Efficacy and safety of same‐day discharge after atrial fibrillation ablation: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Conventionally, patients have been admitted overnight after atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation. Several centers have recently adopted a same‐day discharge (SDD) protocol for patients undergoing AF catheter ablation. We aimed to systematically review the current evidence for the safety and ef...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical cardiology (Mahwah, N.J.) N.J.), 2022-02, Vol.45 (2), p.162-172
Hauptverfasser: Rashedi, Sina, Tavolinejad, Hamed, Kazemian, Sina, Mardani, Mahta, Masoudi, Maryam, Masoudkabir, Farzad, Haghjoo, Majid
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 172
container_issue 2
container_start_page 162
container_title Clinical cardiology (Mahwah, N.J.)
container_volume 45
creator Rashedi, Sina
Tavolinejad, Hamed
Kazemian, Sina
Mardani, Mahta
Masoudi, Maryam
Masoudkabir, Farzad
Haghjoo, Majid
description Conventionally, patients have been admitted overnight after atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation. Several centers have recently adopted a same‐day discharge (SDD) protocol for patients undergoing AF catheter ablation. We aimed to systematically review the current evidence for the safety and efficacy of SDD after AF catheter ablation. A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane library until August 21, 2021. The risk of bias was assessed with the “Methodological Index for Non‐Randomized Studies” (MINORS). The pooled efficacy rate of SDD protocol (defined as the proportion of patients discharged the same day of ablation among the patients who were planned for SDD) was calculated. Meanwhile, pooled major complication rates and early readmission or emergency department (ED) visit rates were evaluated in successful and planned SDD groups separately. Overall, 12 observational studies consisting of 18,065 catheter ablations were included, among which 7320 (40.52%) were discharged the same‐day after ablation. The pooled efficacy was 90.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] [82.7–96.0]). The major complication rates were 1.1% (95%CI [0.5–1.9]), and 0.7% (95% CI [0.0–3.1]) in planned SDD and successful SDD groups, respectively. In addition, readmission/ED visit rate were 3.0% (95%CI [0.9–6.1]), and 3.1% (95% CI [0.8–6.5]) in the same groups. There were no significant differences between planned SDD and overnight groups with respect to major complication rate (risk ratio = 0.70, 95%CI [0.35–1.42], p‐value = .369). The available data indicates that SDD after AF ablation is safe and efficient. Further prospective and randomized studies are warranted to elucidate the safety of SDD after AF ablation and develop a standardized SDD protocol.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/clc.23778
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8860483</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2630953693</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4438-cb19c8a674f1edc87cab7c9e042d844f69fd0a18372fb2a213062a3c4ab19e6e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1KHTEUx4O01KvtwhcogW7qYjRfziQuBLloW7jQja7DmcyJRuZDk7leZtdH6DP2Scx1rLSFrnLC-eXHOfkTcsDZEWdMHLvWHQlZVXqHLLiRotCVrN6QBeMlK4zQZpfspXSXUaaFfEd25QnTiimzIJsL74MDN1HoG5rA4zjRweeqw18_fjYw0SYkdwvxBin4ESOFMQZoqQ91DG0LYxh6CvVcnNJzmqY0YpevjkZ8DLh5Vnc4QhZCD-2UQnpP3npoE354OffJ9eXF1fJrsfr-5dvyfFU4paQuXM2N01BWynNsnK4c1JUzyJRotFK-NL5hwLWshK8FCC5ZKUA6Bfkhlij3ydnsvV_XXTZgP0Zo7X0MHcTJDhDs350-3Nqb4dFqXTKlZRZ8fhHE4WGNabRd_g_Mi_c4rJMVpZBSZJhn9NM_6N2wjnnhLSWZOZGl2QoPZ8rFIaWI_nUYzuw2TpvjtM9xZvbjn9O_kr_zy8DxDGxCi9P_TXa5Ws7KJwb1rc8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2630953693</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy and safety of same‐day discharge after atrial fibrillation ablation: A systematic review and meta‐analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Rashedi, Sina ; Tavolinejad, Hamed ; Kazemian, Sina ; Mardani, Mahta ; Masoudi, Maryam ; Masoudkabir, Farzad ; Haghjoo, Majid</creator><creatorcontrib>Rashedi, Sina ; Tavolinejad, Hamed ; Kazemian, Sina ; Mardani, Mahta ; Masoudi, Maryam ; Masoudkabir, Farzad ; Haghjoo, Majid</creatorcontrib><description>Conventionally, patients have been admitted overnight after atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation. Several centers have recently adopted a same‐day discharge (SDD) protocol for patients undergoing AF catheter ablation. We aimed to systematically review the current evidence for the safety and efficacy of SDD after AF catheter ablation. A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane library until August 21, 2021. The risk of bias was assessed with the “Methodological Index for Non‐Randomized Studies” (MINORS). The pooled efficacy rate of SDD protocol (defined as the proportion of patients discharged the same day of ablation among the patients who were planned for SDD) was calculated. Meanwhile, pooled major complication rates and early readmission or emergency department (ED) visit rates were evaluated in successful and planned SDD groups separately. Overall, 12 observational studies consisting of 18,065 catheter ablations were included, among which 7320 (40.52%) were discharged the same‐day after ablation. The pooled efficacy was 90.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] [82.7–96.0]). The major complication rates were 1.1% (95%CI [0.5–1.9]), and 0.7% (95% CI [0.0–3.1]) in planned SDD and successful SDD groups, respectively. In addition, readmission/ED visit rate were 3.0% (95%CI [0.9–6.1]), and 3.1% (95% CI [0.8–6.5]) in the same groups. There were no significant differences between planned SDD and overnight groups with respect to major complication rate (risk ratio = 0.70, 95%CI [0.35–1.42], p‐value = .369). The available data indicates that SDD after AF ablation is safe and efficient. Further prospective and randomized studies are warranted to elucidate the safety of SDD after AF ablation and develop a standardized SDD protocol.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0160-9289</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-8737</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/clc.23778</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35084049</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Ablation ; atrial fibrillation ; Atrial Fibrillation - complications ; Atrial Fibrillation - diagnosis ; Atrial Fibrillation - surgery ; Bias ; Cardiac arrhythmia ; catheter ablation ; Catheter Ablation - adverse effects ; Catheter Ablation - methods ; Catheters ; efficacy ; Humans ; Meta-analysis ; Patient Discharge ; Patient satisfaction ; Review ; Reviews ; safety ; same‐day discharge ; Systematic review ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Clinical cardiology (Mahwah, N.J.), 2022-02, Vol.45 (2), p.162-172</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><rights>2022 The Authors. Clinical Cardiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><rights>2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4438-cb19c8a674f1edc87cab7c9e042d844f69fd0a18372fb2a213062a3c4ab19e6e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4438-cb19c8a674f1edc87cab7c9e042d844f69fd0a18372fb2a213062a3c4ab19e6e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2559-0858 ; 0000-0001-8098-7121 ; 0000-0003-0146-5611 ; 0000-0002-0244-5914</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8860483/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8860483/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,1417,11562,27924,27925,45574,45575,46052,46476,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35084049$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rashedi, Sina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tavolinejad, Hamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kazemian, Sina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mardani, Mahta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masoudi, Maryam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masoudkabir, Farzad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haghjoo, Majid</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy and safety of same‐day discharge after atrial fibrillation ablation: A systematic review and meta‐analysis</title><title>Clinical cardiology (Mahwah, N.J.)</title><addtitle>Clin Cardiol</addtitle><description>Conventionally, patients have been admitted overnight after atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation. Several centers have recently adopted a same‐day discharge (SDD) protocol for patients undergoing AF catheter ablation. We aimed to systematically review the current evidence for the safety and efficacy of SDD after AF catheter ablation. A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane library until August 21, 2021. The risk of bias was assessed with the “Methodological Index for Non‐Randomized Studies” (MINORS). The pooled efficacy rate of SDD protocol (defined as the proportion of patients discharged the same day of ablation among the patients who were planned for SDD) was calculated. Meanwhile, pooled major complication rates and early readmission or emergency department (ED) visit rates were evaluated in successful and planned SDD groups separately. Overall, 12 observational studies consisting of 18,065 catheter ablations were included, among which 7320 (40.52%) were discharged the same‐day after ablation. The pooled efficacy was 90.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] [82.7–96.0]). The major complication rates were 1.1% (95%CI [0.5–1.9]), and 0.7% (95% CI [0.0–3.1]) in planned SDD and successful SDD groups, respectively. In addition, readmission/ED visit rate were 3.0% (95%CI [0.9–6.1]), and 3.1% (95% CI [0.8–6.5]) in the same groups. There were no significant differences between planned SDD and overnight groups with respect to major complication rate (risk ratio = 0.70, 95%CI [0.35–1.42], p‐value = .369). The available data indicates that SDD after AF ablation is safe and efficient. Further prospective and randomized studies are warranted to elucidate the safety of SDD after AF ablation and develop a standardized SDD protocol.</description><subject>Ablation</subject><subject>atrial fibrillation</subject><subject>Atrial Fibrillation - complications</subject><subject>Atrial Fibrillation - diagnosis</subject><subject>Atrial Fibrillation - surgery</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Cardiac arrhythmia</subject><subject>catheter ablation</subject><subject>Catheter Ablation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Catheter Ablation - methods</subject><subject>Catheters</subject><subject>efficacy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Patient Discharge</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>safety</subject><subject>same‐day discharge</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0160-9289</issn><issn>1932-8737</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1KHTEUx4O01KvtwhcogW7qYjRfziQuBLloW7jQja7DmcyJRuZDk7leZtdH6DP2Scx1rLSFrnLC-eXHOfkTcsDZEWdMHLvWHQlZVXqHLLiRotCVrN6QBeMlK4zQZpfspXSXUaaFfEd25QnTiimzIJsL74MDN1HoG5rA4zjRweeqw18_fjYw0SYkdwvxBin4ESOFMQZoqQ91DG0LYxh6CvVcnNJzmqY0YpevjkZ8DLh5Vnc4QhZCD-2UQnpP3npoE354OffJ9eXF1fJrsfr-5dvyfFU4paQuXM2N01BWynNsnK4c1JUzyJRotFK-NL5hwLWshK8FCC5ZKUA6Bfkhlij3ydnsvV_XXTZgP0Zo7X0MHcTJDhDs350-3Nqb4dFqXTKlZRZ8fhHE4WGNabRd_g_Mi_c4rJMVpZBSZJhn9NM_6N2wjnnhLSWZOZGl2QoPZ8rFIaWI_nUYzuw2TpvjtM9xZvbjn9O_kr_zy8DxDGxCi9P_TXa5Ws7KJwb1rc8</recordid><startdate>202202</startdate><enddate>202202</enddate><creator>Rashedi, Sina</creator><creator>Tavolinejad, Hamed</creator><creator>Kazemian, Sina</creator><creator>Mardani, Mahta</creator><creator>Masoudi, Maryam</creator><creator>Masoudkabir, Farzad</creator><creator>Haghjoo, Majid</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2559-0858</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8098-7121</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0146-5611</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0244-5914</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202202</creationdate><title>Efficacy and safety of same‐day discharge after atrial fibrillation ablation: A systematic review and meta‐analysis</title><author>Rashedi, Sina ; Tavolinejad, Hamed ; Kazemian, Sina ; Mardani, Mahta ; Masoudi, Maryam ; Masoudkabir, Farzad ; Haghjoo, Majid</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4438-cb19c8a674f1edc87cab7c9e042d844f69fd0a18372fb2a213062a3c4ab19e6e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Ablation</topic><topic>atrial fibrillation</topic><topic>Atrial Fibrillation - complications</topic><topic>Atrial Fibrillation - diagnosis</topic><topic>Atrial Fibrillation - surgery</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Cardiac arrhythmia</topic><topic>catheter ablation</topic><topic>Catheter Ablation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Catheter Ablation - methods</topic><topic>Catheters</topic><topic>efficacy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Patient Discharge</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>safety</topic><topic>same‐day discharge</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rashedi, Sina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tavolinejad, Hamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kazemian, Sina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mardani, Mahta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masoudi, Maryam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masoudkabir, Farzad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haghjoo, Majid</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Clinical cardiology (Mahwah, N.J.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rashedi, Sina</au><au>Tavolinejad, Hamed</au><au>Kazemian, Sina</au><au>Mardani, Mahta</au><au>Masoudi, Maryam</au><au>Masoudkabir, Farzad</au><au>Haghjoo, Majid</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy and safety of same‐day discharge after atrial fibrillation ablation: A systematic review and meta‐analysis</atitle><jtitle>Clinical cardiology (Mahwah, N.J.)</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Cardiol</addtitle><date>2022-02</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>162</spage><epage>172</epage><pages>162-172</pages><issn>0160-9289</issn><eissn>1932-8737</eissn><abstract>Conventionally, patients have been admitted overnight after atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation. Several centers have recently adopted a same‐day discharge (SDD) protocol for patients undergoing AF catheter ablation. We aimed to systematically review the current evidence for the safety and efficacy of SDD after AF catheter ablation. A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane library until August 21, 2021. The risk of bias was assessed with the “Methodological Index for Non‐Randomized Studies” (MINORS). The pooled efficacy rate of SDD protocol (defined as the proportion of patients discharged the same day of ablation among the patients who were planned for SDD) was calculated. Meanwhile, pooled major complication rates and early readmission or emergency department (ED) visit rates were evaluated in successful and planned SDD groups separately. Overall, 12 observational studies consisting of 18,065 catheter ablations were included, among which 7320 (40.52%) were discharged the same‐day after ablation. The pooled efficacy was 90.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] [82.7–96.0]). The major complication rates were 1.1% (95%CI [0.5–1.9]), and 0.7% (95% CI [0.0–3.1]) in planned SDD and successful SDD groups, respectively. In addition, readmission/ED visit rate were 3.0% (95%CI [0.9–6.1]), and 3.1% (95% CI [0.8–6.5]) in the same groups. There were no significant differences between planned SDD and overnight groups with respect to major complication rate (risk ratio = 0.70, 95%CI [0.35–1.42], p‐value = .369). The available data indicates that SDD after AF ablation is safe and efficient. Further prospective and randomized studies are warranted to elucidate the safety of SDD after AF ablation and develop a standardized SDD protocol.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>35084049</pmid><doi>10.1002/clc.23778</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2559-0858</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8098-7121</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0146-5611</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0244-5914</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0160-9289
ispartof Clinical cardiology (Mahwah, N.J.), 2022-02, Vol.45 (2), p.162-172
issn 0160-9289
1932-8737
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8860483
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Access via Wiley Online Library; Wiley Online Library Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Ablation
atrial fibrillation
Atrial Fibrillation - complications
Atrial Fibrillation - diagnosis
Atrial Fibrillation - surgery
Bias
Cardiac arrhythmia
catheter ablation
Catheter Ablation - adverse effects
Catheter Ablation - methods
Catheters
efficacy
Humans
Meta-analysis
Patient Discharge
Patient satisfaction
Review
Reviews
safety
same‐day discharge
Systematic review
Treatment Outcome
title Efficacy and safety of same‐day discharge after atrial fibrillation ablation: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T00%3A21%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20and%20safety%20of%20same%E2%80%90day%20discharge%20after%20atrial%20fibrillation%20ablation:%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta%E2%80%90analysis&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20cardiology%20(Mahwah,%20N.J.)&rft.au=Rashedi,%20Sina&rft.date=2022-02&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=162&rft.epage=172&rft.pages=162-172&rft.issn=0160-9289&rft.eissn=1932-8737&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/clc.23778&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2630953693%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2630953693&rft_id=info:pmid/35084049&rfr_iscdi=true