Potential occupational and respiratory hazards in a Minnesota cannabis cultivation and processing facility
Background Cannabis has been legalized in some form for much of the United States. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) received a health hazard evaluation request from a Minnesota cannabis facility and their union to undertake an evaluation. Methods NIOSH representative...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of industrial medicine 2019-10, Vol.62 (10), p.874-882 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 882 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 874 |
container_title | American journal of industrial medicine |
container_volume | 62 |
creator | Couch, James R. Grimes, George R. Wiegand, Douglas M. Green, Brett J. Glassford, Eric K. Zwack, Leonard M. Lemons, Angela R. Jackson, Stephen R. Beezhold, Donald H. |
description | Background
Cannabis has been legalized in some form for much of the United States. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) received a health hazard evaluation request from a Minnesota cannabis facility and their union to undertake an evaluation.
Methods
NIOSH representatives visited the facility in August 2016 and April 2017. Surface wipe samples were collected for analysis of delta‐9 tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9‐THC), delta‐9 tetrahydrocannabinol acid (Δ9‐THCA), cannabidiol, and cannabinol. Environmental air samples were collected for volatile organic compounds (VOCs), endotoxins (limulus amebocyte lysate assay), and fungal diversity (NIOSH two‐stage BC251 bioaerosol sampler with internal transcribed spacer region sequencing analysis).
Results
Surface wipe samples identified Δ9‐THC throughout the facility. Diacetyl and 2,3‐pentanedione were measured in initial VOC screening and subsequent sampling during tasks where heat transference was greatest, though levels were well below the NIOSH recommended exposure limits. Endotoxin concentrations were highest during processing activities, while internal transcribed spacer region sequencing revealed that the Basidiomycota genus, Wallemia, had the highest relative abundance.
Conclusions
To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first published report of potential diacetyl and 2,3‐pentanedione exposure in the cannabis industry, most notably during cannabis decarboxylation. Endotoxin exposure was elevated during grinding, indicating that this is a potentially high‐risk task. The findings indicate that potential health hazards of significance are present during cannabis processing, and employers should be aware of potential exposures to VOCs, endotoxin, and fungi. Further research into the degree of respiratory and dermal hazards and resulting health effects in this industry is recommended. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ajim.23025 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8893282</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2283882435</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4485-7a5f7083003a8ac12fa6797dc71e927288d23c6f8e5329b4bb37de0a45a49f123</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctKxDAUhoMoOl42PoAE3AnV3DpJN4IMXlF0oetwmqaaoZPUpFXGp7czo6IbV4eQ73w5OT9C-5QcU0LYCUzd7JhxwvI1NKKkkBlhUqyj0VBoxnM13kLbKU0JoVSMxSba4pRzpigboelD6KzvHDQ4GNO30LnghwP4CkebWhehC3GOX-ADYpWw8xjwnfPeptABNuA9lC5h0zede1t2L3vbGIxNyflnXINxjevmu2ijhibZva-6g54uzh8nV9nt_eX15Ow2M0KoPJOQ15IoTggHBYayGsaykJWR1BZMMqUqxs24VjbnrChFWXJZWQIiB1HUlPEddLrytn05s5UZvheh0W10M4hzHcDpvzfevejn8KaVKoatLASHX4IYXnubOj0NfRy2kjRjiivFBM8H6mhFmRhSirb-eYESvchFL3LRy1wG-OD3TD_odxADQFfAu2vs_B-VPru5vltJPwHCUZre</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2283882435</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Potential occupational and respiratory hazards in a Minnesota cannabis cultivation and processing facility</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Couch, James R. ; Grimes, George R. ; Wiegand, Douglas M. ; Green, Brett J. ; Glassford, Eric K. ; Zwack, Leonard M. ; Lemons, Angela R. ; Jackson, Stephen R. ; Beezhold, Donald H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Couch, James R. ; Grimes, George R. ; Wiegand, Douglas M. ; Green, Brett J. ; Glassford, Eric K. ; Zwack, Leonard M. ; Lemons, Angela R. ; Jackson, Stephen R. ; Beezhold, Donald H.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Cannabis has been legalized in some form for much of the United States. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) received a health hazard evaluation request from a Minnesota cannabis facility and their union to undertake an evaluation.
Methods
NIOSH representatives visited the facility in August 2016 and April 2017. Surface wipe samples were collected for analysis of delta‐9 tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9‐THC), delta‐9 tetrahydrocannabinol acid (Δ9‐THCA), cannabidiol, and cannabinol. Environmental air samples were collected for volatile organic compounds (VOCs), endotoxins (limulus amebocyte lysate assay), and fungal diversity (NIOSH two‐stage BC251 bioaerosol sampler with internal transcribed spacer region sequencing analysis).
Results
Surface wipe samples identified Δ9‐THC throughout the facility. Diacetyl and 2,3‐pentanedione were measured in initial VOC screening and subsequent sampling during tasks where heat transference was greatest, though levels were well below the NIOSH recommended exposure limits. Endotoxin concentrations were highest during processing activities, while internal transcribed spacer region sequencing revealed that the Basidiomycota genus, Wallemia, had the highest relative abundance.
Conclusions
To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first published report of potential diacetyl and 2,3‐pentanedione exposure in the cannabis industry, most notably during cannabis decarboxylation. Endotoxin exposure was elevated during grinding, indicating that this is a potentially high‐risk task. The findings indicate that potential health hazards of significance are present during cannabis processing, and employers should be aware of potential exposures to VOCs, endotoxin, and fungi. Further research into the degree of respiratory and dermal hazards and resulting health effects in this industry is recommended.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0271-3586</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0274</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ajim.23025</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31332812</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>2,3‐pentanedione ; Agriculture ; Air Microbiology ; Air Pollutants, Occupational - analysis ; Air sampling ; Bioaerosols ; Cannabidiol - analysis ; Cannabinol - analysis ; Cannabis ; Cannabis - chemistry ; Cultivation ; Decarboxylation ; Diacetyl ; Dronabinol - analogs & derivatives ; Dronabinol - analysis ; endotoxin ; Endotoxins ; Endotoxins - analysis ; Exposure limits ; Fungi ; Hazard assessment ; Health hazards ; Humans ; Inhalation Exposure - analysis ; Marijuana ; Minnesota ; Occupational Exposure - analysis ; Occupational hazards ; Occupational safety ; Organic compounds ; Relative abundance ; Skin ; Spacer region ; Tetrahydrocannabinol ; VOCs ; Volatile organic compounds ; Volatile Organic Compounds - analysis</subject><ispartof>American journal of industrial medicine, 2019-10, Vol.62 (10), p.874-882</ispartof><rights>Published 2019. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA</rights><rights>Published 2019. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.</rights><rights>2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4485-7a5f7083003a8ac12fa6797dc71e927288d23c6f8e5329b4bb37de0a45a49f123</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4485-7a5f7083003a8ac12fa6797dc71e927288d23c6f8e5329b4bb37de0a45a49f123</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2577-4611 ; 0000-0001-9822-3744 ; 0000-0003-3057-9888 ; 0000-0001-5543-5747</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fajim.23025$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fajim.23025$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31332812$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Couch, James R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grimes, George R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiegand, Douglas M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Brett J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glassford, Eric K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zwack, Leonard M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemons, Angela R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Stephen R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beezhold, Donald H.</creatorcontrib><title>Potential occupational and respiratory hazards in a Minnesota cannabis cultivation and processing facility</title><title>American journal of industrial medicine</title><addtitle>Am J Ind Med</addtitle><description>Background
Cannabis has been legalized in some form for much of the United States. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) received a health hazard evaluation request from a Minnesota cannabis facility and their union to undertake an evaluation.
Methods
NIOSH representatives visited the facility in August 2016 and April 2017. Surface wipe samples were collected for analysis of delta‐9 tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9‐THC), delta‐9 tetrahydrocannabinol acid (Δ9‐THCA), cannabidiol, and cannabinol. Environmental air samples were collected for volatile organic compounds (VOCs), endotoxins (limulus amebocyte lysate assay), and fungal diversity (NIOSH two‐stage BC251 bioaerosol sampler with internal transcribed spacer region sequencing analysis).
Results
Surface wipe samples identified Δ9‐THC throughout the facility. Diacetyl and 2,3‐pentanedione were measured in initial VOC screening and subsequent sampling during tasks where heat transference was greatest, though levels were well below the NIOSH recommended exposure limits. Endotoxin concentrations were highest during processing activities, while internal transcribed spacer region sequencing revealed that the Basidiomycota genus, Wallemia, had the highest relative abundance.
Conclusions
To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first published report of potential diacetyl and 2,3‐pentanedione exposure in the cannabis industry, most notably during cannabis decarboxylation. Endotoxin exposure was elevated during grinding, indicating that this is a potentially high‐risk task. The findings indicate that potential health hazards of significance are present during cannabis processing, and employers should be aware of potential exposures to VOCs, endotoxin, and fungi. Further research into the degree of respiratory and dermal hazards and resulting health effects in this industry is recommended.</description><subject>2,3‐pentanedione</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Air Microbiology</subject><subject>Air Pollutants, Occupational - analysis</subject><subject>Air sampling</subject><subject>Bioaerosols</subject><subject>Cannabidiol - analysis</subject><subject>Cannabinol - analysis</subject><subject>Cannabis</subject><subject>Cannabis - chemistry</subject><subject>Cultivation</subject><subject>Decarboxylation</subject><subject>Diacetyl</subject><subject>Dronabinol - analogs & derivatives</subject><subject>Dronabinol - analysis</subject><subject>endotoxin</subject><subject>Endotoxins</subject><subject>Endotoxins - analysis</subject><subject>Exposure limits</subject><subject>Fungi</subject><subject>Hazard assessment</subject><subject>Health hazards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inhalation Exposure - analysis</subject><subject>Marijuana</subject><subject>Minnesota</subject><subject>Occupational Exposure - analysis</subject><subject>Occupational hazards</subject><subject>Occupational safety</subject><subject>Organic compounds</subject><subject>Relative abundance</subject><subject>Skin</subject><subject>Spacer region</subject><subject>Tetrahydrocannabinol</subject><subject>VOCs</subject><subject>Volatile organic compounds</subject><subject>Volatile Organic Compounds - analysis</subject><issn>0271-3586</issn><issn>1097-0274</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctKxDAUhoMoOl42PoAE3AnV3DpJN4IMXlF0oetwmqaaoZPUpFXGp7czo6IbV4eQ73w5OT9C-5QcU0LYCUzd7JhxwvI1NKKkkBlhUqyj0VBoxnM13kLbKU0JoVSMxSba4pRzpigboelD6KzvHDQ4GNO30LnghwP4CkebWhehC3GOX-ADYpWw8xjwnfPeptABNuA9lC5h0zede1t2L3vbGIxNyflnXINxjevmu2ijhibZva-6g54uzh8nV9nt_eX15Ow2M0KoPJOQ15IoTggHBYayGsaykJWR1BZMMqUqxs24VjbnrChFWXJZWQIiB1HUlPEddLrytn05s5UZvheh0W10M4hzHcDpvzfevejn8KaVKoatLASHX4IYXnubOj0NfRy2kjRjiivFBM8H6mhFmRhSirb-eYESvchFL3LRy1wG-OD3TD_odxADQFfAu2vs_B-VPru5vltJPwHCUZre</recordid><startdate>201910</startdate><enddate>201910</enddate><creator>Couch, James R.</creator><creator>Grimes, George R.</creator><creator>Wiegand, Douglas M.</creator><creator>Green, Brett J.</creator><creator>Glassford, Eric K.</creator><creator>Zwack, Leonard M.</creator><creator>Lemons, Angela R.</creator><creator>Jackson, Stephen R.</creator><creator>Beezhold, Donald H.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2577-4611</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9822-3744</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3057-9888</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5543-5747</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201910</creationdate><title>Potential occupational and respiratory hazards in a Minnesota cannabis cultivation and processing facility</title><author>Couch, James R. ; Grimes, George R. ; Wiegand, Douglas M. ; Green, Brett J. ; Glassford, Eric K. ; Zwack, Leonard M. ; Lemons, Angela R. ; Jackson, Stephen R. ; Beezhold, Donald H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4485-7a5f7083003a8ac12fa6797dc71e927288d23c6f8e5329b4bb37de0a45a49f123</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>2,3‐pentanedione</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Air Microbiology</topic><topic>Air Pollutants, Occupational - analysis</topic><topic>Air sampling</topic><topic>Bioaerosols</topic><topic>Cannabidiol - analysis</topic><topic>Cannabinol - analysis</topic><topic>Cannabis</topic><topic>Cannabis - chemistry</topic><topic>Cultivation</topic><topic>Decarboxylation</topic><topic>Diacetyl</topic><topic>Dronabinol - analogs & derivatives</topic><topic>Dronabinol - analysis</topic><topic>endotoxin</topic><topic>Endotoxins</topic><topic>Endotoxins - analysis</topic><topic>Exposure limits</topic><topic>Fungi</topic><topic>Hazard assessment</topic><topic>Health hazards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inhalation Exposure - analysis</topic><topic>Marijuana</topic><topic>Minnesota</topic><topic>Occupational Exposure - analysis</topic><topic>Occupational hazards</topic><topic>Occupational safety</topic><topic>Organic compounds</topic><topic>Relative abundance</topic><topic>Skin</topic><topic>Spacer region</topic><topic>Tetrahydrocannabinol</topic><topic>VOCs</topic><topic>Volatile organic compounds</topic><topic>Volatile Organic Compounds - analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Couch, James R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grimes, George R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiegand, Douglas M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Brett J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glassford, Eric K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zwack, Leonard M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemons, Angela R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Stephen R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beezhold, Donald H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>American journal of industrial medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Couch, James R.</au><au>Grimes, George R.</au><au>Wiegand, Douglas M.</au><au>Green, Brett J.</au><au>Glassford, Eric K.</au><au>Zwack, Leonard M.</au><au>Lemons, Angela R.</au><au>Jackson, Stephen R.</au><au>Beezhold, Donald H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Potential occupational and respiratory hazards in a Minnesota cannabis cultivation and processing facility</atitle><jtitle>American journal of industrial medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Ind Med</addtitle><date>2019-10</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>874</spage><epage>882</epage><pages>874-882</pages><issn>0271-3586</issn><eissn>1097-0274</eissn><abstract>Background
Cannabis has been legalized in some form for much of the United States. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) received a health hazard evaluation request from a Minnesota cannabis facility and their union to undertake an evaluation.
Methods
NIOSH representatives visited the facility in August 2016 and April 2017. Surface wipe samples were collected for analysis of delta‐9 tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9‐THC), delta‐9 tetrahydrocannabinol acid (Δ9‐THCA), cannabidiol, and cannabinol. Environmental air samples were collected for volatile organic compounds (VOCs), endotoxins (limulus amebocyte lysate assay), and fungal diversity (NIOSH two‐stage BC251 bioaerosol sampler with internal transcribed spacer region sequencing analysis).
Results
Surface wipe samples identified Δ9‐THC throughout the facility. Diacetyl and 2,3‐pentanedione were measured in initial VOC screening and subsequent sampling during tasks where heat transference was greatest, though levels were well below the NIOSH recommended exposure limits. Endotoxin concentrations were highest during processing activities, while internal transcribed spacer region sequencing revealed that the Basidiomycota genus, Wallemia, had the highest relative abundance.
Conclusions
To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first published report of potential diacetyl and 2,3‐pentanedione exposure in the cannabis industry, most notably during cannabis decarboxylation. Endotoxin exposure was elevated during grinding, indicating that this is a potentially high‐risk task. The findings indicate that potential health hazards of significance are present during cannabis processing, and employers should be aware of potential exposures to VOCs, endotoxin, and fungi. Further research into the degree of respiratory and dermal hazards and resulting health effects in this industry is recommended.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>31332812</pmid><doi>10.1002/ajim.23025</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2577-4611</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9822-3744</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3057-9888</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5543-5747</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0271-3586 |
ispartof | American journal of industrial medicine, 2019-10, Vol.62 (10), p.874-882 |
issn | 0271-3586 1097-0274 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8893282 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | 2,3‐pentanedione Agriculture Air Microbiology Air Pollutants, Occupational - analysis Air sampling Bioaerosols Cannabidiol - analysis Cannabinol - analysis Cannabis Cannabis - chemistry Cultivation Decarboxylation Diacetyl Dronabinol - analogs & derivatives Dronabinol - analysis endotoxin Endotoxins Endotoxins - analysis Exposure limits Fungi Hazard assessment Health hazards Humans Inhalation Exposure - analysis Marijuana Minnesota Occupational Exposure - analysis Occupational hazards Occupational safety Organic compounds Relative abundance Skin Spacer region Tetrahydrocannabinol VOCs Volatile organic compounds Volatile Organic Compounds - analysis |
title | Potential occupational and respiratory hazards in a Minnesota cannabis cultivation and processing facility |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T15%3A09%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Potential%20occupational%20and%20respiratory%20hazards%20in%20a%20Minnesota%20cannabis%20cultivation%20and%20processing%20facility&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20industrial%20medicine&rft.au=Couch,%20James%20R.&rft.date=2019-10&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=874&rft.epage=882&rft.pages=874-882&rft.issn=0271-3586&rft.eissn=1097-0274&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ajim.23025&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2283882435%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2283882435&rft_id=info:pmid/31332812&rfr_iscdi=true |