Influences of assisted breathing and mechanical ventilator settings on tidal volume and alveolar pressures in acute respiratory distress syndrome: a bench study

To evaluate the influences of respiratory muscle efforts and respiratory rate setting in the ventilator on tidal volume and alveolar distending pressures at end inspiration and expiration in volume-controlled ventilation and pressure-controlled ventilation modes in acute respiratory distress syndrom...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Critical care science 2021-10, Vol.33 (4), p.572-582
Hauptverfasser: Vasconcelos, Renata Santos, Sales, Raquel Pinto, Lino, Juliana Arcanjo, Gomes, Luíza Gabriela de Carvalho, Sousa, Nancy Delma Silva Vega Canjura, Marinho, Liégina Silveira, Pinheiro, Bruno do Valle, Holanda, Marcelo Alcantara
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 582
container_issue 4
container_start_page 572
container_title Critical care science
container_volume 33
creator Vasconcelos, Renata Santos
Sales, Raquel Pinto
Lino, Juliana Arcanjo
Gomes, Luíza Gabriela de Carvalho
Sousa, Nancy Delma Silva Vega Canjura
Marinho, Liégina Silveira
Pinheiro, Bruno do Valle
Holanda, Marcelo Alcantara
description To evaluate the influences of respiratory muscle efforts and respiratory rate setting in the ventilator on tidal volume and alveolar distending pressures at end inspiration and expiration in volume-controlled ventilation and pressure-controlled ventilation modes in acute respiratory distress syndrome. An active test lung (ASL 5000™) connected to five intensive care unit ventilators was used in a model of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Respiratory muscle efforts (muscle pressure) were configured in three different ways: no effort (muscle pressure: 0cmH2O); inspiratory efforts only (muscle pressure:-5cmH2O, neural inspiratory time of 0.6s); and both inspiratory and expiratory muscle efforts (muscle pressure:-5/+5cmH2O). Volume-controlled and pressure-controlled ventilation modes were set to deliver a target tidal volume of 420mL and positive end-expiratory pressure of 10cmH2O. The tidal volume delivered to the lungs, alveolar pressures at the end of inspiration, and alveolar pressures at end expiration were evaluated. When triggered by the simulated patient, the median tidal volume was 27mL lower than the set tidal volume (range-63 to +79mL), and there was variation in alveolar pressures with a median of 25.4cmH2O (range 20.5 to 30cmH2O). In the simulated scenarios with both spontaneous inspiratory and expiratory muscle efforts and with a mandatory respiratory rate lower than the simulated patient's efforts, the median tidal volume was higher than controlled breathing. Adjusting respiratory muscle effort and pulmonary ventilator respiratory rate to a value above the patient's respiratory rate in assisted/controlled modes generated large variations in tidal volume and pulmonary pressures, while the controlled mode showed no variations in these outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.5935/0103-507X.20210084
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8889593</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>35081242</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1984-fdfb150346f3788cc273c502ae743a9afce190fa0393ca1b9a803b5150a586403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkd9qHSEQh6W0NIc0L9CL4gtsOup6VntRKKH5A4HctNA7mXU1x7LrHtQ9cN4mjxq3aUJyo8jM9xuHj5DPDM6lFvIrMBCNhO7POQfOAFT7jmyYVrxphZDvyYbrrWx417Un5CznvwDANRdMdB_JiZCgGG_5hjzcRD8uLlqX6ewp5hxycQPtk8OyC_GeYhzo5OwOY7A40oOLJYxY5kSzK6V2VDDSEoa1OI_L5P4hOB7cPGKi--RyXupBQ6Rol-JofexDWjOOdKjz1g6aj3FI8-S-UaR9_dCO5rIMx0_kg8cxu7P_9yn5ffnz18V1c3t3dXPx47axdem28YPvmQTRbr3olLKWd8JK4Oi6VqBGbx3T4BGEFhZZr1GB6GVFUKptC-KUfH_K3S_95AZb10w4mn0KE6ajmTGYt5UYduZ-PhillK5GagB_CrBpzjk5_8IyMKsysyozqzLzrKxCX15PfUGeBYlHzZaXLg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influences of assisted breathing and mechanical ventilator settings on tidal volume and alveolar pressures in acute respiratory distress syndrome: a bench study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Vasconcelos, Renata Santos ; Sales, Raquel Pinto ; Lino, Juliana Arcanjo ; Gomes, Luíza Gabriela de Carvalho ; Sousa, Nancy Delma Silva Vega Canjura ; Marinho, Liégina Silveira ; Pinheiro, Bruno do Valle ; Holanda, Marcelo Alcantara</creator><creatorcontrib>Vasconcelos, Renata Santos ; Sales, Raquel Pinto ; Lino, Juliana Arcanjo ; Gomes, Luíza Gabriela de Carvalho ; Sousa, Nancy Delma Silva Vega Canjura ; Marinho, Liégina Silveira ; Pinheiro, Bruno do Valle ; Holanda, Marcelo Alcantara</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate the influences of respiratory muscle efforts and respiratory rate setting in the ventilator on tidal volume and alveolar distending pressures at end inspiration and expiration in volume-controlled ventilation and pressure-controlled ventilation modes in acute respiratory distress syndrome. An active test lung (ASL 5000™) connected to five intensive care unit ventilators was used in a model of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Respiratory muscle efforts (muscle pressure) were configured in three different ways: no effort (muscle pressure: 0cmH2O); inspiratory efforts only (muscle pressure:-5cmH2O, neural inspiratory time of 0.6s); and both inspiratory and expiratory muscle efforts (muscle pressure:-5/+5cmH2O). Volume-controlled and pressure-controlled ventilation modes were set to deliver a target tidal volume of 420mL and positive end-expiratory pressure of 10cmH2O. The tidal volume delivered to the lungs, alveolar pressures at the end of inspiration, and alveolar pressures at end expiration were evaluated. When triggered by the simulated patient, the median tidal volume was 27mL lower than the set tidal volume (range-63 to +79mL), and there was variation in alveolar pressures with a median of 25.4cmH2O (range 20.5 to 30cmH2O). In the simulated scenarios with both spontaneous inspiratory and expiratory muscle efforts and with a mandatory respiratory rate lower than the simulated patient's efforts, the median tidal volume was higher than controlled breathing. Adjusting respiratory muscle effort and pulmonary ventilator respiratory rate to a value above the patient's respiratory rate in assisted/controlled modes generated large variations in tidal volume and pulmonary pressures, while the controlled mode showed no variations in these outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2965-2774</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0103-507X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1982-4335</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2965-2774</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5935/0103-507X.20210084</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35081242</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Brazil: Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira - AMIB</publisher><subject>Humans ; Lung ; Original ; Respiration, Artificial ; Respiratory Distress Syndrome - therapy ; Tidal Volume ; Ventilators, Mechanical</subject><ispartof>Critical care science, 2021-10, Vol.33 (4), p.572-582</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0003-0481-0695 ; 0000-0002-5288-3533</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8889593/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8889593/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35081242$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vasconcelos, Renata Santos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sales, Raquel Pinto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lino, Juliana Arcanjo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomes, Luíza Gabriela de Carvalho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sousa, Nancy Delma Silva Vega Canjura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marinho, Liégina Silveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinheiro, Bruno do Valle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holanda, Marcelo Alcantara</creatorcontrib><title>Influences of assisted breathing and mechanical ventilator settings on tidal volume and alveolar pressures in acute respiratory distress syndrome: a bench study</title><title>Critical care science</title><addtitle>Rev Bras Ter Intensiva</addtitle><description>To evaluate the influences of respiratory muscle efforts and respiratory rate setting in the ventilator on tidal volume and alveolar distending pressures at end inspiration and expiration in volume-controlled ventilation and pressure-controlled ventilation modes in acute respiratory distress syndrome. An active test lung (ASL 5000™) connected to five intensive care unit ventilators was used in a model of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Respiratory muscle efforts (muscle pressure) were configured in three different ways: no effort (muscle pressure: 0cmH2O); inspiratory efforts only (muscle pressure:-5cmH2O, neural inspiratory time of 0.6s); and both inspiratory and expiratory muscle efforts (muscle pressure:-5/+5cmH2O). Volume-controlled and pressure-controlled ventilation modes were set to deliver a target tidal volume of 420mL and positive end-expiratory pressure of 10cmH2O. The tidal volume delivered to the lungs, alveolar pressures at the end of inspiration, and alveolar pressures at end expiration were evaluated. When triggered by the simulated patient, the median tidal volume was 27mL lower than the set tidal volume (range-63 to +79mL), and there was variation in alveolar pressures with a median of 25.4cmH2O (range 20.5 to 30cmH2O). In the simulated scenarios with both spontaneous inspiratory and expiratory muscle efforts and with a mandatory respiratory rate lower than the simulated patient's efforts, the median tidal volume was higher than controlled breathing. Adjusting respiratory muscle effort and pulmonary ventilator respiratory rate to a value above the patient's respiratory rate in assisted/controlled modes generated large variations in tidal volume and pulmonary pressures, while the controlled mode showed no variations in these outcomes.</description><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lung</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Respiration, Artificial</subject><subject>Respiratory Distress Syndrome - therapy</subject><subject>Tidal Volume</subject><subject>Ventilators, Mechanical</subject><issn>2965-2774</issn><issn>0103-507X</issn><issn>1982-4335</issn><issn>2965-2774</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkd9qHSEQh6W0NIc0L9CL4gtsOup6VntRKKH5A4HctNA7mXU1x7LrHtQ9cN4mjxq3aUJyo8jM9xuHj5DPDM6lFvIrMBCNhO7POQfOAFT7jmyYVrxphZDvyYbrrWx417Un5CznvwDANRdMdB_JiZCgGG_5hjzcRD8uLlqX6ewp5hxycQPtk8OyC_GeYhzo5OwOY7A40oOLJYxY5kSzK6V2VDDSEoa1OI_L5P4hOB7cPGKi--RyXupBQ6Rol-JofexDWjOOdKjz1g6aj3FI8-S-UaR9_dCO5rIMx0_kg8cxu7P_9yn5ffnz18V1c3t3dXPx47axdem28YPvmQTRbr3olLKWd8JK4Oi6VqBGbx3T4BGEFhZZr1GB6GVFUKptC-KUfH_K3S_95AZb10w4mn0KE6ajmTGYt5UYduZ-PhillK5GagB_CrBpzjk5_8IyMKsysyozqzLzrKxCX15PfUGeBYlHzZaXLg</recordid><startdate>202110</startdate><enddate>202110</enddate><creator>Vasconcelos, Renata Santos</creator><creator>Sales, Raquel Pinto</creator><creator>Lino, Juliana Arcanjo</creator><creator>Gomes, Luíza Gabriela de Carvalho</creator><creator>Sousa, Nancy Delma Silva Vega Canjura</creator><creator>Marinho, Liégina Silveira</creator><creator>Pinheiro, Bruno do Valle</creator><creator>Holanda, Marcelo Alcantara</creator><general>Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira - AMIB</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0481-0695</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5288-3533</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202110</creationdate><title>Influences of assisted breathing and mechanical ventilator settings on tidal volume and alveolar pressures in acute respiratory distress syndrome: a bench study</title><author>Vasconcelos, Renata Santos ; Sales, Raquel Pinto ; Lino, Juliana Arcanjo ; Gomes, Luíza Gabriela de Carvalho ; Sousa, Nancy Delma Silva Vega Canjura ; Marinho, Liégina Silveira ; Pinheiro, Bruno do Valle ; Holanda, Marcelo Alcantara</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1984-fdfb150346f3788cc273c502ae743a9afce190fa0393ca1b9a803b5150a586403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lung</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Respiration, Artificial</topic><topic>Respiratory Distress Syndrome - therapy</topic><topic>Tidal Volume</topic><topic>Ventilators, Mechanical</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vasconcelos, Renata Santos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sales, Raquel Pinto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lino, Juliana Arcanjo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomes, Luíza Gabriela de Carvalho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sousa, Nancy Delma Silva Vega Canjura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marinho, Liégina Silveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinheiro, Bruno do Valle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holanda, Marcelo Alcantara</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Critical care science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vasconcelos, Renata Santos</au><au>Sales, Raquel Pinto</au><au>Lino, Juliana Arcanjo</au><au>Gomes, Luíza Gabriela de Carvalho</au><au>Sousa, Nancy Delma Silva Vega Canjura</au><au>Marinho, Liégina Silveira</au><au>Pinheiro, Bruno do Valle</au><au>Holanda, Marcelo Alcantara</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influences of assisted breathing and mechanical ventilator settings on tidal volume and alveolar pressures in acute respiratory distress syndrome: a bench study</atitle><jtitle>Critical care science</jtitle><addtitle>Rev Bras Ter Intensiva</addtitle><date>2021-10</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>572</spage><epage>582</epage><pages>572-582</pages><issn>2965-2774</issn><issn>0103-507X</issn><eissn>1982-4335</eissn><eissn>2965-2774</eissn><abstract>To evaluate the influences of respiratory muscle efforts and respiratory rate setting in the ventilator on tidal volume and alveolar distending pressures at end inspiration and expiration in volume-controlled ventilation and pressure-controlled ventilation modes in acute respiratory distress syndrome. An active test lung (ASL 5000™) connected to five intensive care unit ventilators was used in a model of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Respiratory muscle efforts (muscle pressure) were configured in three different ways: no effort (muscle pressure: 0cmH2O); inspiratory efforts only (muscle pressure:-5cmH2O, neural inspiratory time of 0.6s); and both inspiratory and expiratory muscle efforts (muscle pressure:-5/+5cmH2O). Volume-controlled and pressure-controlled ventilation modes were set to deliver a target tidal volume of 420mL and positive end-expiratory pressure of 10cmH2O. The tidal volume delivered to the lungs, alveolar pressures at the end of inspiration, and alveolar pressures at end expiration were evaluated. When triggered by the simulated patient, the median tidal volume was 27mL lower than the set tidal volume (range-63 to +79mL), and there was variation in alveolar pressures with a median of 25.4cmH2O (range 20.5 to 30cmH2O). In the simulated scenarios with both spontaneous inspiratory and expiratory muscle efforts and with a mandatory respiratory rate lower than the simulated patient's efforts, the median tidal volume was higher than controlled breathing. Adjusting respiratory muscle effort and pulmonary ventilator respiratory rate to a value above the patient's respiratory rate in assisted/controlled modes generated large variations in tidal volume and pulmonary pressures, while the controlled mode showed no variations in these outcomes.</abstract><cop>Brazil</cop><pub>Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira - AMIB</pub><pmid>35081242</pmid><doi>10.5935/0103-507X.20210084</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0481-0695</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5288-3533</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2965-2774
ispartof Critical care science, 2021-10, Vol.33 (4), p.572-582
issn 2965-2774
0103-507X
1982-4335
2965-2774
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8889593
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Humans
Lung
Original
Respiration, Artificial
Respiratory Distress Syndrome - therapy
Tidal Volume
Ventilators, Mechanical
title Influences of assisted breathing and mechanical ventilator settings on tidal volume and alveolar pressures in acute respiratory distress syndrome: a bench study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T15%3A37%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influences%20of%20assisted%20breathing%20and%20mechanical%20ventilator%20settings%20on%20tidal%20volume%20and%20alveolar%20pressures%20in%20acute%20respiratory%20distress%20syndrome:%20a%20bench%20study&rft.jtitle=Critical%20care%20science&rft.au=Vasconcelos,%20Renata%20Santos&rft.date=2021-10&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=572&rft.epage=582&rft.pages=572-582&rft.issn=2965-2774&rft.eissn=1982-4335&rft_id=info:doi/10.5935/0103-507X.20210084&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E35081242%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/35081242&rfr_iscdi=true