Feasibility of Single-Time-Point Dosimetry for Radiopharmaceutical Therapies

Because of challenges in performing routine personalized dosimetry in radiopharmaceutical therapies, interest in single-time-point (STP) dosimetry, particularly using only a single SPECT scan, is on the rise. Meanwhile, there are questions about the reliability of STP dosimetry, with limited indepen...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2021-07, Vol.62 (7), p.1006-1011
Hauptverfasser: Hou, Xinchi, Brosch, Julia, Uribe, Carlos, Desy, Alessandro, Böning, Guido, Beauregard, Jean-Mathieu, Celler, Anna, Rahmim, Arman
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1011
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1006
container_title Journal of Nuclear Medicine
container_volume 62
creator Hou, Xinchi
Brosch, Julia
Uribe, Carlos
Desy, Alessandro
Böning, Guido
Beauregard, Jean-Mathieu
Celler, Anna
Rahmim, Arman
description Because of challenges in performing routine personalized dosimetry in radiopharmaceutical therapies, interest in single-time-point (STP) dosimetry, particularly using only a single SPECT scan, is on the rise. Meanwhile, there are questions about the reliability of STP dosimetry, with limited independent validations. In the present work, we analyzed 2 STP dosimetry methods and evaluated dose errors for several radiopharmaceuticals based on effective half-life distributions. We first challenged the common assumption that radiopharmaceutical effective half-lives across the population are gaussian-distributed (i.e., follow a normal distribution). Then, dose accuracy was estimated using 2 STP dosimetry methods for a wide range of potential post injection (p.i.) scan time points for different radiopharmaceuticals applied to neuroendocrine tumors and prostate cancer. The accuracy and limitations of each of the STP methods were discussed. A lognormal distribution was more appropriate for capturing effective half-life distributions. The STP framework was promising for dosimetry of Lu-DOTATATE and for kidney dosimetry of different radiopharmaceuticals (errors < 30%). Meanwhile, for some radiopharmaceuticals, STP accuracy was compromised (e.g., in bone marrow and tumors for -labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen [PSMA])). The optimal SPECT scanning time for Lu-DOTATATE was approximately 72 h p.i., whereas 48 h p.i. was better for Lu-PSMA. Simplified STP dosimetry methods may compromise the accuracy of dose estimates, with some exceptions, such as for Lu-DOTATATE and for kidney dosimetry in different radiopharmaceuticals. Simplified personalized dosimetry in the clinic continues to be challenging. On the basis of our results, we make suggestions and recommendations for improved personalized dosimetry using simplified imaging schemes.
doi_str_mv 10.2967/jnumed.120.254656
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8882881</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2456431256</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-3ca25dcc194ef9ef9682a640793031b582c5aa85ee33e4a0bac3e10bf27669723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkdGL1DAQxoMo3nr6B_giBV986ZlMOmn7IsiddwoLiq7PYZqd3mZpmzVphf3vjezdob4IgTDMNx_zzU-Il0peQGvqt_tpGXl7oSDXWBk0j8RKocYSjakfi5VURpWIEs_Es5T2UkrTNM1Tcaa1gtoArsT6min5zg9-PhahL7756XbgcuNHLr8EP83FVUi5mOOx6EMsvtLWh8OO4kiOl9k7GorNjiMdPKfn4klPQ-IXd_-5-H79YXP5sVx_vvl0-X5dugpxLrUjwK1zqq24b_MzDZCpZN1qqVWHDTgkapBZa65IduQ0K9n1eWfT1qDPxbuT72Hp8gEcT3OkwR6iHykebSBv_-5Mfmdvw0-b00PTqGzw5s4ghh8Lp9mOPjkeBpo4LMlChabKN0KTpa__ke7DEqcczwKilgAa_qcCaBFqnVXqpHIxpBS5f1hZSfubqD0RtZmoPRHNM6_-zPowcY9Q_wKDYp23</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2552295273</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Feasibility of Single-Time-Point Dosimetry for Radiopharmaceutical Therapies</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Hou, Xinchi ; Brosch, Julia ; Uribe, Carlos ; Desy, Alessandro ; Böning, Guido ; Beauregard, Jean-Mathieu ; Celler, Anna ; Rahmim, Arman</creator><creatorcontrib>Hou, Xinchi ; Brosch, Julia ; Uribe, Carlos ; Desy, Alessandro ; Böning, Guido ; Beauregard, Jean-Mathieu ; Celler, Anna ; Rahmim, Arman</creatorcontrib><description>Because of challenges in performing routine personalized dosimetry in radiopharmaceutical therapies, interest in single-time-point (STP) dosimetry, particularly using only a single SPECT scan, is on the rise. Meanwhile, there are questions about the reliability of STP dosimetry, with limited independent validations. In the present work, we analyzed 2 STP dosimetry methods and evaluated dose errors for several radiopharmaceuticals based on effective half-life distributions. We first challenged the common assumption that radiopharmaceutical effective half-lives across the population are gaussian-distributed (i.e., follow a normal distribution). Then, dose accuracy was estimated using 2 STP dosimetry methods for a wide range of potential post injection (p.i.) scan time points for different radiopharmaceuticals applied to neuroendocrine tumors and prostate cancer. The accuracy and limitations of each of the STP methods were discussed. A lognormal distribution was more appropriate for capturing effective half-life distributions. The STP framework was promising for dosimetry of Lu-DOTATATE and for kidney dosimetry of different radiopharmaceuticals (errors &lt; 30%). Meanwhile, for some radiopharmaceuticals, STP accuracy was compromised (e.g., in bone marrow and tumors for -labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen [PSMA])). The optimal SPECT scanning time for Lu-DOTATATE was approximately 72 h p.i., whereas 48 h p.i. was better for Lu-PSMA. Simplified STP dosimetry methods may compromise the accuracy of dose estimates, with some exceptions, such as for Lu-DOTATATE and for kidney dosimetry in different radiopharmaceuticals. Simplified personalized dosimetry in the clinic continues to be challenging. On the basis of our results, we make suggestions and recommendations for improved personalized dosimetry using simplified imaging schemes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-5505</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1535-5667</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-5667</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2159-662X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.254656</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33127625</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Society of Nuclear Medicine</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Antigens ; Bone marrow ; Bone tumors ; Customization ; Dosimeters ; Dosimetry ; Feasibility Studies ; Half-Life ; Humans ; Kidneys ; Lutetium isotopes ; Male ; Neuroendocrine tumors ; Neuroendocrine Tumors - diagnostic imaging ; Neuroendocrine Tumors - radiotherapy ; Normal distribution ; Pharmaceuticals ; Prostate ; Prostate cancer ; Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Radiobiology/Dosimetry ; Radiochemical analysis ; Radioisotopes ; Radiometry ; Radiopharmaceuticals - therapeutic use ; Reproducibility of Results ; Single photon emission computed tomography ; Time Factors ; Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 2021-07, Vol.62 (7), p.1006-1011</ispartof><rights>2021 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.</rights><rights>Copyright Society of Nuclear Medicine Jul 1, 2021</rights><rights>2021 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-3ca25dcc194ef9ef9682a640793031b582c5aa85ee33e4a0bac3e10bf27669723</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-3ca25dcc194ef9ef9682a640793031b582c5aa85ee33e4a0bac3e10bf27669723</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33127625$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hou, Xinchi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brosch, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uribe, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Desy, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Böning, Guido</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beauregard, Jean-Mathieu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Celler, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahmim, Arman</creatorcontrib><title>Feasibility of Single-Time-Point Dosimetry for Radiopharmaceutical Therapies</title><title>Journal of Nuclear Medicine</title><addtitle>J Nucl Med</addtitle><description>Because of challenges in performing routine personalized dosimetry in radiopharmaceutical therapies, interest in single-time-point (STP) dosimetry, particularly using only a single SPECT scan, is on the rise. Meanwhile, there are questions about the reliability of STP dosimetry, with limited independent validations. In the present work, we analyzed 2 STP dosimetry methods and evaluated dose errors for several radiopharmaceuticals based on effective half-life distributions. We first challenged the common assumption that radiopharmaceutical effective half-lives across the population are gaussian-distributed (i.e., follow a normal distribution). Then, dose accuracy was estimated using 2 STP dosimetry methods for a wide range of potential post injection (p.i.) scan time points for different radiopharmaceuticals applied to neuroendocrine tumors and prostate cancer. The accuracy and limitations of each of the STP methods were discussed. A lognormal distribution was more appropriate for capturing effective half-life distributions. The STP framework was promising for dosimetry of Lu-DOTATATE and for kidney dosimetry of different radiopharmaceuticals (errors &lt; 30%). Meanwhile, for some radiopharmaceuticals, STP accuracy was compromised (e.g., in bone marrow and tumors for -labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen [PSMA])). The optimal SPECT scanning time for Lu-DOTATATE was approximately 72 h p.i., whereas 48 h p.i. was better for Lu-PSMA. Simplified STP dosimetry methods may compromise the accuracy of dose estimates, with some exceptions, such as for Lu-DOTATATE and for kidney dosimetry in different radiopharmaceuticals. Simplified personalized dosimetry in the clinic continues to be challenging. On the basis of our results, we make suggestions and recommendations for improved personalized dosimetry using simplified imaging schemes.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>Bone marrow</subject><subject>Bone tumors</subject><subject>Customization</subject><subject>Dosimeters</subject><subject>Dosimetry</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Half-Life</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidneys</subject><subject>Lutetium isotopes</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Neuroendocrine tumors</subject><subject>Neuroendocrine Tumors - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Neuroendocrine Tumors - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Normal distribution</subject><subject>Pharmaceuticals</subject><subject>Prostate</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Radiobiology/Dosimetry</subject><subject>Radiochemical analysis</subject><subject>Radioisotopes</subject><subject>Radiometry</subject><subject>Radiopharmaceuticals - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Single photon emission computed tomography</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0161-5505</issn><issn>1535-5667</issn><issn>1535-5667</issn><issn>2159-662X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkdGL1DAQxoMo3nr6B_giBV986ZlMOmn7IsiddwoLiq7PYZqd3mZpmzVphf3vjezdob4IgTDMNx_zzU-Il0peQGvqt_tpGXl7oSDXWBk0j8RKocYSjakfi5VURpWIEs_Es5T2UkrTNM1Tcaa1gtoArsT6min5zg9-PhahL7756XbgcuNHLr8EP83FVUi5mOOx6EMsvtLWh8OO4kiOl9k7GorNjiMdPKfn4klPQ-IXd_-5-H79YXP5sVx_vvl0-X5dugpxLrUjwK1zqq24b_MzDZCpZN1qqVWHDTgkapBZa65IduQ0K9n1eWfT1qDPxbuT72Hp8gEcT3OkwR6iHykebSBv_-5Mfmdvw0-b00PTqGzw5s4ghh8Lp9mOPjkeBpo4LMlChabKN0KTpa__ke7DEqcczwKilgAa_qcCaBFqnVXqpHIxpBS5f1hZSfubqD0RtZmoPRHNM6_-zPowcY9Q_wKDYp23</recordid><startdate>20210701</startdate><enddate>20210701</enddate><creator>Hou, Xinchi</creator><creator>Brosch, Julia</creator><creator>Uribe, Carlos</creator><creator>Desy, Alessandro</creator><creator>Böning, Guido</creator><creator>Beauregard, Jean-Mathieu</creator><creator>Celler, Anna</creator><creator>Rahmim, Arman</creator><general>Society of Nuclear Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210701</creationdate><title>Feasibility of Single-Time-Point Dosimetry for Radiopharmaceutical Therapies</title><author>Hou, Xinchi ; Brosch, Julia ; Uribe, Carlos ; Desy, Alessandro ; Böning, Guido ; Beauregard, Jean-Mathieu ; Celler, Anna ; Rahmim, Arman</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-3ca25dcc194ef9ef9682a640793031b582c5aa85ee33e4a0bac3e10bf27669723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>Bone marrow</topic><topic>Bone tumors</topic><topic>Customization</topic><topic>Dosimeters</topic><topic>Dosimetry</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Half-Life</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidneys</topic><topic>Lutetium isotopes</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Neuroendocrine tumors</topic><topic>Neuroendocrine Tumors - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Neuroendocrine Tumors - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Normal distribution</topic><topic>Pharmaceuticals</topic><topic>Prostate</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Radiobiology/Dosimetry</topic><topic>Radiochemical analysis</topic><topic>Radioisotopes</topic><topic>Radiometry</topic><topic>Radiopharmaceuticals - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Single photon emission computed tomography</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hou, Xinchi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brosch, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uribe, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Desy, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Böning, Guido</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beauregard, Jean-Mathieu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Celler, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahmim, Arman</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of Nuclear Medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hou, Xinchi</au><au>Brosch, Julia</au><au>Uribe, Carlos</au><au>Desy, Alessandro</au><au>Böning, Guido</au><au>Beauregard, Jean-Mathieu</au><au>Celler, Anna</au><au>Rahmim, Arman</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Feasibility of Single-Time-Point Dosimetry for Radiopharmaceutical Therapies</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Nuclear Medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Nucl Med</addtitle><date>2021-07-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1006</spage><epage>1011</epage><pages>1006-1011</pages><issn>0161-5505</issn><issn>1535-5667</issn><eissn>1535-5667</eissn><eissn>2159-662X</eissn><abstract>Because of challenges in performing routine personalized dosimetry in radiopharmaceutical therapies, interest in single-time-point (STP) dosimetry, particularly using only a single SPECT scan, is on the rise. Meanwhile, there are questions about the reliability of STP dosimetry, with limited independent validations. In the present work, we analyzed 2 STP dosimetry methods and evaluated dose errors for several radiopharmaceuticals based on effective half-life distributions. We first challenged the common assumption that radiopharmaceutical effective half-lives across the population are gaussian-distributed (i.e., follow a normal distribution). Then, dose accuracy was estimated using 2 STP dosimetry methods for a wide range of potential post injection (p.i.) scan time points for different radiopharmaceuticals applied to neuroendocrine tumors and prostate cancer. The accuracy and limitations of each of the STP methods were discussed. A lognormal distribution was more appropriate for capturing effective half-life distributions. The STP framework was promising for dosimetry of Lu-DOTATATE and for kidney dosimetry of different radiopharmaceuticals (errors &lt; 30%). Meanwhile, for some radiopharmaceuticals, STP accuracy was compromised (e.g., in bone marrow and tumors for -labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen [PSMA])). The optimal SPECT scanning time for Lu-DOTATATE was approximately 72 h p.i., whereas 48 h p.i. was better for Lu-PSMA. Simplified STP dosimetry methods may compromise the accuracy of dose estimates, with some exceptions, such as for Lu-DOTATATE and for kidney dosimetry in different radiopharmaceuticals. Simplified personalized dosimetry in the clinic continues to be challenging. On the basis of our results, we make suggestions and recommendations for improved personalized dosimetry using simplified imaging schemes.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Society of Nuclear Medicine</pub><pmid>33127625</pmid><doi>10.2967/jnumed.120.254656</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0161-5505
ispartof Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 2021-07, Vol.62 (7), p.1006-1011
issn 0161-5505
1535-5667
1535-5667
2159-662X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8882881
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Accuracy
Antigens
Bone marrow
Bone tumors
Customization
Dosimeters
Dosimetry
Feasibility Studies
Half-Life
Humans
Kidneys
Lutetium isotopes
Male
Neuroendocrine tumors
Neuroendocrine Tumors - diagnostic imaging
Neuroendocrine Tumors - radiotherapy
Normal distribution
Pharmaceuticals
Prostate
Prostate cancer
Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy
Radiobiology/Dosimetry
Radiochemical analysis
Radioisotopes
Radiometry
Radiopharmaceuticals - therapeutic use
Reproducibility of Results
Single photon emission computed tomography
Time Factors
Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon
Tumors
title Feasibility of Single-Time-Point Dosimetry for Radiopharmaceutical Therapies
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T02%3A49%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Feasibility%20of%20Single-Time-Point%20Dosimetry%20for%20Radiopharmaceutical%20Therapies&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Nuclear%20Medicine&rft.au=Hou,%20Xinchi&rft.date=2021-07-01&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1006&rft.epage=1011&rft.pages=1006-1011&rft.issn=0161-5505&rft.eissn=1535-5667&rft_id=info:doi/10.2967/jnumed.120.254656&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2456431256%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2552295273&rft_id=info:pmid/33127625&rfr_iscdi=true