Jonathan ; Vranceanu, Ana-Maria</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a470t-748a1cda66c745b23f498069ad76c13e7f94f9d95645002d4f71218b31377d943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adaptation, Psychological</topic><topic>Caregivers</topic><topic>Caregivers - psychology</topic><topic>Clinical research</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Depression - psychology</topic><topic>Distress</topic><topic>Dyads</topic><topic>Emotional distress</topic><topic>Emotional well being</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health education</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inpatient</topic><topic>Intensive Care</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Post traumatic stress disorder</topic><topic>Posttraumatic Stress</topic><topic>Psychological Distress</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Quality of Life - psychology</topic><topic>Randomized Clinical Trials</topic><topic>Resilience</topic><topic>Stress Reactions</topic><topic>Survivor</topic><topic>Survivors</topic><topic>Survivors - psychology</topic><topic>Symptoms</topic><topic>Treatment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bannon, Sarah M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cornelius, Talea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gates, Melissa V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lester, Ethan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mace, Ryan A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Popok, Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macklin, Eric A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosand, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vranceanu, Ana-Maria</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Health psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bannon, Sarah M.</au><au>Cornelius, Talea</au><au>Gates, Melissa V.</au><au>Lester, Ethan</au><au>Mace, Ryan A.</au><au>Popok, Paula</au><au>Macklin, Eric A.</au><au>Rosand, Jonathan</au><au>Vranceanu, Ana-Maria</au><au>Tsai, Jack</au><au>Freedland, Kenneth E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Emotional Distress in Neuro-ICU Survivor-Caregiver Dyads: The Recovering Together Randomized Clinical Trial</atitle><jtitle>Health psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Health Psychol</addtitle><date>2022-04-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>268</spage><epage>277</epage><pages>268-277</pages><issn>0278-6133</issn><eissn>1930-7810</eissn><abstract>Objective: Emotional distress is common in both survivors and their informal caregivers following admission to a neuroscience intensive care unit (Neuro-ICU) and can negatively affect their individual recovery and quality of life. Neuro-ICU survivor-caregiver dyads can influence each other's emotional distress over time, but whether such influence emerges during dyadic treatment remains unknown. The present study involved secondary data analysis of Neuro-ICU dyads enrolled in a randomized clinical trial of a dyadic resiliency intervention, Recovering Together (RT), versus a health education attention placebo control to test dyadic similarities in emotional distress before and after treatment. Method: Data were collected from 58 dyads following Neuro-ICU admission. Emotional distress (depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress) was assessed at baseline, 6 weeks (postintervention), and 12 weeks later. Nonindependence within survivor-caregiver dyads was examined (i.e., correlations between cross-sectional symptoms and changes in symptoms over time); mutual influence of emotional functioning over time (i.e., "partner effects") was examined using cross-lagged path analyses. Results: There were strong, positive cross-sectional correlations between survivor and caregiver distress at postintervention and follow-up and between changes in survivor and caregiver distress from baseline to postintervention and postintervention to follow-up. There were no partner effects. Conclusions: Neuro-ICU survivors and their informal caregivers show similar changes in emotional distress after treatment. These findings highlight the potential benefits of intervening on both survivor and caregiver distress following Neuro-ICU admission.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>34498896</pmid><doi>10.1037/hea0001102</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3994-6488</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0278-6133 |
ispartof | Health psychology, 2022-04, Vol.41 (4), p.268-277 |
issn | 0278-6133 1930-7810 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8904645 |
source | APA PsycARTICLES; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE |
subjects | Adaptation, Psychological Caregivers Caregivers - psychology Clinical research Clinical trials Cross-Sectional Studies Depression - psychology Distress Dyads Emotional distress Emotional well being Female Health education Human Humans Inpatient Intensive Care Intensive Care Units Male Post traumatic stress disorder Posttraumatic Stress Psychological Distress Quality of Life Quality of Life - psychology Randomized Clinical Trials Resilience Stress Reactions Survivor Survivors Survivors - psychology Symptoms Treatment |
title | Emotional Distress in Neuro-ICU Survivor-Caregiver Dyads: The Recovering Together Randomized Clinical Trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T06%3A12%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Emotional%20Distress%20in%20Neuro-ICU%20Survivor-Caregiver%20Dyads:%20The%20Recovering%20Together%20Randomized%20Clinical%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Health%20psychology&rft.au=Bannon,%20Sarah%20M.&rft.date=2022-04-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=268&rft.epage=277&rft.pages=268-277&rft.issn=0278-6133&rft.eissn=1930-7810&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/hea0001102&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2570517843%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2570517843&rft_id=info:pmid/34498896&rfr_iscdi=true |