Preparing the Next Generation of Academic Researchers During the Pandemic: Lessons from a National Mental Health Research Postdoctoral Fellowship

Objective The COVID-19 pandemic has severely disrupted all aspects of academic medicine, including post-doctoral research fellowship training. The current survey examined ways in which research fellows across 28 U.S. nationally diverse sites have been impacted. Methods Survey participants included 6...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Academic psychiatry 2022-08, Vol.46 (4), p.466-469
Hauptverfasser: Hantke, Nathan C., Samarina, Viktoriya, Hallmayer, Joachim, Anker, Lauren, O’Hara, Ruth, Beaudreau, Sherry A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 469
container_issue 4
container_start_page 466
container_title Academic psychiatry
container_volume 46
creator Hantke, Nathan C.
Samarina, Viktoriya
Hallmayer, Joachim
Anker, Lauren
O’Hara, Ruth
Beaudreau, Sherry A.
description Objective The COVID-19 pandemic has severely disrupted all aspects of academic medicine, including post-doctoral research fellowship training. The current survey examined ways in which research fellows across 28 U.S. nationally diverse sites have been impacted. Methods Survey participants included 62 M.D. and Ph.D. post-doctoral fellows and 27 local fellowship center directors within the Veterans Affairs (VA) Advanced Fellowship in Mental Illness Research and Treatment (MIRT), a national fellowship program tasked to develop academic clinician researchers within the field of mental health. Survey questions focused on productivity and challenges experienced by fellows during the pandemic. Results Half of fellows reported working entirely off-site during the COVID-19 pandemic. All fellows reported some level of disruption in productivity during the pandemic; 73% reported a disruption in data collection, 69% reported decreased scholarly output, 41% reported disruption in grant writing, and 73% reported disruption in ability to provide clinical care. Yet, the majority of fellows (66%) reported not having to change their research goals, pivoting to telehealth-based data collection, and employing extant data for research projects and peer-reviewed publications. Conclusions The results of the fellow and director surveys highlight the associated disruption of the COVID-19 pandemic on fellowship-related activities and parallel ingenuity of programs to continue conducting research and clinical services in a modified fashion. While many research goals continued unabated, the findings suggest alterations in data collection methodology and a focus on using extant data, which may have a residual influence on future early career research grant applications.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s40596-022-01613-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8901092</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2637315633</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-2110d05411390965d99286a343760e6fa0fb8da3e7ec68f7ddcd77cbfb7850de3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhSMEoqXwAiyQJTZsAuOf2DELpKrQFulSrhCsLV970qRK4mAntDwGb4x7b7n8LFiNpfnm-MyconhK4SUFUK-SgErLEhgrgUrKS3GvOKSVqErFONzPbxCs1FLBQfEopSsA4FSwh8UBr1ilONWHxY91xMnGbrwkc4vkAm9mcoYjRjt3YSShIcfOehw6Rz5hQhtdizGRt8t-ZG3Hbf81WWFKYUykiWEgllxsJWxPPuA453KOtp_bvQxZhzT74OYQc_MU-z5cp7abHhcPGtsnfHJXj4ovp-8-n5yXq49n70-OV6UTSswloxQ8VIJSrkHLymvNamm54EoCysZCs6m95ajQybpR3juvlNs0G1VX4JEfFW92utOyGdC7bDIbMVPsBhu_m2A783dn7FpzGb6ZWgMFzbLAizuBGL4umGYzdMnlPeyIYUmGSZ5vXEnOM_r8H_QqLDHfJlOaZyx7rjPFdpSLIaWIzd4MBXObuNklbnLiZpu4EXno2Z9r7Ed-RZwBvgPSdJsZxt9__0f2JxXLuRk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2933737608</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Preparing the Next Generation of Academic Researchers During the Pandemic: Lessons from a National Mental Health Research Postdoctoral Fellowship</title><source>ProQuest Central Essentials</source><source>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</source><source>ProQuest Central Student</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>ProQuest Central Korea</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Hantke, Nathan C. ; Samarina, Viktoriya ; Hallmayer, Joachim ; Anker, Lauren ; O’Hara, Ruth ; Beaudreau, Sherry A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hantke, Nathan C. ; Samarina, Viktoriya ; Hallmayer, Joachim ; Anker, Lauren ; O’Hara, Ruth ; Beaudreau, Sherry A.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective The COVID-19 pandemic has severely disrupted all aspects of academic medicine, including post-doctoral research fellowship training. The current survey examined ways in which research fellows across 28 U.S. nationally diverse sites have been impacted. Methods Survey participants included 62 M.D. and Ph.D. post-doctoral fellows and 27 local fellowship center directors within the Veterans Affairs (VA) Advanced Fellowship in Mental Illness Research and Treatment (MIRT), a national fellowship program tasked to develop academic clinician researchers within the field of mental health. Survey questions focused on productivity and challenges experienced by fellows during the pandemic. Results Half of fellows reported working entirely off-site during the COVID-19 pandemic. All fellows reported some level of disruption in productivity during the pandemic; 73% reported a disruption in data collection, 69% reported decreased scholarly output, 41% reported disruption in grant writing, and 73% reported disruption in ability to provide clinical care. Yet, the majority of fellows (66%) reported not having to change their research goals, pivoting to telehealth-based data collection, and employing extant data for research projects and peer-reviewed publications. Conclusions The results of the fellow and director surveys highlight the associated disruption of the COVID-19 pandemic on fellowship-related activities and parallel ingenuity of programs to continue conducting research and clinical services in a modified fashion. While many research goals continued unabated, the findings suggest alterations in data collection methodology and a focus on using extant data, which may have a residual influence on future early career research grant applications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1042-9670</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-7230</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s40596-022-01613-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35257319</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Academic Standards ; Accreditation (Institutions) ; Careers ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 and Psychiatry Education ; Data collection ; Directors ; Feedback (Response) ; Fellowships ; Grants ; In Brief Report ; Likert Scales ; Medical Education ; Medical research ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Mental disorders ; Mental health ; Needs Assessment ; Pandemics ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Postdoctoral Education ; Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ; Productivity ; Professional development ; Psychiatry ; Quality Assurance ; Quality Control ; Researchers ; Resistance (Psychology) ; Response rates ; Response Rates (Questionnaires) ; Sense of Community ; Telemedicine ; Trainees ; Training Objectives ; Writing</subject><ispartof>Academic psychiatry, 2022-08, Vol.46 (4), p.466-469</ispartof><rights>This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply 2022</rights><rights>2022. This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply.</rights><rights>This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-2110d05411390965d99286a343760e6fa0fb8da3e7ec68f7ddcd77cbfb7850de3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-2110d05411390965d99286a343760e6fa0fb8da3e7ec68f7ddcd77cbfb7850de3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4261-8330</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2933737608/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2933737608?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,21392,21393,21394,21395,23260,27928,27929,33534,33535,33707,33708,33748,33749,34009,34010,34318,34319,41492,42561,43663,43791,43809,43957,44071,51323,64389,64391,64393,72473,74108,74287,74306,74477,74594</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35257319$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hantke, Nathan C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samarina, Viktoriya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hallmayer, Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anker, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Hara, Ruth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beaudreau, Sherry A.</creatorcontrib><title>Preparing the Next Generation of Academic Researchers During the Pandemic: Lessons from a National Mental Health Research Postdoctoral Fellowship</title><title>Academic psychiatry</title><addtitle>Acad Psychiatry</addtitle><addtitle>Acad Psychiatry</addtitle><description>Objective The COVID-19 pandemic has severely disrupted all aspects of academic medicine, including post-doctoral research fellowship training. The current survey examined ways in which research fellows across 28 U.S. nationally diverse sites have been impacted. Methods Survey participants included 62 M.D. and Ph.D. post-doctoral fellows and 27 local fellowship center directors within the Veterans Affairs (VA) Advanced Fellowship in Mental Illness Research and Treatment (MIRT), a national fellowship program tasked to develop academic clinician researchers within the field of mental health. Survey questions focused on productivity and challenges experienced by fellows during the pandemic. Results Half of fellows reported working entirely off-site during the COVID-19 pandemic. All fellows reported some level of disruption in productivity during the pandemic; 73% reported a disruption in data collection, 69% reported decreased scholarly output, 41% reported disruption in grant writing, and 73% reported disruption in ability to provide clinical care. Yet, the majority of fellows (66%) reported not having to change their research goals, pivoting to telehealth-based data collection, and employing extant data for research projects and peer-reviewed publications. Conclusions The results of the fellow and director surveys highlight the associated disruption of the COVID-19 pandemic on fellowship-related activities and parallel ingenuity of programs to continue conducting research and clinical services in a modified fashion. While many research goals continued unabated, the findings suggest alterations in data collection methodology and a focus on using extant data, which may have a residual influence on future early career research grant applications.</description><subject>Academic Standards</subject><subject>Accreditation (Institutions)</subject><subject>Careers</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 and Psychiatry Education</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Directors</subject><subject>Feedback (Response)</subject><subject>Fellowships</subject><subject>Grants</subject><subject>In Brief Report</subject><subject>Likert Scales</subject><subject>Medical Education</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Needs Assessment</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Postdoctoral Education</subject><subject>Posttraumatic Stress Disorder</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Professional development</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Quality Assurance</subject><subject>Quality Control</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Resistance (Psychology)</subject><subject>Response rates</subject><subject>Response Rates (Questionnaires)</subject><subject>Sense of Community</subject><subject>Telemedicine</subject><subject>Trainees</subject><subject>Training Objectives</subject><subject>Writing</subject><issn>1042-9670</issn><issn>1545-7230</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhSMEoqXwAiyQJTZsAuOf2DELpKrQFulSrhCsLV970qRK4mAntDwGb4x7b7n8LFiNpfnm-MyconhK4SUFUK-SgErLEhgrgUrKS3GvOKSVqErFONzPbxCs1FLBQfEopSsA4FSwh8UBr1ilONWHxY91xMnGbrwkc4vkAm9mcoYjRjt3YSShIcfOehw6Rz5hQhtdizGRt8t-ZG3Hbf81WWFKYUykiWEgllxsJWxPPuA453KOtp_bvQxZhzT74OYQc_MU-z5cp7abHhcPGtsnfHJXj4ovp-8-n5yXq49n70-OV6UTSswloxQ8VIJSrkHLymvNamm54EoCysZCs6m95ajQybpR3juvlNs0G1VX4JEfFW92utOyGdC7bDIbMVPsBhu_m2A783dn7FpzGb6ZWgMFzbLAizuBGL4umGYzdMnlPeyIYUmGSZ5vXEnOM_r8H_QqLDHfJlOaZyx7rjPFdpSLIaWIzd4MBXObuNklbnLiZpu4EXno2Z9r7Ed-RZwBvgPSdJsZxt9__0f2JxXLuRk</recordid><startdate>20220801</startdate><enddate>20220801</enddate><creator>Hantke, Nathan C.</creator><creator>Samarina, Viktoriya</creator><creator>Hallmayer, Joachim</creator><creator>Anker, Lauren</creator><creator>O’Hara, Ruth</creator><creator>Beaudreau, Sherry A.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4261-8330</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220801</creationdate><title>Preparing the Next Generation of Academic Researchers During the Pandemic: Lessons from a National Mental Health Research Postdoctoral Fellowship</title><author>Hantke, Nathan C. ; Samarina, Viktoriya ; Hallmayer, Joachim ; Anker, Lauren ; O’Hara, Ruth ; Beaudreau, Sherry A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-2110d05411390965d99286a343760e6fa0fb8da3e7ec68f7ddcd77cbfb7850de3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Academic Standards</topic><topic>Accreditation (Institutions)</topic><topic>Careers</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 and Psychiatry Education</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Directors</topic><topic>Feedback (Response)</topic><topic>Fellowships</topic><topic>Grants</topic><topic>In Brief Report</topic><topic>Likert Scales</topic><topic>Medical Education</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Needs Assessment</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Postdoctoral Education</topic><topic>Posttraumatic Stress Disorder</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Professional development</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Quality Assurance</topic><topic>Quality Control</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Resistance (Psychology)</topic><topic>Response rates</topic><topic>Response Rates (Questionnaires)</topic><topic>Sense of Community</topic><topic>Telemedicine</topic><topic>Trainees</topic><topic>Training Objectives</topic><topic>Writing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hantke, Nathan C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samarina, Viktoriya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hallmayer, Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anker, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Hara, Ruth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beaudreau, Sherry A.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Academic psychiatry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hantke, Nathan C.</au><au>Samarina, Viktoriya</au><au>Hallmayer, Joachim</au><au>Anker, Lauren</au><au>O’Hara, Ruth</au><au>Beaudreau, Sherry A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Preparing the Next Generation of Academic Researchers During the Pandemic: Lessons from a National Mental Health Research Postdoctoral Fellowship</atitle><jtitle>Academic psychiatry</jtitle><stitle>Acad Psychiatry</stitle><addtitle>Acad Psychiatry</addtitle><date>2022-08-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>466</spage><epage>469</epage><pages>466-469</pages><issn>1042-9670</issn><eissn>1545-7230</eissn><abstract>Objective The COVID-19 pandemic has severely disrupted all aspects of academic medicine, including post-doctoral research fellowship training. The current survey examined ways in which research fellows across 28 U.S. nationally diverse sites have been impacted. Methods Survey participants included 62 M.D. and Ph.D. post-doctoral fellows and 27 local fellowship center directors within the Veterans Affairs (VA) Advanced Fellowship in Mental Illness Research and Treatment (MIRT), a national fellowship program tasked to develop academic clinician researchers within the field of mental health. Survey questions focused on productivity and challenges experienced by fellows during the pandemic. Results Half of fellows reported working entirely off-site during the COVID-19 pandemic. All fellows reported some level of disruption in productivity during the pandemic; 73% reported a disruption in data collection, 69% reported decreased scholarly output, 41% reported disruption in grant writing, and 73% reported disruption in ability to provide clinical care. Yet, the majority of fellows (66%) reported not having to change their research goals, pivoting to telehealth-based data collection, and employing extant data for research projects and peer-reviewed publications. Conclusions The results of the fellow and director surveys highlight the associated disruption of the COVID-19 pandemic on fellowship-related activities and parallel ingenuity of programs to continue conducting research and clinical services in a modified fashion. While many research goals continued unabated, the findings suggest alterations in data collection methodology and a focus on using extant data, which may have a residual influence on future early career research grant applications.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>35257319</pmid><doi>10.1007/s40596-022-01613-4</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4261-8330</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1042-9670
ispartof Academic psychiatry, 2022-08, Vol.46 (4), p.466-469
issn 1042-9670
1545-7230
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8901092
source ProQuest Central Essentials; ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition); ProQuest Central Student; SpringerNature Journals; ProQuest Central Korea; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; ProQuest Central
subjects Academic Standards
Accreditation (Institutions)
Careers
COVID-19
COVID-19 and Psychiatry Education
Data collection
Directors
Feedback (Response)
Fellowships
Grants
In Brief Report
Likert Scales
Medical Education
Medical research
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Mental disorders
Mental health
Needs Assessment
Pandemics
Polls & surveys
Postdoctoral Education
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
Productivity
Professional development
Psychiatry
Quality Assurance
Quality Control
Researchers
Resistance (Psychology)
Response rates
Response Rates (Questionnaires)
Sense of Community
Telemedicine
Trainees
Training Objectives
Writing
title Preparing the Next Generation of Academic Researchers During the Pandemic: Lessons from a National Mental Health Research Postdoctoral Fellowship
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T11%3A39%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Preparing%20the%20Next%20Generation%20of%20Academic%20Researchers%20During%20the%20Pandemic:%20Lessons%20from%20a%20National%20Mental%20Health%20Research%20Postdoctoral%20Fellowship&rft.jtitle=Academic%20psychiatry&rft.au=Hantke,%20Nathan%20C.&rft.date=2022-08-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=466&rft.epage=469&rft.pages=466-469&rft.issn=1042-9670&rft.eissn=1545-7230&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s40596-022-01613-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2637315633%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2933737608&rft_id=info:pmid/35257319&rfr_iscdi=true