Preparing the Next Generation of Academic Researchers During the Pandemic: Lessons from a National Mental Health Research Postdoctoral Fellowship
Objective The COVID-19 pandemic has severely disrupted all aspects of academic medicine, including post-doctoral research fellowship training. The current survey examined ways in which research fellows across 28 U.S. nationally diverse sites have been impacted. Methods Survey participants included 6...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Academic psychiatry 2022-08, Vol.46 (4), p.466-469 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 469 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 466 |
container_title | Academic psychiatry |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Hantke, Nathan C. Samarina, Viktoriya Hallmayer, Joachim Anker, Lauren O’Hara, Ruth Beaudreau, Sherry A. |
description | Objective
The COVID-19 pandemic has severely disrupted all aspects of academic medicine, including post-doctoral research fellowship training. The current survey examined ways in which research fellows across 28 U.S. nationally diverse sites have been impacted.
Methods
Survey participants included 62 M.D. and Ph.D. post-doctoral fellows and 27 local fellowship center directors within the Veterans Affairs (VA) Advanced Fellowship in Mental Illness Research and Treatment (MIRT), a national fellowship program tasked to develop academic clinician researchers within the field of mental health. Survey questions focused on productivity and challenges experienced by fellows during the pandemic.
Results
Half of fellows reported working entirely off-site during the COVID-19 pandemic. All fellows reported some level of disruption in productivity during the pandemic; 73% reported a disruption in data collection, 69% reported decreased scholarly output, 41% reported disruption in grant writing, and 73% reported disruption in ability to provide clinical care. Yet, the majority of fellows (66%) reported not having to change their research goals, pivoting to telehealth-based data collection, and employing extant data for research projects and peer-reviewed publications.
Conclusions
The results of the fellow and director surveys highlight the associated disruption of the COVID-19 pandemic on fellowship-related activities and parallel ingenuity of programs to continue conducting research and clinical services in a modified fashion. While many research goals continued unabated, the findings suggest alterations in data collection methodology and a focus on using extant data, which may have a residual influence on future early career research grant applications. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s40596-022-01613-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8901092</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2637315633</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-2110d05411390965d99286a343760e6fa0fb8da3e7ec68f7ddcd77cbfb7850de3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhSMEoqXwAiyQJTZsAuOf2DELpKrQFulSrhCsLV970qRK4mAntDwGb4x7b7n8LFiNpfnm-MyconhK4SUFUK-SgErLEhgrgUrKS3GvOKSVqErFONzPbxCs1FLBQfEopSsA4FSwh8UBr1ilONWHxY91xMnGbrwkc4vkAm9mcoYjRjt3YSShIcfOehw6Rz5hQhtdizGRt8t-ZG3Hbf81WWFKYUykiWEgllxsJWxPPuA453KOtp_bvQxZhzT74OYQc_MU-z5cp7abHhcPGtsnfHJXj4ovp-8-n5yXq49n70-OV6UTSswloxQ8VIJSrkHLymvNamm54EoCysZCs6m95ajQybpR3juvlNs0G1VX4JEfFW92utOyGdC7bDIbMVPsBhu_m2A783dn7FpzGb6ZWgMFzbLAizuBGL4umGYzdMnlPeyIYUmGSZ5vXEnOM_r8H_QqLDHfJlOaZyx7rjPFdpSLIaWIzd4MBXObuNklbnLiZpu4EXno2Z9r7Ed-RZwBvgPSdJsZxt9__0f2JxXLuRk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2933737608</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Preparing the Next Generation of Academic Researchers During the Pandemic: Lessons from a National Mental Health Research Postdoctoral Fellowship</title><source>ProQuest Central Essentials</source><source>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</source><source>ProQuest Central Student</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>ProQuest Central Korea</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Hantke, Nathan C. ; Samarina, Viktoriya ; Hallmayer, Joachim ; Anker, Lauren ; O’Hara, Ruth ; Beaudreau, Sherry A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hantke, Nathan C. ; Samarina, Viktoriya ; Hallmayer, Joachim ; Anker, Lauren ; O’Hara, Ruth ; Beaudreau, Sherry A.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
The COVID-19 pandemic has severely disrupted all aspects of academic medicine, including post-doctoral research fellowship training. The current survey examined ways in which research fellows across 28 U.S. nationally diverse sites have been impacted.
Methods
Survey participants included 62 M.D. and Ph.D. post-doctoral fellows and 27 local fellowship center directors within the Veterans Affairs (VA) Advanced Fellowship in Mental Illness Research and Treatment (MIRT), a national fellowship program tasked to develop academic clinician researchers within the field of mental health. Survey questions focused on productivity and challenges experienced by fellows during the pandemic.
Results
Half of fellows reported working entirely off-site during the COVID-19 pandemic. All fellows reported some level of disruption in productivity during the pandemic; 73% reported a disruption in data collection, 69% reported decreased scholarly output, 41% reported disruption in grant writing, and 73% reported disruption in ability to provide clinical care. Yet, the majority of fellows (66%) reported not having to change their research goals, pivoting to telehealth-based data collection, and employing extant data for research projects and peer-reviewed publications.
Conclusions
The results of the fellow and director surveys highlight the associated disruption of the COVID-19 pandemic on fellowship-related activities and parallel ingenuity of programs to continue conducting research and clinical services in a modified fashion. While many research goals continued unabated, the findings suggest alterations in data collection methodology and a focus on using extant data, which may have a residual influence on future early career research grant applications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1042-9670</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-7230</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s40596-022-01613-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35257319</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Academic Standards ; Accreditation (Institutions) ; Careers ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 and Psychiatry Education ; Data collection ; Directors ; Feedback (Response) ; Fellowships ; Grants ; In Brief Report ; Likert Scales ; Medical Education ; Medical research ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Mental disorders ; Mental health ; Needs Assessment ; Pandemics ; Polls & surveys ; Postdoctoral Education ; Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ; Productivity ; Professional development ; Psychiatry ; Quality Assurance ; Quality Control ; Researchers ; Resistance (Psychology) ; Response rates ; Response Rates (Questionnaires) ; Sense of Community ; Telemedicine ; Trainees ; Training Objectives ; Writing</subject><ispartof>Academic psychiatry, 2022-08, Vol.46 (4), p.466-469</ispartof><rights>This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply 2022</rights><rights>2022. This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply.</rights><rights>This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-2110d05411390965d99286a343760e6fa0fb8da3e7ec68f7ddcd77cbfb7850de3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-2110d05411390965d99286a343760e6fa0fb8da3e7ec68f7ddcd77cbfb7850de3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4261-8330</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2933737608/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2933737608?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,21392,21393,21394,21395,23260,27928,27929,33534,33535,33707,33708,33748,33749,34009,34010,34318,34319,41492,42561,43663,43791,43809,43957,44071,51323,64389,64391,64393,72473,74108,74287,74306,74477,74594</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35257319$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hantke, Nathan C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samarina, Viktoriya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hallmayer, Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anker, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Hara, Ruth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beaudreau, Sherry A.</creatorcontrib><title>Preparing the Next Generation of Academic Researchers During the Pandemic: Lessons from a National Mental Health Research Postdoctoral Fellowship</title><title>Academic psychiatry</title><addtitle>Acad Psychiatry</addtitle><addtitle>Acad Psychiatry</addtitle><description>Objective
The COVID-19 pandemic has severely disrupted all aspects of academic medicine, including post-doctoral research fellowship training. The current survey examined ways in which research fellows across 28 U.S. nationally diverse sites have been impacted.
Methods
Survey participants included 62 M.D. and Ph.D. post-doctoral fellows and 27 local fellowship center directors within the Veterans Affairs (VA) Advanced Fellowship in Mental Illness Research and Treatment (MIRT), a national fellowship program tasked to develop academic clinician researchers within the field of mental health. Survey questions focused on productivity and challenges experienced by fellows during the pandemic.
Results
Half of fellows reported working entirely off-site during the COVID-19 pandemic. All fellows reported some level of disruption in productivity during the pandemic; 73% reported a disruption in data collection, 69% reported decreased scholarly output, 41% reported disruption in grant writing, and 73% reported disruption in ability to provide clinical care. Yet, the majority of fellows (66%) reported not having to change their research goals, pivoting to telehealth-based data collection, and employing extant data for research projects and peer-reviewed publications.
Conclusions
The results of the fellow and director surveys highlight the associated disruption of the COVID-19 pandemic on fellowship-related activities and parallel ingenuity of programs to continue conducting research and clinical services in a modified fashion. While many research goals continued unabated, the findings suggest alterations in data collection methodology and a focus on using extant data, which may have a residual influence on future early career research grant applications.</description><subject>Academic Standards</subject><subject>Accreditation (Institutions)</subject><subject>Careers</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 and Psychiatry Education</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Directors</subject><subject>Feedback (Response)</subject><subject>Fellowships</subject><subject>Grants</subject><subject>In Brief Report</subject><subject>Likert Scales</subject><subject>Medical Education</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Needs Assessment</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Postdoctoral Education</subject><subject>Posttraumatic Stress Disorder</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Professional development</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Quality Assurance</subject><subject>Quality Control</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Resistance (Psychology)</subject><subject>Response rates</subject><subject>Response Rates (Questionnaires)</subject><subject>Sense of Community</subject><subject>Telemedicine</subject><subject>Trainees</subject><subject>Training Objectives</subject><subject>Writing</subject><issn>1042-9670</issn><issn>1545-7230</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhSMEoqXwAiyQJTZsAuOf2DELpKrQFulSrhCsLV970qRK4mAntDwGb4x7b7n8LFiNpfnm-MyconhK4SUFUK-SgErLEhgrgUrKS3GvOKSVqErFONzPbxCs1FLBQfEopSsA4FSwh8UBr1ilONWHxY91xMnGbrwkc4vkAm9mcoYjRjt3YSShIcfOehw6Rz5hQhtdizGRt8t-ZG3Hbf81WWFKYUykiWEgllxsJWxPPuA453KOtp_bvQxZhzT74OYQc_MU-z5cp7abHhcPGtsnfHJXj4ovp-8-n5yXq49n70-OV6UTSswloxQ8VIJSrkHLymvNamm54EoCysZCs6m95ajQybpR3juvlNs0G1VX4JEfFW92utOyGdC7bDIbMVPsBhu_m2A783dn7FpzGb6ZWgMFzbLAizuBGL4umGYzdMnlPeyIYUmGSZ5vXEnOM_r8H_QqLDHfJlOaZyx7rjPFdpSLIaWIzd4MBXObuNklbnLiZpu4EXno2Z9r7Ed-RZwBvgPSdJsZxt9__0f2JxXLuRk</recordid><startdate>20220801</startdate><enddate>20220801</enddate><creator>Hantke, Nathan C.</creator><creator>Samarina, Viktoriya</creator><creator>Hallmayer, Joachim</creator><creator>Anker, Lauren</creator><creator>O’Hara, Ruth</creator><creator>Beaudreau, Sherry A.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4261-8330</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220801</creationdate><title>Preparing the Next Generation of Academic Researchers During the Pandemic: Lessons from a National Mental Health Research Postdoctoral Fellowship</title><author>Hantke, Nathan C. ; Samarina, Viktoriya ; Hallmayer, Joachim ; Anker, Lauren ; O’Hara, Ruth ; Beaudreau, Sherry A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-2110d05411390965d99286a343760e6fa0fb8da3e7ec68f7ddcd77cbfb7850de3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Academic Standards</topic><topic>Accreditation (Institutions)</topic><topic>Careers</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 and Psychiatry Education</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Directors</topic><topic>Feedback (Response)</topic><topic>Fellowships</topic><topic>Grants</topic><topic>In Brief Report</topic><topic>Likert Scales</topic><topic>Medical Education</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Needs Assessment</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Postdoctoral Education</topic><topic>Posttraumatic Stress Disorder</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Professional development</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Quality Assurance</topic><topic>Quality Control</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Resistance (Psychology)</topic><topic>Response rates</topic><topic>Response Rates (Questionnaires)</topic><topic>Sense of Community</topic><topic>Telemedicine</topic><topic>Trainees</topic><topic>Training Objectives</topic><topic>Writing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hantke, Nathan C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samarina, Viktoriya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hallmayer, Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anker, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Hara, Ruth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beaudreau, Sherry A.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Academic psychiatry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hantke, Nathan C.</au><au>Samarina, Viktoriya</au><au>Hallmayer, Joachim</au><au>Anker, Lauren</au><au>O’Hara, Ruth</au><au>Beaudreau, Sherry A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Preparing the Next Generation of Academic Researchers During the Pandemic: Lessons from a National Mental Health Research Postdoctoral Fellowship</atitle><jtitle>Academic psychiatry</jtitle><stitle>Acad Psychiatry</stitle><addtitle>Acad Psychiatry</addtitle><date>2022-08-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>466</spage><epage>469</epage><pages>466-469</pages><issn>1042-9670</issn><eissn>1545-7230</eissn><abstract>Objective
The COVID-19 pandemic has severely disrupted all aspects of academic medicine, including post-doctoral research fellowship training. The current survey examined ways in which research fellows across 28 U.S. nationally diverse sites have been impacted.
Methods
Survey participants included 62 M.D. and Ph.D. post-doctoral fellows and 27 local fellowship center directors within the Veterans Affairs (VA) Advanced Fellowship in Mental Illness Research and Treatment (MIRT), a national fellowship program tasked to develop academic clinician researchers within the field of mental health. Survey questions focused on productivity and challenges experienced by fellows during the pandemic.
Results
Half of fellows reported working entirely off-site during the COVID-19 pandemic. All fellows reported some level of disruption in productivity during the pandemic; 73% reported a disruption in data collection, 69% reported decreased scholarly output, 41% reported disruption in grant writing, and 73% reported disruption in ability to provide clinical care. Yet, the majority of fellows (66%) reported not having to change their research goals, pivoting to telehealth-based data collection, and employing extant data for research projects and peer-reviewed publications.
Conclusions
The results of the fellow and director surveys highlight the associated disruption of the COVID-19 pandemic on fellowship-related activities and parallel ingenuity of programs to continue conducting research and clinical services in a modified fashion. While many research goals continued unabated, the findings suggest alterations in data collection methodology and a focus on using extant data, which may have a residual influence on future early career research grant applications.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>35257319</pmid><doi>10.1007/s40596-022-01613-4</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4261-8330</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1042-9670 |
ispartof | Academic psychiatry, 2022-08, Vol.46 (4), p.466-469 |
issn | 1042-9670 1545-7230 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8901092 |
source | ProQuest Central Essentials; ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition); ProQuest Central Student; SpringerNature Journals; ProQuest Central Korea; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; ProQuest Central |
subjects | Academic Standards Accreditation (Institutions) Careers COVID-19 COVID-19 and Psychiatry Education Data collection Directors Feedback (Response) Fellowships Grants In Brief Report Likert Scales Medical Education Medical research Medicine Medicine & Public Health Mental disorders Mental health Needs Assessment Pandemics Polls & surveys Postdoctoral Education Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Productivity Professional development Psychiatry Quality Assurance Quality Control Researchers Resistance (Psychology) Response rates Response Rates (Questionnaires) Sense of Community Telemedicine Trainees Training Objectives Writing |
title | Preparing the Next Generation of Academic Researchers During the Pandemic: Lessons from a National Mental Health Research Postdoctoral Fellowship |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T11%3A39%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Preparing%20the%20Next%20Generation%20of%20Academic%20Researchers%20During%20the%20Pandemic:%20Lessons%20from%20a%20National%20Mental%20Health%20Research%20Postdoctoral%20Fellowship&rft.jtitle=Academic%20psychiatry&rft.au=Hantke,%20Nathan%20C.&rft.date=2022-08-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=466&rft.epage=469&rft.pages=466-469&rft.issn=1042-9670&rft.eissn=1545-7230&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s40596-022-01613-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2637315633%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2933737608&rft_id=info:pmid/35257319&rfr_iscdi=true |