Sex Differences in Cardiac Rehabilitation Outcomes

Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in males and females in the United States and globally. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is recommended by the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology for secondary prevention for patients with cardiovascular disease....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Circulation research 2022-02, Vol.130 (4), p.552-565
Hauptverfasser: Smith, Joshua R., Thomas, Randal J., Bonikowske, Amanda R., Hammer, Shane M., Olson, Thomas P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 565
container_issue 4
container_start_page 552
container_title Circulation research
container_volume 130
creator Smith, Joshua R.
Thomas, Randal J.
Bonikowske, Amanda R.
Hammer, Shane M.
Olson, Thomas P.
description Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in males and females in the United States and globally. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is recommended by the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology for secondary prevention for patients with cardiovascular disease. CR participation is associated with improved cardiovascular disease risk factor management, quality of life, and exercise capacity as well as reductions in hospital admissions and mortality. Despite these advantageous clinical outcomes, significant sex disparities exist in outpatient phase II CR programming. This article reviews sex differences that are present in the spectrum of care provided by outpatient phase II CR programming (ie, from referral to clinical management). We first review CR participation by detailing the sex disparities in the rates of CR referral, enrollment, and completion. In doing so, we discuss patient, health care provider, and social/environmental level barriers to CR participation with a particular emphasis on those barriers that majorly impact females. We also evaluate sex differences in the core components incorporated into CR programming (eg, patient assessment, exercise training, hypertension management). Next, we review strategies to mitigate these sex differences in CR participation with a focus on automatic CR referral, female-only CR programming, and hybrid CR. Finally, we outline knowledge gaps and areas of future research to minimize and prevent sex differences in CR programming.
doi_str_mv 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.319894
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8868533</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2630931815</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5228-7f9af8dcd732549128158fb62f712258ddc6114e07dde940c3ccac277bcbe03d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkdtKxDAQhoMouh4eQemlN10zSdOkN8JSjyAIq16HNJm60W6rSevh7a2sRxgYmPnnn-EbQvaBTgFyOCov5-X89GZ2MZsCgymHQhXZGpmAYFmaCQnrZEIpLVLJOd0i2zE-UAoZZ8Um2eICpFBcTQi7wbfkxNc1BmwtxsS3SWmC88Ymc1yYyje-N73v2uR66G23xLhLNmrTRNz7yjvk7uz0trxIr67PL8vZVWoFYyqVdWFq5ayTnImsAKZAqLrKWS2BMaGcszlAhlQ6h0VGLbfWWCZlZSuk3PEdcrzyfRqqJTqLbR9Mo5-CX5rwrjvj9f9O6xf6vnvRSuVKcD4aHH4ZhO55wNjrpY8Wm8a02A1Rs5zTgsN41ygVK6kNXYwB6581QPUnb_3LW4-89Yr3OHfw98afqW_AoyBbCV67pscQH5vhFYNeoGn6hR4fRDkFljLKxgBF08-S4h8-kIx0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2630931815</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sex Differences in Cardiac Rehabilitation Outcomes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Heart Association Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Smith, Joshua R. ; Thomas, Randal J. ; Bonikowske, Amanda R. ; Hammer, Shane M. ; Olson, Thomas P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Smith, Joshua R. ; Thomas, Randal J. ; Bonikowske, Amanda R. ; Hammer, Shane M. ; Olson, Thomas P.</creatorcontrib><description>Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in males and females in the United States and globally. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is recommended by the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology for secondary prevention for patients with cardiovascular disease. CR participation is associated with improved cardiovascular disease risk factor management, quality of life, and exercise capacity as well as reductions in hospital admissions and mortality. Despite these advantageous clinical outcomes, significant sex disparities exist in outpatient phase II CR programming. This article reviews sex differences that are present in the spectrum of care provided by outpatient phase II CR programming (ie, from referral to clinical management). We first review CR participation by detailing the sex disparities in the rates of CR referral, enrollment, and completion. In doing so, we discuss patient, health care provider, and social/environmental level barriers to CR participation with a particular emphasis on those barriers that majorly impact females. We also evaluate sex differences in the core components incorporated into CR programming (eg, patient assessment, exercise training, hypertension management). Next, we review strategies to mitigate these sex differences in CR participation with a focus on automatic CR referral, female-only CR programming, and hybrid CR. Finally, we outline knowledge gaps and areas of future research to minimize and prevent sex differences in CR programming.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-7330</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1524-4571</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-4571</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.319894</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35175838</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Cardiac Rehabilitation - methods ; Cardiac Rehabilitation - trends ; Cardiovascular Diseases - diagnosis ; Cardiovascular Diseases - physiopathology ; Cardiovascular Diseases - therapy ; Diet, Healthy - methods ; Exercise ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Sex Characteristics ; Smoking Cessation - methods ; Treatment Outcome ; Weight Loss - physiology</subject><ispartof>Circulation research, 2022-02, Vol.130 (4), p.552-565</ispartof><rights>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5228-7f9af8dcd732549128158fb62f712258ddc6114e07dde940c3ccac277bcbe03d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5228-7f9af8dcd732549128158fb62f712258ddc6114e07dde940c3ccac277bcbe03d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3687-6261</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3674,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35175838$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smith, Joshua R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Randal J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonikowske, Amanda R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammer, Shane M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olson, Thomas P.</creatorcontrib><title>Sex Differences in Cardiac Rehabilitation Outcomes</title><title>Circulation research</title><addtitle>Circ Res</addtitle><description>Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in males and females in the United States and globally. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is recommended by the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology for secondary prevention for patients with cardiovascular disease. CR participation is associated with improved cardiovascular disease risk factor management, quality of life, and exercise capacity as well as reductions in hospital admissions and mortality. Despite these advantageous clinical outcomes, significant sex disparities exist in outpatient phase II CR programming. This article reviews sex differences that are present in the spectrum of care provided by outpatient phase II CR programming (ie, from referral to clinical management). We first review CR participation by detailing the sex disparities in the rates of CR referral, enrollment, and completion. In doing so, we discuss patient, health care provider, and social/environmental level barriers to CR participation with a particular emphasis on those barriers that majorly impact females. We also evaluate sex differences in the core components incorporated into CR programming (eg, patient assessment, exercise training, hypertension management). Next, we review strategies to mitigate these sex differences in CR participation with a focus on automatic CR referral, female-only CR programming, and hybrid CR. Finally, we outline knowledge gaps and areas of future research to minimize and prevent sex differences in CR programming.</description><subject>Cardiac Rehabilitation - methods</subject><subject>Cardiac Rehabilitation - trends</subject><subject>Cardiovascular Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Cardiovascular Diseases - physiopathology</subject><subject>Cardiovascular Diseases - therapy</subject><subject>Diet, Healthy - methods</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Sex Characteristics</subject><subject>Smoking Cessation - methods</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Weight Loss - physiology</subject><issn>0009-7330</issn><issn>1524-4571</issn><issn>1524-4571</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkdtKxDAQhoMouh4eQemlN10zSdOkN8JSjyAIq16HNJm60W6rSevh7a2sRxgYmPnnn-EbQvaBTgFyOCov5-X89GZ2MZsCgymHQhXZGpmAYFmaCQnrZEIpLVLJOd0i2zE-UAoZZ8Um2eICpFBcTQi7wbfkxNc1BmwtxsS3SWmC88Ymc1yYyje-N73v2uR66G23xLhLNmrTRNz7yjvk7uz0trxIr67PL8vZVWoFYyqVdWFq5ayTnImsAKZAqLrKWS2BMaGcszlAhlQ6h0VGLbfWWCZlZSuk3PEdcrzyfRqqJTqLbR9Mo5-CX5rwrjvj9f9O6xf6vnvRSuVKcD4aHH4ZhO55wNjrpY8Wm8a02A1Rs5zTgsN41ygVK6kNXYwB6581QPUnb_3LW4-89Yr3OHfw98afqW_AoyBbCV67pscQH5vhFYNeoGn6hR4fRDkFljLKxgBF08-S4h8-kIx0</recordid><startdate>20220218</startdate><enddate>20220218</enddate><creator>Smith, Joshua R.</creator><creator>Thomas, Randal J.</creator><creator>Bonikowske, Amanda R.</creator><creator>Hammer, Shane M.</creator><creator>Olson, Thomas P.</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3687-6261</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220218</creationdate><title>Sex Differences in Cardiac Rehabilitation Outcomes</title><author>Smith, Joshua R. ; Thomas, Randal J. ; Bonikowske, Amanda R. ; Hammer, Shane M. ; Olson, Thomas P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5228-7f9af8dcd732549128158fb62f712258ddc6114e07dde940c3ccac277bcbe03d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Cardiac Rehabilitation - methods</topic><topic>Cardiac Rehabilitation - trends</topic><topic>Cardiovascular Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Cardiovascular Diseases - physiopathology</topic><topic>Cardiovascular Diseases - therapy</topic><topic>Diet, Healthy - methods</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Sex Characteristics</topic><topic>Smoking Cessation - methods</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Weight Loss - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smith, Joshua R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Randal J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonikowske, Amanda R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammer, Shane M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olson, Thomas P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Circulation research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smith, Joshua R.</au><au>Thomas, Randal J.</au><au>Bonikowske, Amanda R.</au><au>Hammer, Shane M.</au><au>Olson, Thomas P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sex Differences in Cardiac Rehabilitation Outcomes</atitle><jtitle>Circulation research</jtitle><addtitle>Circ Res</addtitle><date>2022-02-18</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>130</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>552</spage><epage>565</epage><pages>552-565</pages><issn>0009-7330</issn><issn>1524-4571</issn><eissn>1524-4571</eissn><abstract>Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in males and females in the United States and globally. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is recommended by the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology for secondary prevention for patients with cardiovascular disease. CR participation is associated with improved cardiovascular disease risk factor management, quality of life, and exercise capacity as well as reductions in hospital admissions and mortality. Despite these advantageous clinical outcomes, significant sex disparities exist in outpatient phase II CR programming. This article reviews sex differences that are present in the spectrum of care provided by outpatient phase II CR programming (ie, from referral to clinical management). We first review CR participation by detailing the sex disparities in the rates of CR referral, enrollment, and completion. In doing so, we discuss patient, health care provider, and social/environmental level barriers to CR participation with a particular emphasis on those barriers that majorly impact females. We also evaluate sex differences in the core components incorporated into CR programming (eg, patient assessment, exercise training, hypertension management). Next, we review strategies to mitigate these sex differences in CR participation with a focus on automatic CR referral, female-only CR programming, and hybrid CR. Finally, we outline knowledge gaps and areas of future research to minimize and prevent sex differences in CR programming.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>35175838</pmid><doi>10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.319894</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3687-6261</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0009-7330
ispartof Circulation research, 2022-02, Vol.130 (4), p.552-565
issn 0009-7330
1524-4571
1524-4571
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8868533
source MEDLINE; American Heart Association Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Cardiac Rehabilitation - methods
Cardiac Rehabilitation - trends
Cardiovascular Diseases - diagnosis
Cardiovascular Diseases - physiopathology
Cardiovascular Diseases - therapy
Diet, Healthy - methods
Exercise
Female
Humans
Male
Sex Characteristics
Smoking Cessation - methods
Treatment Outcome
Weight Loss - physiology
title Sex Differences in Cardiac Rehabilitation Outcomes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T09%3A33%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sex%20Differences%20in%20Cardiac%20Rehabilitation%20Outcomes&rft.jtitle=Circulation%20research&rft.au=Smith,%20Joshua%20R.&rft.date=2022-02-18&rft.volume=130&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=552&rft.epage=565&rft.pages=552-565&rft.issn=0009-7330&rft.eissn=1524-4571&rft_id=info:doi/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.319894&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2630931815%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2630931815&rft_id=info:pmid/35175838&rfr_iscdi=true