Epidemiology of haemodialysis outcomes
Haemodialysis (HD) is the commonest form of kidney replacement therapy in the world, accounting for approximately 69% of all kidney replacement therapy and 89% of all dialysis. Over the last six decades since the inception of HD, dialysis technology and patient access to the therapy have advanced co...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nature reviews. Nephrology 2022-06, Vol.18 (6), p.378-395 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 395 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 378 |
container_title | Nature reviews. Nephrology |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Bello, Aminu K. Okpechi, Ikechi G. Osman, Mohamed A. Cho, Yeoungjee Htay, Htay Jha, Vivekanand Wainstein, Marina Johnson, David W. |
description | Haemodialysis (HD) is the commonest form of kidney replacement therapy in the world, accounting for approximately 69% of all kidney replacement therapy and 89% of all dialysis. Over the last six decades since the inception of HD, dialysis technology and patient access to the therapy have advanced considerably, particularly in high-income countries. However, HD availability, accessibility, cost and outcomes vary widely across the world and, overall, the rates of impaired quality of life, morbidity and mortality are high. Cardiovascular disease affects more than two-thirds of people receiving HD, is the major cause of morbidity and accounts for almost 50% of mortality. In addition, patients on HD have high symptom loads and are often under considerable financial strain. Despite the many advances in HD technology and delivery systems that have been achieved since the treatment was first developed, poor outcomes among patients receiving HD remain a major public health concern. Understanding the epidemiology of HD outcomes, why they might vary across different populations and how they might be improved is therefore crucial, although this goal is hampered by the considerable heterogeneity in the monitoring and reporting of these outcomes across settings.
This Review examines the epidemiology of haemodialysis outcomes — clinical, patient-reported and surrogate outcomes — across world regions and populations, including vulnerable individuals. The authors also discuss the current status of monitoring and reporting of haemodialysis outcomes and potential strategies for improvement.
Key points
Nearly 4 million people in the world are living on kidney replacement therapy (KRT), and haemodialysis (HD) remains the commonest form of KRT, accounting for approximately 69% of all KRT and 89% of all dialysis.
Dialysis technology and patient access to KRT have advanced substantially since the 1960s, particularly in high-income countries. However, HD availability, accessibility, cost and outcomes continue to vary widely across countries, particularly among disadvantaged populations (including Indigenous peoples, women and people at the extremes of age).
Cardiovascular disease affects over two-thirds of people receiving HD, is the major cause of morbidity and accounts for almost 50% of mortality; mortality among patients on HD is significantly higher than that of their counterparts in the general population, and treated kidney failure has a higher mortality than many types of c |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/s41581-022-00542-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8862002</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2667090935</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-cd4598022c88e99a3d65b05cb49ef9385d4c7b23869cfe1115edf725395584383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtLw0AUhQdRbK3-ARdSEMRNdN6PjSClPqDgRsHdMJlM2pQkUzOJ0H_v1NT6WLiaC_e7Z-65B4BTBK8QJPI6UMQkSiDGCYSM4kTsgSESTCUMitf9Xc3RAByFsISQcyrYIRgQhhTFiA3BxXRVZK4qfOnn67HPxwvjKp8VplyHIox911pfuXAMDnJTBneyfUfg5W76PHlIZk_3j5PbWWKpoG1iM8qUjAtZKZ1ShmScpZDZlCqXKyJZRq1IMZFc2dwhhJjLcoEZUYxJSiQZgZted9Wllcusq9vGlHrVFJVp1tqbQv_u1MVCz_27lpJjCHEUuNwKNP6tc6HVVRGsK0tTO98FjTnBiEpMRUTP_6BL3zV1tBcpLqCCirBI4Z6yjQ-hcfluGQT1Jgbdx6Cja_0Zg95In_20sRv5unsESA-E2Krnrvn--x_ZD-wMkeQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2667090935</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Epidemiology of haemodialysis outcomes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Bello, Aminu K. ; Okpechi, Ikechi G. ; Osman, Mohamed A. ; Cho, Yeoungjee ; Htay, Htay ; Jha, Vivekanand ; Wainstein, Marina ; Johnson, David W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bello, Aminu K. ; Okpechi, Ikechi G. ; Osman, Mohamed A. ; Cho, Yeoungjee ; Htay, Htay ; Jha, Vivekanand ; Wainstein, Marina ; Johnson, David W.</creatorcontrib><description>Haemodialysis (HD) is the commonest form of kidney replacement therapy in the world, accounting for approximately 69% of all kidney replacement therapy and 89% of all dialysis. Over the last six decades since the inception of HD, dialysis technology and patient access to the therapy have advanced considerably, particularly in high-income countries. However, HD availability, accessibility, cost and outcomes vary widely across the world and, overall, the rates of impaired quality of life, morbidity and mortality are high. Cardiovascular disease affects more than two-thirds of people receiving HD, is the major cause of morbidity and accounts for almost 50% of mortality. In addition, patients on HD have high symptom loads and are often under considerable financial strain. Despite the many advances in HD technology and delivery systems that have been achieved since the treatment was first developed, poor outcomes among patients receiving HD remain a major public health concern. Understanding the epidemiology of HD outcomes, why they might vary across different populations and how they might be improved is therefore crucial, although this goal is hampered by the considerable heterogeneity in the monitoring and reporting of these outcomes across settings.
This Review examines the epidemiology of haemodialysis outcomes — clinical, patient-reported and surrogate outcomes — across world regions and populations, including vulnerable individuals. The authors also discuss the current status of monitoring and reporting of haemodialysis outcomes and potential strategies for improvement.
Key points
Nearly 4 million people in the world are living on kidney replacement therapy (KRT), and haemodialysis (HD) remains the commonest form of KRT, accounting for approximately 69% of all KRT and 89% of all dialysis.
Dialysis technology and patient access to KRT have advanced substantially since the 1960s, particularly in high-income countries. However, HD availability, accessibility, cost and outcomes continue to vary widely across countries, particularly among disadvantaged populations (including Indigenous peoples, women and people at the extremes of age).
Cardiovascular disease affects over two-thirds of people receiving HD, is the major cause of morbidity and accounts for almost 50% of mortality; mortality among patients on HD is significantly higher than that of their counterparts in the general population, and treated kidney failure has a higher mortality than many types of cancer. Patients on HD also experience high burdens of symptoms, poor quality of life and financial difficulties.
Careful monitoring of the outcomes of patients on HD is essential to develop effective strategies for risk reduction. Outcome measures are highly variable across regions, countries, centres and segments of the population. Establishing kidney registries that collect a variety of clinical and patient-reported outcomes using harmonized definitions is therefore crucial.
Evaluation of HD outcomes should include the impact on family and friends, and personal finances, and should examine inequities in disadvantaged populations, who comprise a large proportion of the HD population.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1759-5061</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1759-507X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41581-022-00542-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35194215</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>692/1807/4024 ; 692/308/174 ; 692/4022/1585/104/1586 ; 692/4022/1950/1544 ; Cardiovascular Diseases ; Epidemiology ; Hemodialysis ; Humans ; Kidney Failure, Chronic - diagnosis ; Kidney Failure, Chronic - epidemiology ; Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Mortality ; Nephrology ; Quality of Life ; Renal Dialysis ; Renal Replacement Therapy ; Review ; Review Article</subject><ispartof>Nature reviews. Nephrology, 2022-06, Vol.18 (6), p.378-395</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature Limited 2022</rights><rights>2022. Springer Nature Limited.</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Jun 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-cd4598022c88e99a3d65b05cb49ef9385d4c7b23869cfe1115edf725395584383</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-cd4598022c88e99a3d65b05cb49ef9385d4c7b23869cfe1115edf725395584383</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8015-9470 ; 0000-0001-5491-3460 ; 0000-0002-5915-6101 ; 0000-0002-6905-5937</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1038/s41581-022-00542-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1038/s41581-022-00542-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35194215$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bello, Aminu K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okpechi, Ikechi G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osman, Mohamed A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Yeoungjee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Htay, Htay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jha, Vivekanand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wainstein, Marina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, David W.</creatorcontrib><title>Epidemiology of haemodialysis outcomes</title><title>Nature reviews. Nephrology</title><addtitle>Nat Rev Nephrol</addtitle><addtitle>Nat Rev Nephrol</addtitle><description>Haemodialysis (HD) is the commonest form of kidney replacement therapy in the world, accounting for approximately 69% of all kidney replacement therapy and 89% of all dialysis. Over the last six decades since the inception of HD, dialysis technology and patient access to the therapy have advanced considerably, particularly in high-income countries. However, HD availability, accessibility, cost and outcomes vary widely across the world and, overall, the rates of impaired quality of life, morbidity and mortality are high. Cardiovascular disease affects more than two-thirds of people receiving HD, is the major cause of morbidity and accounts for almost 50% of mortality. In addition, patients on HD have high symptom loads and are often under considerable financial strain. Despite the many advances in HD technology and delivery systems that have been achieved since the treatment was first developed, poor outcomes among patients receiving HD remain a major public health concern. Understanding the epidemiology of HD outcomes, why they might vary across different populations and how they might be improved is therefore crucial, although this goal is hampered by the considerable heterogeneity in the monitoring and reporting of these outcomes across settings.
This Review examines the epidemiology of haemodialysis outcomes — clinical, patient-reported and surrogate outcomes — across world regions and populations, including vulnerable individuals. The authors also discuss the current status of monitoring and reporting of haemodialysis outcomes and potential strategies for improvement.
Key points
Nearly 4 million people in the world are living on kidney replacement therapy (KRT), and haemodialysis (HD) remains the commonest form of KRT, accounting for approximately 69% of all KRT and 89% of all dialysis.
Dialysis technology and patient access to KRT have advanced substantially since the 1960s, particularly in high-income countries. However, HD availability, accessibility, cost and outcomes continue to vary widely across countries, particularly among disadvantaged populations (including Indigenous peoples, women and people at the extremes of age).
Cardiovascular disease affects over two-thirds of people receiving HD, is the major cause of morbidity and accounts for almost 50% of mortality; mortality among patients on HD is significantly higher than that of their counterparts in the general population, and treated kidney failure has a higher mortality than many types of cancer. Patients on HD also experience high burdens of symptoms, poor quality of life and financial difficulties.
Careful monitoring of the outcomes of patients on HD is essential to develop effective strategies for risk reduction. Outcome measures are highly variable across regions, countries, centres and segments of the population. Establishing kidney registries that collect a variety of clinical and patient-reported outcomes using harmonized definitions is therefore crucial.
Evaluation of HD outcomes should include the impact on family and friends, and personal finances, and should examine inequities in disadvantaged populations, who comprise a large proportion of the HD population.</description><subject>692/1807/4024</subject><subject>692/308/174</subject><subject>692/4022/1585/104/1586</subject><subject>692/4022/1950/1544</subject><subject>Cardiovascular Diseases</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Hemodialysis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney Failure, Chronic - diagnosis</subject><subject>Kidney Failure, Chronic - epidemiology</subject><subject>Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Nephrology</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Renal Dialysis</subject><subject>Renal Replacement Therapy</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Review Article</subject><issn>1759-5061</issn><issn>1759-507X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtLw0AUhQdRbK3-ARdSEMRNdN6PjSClPqDgRsHdMJlM2pQkUzOJ0H_v1NT6WLiaC_e7Z-65B4BTBK8QJPI6UMQkSiDGCYSM4kTsgSESTCUMitf9Xc3RAByFsISQcyrYIRgQhhTFiA3BxXRVZK4qfOnn67HPxwvjKp8VplyHIox911pfuXAMDnJTBneyfUfg5W76PHlIZk_3j5PbWWKpoG1iM8qUjAtZKZ1ShmScpZDZlCqXKyJZRq1IMZFc2dwhhJjLcoEZUYxJSiQZgZted9Wllcusq9vGlHrVFJVp1tqbQv_u1MVCz_27lpJjCHEUuNwKNP6tc6HVVRGsK0tTO98FjTnBiEpMRUTP_6BL3zV1tBcpLqCCirBI4Z6yjQ-hcfluGQT1Jgbdx6Cja_0Zg95In_20sRv5unsESA-E2Krnrvn--x_ZD-wMkeQ</recordid><startdate>20220601</startdate><enddate>20220601</enddate><creator>Bello, Aminu K.</creator><creator>Okpechi, Ikechi G.</creator><creator>Osman, Mohamed A.</creator><creator>Cho, Yeoungjee</creator><creator>Htay, Htay</creator><creator>Jha, Vivekanand</creator><creator>Wainstein, Marina</creator><creator>Johnson, David W.</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8015-9470</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5491-3460</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5915-6101</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6905-5937</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220601</creationdate><title>Epidemiology of haemodialysis outcomes</title><author>Bello, Aminu K. ; Okpechi, Ikechi G. ; Osman, Mohamed A. ; Cho, Yeoungjee ; Htay, Htay ; Jha, Vivekanand ; Wainstein, Marina ; Johnson, David W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-cd4598022c88e99a3d65b05cb49ef9385d4c7b23869cfe1115edf725395584383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>692/1807/4024</topic><topic>692/308/174</topic><topic>692/4022/1585/104/1586</topic><topic>692/4022/1950/1544</topic><topic>Cardiovascular Diseases</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Hemodialysis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney Failure, Chronic - diagnosis</topic><topic>Kidney Failure, Chronic - epidemiology</topic><topic>Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Nephrology</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Renal Dialysis</topic><topic>Renal Replacement Therapy</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Review Article</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bello, Aminu K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okpechi, Ikechi G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osman, Mohamed A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Yeoungjee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Htay, Htay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jha, Vivekanand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wainstein, Marina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, David W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Nature reviews. Nephrology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bello, Aminu K.</au><au>Okpechi, Ikechi G.</au><au>Osman, Mohamed A.</au><au>Cho, Yeoungjee</au><au>Htay, Htay</au><au>Jha, Vivekanand</au><au>Wainstein, Marina</au><au>Johnson, David W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Epidemiology of haemodialysis outcomes</atitle><jtitle>Nature reviews. Nephrology</jtitle><stitle>Nat Rev Nephrol</stitle><addtitle>Nat Rev Nephrol</addtitle><date>2022-06-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>378</spage><epage>395</epage><pages>378-395</pages><issn>1759-5061</issn><eissn>1759-507X</eissn><abstract>Haemodialysis (HD) is the commonest form of kidney replacement therapy in the world, accounting for approximately 69% of all kidney replacement therapy and 89% of all dialysis. Over the last six decades since the inception of HD, dialysis technology and patient access to the therapy have advanced considerably, particularly in high-income countries. However, HD availability, accessibility, cost and outcomes vary widely across the world and, overall, the rates of impaired quality of life, morbidity and mortality are high. Cardiovascular disease affects more than two-thirds of people receiving HD, is the major cause of morbidity and accounts for almost 50% of mortality. In addition, patients on HD have high symptom loads and are often under considerable financial strain. Despite the many advances in HD technology and delivery systems that have been achieved since the treatment was first developed, poor outcomes among patients receiving HD remain a major public health concern. Understanding the epidemiology of HD outcomes, why they might vary across different populations and how they might be improved is therefore crucial, although this goal is hampered by the considerable heterogeneity in the monitoring and reporting of these outcomes across settings.
This Review examines the epidemiology of haemodialysis outcomes — clinical, patient-reported and surrogate outcomes — across world regions and populations, including vulnerable individuals. The authors also discuss the current status of monitoring and reporting of haemodialysis outcomes and potential strategies for improvement.
Key points
Nearly 4 million people in the world are living on kidney replacement therapy (KRT), and haemodialysis (HD) remains the commonest form of KRT, accounting for approximately 69% of all KRT and 89% of all dialysis.
Dialysis technology and patient access to KRT have advanced substantially since the 1960s, particularly in high-income countries. However, HD availability, accessibility, cost and outcomes continue to vary widely across countries, particularly among disadvantaged populations (including Indigenous peoples, women and people at the extremes of age).
Cardiovascular disease affects over two-thirds of people receiving HD, is the major cause of morbidity and accounts for almost 50% of mortality; mortality among patients on HD is significantly higher than that of their counterparts in the general population, and treated kidney failure has a higher mortality than many types of cancer. Patients on HD also experience high burdens of symptoms, poor quality of life and financial difficulties.
Careful monitoring of the outcomes of patients on HD is essential to develop effective strategies for risk reduction. Outcome measures are highly variable across regions, countries, centres and segments of the population. Establishing kidney registries that collect a variety of clinical and patient-reported outcomes using harmonized definitions is therefore crucial.
Evaluation of HD outcomes should include the impact on family and friends, and personal finances, and should examine inequities in disadvantaged populations, who comprise a large proportion of the HD population.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>35194215</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41581-022-00542-7</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8015-9470</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5491-3460</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5915-6101</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6905-5937</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1759-5061 |
ispartof | Nature reviews. Nephrology, 2022-06, Vol.18 (6), p.378-395 |
issn | 1759-5061 1759-507X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8862002 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | 692/1807/4024 692/308/174 692/4022/1585/104/1586 692/4022/1950/1544 Cardiovascular Diseases Epidemiology Hemodialysis Humans Kidney Failure, Chronic - diagnosis Kidney Failure, Chronic - epidemiology Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy Medicine Medicine & Public Health Mortality Nephrology Quality of Life Renal Dialysis Renal Replacement Therapy Review Review Article |
title | Epidemiology of haemodialysis outcomes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T04%3A24%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Epidemiology%20of%20haemodialysis%20outcomes&rft.jtitle=Nature%20reviews.%20Nephrology&rft.au=Bello,%20Aminu%20K.&rft.date=2022-06-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=378&rft.epage=395&rft.pages=378-395&rft.issn=1759-5061&rft.eissn=1759-507X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41581-022-00542-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2667090935%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2667090935&rft_id=info:pmid/35194215&rfr_iscdi=true |