Clot accumulation at the tip of hemodialysis catheters in a large animal model

Background: The issue of side holes in the tips of the tunneled cuffed central venous catheters is complex and has been subject to longstanding debate. This study sought to compare the clotting potential of the side-hole-free Pristine hemodialysis catheter with that of a symmetric catheter with side...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The journal of vascular access 2022-01, Vol.23 (1), p.128-134
Hauptverfasser: Tal, Michael G., Livne, Ron, Neeman, Rotem
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 134
container_issue 1
container_start_page 128
container_title The journal of vascular access
container_volume 23
creator Tal, Michael G.
Livne, Ron
Neeman, Rotem
description Background: The issue of side holes in the tips of the tunneled cuffed central venous catheters is complex and has been subject to longstanding debate. This study sought to compare the clotting potential of the side-hole-free Pristine hemodialysis catheter with that of a symmetric catheter with side holes. Methods: Both jugular veins of five goats were catheterized with the two different catheters. The catheters were left in place for 4 weeks and were flushed and locked with heparin thrice weekly. The aspirated intraluminal clot length was assessed visually prior to each flushing. In addition, the size and weight of the clot were recorded upon catheter extraction at the end of the 4-week follow-up Results: The mean intraluminal clot length observed during the entire study follow-up measured up to a mean of 0.66 cm in the GlidePath (95% CI, 0.14–1.18) and 0.19 cm in the Pristine hemodialysis catheter (95% CI, −0.33 to 0.71), the difference being statistically significant (p = 0.026). On average, 0.01 g and 0.07 g of intraluminal clot were retrieved from the Pristine and GlidePath catheters, respectively (p = 0.052). Conclusion: The Pristine hemodialysis catheter was largely superior to a standard side hole catheter in impeding clot formation, and, contrary to the side hole catheter, allowed for complete aspiration of the intraluminal clot.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1129729820983617
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8899813</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1129729820983617</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2473401491</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-41914b2e92275f9c3928288f3912070bf75a341b9ff365e89feac043735588c03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtLAzEUhYMoVqt7V5Klm9G8pkk2ghRfILrRdUhj0qZkJjXJCP33plRFBVf3wvnuuS8ATjA6x5jzC4yJ5EQKgqSgE8x3wAHmhDUTRMluzavcbPQROMx5iRCRLWb7YEQpbScC0wPwOA2xQG3M0A1BFx97qAssCwuLX8Ho4MJ28dXrsM4-Q6OrUmzK0FcOBp3mFuredzrAitlwBPacDtkef8YxeLm5fp7eNQ9Pt_fTq4fGMMpKw7DEbEasJIS3ThoqiSBCOCoxQRzNHG81ZXgmnaOT1grprDaIUU7bVgiD6Bhcbn1Xw6yzr8b2JemgVqmOktYqaq9-K71fqHl8V0JIWRevBmefBim-DTYX1flsbAi6t3HIijBOGcJM4oqiLWpSzDlZ990GI7V5g_r7hlpy-nO874Kvu1eg2QJZz61axiH19Vz_G34A4ZCPJA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2473401491</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clot accumulation at the tip of hemodialysis catheters in a large animal model</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Tal, Michael G. ; Livne, Ron ; Neeman, Rotem</creator><creatorcontrib>Tal, Michael G. ; Livne, Ron ; Neeman, Rotem</creatorcontrib><description>Background: The issue of side holes in the tips of the tunneled cuffed central venous catheters is complex and has been subject to longstanding debate. This study sought to compare the clotting potential of the side-hole-free Pristine hemodialysis catheter with that of a symmetric catheter with side holes. Methods: Both jugular veins of five goats were catheterized with the two different catheters. The catheters were left in place for 4 weeks and were flushed and locked with heparin thrice weekly. The aspirated intraluminal clot length was assessed visually prior to each flushing. In addition, the size and weight of the clot were recorded upon catheter extraction at the end of the 4-week follow-up Results: The mean intraluminal clot length observed during the entire study follow-up measured up to a mean of 0.66 cm in the GlidePath (95% CI, 0.14–1.18) and 0.19 cm in the Pristine hemodialysis catheter (95% CI, −0.33 to 0.71), the difference being statistically significant (p = 0.026). On average, 0.01 g and 0.07 g of intraluminal clot were retrieved from the Pristine and GlidePath catheters, respectively (p = 0.052). Conclusion: The Pristine hemodialysis catheter was largely superior to a standard side hole catheter in impeding clot formation, and, contrary to the side hole catheter, allowed for complete aspiration of the intraluminal clot.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1129-7298</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1724-6032</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1129729820983617</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33356813</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Animals ; Catheterization, Central Venous - adverse effects ; Catheters, Indwelling ; Central Venous Catheters ; Models, Animal ; Original s ; Renal Dialysis</subject><ispartof>The journal of vascular access, 2022-01, Vol.23 (1), p.128-134</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020 2020 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-41914b2e92275f9c3928288f3912070bf75a341b9ff365e89feac043735588c03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-41914b2e92275f9c3928288f3912070bf75a341b9ff365e89feac043735588c03</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2642-4296</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1129729820983617$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1129729820983617$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33356813$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tal, Michael G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Livne, Ron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neeman, Rotem</creatorcontrib><title>Clot accumulation at the tip of hemodialysis catheters in a large animal model</title><title>The journal of vascular access</title><addtitle>J Vasc Access</addtitle><description>Background: The issue of side holes in the tips of the tunneled cuffed central venous catheters is complex and has been subject to longstanding debate. This study sought to compare the clotting potential of the side-hole-free Pristine hemodialysis catheter with that of a symmetric catheter with side holes. Methods: Both jugular veins of five goats were catheterized with the two different catheters. The catheters were left in place for 4 weeks and were flushed and locked with heparin thrice weekly. The aspirated intraluminal clot length was assessed visually prior to each flushing. In addition, the size and weight of the clot were recorded upon catheter extraction at the end of the 4-week follow-up Results: The mean intraluminal clot length observed during the entire study follow-up measured up to a mean of 0.66 cm in the GlidePath (95% CI, 0.14–1.18) and 0.19 cm in the Pristine hemodialysis catheter (95% CI, −0.33 to 0.71), the difference being statistically significant (p = 0.026). On average, 0.01 g and 0.07 g of intraluminal clot were retrieved from the Pristine and GlidePath catheters, respectively (p = 0.052). Conclusion: The Pristine hemodialysis catheter was largely superior to a standard side hole catheter in impeding clot formation, and, contrary to the side hole catheter, allowed for complete aspiration of the intraluminal clot.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Catheterization, Central Venous - adverse effects</subject><subject>Catheters, Indwelling</subject><subject>Central Venous Catheters</subject><subject>Models, Animal</subject><subject>Original s</subject><subject>Renal Dialysis</subject><issn>1129-7298</issn><issn>1724-6032</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUtLAzEUhYMoVqt7V5Klm9G8pkk2ghRfILrRdUhj0qZkJjXJCP33plRFBVf3wvnuuS8ATjA6x5jzC4yJ5EQKgqSgE8x3wAHmhDUTRMluzavcbPQROMx5iRCRLWb7YEQpbScC0wPwOA2xQG3M0A1BFx97qAssCwuLX8Ho4MJ28dXrsM4-Q6OrUmzK0FcOBp3mFuredzrAitlwBPacDtkef8YxeLm5fp7eNQ9Pt_fTq4fGMMpKw7DEbEasJIS3ThoqiSBCOCoxQRzNHG81ZXgmnaOT1grprDaIUU7bVgiD6Bhcbn1Xw6yzr8b2JemgVqmOktYqaq9-K71fqHl8V0JIWRevBmefBim-DTYX1flsbAi6t3HIijBOGcJM4oqiLWpSzDlZ990GI7V5g_r7hlpy-nO874Kvu1eg2QJZz61axiH19Vz_G34A4ZCPJA</recordid><startdate>20220101</startdate><enddate>20220101</enddate><creator>Tal, Michael G.</creator><creator>Livne, Ron</creator><creator>Neeman, Rotem</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2642-4296</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220101</creationdate><title>Clot accumulation at the tip of hemodialysis catheters in a large animal model</title><author>Tal, Michael G. ; Livne, Ron ; Neeman, Rotem</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-41914b2e92275f9c3928288f3912070bf75a341b9ff365e89feac043735588c03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Catheterization, Central Venous - adverse effects</topic><topic>Catheters, Indwelling</topic><topic>Central Venous Catheters</topic><topic>Models, Animal</topic><topic>Original s</topic><topic>Renal Dialysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tal, Michael G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Livne, Ron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neeman, Rotem</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The journal of vascular access</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tal, Michael G.</au><au>Livne, Ron</au><au>Neeman, Rotem</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clot accumulation at the tip of hemodialysis catheters in a large animal model</atitle><jtitle>The journal of vascular access</jtitle><addtitle>J Vasc Access</addtitle><date>2022-01-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>128</spage><epage>134</epage><pages>128-134</pages><issn>1129-7298</issn><eissn>1724-6032</eissn><abstract>Background: The issue of side holes in the tips of the tunneled cuffed central venous catheters is complex and has been subject to longstanding debate. This study sought to compare the clotting potential of the side-hole-free Pristine hemodialysis catheter with that of a symmetric catheter with side holes. Methods: Both jugular veins of five goats were catheterized with the two different catheters. The catheters were left in place for 4 weeks and were flushed and locked with heparin thrice weekly. The aspirated intraluminal clot length was assessed visually prior to each flushing. In addition, the size and weight of the clot were recorded upon catheter extraction at the end of the 4-week follow-up Results: The mean intraluminal clot length observed during the entire study follow-up measured up to a mean of 0.66 cm in the GlidePath (95% CI, 0.14–1.18) and 0.19 cm in the Pristine hemodialysis catheter (95% CI, −0.33 to 0.71), the difference being statistically significant (p = 0.026). On average, 0.01 g and 0.07 g of intraluminal clot were retrieved from the Pristine and GlidePath catheters, respectively (p = 0.052). Conclusion: The Pristine hemodialysis catheter was largely superior to a standard side hole catheter in impeding clot formation, and, contrary to the side hole catheter, allowed for complete aspiration of the intraluminal clot.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>33356813</pmid><doi>10.1177/1129729820983617</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2642-4296</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1129-7298
ispartof The journal of vascular access, 2022-01, Vol.23 (1), p.128-134
issn 1129-7298
1724-6032
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8899813
source MEDLINE; SAGE Complete
subjects Animals
Catheterization, Central Venous - adverse effects
Catheters, Indwelling
Central Venous Catheters
Models, Animal
Original s
Renal Dialysis
title Clot accumulation at the tip of hemodialysis catheters in a large animal model
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T11%3A23%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clot%20accumulation%20at%20the%20tip%20of%20hemodialysis%20catheters%20in%20a%20large%20animal%20model&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20vascular%20access&rft.au=Tal,%20Michael%20G.&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=128&rft.epage=134&rft.pages=128-134&rft.issn=1129-7298&rft.eissn=1724-6032&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1129729820983617&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2473401491%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2473401491&rft_id=info:pmid/33356813&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1129729820983617&rfr_iscdi=true