Feasibility of Single-Time-Point Dosimetry for Radiopharmaceutical Therapies
Because of challenges in performing routine personalized dosimetry in radiopharmaceutical therapies, interest in single-time-point (STP) dosimetry, particularly using only a single SPECT scan, is on the rise. Meanwhile, there are questions about the reliability of STP dosimetry, with limited indepen...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2021-07, Vol.62 (7), p.1006-1011 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1011 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1006 |
container_title | Journal of Nuclear Medicine |
container_volume | 62 |
creator | Hou, Xinchi Brosch, Julia Uribe, Carlos Desy, Alessandro Böning, Guido Beauregard, Jean-Mathieu Celler, Anna Rahmim, Arman |
description | Because of challenges in performing routine personalized dosimetry in radiopharmaceutical therapies, interest in single-time-point (STP) dosimetry, particularly using only a single SPECT scan, is on the rise. Meanwhile, there are questions about the reliability of STP dosimetry, with limited independent validations. In the present work, we analyzed 2 STP dosimetry methods and evaluated dose errors for several radiopharmaceuticals based on effective half-life distributions.
We first challenged the common assumption that radiopharmaceutical effective half-lives across the population are gaussian-distributed (i.e., follow a normal distribution). Then, dose accuracy was estimated using 2 STP dosimetry methods for a wide range of potential post injection (p.i.) scan time points for different radiopharmaceuticals applied to neuroendocrine tumors and prostate cancer. The accuracy and limitations of each of the STP methods were discussed.
A lognormal distribution was more appropriate for capturing effective half-life distributions. The STP framework was promising for dosimetry of
Lu-DOTATATE and for kidney dosimetry of different radiopharmaceuticals (errors < 30%). Meanwhile, for some radiopharmaceuticals, STP accuracy was compromised (e.g., in bone marrow and tumors for
-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen [PSMA])). The optimal SPECT scanning time for
Lu-DOTATATE was approximately 72 h p.i., whereas 48 h p.i. was better for
Lu-PSMA.
Simplified STP dosimetry methods may compromise the accuracy of dose estimates, with some exceptions, such as for
Lu-DOTATATE and for kidney dosimetry in different radiopharmaceuticals. Simplified personalized dosimetry in the clinic continues to be challenging. On the basis of our results, we make suggestions and recommendations for improved personalized dosimetry using simplified imaging schemes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2967/jnumed.120.254656 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8882881</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2456431256</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-3ca25dcc194ef9ef9682a640793031b582c5aa85ee33e4a0bac3e10bf27669723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkdGL1DAQxoMo3nr6B_giBV986ZlMOmn7IsiddwoLiq7PYZqd3mZpmzVphf3vjezdob4IgTDMNx_zzU-Il0peQGvqt_tpGXl7oSDXWBk0j8RKocYSjakfi5VURpWIEs_Es5T2UkrTNM1Tcaa1gtoArsT6min5zg9-PhahL7756XbgcuNHLr8EP83FVUi5mOOx6EMsvtLWh8OO4kiOl9k7GorNjiMdPKfn4klPQ-IXd_-5-H79YXP5sVx_vvl0-X5dugpxLrUjwK1zqq24b_MzDZCpZN1qqVWHDTgkapBZa65IduQ0K9n1eWfT1qDPxbuT72Hp8gEcT3OkwR6iHykebSBv_-5Mfmdvw0-b00PTqGzw5s4ghh8Lp9mOPjkeBpo4LMlChabKN0KTpa__ke7DEqcczwKilgAa_qcCaBFqnVXqpHIxpBS5f1hZSfubqD0RtZmoPRHNM6_-zPowcY9Q_wKDYp23</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2552295273</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Feasibility of Single-Time-Point Dosimetry for Radiopharmaceutical Therapies</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Hou, Xinchi ; Brosch, Julia ; Uribe, Carlos ; Desy, Alessandro ; Böning, Guido ; Beauregard, Jean-Mathieu ; Celler, Anna ; Rahmim, Arman</creator><creatorcontrib>Hou, Xinchi ; Brosch, Julia ; Uribe, Carlos ; Desy, Alessandro ; Böning, Guido ; Beauregard, Jean-Mathieu ; Celler, Anna ; Rahmim, Arman</creatorcontrib><description>Because of challenges in performing routine personalized dosimetry in radiopharmaceutical therapies, interest in single-time-point (STP) dosimetry, particularly using only a single SPECT scan, is on the rise. Meanwhile, there are questions about the reliability of STP dosimetry, with limited independent validations. In the present work, we analyzed 2 STP dosimetry methods and evaluated dose errors for several radiopharmaceuticals based on effective half-life distributions.
We first challenged the common assumption that radiopharmaceutical effective half-lives across the population are gaussian-distributed (i.e., follow a normal distribution). Then, dose accuracy was estimated using 2 STP dosimetry methods for a wide range of potential post injection (p.i.) scan time points for different radiopharmaceuticals applied to neuroendocrine tumors and prostate cancer. The accuracy and limitations of each of the STP methods were discussed.
A lognormal distribution was more appropriate for capturing effective half-life distributions. The STP framework was promising for dosimetry of
Lu-DOTATATE and for kidney dosimetry of different radiopharmaceuticals (errors < 30%). Meanwhile, for some radiopharmaceuticals, STP accuracy was compromised (e.g., in bone marrow and tumors for
-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen [PSMA])). The optimal SPECT scanning time for
Lu-DOTATATE was approximately 72 h p.i., whereas 48 h p.i. was better for
Lu-PSMA.
Simplified STP dosimetry methods may compromise the accuracy of dose estimates, with some exceptions, such as for
Lu-DOTATATE and for kidney dosimetry in different radiopharmaceuticals. Simplified personalized dosimetry in the clinic continues to be challenging. On the basis of our results, we make suggestions and recommendations for improved personalized dosimetry using simplified imaging schemes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-5505</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1535-5667</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-5667</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2159-662X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.254656</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33127625</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Society of Nuclear Medicine</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Antigens ; Bone marrow ; Bone tumors ; Customization ; Dosimeters ; Dosimetry ; Feasibility Studies ; Half-Life ; Humans ; Kidneys ; Lutetium isotopes ; Male ; Neuroendocrine tumors ; Neuroendocrine Tumors - diagnostic imaging ; Neuroendocrine Tumors - radiotherapy ; Normal distribution ; Pharmaceuticals ; Prostate ; Prostate cancer ; Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Radiobiology/Dosimetry ; Radiochemical analysis ; Radioisotopes ; Radiometry ; Radiopharmaceuticals - therapeutic use ; Reproducibility of Results ; Single photon emission computed tomography ; Time Factors ; Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 2021-07, Vol.62 (7), p.1006-1011</ispartof><rights>2021 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.</rights><rights>Copyright Society of Nuclear Medicine Jul 1, 2021</rights><rights>2021 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-3ca25dcc194ef9ef9682a640793031b582c5aa85ee33e4a0bac3e10bf27669723</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-3ca25dcc194ef9ef9682a640793031b582c5aa85ee33e4a0bac3e10bf27669723</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33127625$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hou, Xinchi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brosch, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uribe, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Desy, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Böning, Guido</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beauregard, Jean-Mathieu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Celler, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahmim, Arman</creatorcontrib><title>Feasibility of Single-Time-Point Dosimetry for Radiopharmaceutical Therapies</title><title>Journal of Nuclear Medicine</title><addtitle>J Nucl Med</addtitle><description>Because of challenges in performing routine personalized dosimetry in radiopharmaceutical therapies, interest in single-time-point (STP) dosimetry, particularly using only a single SPECT scan, is on the rise. Meanwhile, there are questions about the reliability of STP dosimetry, with limited independent validations. In the present work, we analyzed 2 STP dosimetry methods and evaluated dose errors for several radiopharmaceuticals based on effective half-life distributions.
We first challenged the common assumption that radiopharmaceutical effective half-lives across the population are gaussian-distributed (i.e., follow a normal distribution). Then, dose accuracy was estimated using 2 STP dosimetry methods for a wide range of potential post injection (p.i.) scan time points for different radiopharmaceuticals applied to neuroendocrine tumors and prostate cancer. The accuracy and limitations of each of the STP methods were discussed.
A lognormal distribution was more appropriate for capturing effective half-life distributions. The STP framework was promising for dosimetry of
Lu-DOTATATE and for kidney dosimetry of different radiopharmaceuticals (errors < 30%). Meanwhile, for some radiopharmaceuticals, STP accuracy was compromised (e.g., in bone marrow and tumors for
-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen [PSMA])). The optimal SPECT scanning time for
Lu-DOTATATE was approximately 72 h p.i., whereas 48 h p.i. was better for
Lu-PSMA.
Simplified STP dosimetry methods may compromise the accuracy of dose estimates, with some exceptions, such as for
Lu-DOTATATE and for kidney dosimetry in different radiopharmaceuticals. Simplified personalized dosimetry in the clinic continues to be challenging. On the basis of our results, we make suggestions and recommendations for improved personalized dosimetry using simplified imaging schemes.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>Bone marrow</subject><subject>Bone tumors</subject><subject>Customization</subject><subject>Dosimeters</subject><subject>Dosimetry</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Half-Life</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidneys</subject><subject>Lutetium isotopes</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Neuroendocrine tumors</subject><subject>Neuroendocrine Tumors - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Neuroendocrine Tumors - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Normal distribution</subject><subject>Pharmaceuticals</subject><subject>Prostate</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Radiobiology/Dosimetry</subject><subject>Radiochemical analysis</subject><subject>Radioisotopes</subject><subject>Radiometry</subject><subject>Radiopharmaceuticals - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Single photon emission computed tomography</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0161-5505</issn><issn>1535-5667</issn><issn>1535-5667</issn><issn>2159-662X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkdGL1DAQxoMo3nr6B_giBV986ZlMOmn7IsiddwoLiq7PYZqd3mZpmzVphf3vjezdob4IgTDMNx_zzU-Il0peQGvqt_tpGXl7oSDXWBk0j8RKocYSjakfi5VURpWIEs_Es5T2UkrTNM1Tcaa1gtoArsT6min5zg9-PhahL7756XbgcuNHLr8EP83FVUi5mOOx6EMsvtLWh8OO4kiOl9k7GorNjiMdPKfn4klPQ-IXd_-5-H79YXP5sVx_vvl0-X5dugpxLrUjwK1zqq24b_MzDZCpZN1qqVWHDTgkapBZa65IduQ0K9n1eWfT1qDPxbuT72Hp8gEcT3OkwR6iHykebSBv_-5Mfmdvw0-b00PTqGzw5s4ghh8Lp9mOPjkeBpo4LMlChabKN0KTpa__ke7DEqcczwKilgAa_qcCaBFqnVXqpHIxpBS5f1hZSfubqD0RtZmoPRHNM6_-zPowcY9Q_wKDYp23</recordid><startdate>20210701</startdate><enddate>20210701</enddate><creator>Hou, Xinchi</creator><creator>Brosch, Julia</creator><creator>Uribe, Carlos</creator><creator>Desy, Alessandro</creator><creator>Böning, Guido</creator><creator>Beauregard, Jean-Mathieu</creator><creator>Celler, Anna</creator><creator>Rahmim, Arman</creator><general>Society of Nuclear Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210701</creationdate><title>Feasibility of Single-Time-Point Dosimetry for Radiopharmaceutical Therapies</title><author>Hou, Xinchi ; Brosch, Julia ; Uribe, Carlos ; Desy, Alessandro ; Böning, Guido ; Beauregard, Jean-Mathieu ; Celler, Anna ; Rahmim, Arman</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-3ca25dcc194ef9ef9682a640793031b582c5aa85ee33e4a0bac3e10bf27669723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>Bone marrow</topic><topic>Bone tumors</topic><topic>Customization</topic><topic>Dosimeters</topic><topic>Dosimetry</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Half-Life</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidneys</topic><topic>Lutetium isotopes</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Neuroendocrine tumors</topic><topic>Neuroendocrine Tumors - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Neuroendocrine Tumors - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Normal distribution</topic><topic>Pharmaceuticals</topic><topic>Prostate</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Radiobiology/Dosimetry</topic><topic>Radiochemical analysis</topic><topic>Radioisotopes</topic><topic>Radiometry</topic><topic>Radiopharmaceuticals - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Single photon emission computed tomography</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hou, Xinchi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brosch, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uribe, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Desy, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Böning, Guido</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beauregard, Jean-Mathieu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Celler, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahmim, Arman</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of Nuclear Medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hou, Xinchi</au><au>Brosch, Julia</au><au>Uribe, Carlos</au><au>Desy, Alessandro</au><au>Böning, Guido</au><au>Beauregard, Jean-Mathieu</au><au>Celler, Anna</au><au>Rahmim, Arman</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Feasibility of Single-Time-Point Dosimetry for Radiopharmaceutical Therapies</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Nuclear Medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Nucl Med</addtitle><date>2021-07-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1006</spage><epage>1011</epage><pages>1006-1011</pages><issn>0161-5505</issn><issn>1535-5667</issn><eissn>1535-5667</eissn><eissn>2159-662X</eissn><abstract>Because of challenges in performing routine personalized dosimetry in radiopharmaceutical therapies, interest in single-time-point (STP) dosimetry, particularly using only a single SPECT scan, is on the rise. Meanwhile, there are questions about the reliability of STP dosimetry, with limited independent validations. In the present work, we analyzed 2 STP dosimetry methods and evaluated dose errors for several radiopharmaceuticals based on effective half-life distributions.
We first challenged the common assumption that radiopharmaceutical effective half-lives across the population are gaussian-distributed (i.e., follow a normal distribution). Then, dose accuracy was estimated using 2 STP dosimetry methods for a wide range of potential post injection (p.i.) scan time points for different radiopharmaceuticals applied to neuroendocrine tumors and prostate cancer. The accuracy and limitations of each of the STP methods were discussed.
A lognormal distribution was more appropriate for capturing effective half-life distributions. The STP framework was promising for dosimetry of
Lu-DOTATATE and for kidney dosimetry of different radiopharmaceuticals (errors < 30%). Meanwhile, for some radiopharmaceuticals, STP accuracy was compromised (e.g., in bone marrow and tumors for
-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen [PSMA])). The optimal SPECT scanning time for
Lu-DOTATATE was approximately 72 h p.i., whereas 48 h p.i. was better for
Lu-PSMA.
Simplified STP dosimetry methods may compromise the accuracy of dose estimates, with some exceptions, such as for
Lu-DOTATATE and for kidney dosimetry in different radiopharmaceuticals. Simplified personalized dosimetry in the clinic continues to be challenging. On the basis of our results, we make suggestions and recommendations for improved personalized dosimetry using simplified imaging schemes.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Society of Nuclear Medicine</pub><pmid>33127625</pmid><doi>10.2967/jnumed.120.254656</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0161-5505 |
ispartof | Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 2021-07, Vol.62 (7), p.1006-1011 |
issn | 0161-5505 1535-5667 1535-5667 2159-662X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8882881 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Accuracy Antigens Bone marrow Bone tumors Customization Dosimeters Dosimetry Feasibility Studies Half-Life Humans Kidneys Lutetium isotopes Male Neuroendocrine tumors Neuroendocrine Tumors - diagnostic imaging Neuroendocrine Tumors - radiotherapy Normal distribution Pharmaceuticals Prostate Prostate cancer Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy Radiobiology/Dosimetry Radiochemical analysis Radioisotopes Radiometry Radiopharmaceuticals - therapeutic use Reproducibility of Results Single photon emission computed tomography Time Factors Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon Tumors |
title | Feasibility of Single-Time-Point Dosimetry for Radiopharmaceutical Therapies |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T02%3A49%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Feasibility%20of%20Single-Time-Point%20Dosimetry%20for%20Radiopharmaceutical%20Therapies&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Nuclear%20Medicine&rft.au=Hou,%20Xinchi&rft.date=2021-07-01&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1006&rft.epage=1011&rft.pages=1006-1011&rft.issn=0161-5505&rft.eissn=1535-5667&rft_id=info:doi/10.2967/jnumed.120.254656&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2456431256%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2552295273&rft_id=info:pmid/33127625&rfr_iscdi=true |