Emotional Distress in Neuro-ICU Survivor-Caregiver Dyads: The Recovering Together Randomized Clinical Trial

Objective: Emotional distress is common in both survivors and their informal caregivers following admission to a neuroscience intensive care unit (Neuro-ICU) and can negatively affect their individual recovery and quality of life. Neuro-ICU survivor-caregiver dyads can influence each other's em...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Health psychology 2022-04, Vol.41 (4), p.268-277
Hauptverfasser: Bannon, Sarah M., Cornelius, Talea, Gates, Melissa V., Lester, Ethan, Mace, Ryan A., Popok, Paula, Macklin, Eric A., Rosand, Jonathan, Vranceanu, Ana-Maria
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 277
container_issue 4
container_start_page 268
container_title Health psychology
container_volume 41
creator Bannon, Sarah M.
Cornelius, Talea
Gates, Melissa V.
Lester, Ethan
Mace, Ryan A.
Popok, Paula
Macklin, Eric A.
Rosand, Jonathan
Vranceanu, Ana-Maria
description Objective: Emotional distress is common in both survivors and their informal caregivers following admission to a neuroscience intensive care unit (Neuro-ICU) and can negatively affect their individual recovery and quality of life. Neuro-ICU survivor-caregiver dyads can influence each other's emotional distress over time, but whether such influence emerges during dyadic treatment remains unknown. The present study involved secondary data analysis of Neuro-ICU dyads enrolled in a randomized clinical trial of a dyadic resiliency intervention, Recovering Together (RT), versus a health education attention placebo control to test dyadic similarities in emotional distress before and after treatment. Method: Data were collected from 58 dyads following Neuro-ICU admission. Emotional distress (depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress) was assessed at baseline, 6 weeks (postintervention), and 12 weeks later. Nonindependence within survivor-caregiver dyads was examined (i.e., correlations between cross-sectional symptoms and changes in symptoms over time); mutual influence of emotional functioning over time (i.e., "partner effects") was examined using cross-lagged path analyses. Results: There were strong, positive cross-sectional correlations between survivor and caregiver distress at postintervention and follow-up and between changes in survivor and caregiver distress from baseline to postintervention and postintervention to follow-up. There were no partner effects. Conclusions: Neuro-ICU survivors and their informal caregivers show similar changes in emotional distress after treatment. These findings highlight the potential benefits of intervening on both survivor and caregiver distress following Neuro-ICU admission.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/hea0001102
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8904645</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2570517843</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a470t-748a1cda66c745b23f498069ad76c13e7f94f9d95645002d4f71218b31377d943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV1rFDEUhoModlu98QdIwBtRRvP94YUg06qFolC31yGbZHZTZyZrMrOw_fWmbK0fF14Fch4e3nNeAJ5h9AYjKt9ugkUIYYzIA7DAmqJGKoweggUiUjUCU3oEjku5rhDRnD8GR5QxrZQWC_D9bEhTTKPt4WksUw6lwDjCL2HOqTlvr-C3Oe_iLuWmtTms4y5keLq3vryDy02Al8Gl-hXHNVymdZg2dXxpR5-GeBM8bPs4Rlfdyxxt_wQ86mxfwtO79wRcfTxbtp-bi6-fztsPF41lEk2NZMpi560QTjK-IrSrYZHQ1kvhMA2y06zTXnPBeN3Is05igtWKYiql14yegPcH73ZeDcG7ME7Z9mab42Dz3iQbzd-TMW7MOu2M0ohVaRW8vBPk9GMOZTJDLC70vR1DmoshXGLEOSGqoi_-Qa_TnOs5KyWYlgJhSv5LcYk4lorRSr06UC6nUnLo7iNjZG6bNr-brvDzP5e8R39VW4HXB8BurdmWvbN5iq4Pxc0518VvZYZhw2pQRX8C_mayLA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2570517843</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Emotional Distress in Neuro-ICU Survivor-Caregiver Dyads: The Recovering Together Randomized Clinical Trial</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Bannon, Sarah M. ; Cornelius, Talea ; Gates, Melissa V. ; Lester, Ethan ; Mace, Ryan A. ; Popok, Paula ; Macklin, Eric A. ; Rosand, Jonathan ; Vranceanu, Ana-Maria</creator><contributor>Tsai, Jack ; Freedland, Kenneth E</contributor><creatorcontrib>Bannon, Sarah M. ; Cornelius, Talea ; Gates, Melissa V. ; Lester, Ethan ; Mace, Ryan A. ; Popok, Paula ; Macklin, Eric A. ; Rosand, Jonathan ; Vranceanu, Ana-Maria ; Tsai, Jack ; Freedland, Kenneth E</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: Emotional distress is common in both survivors and their informal caregivers following admission to a neuroscience intensive care unit (Neuro-ICU) and can negatively affect their individual recovery and quality of life. Neuro-ICU survivor-caregiver dyads can influence each other's emotional distress over time, but whether such influence emerges during dyadic treatment remains unknown. The present study involved secondary data analysis of Neuro-ICU dyads enrolled in a randomized clinical trial of a dyadic resiliency intervention, Recovering Together (RT), versus a health education attention placebo control to test dyadic similarities in emotional distress before and after treatment. Method: Data were collected from 58 dyads following Neuro-ICU admission. Emotional distress (depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress) was assessed at baseline, 6 weeks (postintervention), and 12 weeks later. Nonindependence within survivor-caregiver dyads was examined (i.e., correlations between cross-sectional symptoms and changes in symptoms over time); mutual influence of emotional functioning over time (i.e., "partner effects") was examined using cross-lagged path analyses. Results: There were strong, positive cross-sectional correlations between survivor and caregiver distress at postintervention and follow-up and between changes in survivor and caregiver distress from baseline to postintervention and postintervention to follow-up. There were no partner effects. Conclusions: Neuro-ICU survivors and their informal caregivers show similar changes in emotional distress after treatment. These findings highlight the potential benefits of intervening on both survivor and caregiver distress following Neuro-ICU admission.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-6133</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1930-7810</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/hea0001102</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34498896</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adaptation, Psychological ; Caregivers ; Caregivers - psychology ; Clinical research ; Clinical trials ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Depression - psychology ; Distress ; Dyads ; Emotional distress ; Emotional well being ; Female ; Health education ; Human ; Humans ; Inpatient ; Intensive Care ; Intensive Care Units ; Male ; Post traumatic stress disorder ; Posttraumatic Stress ; Psychological Distress ; Quality of Life ; Quality of Life - psychology ; Randomized Clinical Trials ; Resilience ; Stress Reactions ; Survivor ; Survivors ; Survivors - psychology ; Symptoms ; Treatment</subject><ispartof>Health psychology, 2022-04, Vol.41 (4), p.268-277</ispartof><rights>2021 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2021, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Apr 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a470t-748a1cda66c745b23f498069ad76c13e7f94f9d95645002d4f71218b31377d943</citedby><orcidid>0000-0003-3994-6488</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,30976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34498896$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Tsai, Jack</contributor><contributor>Freedland, Kenneth E</contributor><creatorcontrib>Bannon, Sarah M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cornelius, Talea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gates, Melissa V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lester, Ethan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mace, Ryan A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Popok, Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macklin, Eric A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosand, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vranceanu, Ana-Maria</creatorcontrib><title>Emotional Distress in Neuro-ICU Survivor-Caregiver Dyads: The Recovering Together Randomized Clinical Trial</title><title>Health psychology</title><addtitle>Health Psychol</addtitle><description>Objective: Emotional distress is common in both survivors and their informal caregivers following admission to a neuroscience intensive care unit (Neuro-ICU) and can negatively affect their individual recovery and quality of life. Neuro-ICU survivor-caregiver dyads can influence each other's emotional distress over time, but whether such influence emerges during dyadic treatment remains unknown. The present study involved secondary data analysis of Neuro-ICU dyads enrolled in a randomized clinical trial of a dyadic resiliency intervention, Recovering Together (RT), versus a health education attention placebo control to test dyadic similarities in emotional distress before and after treatment. Method: Data were collected from 58 dyads following Neuro-ICU admission. Emotional distress (depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress) was assessed at baseline, 6 weeks (postintervention), and 12 weeks later. Nonindependence within survivor-caregiver dyads was examined (i.e., correlations between cross-sectional symptoms and changes in symptoms over time); mutual influence of emotional functioning over time (i.e., "partner effects") was examined using cross-lagged path analyses. Results: There were strong, positive cross-sectional correlations between survivor and caregiver distress at postintervention and follow-up and between changes in survivor and caregiver distress from baseline to postintervention and postintervention to follow-up. There were no partner effects. Conclusions: Neuro-ICU survivors and their informal caregivers show similar changes in emotional distress after treatment. These findings highlight the potential benefits of intervening on both survivor and caregiver distress following Neuro-ICU admission.</description><subject>Adaptation, Psychological</subject><subject>Caregivers</subject><subject>Caregivers - psychology</subject><subject>Clinical research</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Depression - psychology</subject><subject>Distress</subject><subject>Dyads</subject><subject>Emotional distress</subject><subject>Emotional well being</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health education</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inpatient</subject><subject>Intensive Care</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Post traumatic stress disorder</subject><subject>Posttraumatic Stress</subject><subject>Psychological Distress</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Quality of Life - psychology</subject><subject>Randomized Clinical Trials</subject><subject>Resilience</subject><subject>Stress Reactions</subject><subject>Survivor</subject><subject>Survivors</subject><subject>Survivors - psychology</subject><subject>Symptoms</subject><subject>Treatment</subject><issn>0278-6133</issn><issn>1930-7810</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kV1rFDEUhoModlu98QdIwBtRRvP94YUg06qFolC31yGbZHZTZyZrMrOw_fWmbK0fF14Fch4e3nNeAJ5h9AYjKt9ugkUIYYzIA7DAmqJGKoweggUiUjUCU3oEjku5rhDRnD8GR5QxrZQWC_D9bEhTTKPt4WksUw6lwDjCL2HOqTlvr-C3Oe_iLuWmtTms4y5keLq3vryDy02Al8Gl-hXHNVymdZg2dXxpR5-GeBM8bPs4Rlfdyxxt_wQ86mxfwtO79wRcfTxbtp-bi6-fztsPF41lEk2NZMpi560QTjK-IrSrYZHQ1kvhMA2y06zTXnPBeN3Is05igtWKYiql14yegPcH73ZeDcG7ME7Z9mab42Dz3iQbzd-TMW7MOu2M0ohVaRW8vBPk9GMOZTJDLC70vR1DmoshXGLEOSGqoi_-Qa_TnOs5KyWYlgJhSv5LcYk4lorRSr06UC6nUnLo7iNjZG6bNr-brvDzP5e8R39VW4HXB8BurdmWvbN5iq4Pxc0518VvZYZhw2pQRX8C_mayLA</recordid><startdate>20220401</startdate><enddate>20220401</enddate><creator>Bannon, Sarah M.</creator><creator>Cornelius, Talea</creator><creator>Gates, Melissa V.</creator><creator>Lester, Ethan</creator><creator>Mace, Ryan A.</creator><creator>Popok, Paula</creator><creator>Macklin, Eric A.</creator><creator>Rosand, Jonathan</creator><creator>Vranceanu, Ana-Maria</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3994-6488</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220401</creationdate><title>Emotional Distress in Neuro-ICU Survivor-Caregiver Dyads: The Recovering Together Randomized Clinical Trial</title><author>Bannon, Sarah M. ; Cornelius, Talea ; Gates, Melissa V. ; Lester, Ethan ; Mace, Ryan A. ; Popok, Paula ; Macklin, Eric A. ; Rosand, Jonathan ; Vranceanu, Ana-Maria</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a470t-748a1cda66c745b23f498069ad76c13e7f94f9d95645002d4f71218b31377d943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adaptation, Psychological</topic><topic>Caregivers</topic><topic>Caregivers - psychology</topic><topic>Clinical research</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Depression - psychology</topic><topic>Distress</topic><topic>Dyads</topic><topic>Emotional distress</topic><topic>Emotional well being</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health education</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inpatient</topic><topic>Intensive Care</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Post traumatic stress disorder</topic><topic>Posttraumatic Stress</topic><topic>Psychological Distress</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Quality of Life - psychology</topic><topic>Randomized Clinical Trials</topic><topic>Resilience</topic><topic>Stress Reactions</topic><topic>Survivor</topic><topic>Survivors</topic><topic>Survivors - psychology</topic><topic>Symptoms</topic><topic>Treatment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bannon, Sarah M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cornelius, Talea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gates, Melissa V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lester, Ethan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mace, Ryan A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Popok, Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macklin, Eric A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosand, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vranceanu, Ana-Maria</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Health psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bannon, Sarah M.</au><au>Cornelius, Talea</au><au>Gates, Melissa V.</au><au>Lester, Ethan</au><au>Mace, Ryan A.</au><au>Popok, Paula</au><au>Macklin, Eric A.</au><au>Rosand, Jonathan</au><au>Vranceanu, Ana-Maria</au><au>Tsai, Jack</au><au>Freedland, Kenneth E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Emotional Distress in Neuro-ICU Survivor-Caregiver Dyads: The Recovering Together Randomized Clinical Trial</atitle><jtitle>Health psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Health Psychol</addtitle><date>2022-04-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>268</spage><epage>277</epage><pages>268-277</pages><issn>0278-6133</issn><eissn>1930-7810</eissn><abstract>Objective: Emotional distress is common in both survivors and their informal caregivers following admission to a neuroscience intensive care unit (Neuro-ICU) and can negatively affect their individual recovery and quality of life. Neuro-ICU survivor-caregiver dyads can influence each other's emotional distress over time, but whether such influence emerges during dyadic treatment remains unknown. The present study involved secondary data analysis of Neuro-ICU dyads enrolled in a randomized clinical trial of a dyadic resiliency intervention, Recovering Together (RT), versus a health education attention placebo control to test dyadic similarities in emotional distress before and after treatment. Method: Data were collected from 58 dyads following Neuro-ICU admission. Emotional distress (depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress) was assessed at baseline, 6 weeks (postintervention), and 12 weeks later. Nonindependence within survivor-caregiver dyads was examined (i.e., correlations between cross-sectional symptoms and changes in symptoms over time); mutual influence of emotional functioning over time (i.e., "partner effects") was examined using cross-lagged path analyses. Results: There were strong, positive cross-sectional correlations between survivor and caregiver distress at postintervention and follow-up and between changes in survivor and caregiver distress from baseline to postintervention and postintervention to follow-up. There were no partner effects. Conclusions: Neuro-ICU survivors and their informal caregivers show similar changes in emotional distress after treatment. These findings highlight the potential benefits of intervening on both survivor and caregiver distress following Neuro-ICU admission.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>34498896</pmid><doi>10.1037/hea0001102</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3994-6488</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0278-6133
ispartof Health psychology, 2022-04, Vol.41 (4), p.268-277
issn 0278-6133
1930-7810
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8904645
source APA PsycARTICLES; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE
subjects Adaptation, Psychological
Caregivers
Caregivers - psychology
Clinical research
Clinical trials
Cross-Sectional Studies
Depression - psychology
Distress
Dyads
Emotional distress
Emotional well being
Female
Health education
Human
Humans
Inpatient
Intensive Care
Intensive Care Units
Male
Post traumatic stress disorder
Posttraumatic Stress
Psychological Distress
Quality of Life
Quality of Life - psychology
Randomized Clinical Trials
Resilience
Stress Reactions
Survivor
Survivors
Survivors - psychology
Symptoms
Treatment
title Emotional Distress in Neuro-ICU Survivor-Caregiver Dyads: The Recovering Together Randomized Clinical Trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T06%3A12%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Emotional%20Distress%20in%20Neuro-ICU%20Survivor-Caregiver%20Dyads:%20The%20Recovering%20Together%20Randomized%20Clinical%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Health%20psychology&rft.au=Bannon,%20Sarah%20M.&rft.date=2022-04-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=268&rft.epage=277&rft.pages=268-277&rft.issn=0278-6133&rft.eissn=1930-7810&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/hea0001102&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2570517843%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2570517843&rft_id=info:pmid/34498896&rfr_iscdi=true