Comparative Analysis of the National Fatality Rate in Construction Industry Using Time-Series Approach and Equivalent Evaluation Conditions
Fatality rates such as fatalities per full-time equivalent workers are officially used to compare the risk level of the construction industry among various countries. However, each country evaluates the fatality rate using different conditions. This paper presents the comparison of fatality rates of...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of environmental research and public health 2022-02, Vol.19 (4), p.2312 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 2312 |
| container_title | International journal of environmental research and public health |
| container_volume | 19 |
| creator | Shim, Yukyung Jeong, Jaemin Jeong, Jaewook Lee, Jaehyun Kim, Yongwoo |
| description | Fatality rates such as fatalities per full-time equivalent workers are officially used to compare the risk level of the construction industry among various countries. However, each country evaluates the fatality rate using different conditions. This paper presents the comparison of fatality rates of various countries using conventional (national data) and pair (equivalent condition) methods through a time-series approach. The research was conducted in three stages. The risk level was evaluated in order in South Korea (1.54), Japan (0.84), Mexico (0.83), China (0.70), United Kingdom (0.15), and Singapore (0.13) in terms of national data. However, the risk level was re-evaluated in order in China (2.27), South Korea (2.05), Mexico (1.23), Singapore (0.98), Japan (0.80), and United Kingdom (0.47) in terms of equivalent conditions. The risk level of each can be changed when the fatality rate is compared under given equivalent conditions. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3390/ijerph19042312 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8872405</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2632750429</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-4f29514ba39ebac5436cbb8d57f26fa46a5e90813528c6a3399e164699a5569d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1r3DAQhkVpadK01x6LoJdcnOp7rUthWTZNILTQJmczluWsFltyJHlhf0P_dLX5IulpRjOPXmbmRegzJWeca_LNbW2cNlQTwThlb9AxVYpUQhH69kV-hD6ktCWE10Lp9-iIS0aU0OIY_V2FcYII2e0sXnoY9sklHHqcNxb_LOVQavgcMgwu7_FvyBY7j1fBpxxnc-jjS9_N5bXHN8n5W3ztRlv9sdHZhJfTFAOYDQbf4fXd7HYwWJ_xusT5Xv0g1blDlj6idz0MyX56jCfo5nx9vbqorn79uFwtryojaJ0r0TMtqWiBa9uCkYIr07Z1Jxc9Uz0IBdJqUtOyZG0UlDNpS1VZXIOUSnf8BH1_0J3mdrSdKQNFGJopuhHivgngmtcd7zbNbdg1db1ggsgicPooEMPdbFNuRpeMHQbwNsypYYrzWjNNeEG__oduwxzLTe8ptpDFOF2oswfKxJBStP3zMJQ0B5-b1z6XD19ervCMPxnL_wFrJadr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2632750429</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Analysis of the National Fatality Rate in Construction Industry Using Time-Series Approach and Equivalent Evaluation Conditions</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Shim, Yukyung ; Jeong, Jaemin ; Jeong, Jaewook ; Lee, Jaehyun ; Kim, Yongwoo</creator><creatorcontrib>Shim, Yukyung ; Jeong, Jaemin ; Jeong, Jaewook ; Lee, Jaehyun ; Kim, Yongwoo</creatorcontrib><description>Fatality rates such as fatalities per full-time equivalent workers are officially used to compare the risk level of the construction industry among various countries. However, each country evaluates the fatality rate using different conditions. This paper presents the comparison of fatality rates of various countries using conventional (national data) and pair (equivalent condition) methods through a time-series approach. The research was conducted in three stages. The risk level was evaluated in order in South Korea (1.54), Japan (0.84), Mexico (0.83), China (0.70), United Kingdom (0.15), and Singapore (0.13) in terms of national data. However, the risk level was re-evaluated in order in China (2.27), South Korea (2.05), Mexico (1.23), Singapore (0.98), Japan (0.80), and United Kingdom (0.47) in terms of equivalent conditions. The risk level of each can be changed when the fatality rate is compared under given equivalent conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1661-7827</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19042312</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35206494</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Accident investigations ; China ; Comparative analysis ; Construction Industry ; Employment ; Environmental protection ; Fatalities ; Humans ; Industrial accidents ; Injuries ; Manual workers ; Occupational accidents ; Risk assessment ; Risk levels ; Safety management ; Time Factors ; Time series ; United Kingdom ; United States</subject><ispartof>International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022-02, Vol.19 (4), p.2312</ispartof><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-4f29514ba39ebac5436cbb8d57f26fa46a5e90813528c6a3399e164699a5569d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-4f29514ba39ebac5436cbb8d57f26fa46a5e90813528c6a3399e164699a5569d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1286-2260 ; 0000-0002-7198-4620 ; 0000-0001-7020-0700 ; 0000-0002-9706-7863 ; 0000-0001-5964-1871</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8872405/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8872405/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35206494$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shim, Yukyung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeong, Jaemin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeong, Jaewook</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jaehyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Yongwoo</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Analysis of the National Fatality Rate in Construction Industry Using Time-Series Approach and Equivalent Evaluation Conditions</title><title>International journal of environmental research and public health</title><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><description>Fatality rates such as fatalities per full-time equivalent workers are officially used to compare the risk level of the construction industry among various countries. However, each country evaluates the fatality rate using different conditions. This paper presents the comparison of fatality rates of various countries using conventional (national data) and pair (equivalent condition) methods through a time-series approach. The research was conducted in three stages. The risk level was evaluated in order in South Korea (1.54), Japan (0.84), Mexico (0.83), China (0.70), United Kingdom (0.15), and Singapore (0.13) in terms of national data. However, the risk level was re-evaluated in order in China (2.27), South Korea (2.05), Mexico (1.23), Singapore (0.98), Japan (0.80), and United Kingdom (0.47) in terms of equivalent conditions. The risk level of each can be changed when the fatality rate is compared under given equivalent conditions.</description><subject>Accident investigations</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Construction Industry</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Fatalities</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Industrial accidents</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>Manual workers</subject><subject>Occupational accidents</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Risk levels</subject><subject>Safety management</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Time series</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><issn>1660-4601</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1r3DAQhkVpadK01x6LoJdcnOp7rUthWTZNILTQJmczluWsFltyJHlhf0P_dLX5IulpRjOPXmbmRegzJWeca_LNbW2cNlQTwThlb9AxVYpUQhH69kV-hD6ktCWE10Lp9-iIS0aU0OIY_V2FcYII2e0sXnoY9sklHHqcNxb_LOVQavgcMgwu7_FvyBY7j1fBpxxnc-jjS9_N5bXHN8n5W3ztRlv9sdHZhJfTFAOYDQbf4fXd7HYwWJ_xusT5Xv0g1blDlj6idz0MyX56jCfo5nx9vbqorn79uFwtryojaJ0r0TMtqWiBa9uCkYIr07Z1Jxc9Uz0IBdJqUtOyZG0UlDNpS1VZXIOUSnf8BH1_0J3mdrSdKQNFGJopuhHivgngmtcd7zbNbdg1db1ggsgicPooEMPdbFNuRpeMHQbwNsypYYrzWjNNeEG__oduwxzLTe8ptpDFOF2oswfKxJBStP3zMJQ0B5-b1z6XD19ervCMPxnL_wFrJadr</recordid><startdate>20220217</startdate><enddate>20220217</enddate><creator>Shim, Yukyung</creator><creator>Jeong, Jaemin</creator><creator>Jeong, Jaewook</creator><creator>Lee, Jaehyun</creator><creator>Kim, Yongwoo</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1286-2260</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7198-4620</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7020-0700</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9706-7863</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5964-1871</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220217</creationdate><title>Comparative Analysis of the National Fatality Rate in Construction Industry Using Time-Series Approach and Equivalent Evaluation Conditions</title><author>Shim, Yukyung ; Jeong, Jaemin ; Jeong, Jaewook ; Lee, Jaehyun ; Kim, Yongwoo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-4f29514ba39ebac5436cbb8d57f26fa46a5e90813528c6a3399e164699a5569d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Accident investigations</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Construction Industry</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Fatalities</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Industrial accidents</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>Manual workers</topic><topic>Occupational accidents</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Risk levels</topic><topic>Safety management</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Time series</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shim, Yukyung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeong, Jaemin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeong, Jaewook</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jaehyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Yongwoo</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shim, Yukyung</au><au>Jeong, Jaemin</au><au>Jeong, Jaewook</au><au>Lee, Jaehyun</au><au>Kim, Yongwoo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Analysis of the National Fatality Rate in Construction Industry Using Time-Series Approach and Equivalent Evaluation Conditions</atitle><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><date>2022-02-17</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>2312</spage><pages>2312-</pages><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><eissn>1660-4601</eissn><abstract>Fatality rates such as fatalities per full-time equivalent workers are officially used to compare the risk level of the construction industry among various countries. However, each country evaluates the fatality rate using different conditions. This paper presents the comparison of fatality rates of various countries using conventional (national data) and pair (equivalent condition) methods through a time-series approach. The research was conducted in three stages. The risk level was evaluated in order in South Korea (1.54), Japan (0.84), Mexico (0.83), China (0.70), United Kingdom (0.15), and Singapore (0.13) in terms of national data. However, the risk level was re-evaluated in order in China (2.27), South Korea (2.05), Mexico (1.23), Singapore (0.98), Japan (0.80), and United Kingdom (0.47) in terms of equivalent conditions. The risk level of each can be changed when the fatality rate is compared under given equivalent conditions.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>35206494</pmid><doi>10.3390/ijerph19042312</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1286-2260</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7198-4620</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7020-0700</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9706-7863</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5964-1871</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1660-4601 |
| ispartof | International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022-02, Vol.19 (4), p.2312 |
| issn | 1660-4601 1661-7827 1660-4601 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8872405 |
| source | MEDLINE; PubMed Central Open Access; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
| subjects | Accident investigations China Comparative analysis Construction Industry Employment Environmental protection Fatalities Humans Industrial accidents Injuries Manual workers Occupational accidents Risk assessment Risk levels Safety management Time Factors Time series United Kingdom United States |
| title | Comparative Analysis of the National Fatality Rate in Construction Industry Using Time-Series Approach and Equivalent Evaluation Conditions |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T09%3A26%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Analysis%20of%20the%20National%20Fatality%20Rate%20in%20Construction%20Industry%20Using%20Time-Series%20Approach%20and%20Equivalent%20Evaluation%20Conditions&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20environmental%20research%20and%20public%20health&rft.au=Shim,%20Yukyung&rft.date=2022-02-17&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=2312&rft.pages=2312-&rft.issn=1660-4601&rft.eissn=1660-4601&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/ijerph19042312&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2632750429%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2632750429&rft_id=info:pmid/35206494&rfr_iscdi=true |