Sex Differences in Cardiac Rehabilitation Outcomes
Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in males and females in the United States and globally. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is recommended by the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology for secondary prevention for patients with cardiovascular disease....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Circulation research 2022-02, Vol.130 (4), p.552-565 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 565 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 552 |
container_title | Circulation research |
container_volume | 130 |
creator | Smith, Joshua R. Thomas, Randal J. Bonikowske, Amanda R. Hammer, Shane M. Olson, Thomas P. |
description | Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in males and females in the United States and globally. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is recommended by the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology for secondary prevention for patients with cardiovascular disease. CR participation is associated with improved cardiovascular disease risk factor management, quality of life, and exercise capacity as well as reductions in hospital admissions and mortality. Despite these advantageous clinical outcomes, significant sex disparities exist in outpatient phase II CR programming. This article reviews sex differences that are present in the spectrum of care provided by outpatient phase II CR programming (ie, from referral to clinical management). We first review CR participation by detailing the sex disparities in the rates of CR referral, enrollment, and completion. In doing so, we discuss patient, health care provider, and social/environmental level barriers to CR participation with a particular emphasis on those barriers that majorly impact females. We also evaluate sex differences in the core components incorporated into CR programming (eg, patient assessment, exercise training, hypertension management). Next, we review strategies to mitigate these sex differences in CR participation with a focus on automatic CR referral, female-only CR programming, and hybrid CR. Finally, we outline knowledge gaps and areas of future research to minimize and prevent sex differences in CR programming. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.319894 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8868533</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2630931815</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5228-7f9af8dcd732549128158fb62f712258ddc6114e07dde940c3ccac277bcbe03d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkdtKxDAQhoMouh4eQemlN10zSdOkN8JSjyAIq16HNJm60W6rSevh7a2sRxgYmPnnn-EbQvaBTgFyOCov5-X89GZ2MZsCgymHQhXZGpmAYFmaCQnrZEIpLVLJOd0i2zE-UAoZZ8Um2eICpFBcTQi7wbfkxNc1BmwtxsS3SWmC88Ymc1yYyje-N73v2uR66G23xLhLNmrTRNz7yjvk7uz0trxIr67PL8vZVWoFYyqVdWFq5ayTnImsAKZAqLrKWS2BMaGcszlAhlQ6h0VGLbfWWCZlZSuk3PEdcrzyfRqqJTqLbR9Mo5-CX5rwrjvj9f9O6xf6vnvRSuVKcD4aHH4ZhO55wNjrpY8Wm8a02A1Rs5zTgsN41ygVK6kNXYwB6581QPUnb_3LW4-89Yr3OHfw98afqW_AoyBbCV67pscQH5vhFYNeoGn6hR4fRDkFljLKxgBF08-S4h8-kIx0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2630931815</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sex Differences in Cardiac Rehabilitation Outcomes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Heart Association Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Smith, Joshua R. ; Thomas, Randal J. ; Bonikowske, Amanda R. ; Hammer, Shane M. ; Olson, Thomas P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Smith, Joshua R. ; Thomas, Randal J. ; Bonikowske, Amanda R. ; Hammer, Shane M. ; Olson, Thomas P.</creatorcontrib><description>Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in males and females in the United States and globally. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is recommended by the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology for secondary prevention for patients with cardiovascular disease. CR participation is associated with improved cardiovascular disease risk factor management, quality of life, and exercise capacity as well as reductions in hospital admissions and mortality. Despite these advantageous clinical outcomes, significant sex disparities exist in outpatient phase II CR programming. This article reviews sex differences that are present in the spectrum of care provided by outpatient phase II CR programming (ie, from referral to clinical management). We first review CR participation by detailing the sex disparities in the rates of CR referral, enrollment, and completion. In doing so, we discuss patient, health care provider, and social/environmental level barriers to CR participation with a particular emphasis on those barriers that majorly impact females. We also evaluate sex differences in the core components incorporated into CR programming (eg, patient assessment, exercise training, hypertension management). Next, we review strategies to mitigate these sex differences in CR participation with a focus on automatic CR referral, female-only CR programming, and hybrid CR. Finally, we outline knowledge gaps and areas of future research to minimize and prevent sex differences in CR programming.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-7330</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1524-4571</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-4571</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.319894</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35175838</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</publisher><subject>Cardiac Rehabilitation - methods ; Cardiac Rehabilitation - trends ; Cardiovascular Diseases - diagnosis ; Cardiovascular Diseases - physiopathology ; Cardiovascular Diseases - therapy ; Diet, Healthy - methods ; Exercise ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Sex Characteristics ; Smoking Cessation - methods ; Treatment Outcome ; Weight Loss - physiology</subject><ispartof>Circulation research, 2022-02, Vol.130 (4), p.552-565</ispartof><rights>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5228-7f9af8dcd732549128158fb62f712258ddc6114e07dde940c3ccac277bcbe03d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5228-7f9af8dcd732549128158fb62f712258ddc6114e07dde940c3ccac277bcbe03d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3687-6261</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3674,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35175838$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smith, Joshua R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Randal J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonikowske, Amanda R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammer, Shane M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olson, Thomas P.</creatorcontrib><title>Sex Differences in Cardiac Rehabilitation Outcomes</title><title>Circulation research</title><addtitle>Circ Res</addtitle><description>Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in males and females in the United States and globally. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is recommended by the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology for secondary prevention for patients with cardiovascular disease. CR participation is associated with improved cardiovascular disease risk factor management, quality of life, and exercise capacity as well as reductions in hospital admissions and mortality. Despite these advantageous clinical outcomes, significant sex disparities exist in outpatient phase II CR programming. This article reviews sex differences that are present in the spectrum of care provided by outpatient phase II CR programming (ie, from referral to clinical management). We first review CR participation by detailing the sex disparities in the rates of CR referral, enrollment, and completion. In doing so, we discuss patient, health care provider, and social/environmental level barriers to CR participation with a particular emphasis on those barriers that majorly impact females. We also evaluate sex differences in the core components incorporated into CR programming (eg, patient assessment, exercise training, hypertension management). Next, we review strategies to mitigate these sex differences in CR participation with a focus on automatic CR referral, female-only CR programming, and hybrid CR. Finally, we outline knowledge gaps and areas of future research to minimize and prevent sex differences in CR programming.</description><subject>Cardiac Rehabilitation - methods</subject><subject>Cardiac Rehabilitation - trends</subject><subject>Cardiovascular Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Cardiovascular Diseases - physiopathology</subject><subject>Cardiovascular Diseases - therapy</subject><subject>Diet, Healthy - methods</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Sex Characteristics</subject><subject>Smoking Cessation - methods</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Weight Loss - physiology</subject><issn>0009-7330</issn><issn>1524-4571</issn><issn>1524-4571</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkdtKxDAQhoMouh4eQemlN10zSdOkN8JSjyAIq16HNJm60W6rSevh7a2sRxgYmPnnn-EbQvaBTgFyOCov5-X89GZ2MZsCgymHQhXZGpmAYFmaCQnrZEIpLVLJOd0i2zE-UAoZZ8Um2eICpFBcTQi7wbfkxNc1BmwtxsS3SWmC88Ymc1yYyje-N73v2uR66G23xLhLNmrTRNz7yjvk7uz0trxIr67PL8vZVWoFYyqVdWFq5ayTnImsAKZAqLrKWS2BMaGcszlAhlQ6h0VGLbfWWCZlZSuk3PEdcrzyfRqqJTqLbR9Mo5-CX5rwrjvj9f9O6xf6vnvRSuVKcD4aHH4ZhO55wNjrpY8Wm8a02A1Rs5zTgsN41ygVK6kNXYwB6581QPUnb_3LW4-89Yr3OHfw98afqW_AoyBbCV67pscQH5vhFYNeoGn6hR4fRDkFljLKxgBF08-S4h8-kIx0</recordid><startdate>20220218</startdate><enddate>20220218</enddate><creator>Smith, Joshua R.</creator><creator>Thomas, Randal J.</creator><creator>Bonikowske, Amanda R.</creator><creator>Hammer, Shane M.</creator><creator>Olson, Thomas P.</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3687-6261</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220218</creationdate><title>Sex Differences in Cardiac Rehabilitation Outcomes</title><author>Smith, Joshua R. ; Thomas, Randal J. ; Bonikowske, Amanda R. ; Hammer, Shane M. ; Olson, Thomas P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5228-7f9af8dcd732549128158fb62f712258ddc6114e07dde940c3ccac277bcbe03d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Cardiac Rehabilitation - methods</topic><topic>Cardiac Rehabilitation - trends</topic><topic>Cardiovascular Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Cardiovascular Diseases - physiopathology</topic><topic>Cardiovascular Diseases - therapy</topic><topic>Diet, Healthy - methods</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Sex Characteristics</topic><topic>Smoking Cessation - methods</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Weight Loss - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smith, Joshua R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Randal J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonikowske, Amanda R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammer, Shane M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olson, Thomas P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Circulation research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smith, Joshua R.</au><au>Thomas, Randal J.</au><au>Bonikowske, Amanda R.</au><au>Hammer, Shane M.</au><au>Olson, Thomas P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sex Differences in Cardiac Rehabilitation Outcomes</atitle><jtitle>Circulation research</jtitle><addtitle>Circ Res</addtitle><date>2022-02-18</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>130</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>552</spage><epage>565</epage><pages>552-565</pages><issn>0009-7330</issn><issn>1524-4571</issn><eissn>1524-4571</eissn><abstract>Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in males and females in the United States and globally. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is recommended by the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology for secondary prevention for patients with cardiovascular disease. CR participation is associated with improved cardiovascular disease risk factor management, quality of life, and exercise capacity as well as reductions in hospital admissions and mortality. Despite these advantageous clinical outcomes, significant sex disparities exist in outpatient phase II CR programming. This article reviews sex differences that are present in the spectrum of care provided by outpatient phase II CR programming (ie, from referral to clinical management). We first review CR participation by detailing the sex disparities in the rates of CR referral, enrollment, and completion. In doing so, we discuss patient, health care provider, and social/environmental level barriers to CR participation with a particular emphasis on those barriers that majorly impact females. We also evaluate sex differences in the core components incorporated into CR programming (eg, patient assessment, exercise training, hypertension management). Next, we review strategies to mitigate these sex differences in CR participation with a focus on automatic CR referral, female-only CR programming, and hybrid CR. Finally, we outline knowledge gaps and areas of future research to minimize and prevent sex differences in CR programming.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</pub><pmid>35175838</pmid><doi>10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.319894</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3687-6261</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0009-7330 |
ispartof | Circulation research, 2022-02, Vol.130 (4), p.552-565 |
issn | 0009-7330 1524-4571 1524-4571 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8868533 |
source | MEDLINE; American Heart Association Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Cardiac Rehabilitation - methods Cardiac Rehabilitation - trends Cardiovascular Diseases - diagnosis Cardiovascular Diseases - physiopathology Cardiovascular Diseases - therapy Diet, Healthy - methods Exercise Female Humans Male Sex Characteristics Smoking Cessation - methods Treatment Outcome Weight Loss - physiology |
title | Sex Differences in Cardiac Rehabilitation Outcomes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T09%3A33%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sex%20Differences%20in%20Cardiac%20Rehabilitation%20Outcomes&rft.jtitle=Circulation%20research&rft.au=Smith,%20Joshua%20R.&rft.date=2022-02-18&rft.volume=130&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=552&rft.epage=565&rft.pages=552-565&rft.issn=0009-7330&rft.eissn=1524-4571&rft_id=info:doi/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.319894&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2630931815%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2630931815&rft_id=info:pmid/35175838&rfr_iscdi=true |